ebook img

Toll-Like Receptor Ligands as Antiviral Agents against Avian Influenza Viruses PDF

169 Pages·2017·1.31 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Toll-Like Receptor Ligands as Antiviral Agents against Avian Influenza Viruses

Toll-Like Receptor Ligands as Antiviral Agents against Avian Influenza Viruses by Neda Barjesteh A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Pathobiology Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Neda Barjesteh, January, 2017 ABSTRACT Toll-Like Receptor Ligands as Antiviral Agents against Avian Influenza Viruses Neda Barjesteh Advisor: University of Guelph, 2017 Professor Shayan Sharif Avian influenza viruses (AIV) are a significant threat to the poultry industry and public health. Recent outbreaks of AIV have provoked notable concerns about measures available for control of AIV. In conjunction with the research efforts focused on developing effective vaccines, there is a need to explore novel approaches to modulate host innate responses, as part of a strategy for rapid response against AIV outbreaks. The research presented here evaluated the antiviral activities of Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands against AIV infection and assessed the underlying mechanisms of these activities. Initially, the potential ability of TLR ligands as antiviral agents against AIV was investigated using in vitro and in ovo models. Our results confirmed that TLR ligands were able to reduce AIV replication in chicken cells. However, different levels of antiviral activities were observed among TLR ligands. CpG ODN1826 caused the highest reduction in AIV replication in chicken macrophages and embryonated chicken eggs. Furthermore, results of the present research showed that TLR ligands were able to induce antiviral responses in chicken cells, as demonstrated by an increase in the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, type I interferons and some interferon-stimulated genes. Subsequently, several TLR ligands were examined in vivo to determine whether TLR ligands can reduce viral shedding from infected chickens. Our results demonstrated that all TLR ligand treatments reduced AIV shedding, with the CpG ODN1826 being the most efficacious to reduce oral virus shedding, whereas lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Escherichia coli (E. coli) 026:B6 resulted in the largest reduction in cloacal virus shedding. To further explore the role of TLR ligands in inducing antiviral responses in the chicken respiratory system, tracheal organ cultures (TOC) were used to investigate localized innate responses to TLR ligands. The antiviral activity of TLR ligands in TOCs was demonstrated by induced expression of type I interferons (IFNs) and interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) in TOCs and the reduction of AIV replication in treated TOCs. Overall, the results in this thesis identified candidate TLR ligands for control of AIV infection in chickens and also provided a better understanding of innate responses in chickens that contribute to protection against AIV. Acknowledgements I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to my advisor, Dr. Shayan Sharif for his support, encouragement, and continuous guidance. It would be unlikely to count all the ways that he has helped me in my career. I am so grateful for everything that I have learned from him during my Ph.D. program. I would like to thank Drs. Bonnie Mallard, Éva Nagy, and Faizal Careem for guiding me on the right path and their advice through my Ph.D. program. I will always be thankful to them. I would also like to thank Drs. Byram Bridle and Maricarmen García for serving in my Ph.D. defense exam and their insightful and constructive comments. I would like to acknowledge my labmates in the Sharif lab, both past, and present, including Jennifer Brisbin, Michael St Paul, Tamiru Alkie, Bahram Shojadoost, Douglas Hodgins, Khaled Taha Abd Abdelaziz, Leah Read, Alexander Bekele-Yitbarek, Ravi Kulkarni, Jegarubee Bavananthasiv and Jake Astill for their kind assistance, inspiration, motivation and friendship. I would like to thank my fellow graduate students, research technicians and all of my friends and colleagues in the Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College for providing friendly and innovative environment and helping me during the course of my Ph.D. program. I would also like to acknowledge all of the staff and faculty in the Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College for their help and support during the course of my Ph.D. program. I appreciatively acknowledge the financial support from National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, The Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. iv I would like to dedicate this thesis to my family, my beloved husband, Mehdi, and my inspiring and devoted parents, and affectionate sisters, Laleh, Leila and Vida for their constant support and unconditional love. v Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. xi List of figures ................................................................................................................................ xii List of abbreviations .................................................................................................................... xiv Declaration of work performed .................................................................................................... xix Chapter 1 ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background information .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Literature review ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.2.1. Influenza virus ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.2.2. Host range and susceptibility to AIV in avian species ......................................................... 4 1.2.3. Structure of influenza virus A ............................................................................................... 5 1.2.4. Virus life cycle ...................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.5. Innate responses .................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.6. Sensing microbes ................................................................................................................ 11 1.2.7. Sensing influenza A virus ................................................................................................... 18 1.2.8. The vertebrate interferon response ...................................................................................... 20 1.2.9. Natural killer cells ............................................................................................................... 22 1.2.10. Adaptive immune system responses against influenza virus ............................................ 22 1.2.11. Applications of Toll-like receptor ligands ........................................................................ 26 Chapter 2 ....................................................................................................................................... 31 TLR ligands induce antiviral responses in chicken macrophages ................................................ 31 2.1. Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 32 2.2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 33 2.3. Materials and methods ........................................................................................................... 35 2.3.1. Avian influenza virus .......................................................................................................... 35 2.3.2. Cell culture .......................................................................................................................... 35 2.3.3. Avian influenza virus infection of cells .............................................................................. 35 vi 2.3.4. TLR ligands ........................................................................................................................ 36 2.3.5. Macrophage treatment with TLR ligands and cell infection with avian influenza virus .... 36 2.3.6. Gene expression in chicken macrophages stimulated with TLR ligands ........................... 37 2.3.7. RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis ................................................................................. 38 2.3.8. Real-time PCR .................................................................................................................... 38 2.3.9. Flow cytometry ................................................................................................................... 39 2.4. Statistical analysis .................................................................................................................. 