TO COM 0 THE SKY You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. TO o COM THE SKY THEBATTLE FORAIRSUPERIORITY OVERGERMANY,1942-1944 StephenLMcFarlandand WesleyPhllUpsNewton The University ofAlabama Press Tuscaloosa You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. 'fhe UniversityofAlabama Press 'fuscaloosa,f\labalna 35487-0380 Cop~';ght © 1991 by the Snlithsonian Institution Manufactured in the United States ofAmcl;ca Published byThe Universityoff\labama Press,2006 00 "rhe paperon \,-hich this hook is pt;nted nlccts the nlinimunl requirClTICnts ofAmerican National Standard for Infolmation Science _.Pcnnanence ofPaperfor Pt;nt.ed Lihrary 'lat.cl;als, 1\~SI Z)~}.tl8-198!f. Ijllral)- ()fCongress f:ataloging-in-l)ul>lication I)ata 'l("Far"land. Stepht~n Let\, ln~o "ro conlnland the sky: the hattie for airsllp(~r"iol"ityo"er" \.('"nany" 1Bti2· U11·'I I Stepht'll I... 'lcFarland and \\'-esl(~y Phillips ~('\\1()n. p. e111. Illcludes bibliographical rt~ff'r('l1e(~sand index. ISB~ ()-~1i'1-~,~'I()-1(aIk. pape''-j 1.\\'orld \\at.... l~),~H U).1~ :\(~I..ial 0IH~I..atj()ns. I. ~("'·t()n, \\~(~sley Phillips. II.T"itl('. 1)7H~.\l'1D :lOOn BI-H712 HIa().~"'," dc20 (~II) You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. To Maurer Maurer, historian ofairpower Carl E. McFarland, sU1Vivor ofthe Hump's "Aluminum Trail" Connie McFarland and children, Jennifer andJeffrey Merlin Newton and children, Linda, Alan, and Brent You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. CONTENTS Preface to the Paperback Edition viii Acknowledgments xi Introduction 1 1. The Challenge 11 2. Training to Destroy 61 3. Trial and Error-Early Operations 81 4. To the Brink-The Fall Crisis 117 5. Transition to Air Superiority-Big Week 157 6. Berlin, the Strategic Fighter Campaign, and Control ofthe Air 193 Epllogue 239 Appendix 249 Notes 253 Bibliographic Essay 297 Selected Bibliography 305 Credit Lines 317 Index 319 vii You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. PREFACE TO THE PAPERBACK EDITION In the decade since To Command the Sky first appeared, the U.S. Air Force has experienced seemingly unparalleled, unchallenged, and relatively effortless control ofthe air. The currentgeneration can be excused for taking such for granted, though ithas not always been so. This success has been built on the experience ofWorld War II, when the airmen whose story is told in this book fought, died, and killed to ensure victory for the United States. Since Vietnam, the U.S. Air Force and its philosophers have en gaged in a struggle to redefine American air power by emphasiz ing doctrine. Concurrent with this effort has been a reevaluation of its history through adoctrinal lens. In this indoctrinationeffort, writ ers on air warfare have struggled with terminology. Is it air superi ority, command ofthe air, control ofthe air, counterair strategy, air supremacy, air dominance, or, in the words ofthe Air Force's basic doctrine publication, AFMl-l, "orchestrating aerospace control"? This doctrinal frenzy and these successes in actual wars, however, have not altered the lessons of this book nor the record of what happened in the Second World War. Doctrine, at its most basic, is nothing more than what is taught by aperson, group, ororganization. To speakofanAmerican orGer- viii You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. PREFACETOTHEPAPERBACKEDITION IX man doctrine of air superiority in the Second World War, however, is to use the perspective gained in the almost sixty years since the events of this book to revise or rewrite what actually happened in 1942-1944. Tens of thousands of airmen died while hundreds of thousands of airmen fought to find a way to win the air war over Western Europe. To reduce this struggle to something called "doc trine" is to distort the events of the war. In 1942-1944, the issue of air superiority was in doubt. American commanders tried bomb ing, fighter sweeps, aerial escort, and guerilla air warfare to win air superiority. The struggle came down to attrition-cause death and destruction to the enemy at a rate the enemy could not sustain. This was not doctrine. This was not teaching. This was trying to win a war by destroying the enemy. As one of the men who participated in this struggle said, "we really didn't know what we were trying to do. We were doing it but not defining it."l Trying to identify doc trine here gives a sense of logic and order to a struggle that was in so many ways desperation and chaos. The U.S. ArmyAirForces won this battle for the skies overWest ern Europe due to numerical and technological superiority, courage, tactics, luck, and enemy mistakes, but morethan anything else, train ing and a willingness to modify tactics and strategies as the warcon tinued. The struggle came down to American versus German pilots for which numerical superiority only made a difference in the long run; for which the superiority of one aircraft over another disap peared in the few seconds available for actual combat when flying at a combined speed ofsix hundred or more miles per hour and be cause any American advantage disappeared as American pilots flew great distances to reach the German heartland; andfor which courage abounded onboth sides. Ultimately, however, itcame down to train ing, strategy, and tactics. German tactics, strategy, and training pol icy did not evolve to keep pace with changing conditions and tech nologies, reflecting, perhaps, the inflexible dogma of the Nazi philosophy at the root ofthe war. As one studentofthis battlenoted, "The Germans devised abrilliant strategy that was forced into acon text in which it could not succeed."2 Hap Arnold, Barney Giles, You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press.
Description: