Transit Profiles: the Thirty Largest Agencies - For the 1992 Section 15 Report Year

92 Pages·5.5 MB·English

U.S. Department «
ofTransportation
Federal Transit
Administration
Transit Profiles
the Thirty Largest Agencies
For the 1992 Section 15 Report Year
Audit Review and Analysis Division
Office of Capital and Formula Assistance
CAUTION: Extensive efforts have been made to assure the quality of information
contained in this report. It is impossible, however, to achieve complete accuracy
and consistency of the reported data. In addition, the reported data do not
include all relevant information generally necessary to explain apparent differences
in performance (e.g., information related to work rules, topography, climate, and
unusual events such as strikes and service start-ups). Users of this report,
therefore, should be careful not to draw unwarranted conclusions based solely on
the data contained herein.
Transit Profiles
The Thirty Largest Agencies
!
For the 1992 Section 15 Report Year
December 1993

Transit Profiles, The Thirty Largest Agencies
for the 1992 Section 15 Report Year
Introduction
This publicationconsists ofconsolidated profiles for the thirty (30) largest transit agencies in the
United States. The criteria used to determine the thirty (30) largest transit agencies is operating
expense reported for the 1992 report year. The data contained in each profile consists ofgeneral
and summary reports, as well as modal, performance, and trend indicators for the 1992 report
year. The 1992 Report Year is defined as a transit reporting agency with a fiscal year ending
on or between January 1 and December 31.
In order to provide a more user friendly and easily understood document, a unique publication
name has been created for some transit agencies. There were 512 reports included inthe Section
15 reporting system for the 1992 report year. Many transit systems have similar names such
as "Mass Transportation Authority" or "Regional Transit District." The publication names
attempt to place emphasis on urbanized area names to assist with geographical references and
also to show relationships with regional governing bodies and contractual relationships with
purchased transportation providers.
The left page of the profile shows both, general and financial system information. General
information includes the Size of the Urbanized Area, Service Area, Service Supplied, Service
Consumed, and the Number of Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service. Financial information
includes the Sources of Operating Funds, Summary of Operating Expenses, Sources of Capital
Funds Expended, and Uses of Capital Funds. For 1992, new and enhanced reporting
requirements have provided additional information on Uses of Capital Funds. In addition, two
pie graphs at the bottom of the page depict the Sources of Operating Funds and Sources of
Capital Funds Expended. Pie graphs that have zero value or equal to 100% are not depicted.
In addition, the pie graphs are not shown for Sources of Operating Funds where contractual
relationships exist and/or where operating subsidiaries are derived from parent organizations.
The right page of the profile portrays transit system characteristics by mode. For systems with
more than four modes, only the four largest modes are included. If a transit system operates
either or both Motor Bus (MB) and Heavy Rail (HR), these modes will always appear in
columns one and two respectively. Two other columns are provided if additional modes are
operated (other than or in addition to the primary modes). The columns are arranged in
descending order of their respective operating expense. Specific financial and service
characteristics, as well as performance measures are listed for each mode. This year, Capital
Funding for each mode has been reported. Performance measures have been derived from
individual mode characteristic data. The performance measures indicate service efficiency, cost
effectiveness and service effectiveness for each mode. These performance measures can be
easily compared among various transit systems.
Transit Profiles, The Thirty Largest Agencies
for the 1992 Section 15 Report Year
At the bottom of the right page are line graphs for selected performance measures. They are
provided for the modes in columns 1 and 2 to indicate trend data from 1988 through 1991,
Inconsistent patterns on the line graphs are due to certain anomalies in the database. There are
several reasons for these anomalies. They include: 1) the transit agency commenced reporting
after 1988; 2) a new mode was reported after 1988; 3) a report was not received for a given
year between 1988 and 1991; 4) a waiver was granted for financial, and/or sampling
information; 5) data was either questionable, partially deleted, or zeroed for a given year; and