39 2.5. Results .................................................................................................................................... 39 2.5.1. Low pathogenic avian influenza virus replicates in chicken macrophages ........................ 39 2.5.2. TLR ligands induce NO production in chicken macrophages ............................................ 40 2.5.3. Pam3CSK4, LPS and CpG ODNs decrease viral replication in chicken macrophages ..... 41 2.5.4. Induction of gene expression in macrophages by TLR ligands .......................................... 42 2.5.5. TLR 2, 4 and 21 ligands up-regulate macrophage activation markers ............................... 43 2.6. Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 44 2.7. Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ 48 Chapter 3 ....................................................................................................................................... 57 Induction of antiviral responses against avian influenza virus in embryonated chicken eggs with TLR ligands .................................................................................................................................. 57 3.1. Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 58 3.2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 59 3.3. Materials and methods ........................................................................................................... 61 3.3.1. Avian influenza virus .......................................................................................................... 61 3.3.2. TLR ligands ........................................................................................................................ 61 3.3.3. Embryonated egg treatment with TLR ligands and infection with avian influenza virus .. 61 3.3.4. Gene expression of the chorioallantoic membrane stimulated with TLR ligands .............. 62 3.3.5. RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis ................................................................................. 63 3.3.6. Real-time PCR .................................................................................................................... 63 3.4. Statistical analysis .................................................................................................................. 63 vii 3.5. Results .................................................................................................................................... 64 3.5.1. The chorioallantoic membrane expresses TLRs ................................................................. 64 3.5.2. TLR2/1, 4, 7 and 21 ligands decrease viral replication in embryonated eggs .................... 64 3.5.3. Induction of gene expression in the CAM by TLR ligands ................................................ 65 3.6. Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 67 3.7. Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ 72 Chapter 4 ....................................................................................................................................... 80 Reduction of avian influenza virus shedding by administration of Toll-like receptor ligands to chickens......................................................................................................................................... 80 4.1. Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 81 4.2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 82 4.3. Materials and methods ........................................................................................................... 83 4.3.1. Chickens .............................................................................................................................. 83 4.3.2. Avian influenza virus .......................................................................................................... 84 4.3.3. TLR ligands ........................................................................................................................ 84 4.3.4. Experimental design............................................................................................................ 84 4.3.5. RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and real-time PCR ........................................................ 85 4.4. Statistical analysis .................................................................................................................. 85 4.5. Results .................................................................................................................................... 86 4.5.1. TLR ligands administered intranasally and intramuscularly significantly reduced the oral shedding of H4N6 AIV ................................................................................................................. 86 4.5.2. TLR ligands administered intranasally and intramuscularly significantly reduced cloacal shedding of H4N6 AIV ................................................................................................................. 86 4.5.3. TLR2/1, 4 and 21 ligands administered intranasally induce antiviral responses in trachea 87 4.5.4. TLR2/1, 4 and 21 ligands administered intranasally induce antiviral responses in cecal tonsils ............................................................................................................................................ 88 4.6. Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 89 4.7. Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ 92 Chapter 5 ....................................................................................................................................... 99 viii Local innate responses to TLR ligands in the chicken trachea ................................................... 100 5.1. Abstract ................................................................................................................................ 101 5.2. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 102 5.3. Materials and methods ......................................................................................................... 105 5.3.1. Tracheal organ culture (TOC) ........................................................................................... 105 5.3.2. Avian influenza virus (AIV) ............................................................................................. 106 5.3.3. Stimulation of TOC with TLR Ligands ............................................................................ 106 5.3.4. cDNA synthesis and real-time PCR .................................................................................. 107 5.3.5. Stimulation of chicken macrophages with tracheal supernatants ..................................... 107 5.4. Statistical analysis ................................................................................................................ 108 5.5. Results .................................................................................................................................. 109 5.5.1. TLR ligands induce the expression of innate response genes in chicken tracheal organ cultures ........................................................................................................................................ 109 5.5.2. Supernatants from chicken tracheas treated with TLR ligands activate chicken macrophages ............................................................................................................................... 111 5.5.3. Antiviral compounds produced by stimulated TOCs are able to limit AIV replication in chicken macrophages .................................................................................................................. 111 5.6. Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 112 5.7. Acknowledgments................................................................................................................ 116 Chapter 6 ..................................................................................................................................... 121 6.1. General discussion ............................................................................................................... 122 References ................................................................................................................................... 131 ix x

Description:
to determine whether TLR ligands can reduce viral shedding from infected chickens. Our results At that time, 42 infected commercial flocks and 11 infected backyard flocks were identified. The tonsils. These results raise the possibility of treatment of chickens with TLR ligands as anti-viral agen
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.