6) the elimination of joint expenses reporting in 1992 may cause fluctuations from prior year
data.
For transit systems with purchased transportation relationships exceeding one hundred (100)
vehicles operated in maximum service, the reports of both the transit agency and the purchased
transportation provider(s) have been consolidated in order to provide a comprehensive summary
offinancial performance as well as the amount oftransit service supplied and consumed. Where
this consolidation has occurred, a notation ofthe purchased transportation providers and Section
15 Identification Numbers has been made in the general information section and an asterisk has
been placed next to the purchased transportation expense figure.
Appendix A is an average of the thirty (30) largest agencies. Each data item is the average of
the thirty (30) transit profiles included in this report. This average can be used to compare with
individual transit system performance.
Appendix B provides a Cross Reference Table and indicates where each data item appearing in
this Profile can be located in the Section 15 report filed by individual transit systems. For data
items that were derived, the formula used to calculate each item is listed. Appendix B is based
on 1992 reporting requirements.
Additional information can be obtained from the following reference materials:
• Transit Profiles, Agencies in UrbanizedAreas Exceeding 200,000 Populationfor
the 1992 Section 15 Report Year
• Transit Profiles, Agencies in Urbanized Areas with a Population of less than
200,000for the 1992 Section 15 Report Year
• Data Tablesfor the 1992 Section 15 Report Year
• National Transit Summaries and Trendsfor the 1992 Section 15 Report Year
• Glossary of Transit Terms for Section 15, November 1992
Transit Profiles, The Thirty Largest Agencies
for the 1992 Section 15 Report Year
Table of Contents
Transit Profiles, The Thirty Largest Agencies
for the 1992 Section 15 Report Year
Table of Contents
UZA/Transit Agency Page
GA
Atlanta, . ^
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority 2
MD
Baltimore,
Maryland State Department of Transportation 4
MA
Boston,
Boston-Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority 6
Chicago, IL--Northwestem IN
Chicago-RTA-Chicago Transit Authority 8
Chicago-RTA-Northeastem Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation* 10
OH
Cleveland,
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority 12
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX
Dallas Area Rapid Transit Authority* 14
Denver, CO
Denver-Regional Transportation District 16
Detroit, MI
City of Detroit Department of Transportation 18
Houston, TX
Houston-MetropolitanTransit Authority of Harris County 20
Los Angeles, CA
Orange County Transportation Authority 22
LACMTA-Southem California Rapid Transit District 24
Miami-Hialeah, FL
Miami-Metro-Dade Transit Agency* 26
MN
Minneapolis-St. Paul,
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Metropolitan Transit Commission 28
New York, NY-Northeastern NJ
New York City Department of Transportation* 30
Transitsystemswhichhavepurchasedtransportationcontractsexceedingonehundred(100)vehiclesoperatedinmaximumservicearedenoted
byanasterisk. Forthesetransitsystems, datahasbeenaggregatedforboththe transitsystemand purchasedtransportationprovider(s).
ii
Transit Profiles, The Thirty Largest Agencies
for the 1992 Section 15 Report Year
Table of Contents (continued)
UZA/Transit Agency Page
New York, NY--Northeastera NJ (continued)
New York-MTA-Long Island Rail Road Company 32
New York-MTA-Metro-North Commuter Railroad 34
New York-MTA-New York City Transit Authority 36
NJ-New Jersey Transit Corporation* 38
NY-Port Authority Trans Hudson Corporation 40
Philadelphia, PA--NJ
Philadelphia-Southeastern Permsylvania Transportation Authority 42
PA
Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh-Port Authority of Allegheny County* 44
.
OR-WA
Portland—Vancouver,
Portland-Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District ofOregon 46
San Francisco—Oakland, CA
Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District 48
San Francisco-Bay Area Rapid Transit District 50
San Francisco Municipal Railway 52
San Jose, CA
Santa Clara County Transit District 54
WA
Seattle,
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle 56
Washington State Department ofTransportation 58
DC-MD-VA
Washington,
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority 60
Appendices
Appendix A - Average ofthe Thirty Largest Agencies A-2
Appendix B - Cross Reference Table B-2
Transitsystemswhichhavepurchasedtransportationcontractsexceedingonehundred(100)vehiclesoperatedinmaximumservicearedenoted
by anasterisk. Forthesetransitsystems,datahasbeenaggregatedforboththetransitsystemandpurchasedtransportationprovider(s).
iii