Tissue Specific Accumulation of Hydroxyurea in Elasmobranchs by David Iain Fraser A Thesis Presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Integrative Biology Guelph, Ontario, Canada © David Iain Fraser, October, 2013 ABSTRACT TISSUE SPECIFIC ACCUMULATION OF HYDROXYUREA IN ELASMOBRANCHS David Iain Fraser Advisor: University of Guelph, 2013 Professor J.S. Ballantyne Hydroxyurea is an antibiotic and antiproliferative agent used clinically in the treatment of select cancers, sickle cell anemia, HIV, and myeloproliferative diseases. Hydroxyurea has never been detected in elasmobranch tissues and has only been detected in trace amounts in a single eukaryote. Using the colorimetric assay for hydroxyurea determination originally described by Fabricius and Rajewsky (1971), hydroxyurea was found at relatively high levels in the plasma and tissues of marine, freshwater and euryhaline elasmobranchs and confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The presence of marginal amounts of hydroxyurea in the liver of a teleost (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and absence in a holostean (Amia calva), and a dipnoan (Protopterus dolloi) suggest elasmobranchs may be unique in their ability to accumulate hydroxyurea. In adult little skates (Leucoraja erinacea), hydroxyurea was found to accumulate predominantly in the spiral valve, liver, plasma, rectal gland and stomach to levels ranging from 60-250 µM. Levels of hydroxyurea accumulated in L. erinacea are high enough to have antineoplastic and antimicrobial effects. These findings provide evidence that hydroxyurea may be an important component of the innate immune response of elasmobranchs. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my advisor Dr. James Ballantyne for his support and extreme patience during both my undergraduate and graduate research in his lab. Although, I am not in the least bit sorry to say I now take it as a personal challenge to swim with and photograph whale sharks before you! I am also grateful to my committee members Drs. Patricia Wright and Nicholas Bernier for their invaluable expertise. On behalf on myself and past members of the Ballantyne lab I need to thank the staff of the Hagen Aqualab. Robert Frank, Matt Cornish, and Mike Davies as well as aqualab volunteers Kaitlyn Wagner, Dustin Kelch, and Zachary Millar who were essential to ensuring the wellbeing of my skates and rays. For encouraging me to pursue graduate studies I wish to thank my friends and family, marie Thérèse Rush, and OVC graduate Tessa. I want to give a special shout out to my Mom, Alina Fraser, for proofreading and providing feedback on nearly everything I have written in my 26 years of life. Although you still have to read the chapter myself and Jim wrote on euryhaline elasmobranchs. I know it’s long and technical but your efforts to avoid reading it are not amusing! I would be amiss if I didn’t also thank the members of the Wright and Bernier labs, especially Andy Turko even if he did break into my house that one time, for all the positive interactions and meaningful conversations over the years. I’m sure the local pubs would like to thank us as well. Last, but certainly not least, I need to thank the beautiful and intelligent Kristina Victoria Mikloska. I can’t even begin to express the ways she has helped me through the last year of my graduate studies. Something I will be eternally grateful for. Kristina, thank you. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ v LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................... vii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Subclass: Elasmobranchii ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 The ornithine urea cycle (OUC) and urea biosynthesis in elasmobranchs ........................... 2 1.3 Low incidence of disease in Elasmobranchii ........................................................................ 7 1.4 Hydroxyurea: introduction .................................................................................................. 10 1.5 Hydroxyurea: mechanism of action and metabolism in vertebrates ................................... 13 1.6 Methodological approach.................................................................................................... 16 1.7 Thesis goals and hypotheses ............................................................................................... 17 CHAPTER 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS .......................................................................... 20 2.1 Housing and sampling of adult experimental fish .............................................................. 21 2.2 Housing and staging of skate embryos ............................................................................... 23 2.3 Chemical suppliers .............................................................................................................. 26 2.4 Preparation of tissues, whole embryos and yolk sacs for measurement of urea and hydroxyurea .............................................................................................................................. 26 2.5 Measurement of hydroxyurea in acidified plasma and tissue samples ............................... 27 2.6 Measurement of urea in acidified plasma and tissue samples ............................................ 29 2.7 In vitro incubations with urea precursors, OUC intermediates, and hydroxyarginine ....... 29 2.8 Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry .......................................................................... 32 2.9 Using TargetP 1.1 to predict the presence of mTPs of nNOS and iNOS ........................... 32 2.10 Statistical analysis ............................................................................................................. 34 CHAPTER 3. RESULTS .............................................................................................................. 35 3.1 Hydroxyurea in elasmobranchs and tissue accumulation ................................................... 36 3.2 Comparing hydroxyurea of euryhaline elasmobranchs in marine, brackish and freshwater conditions .................................................................................................................................. 42 3.3 Measurements of hydroxyurea in teleost fish ..................................................................... 42 3.4 In vitro incubations with urea precursors, OUC intermediates, and hydroxyarginine ....... 42 3.5 Predictions of the subcellular localization of nitric oxide synthetase (NOS) ..................... 45 CHAPTER 4. DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................ 49 4.1 Elasmobranchs display tissue specific accumulation of hydroxyurea ................................ 50 4.2 Potential role of hydroxyurea in elasmobranchs resistance to disease ............................... 51 4.3 Hydroxyurea in elasmobranchs is not a byproduct of urea synthesis ................................. 55 4.4 Distribution of hydroxyurea and urea in elasmobranch tissues .......................................... 56 4.5 Theoretical mechanism of hydroxyurea synthesis .............................................................. 60 4.6 Conclusions and perspective ............................................................................................... 65 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 68 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Schematic diagram of arginine metabolism, the ornithine urea cycle (OUC), purine degradation and conversion of uric acid to urea in vertebrates, highlighting pathways of urea biosynthesis…………………………………………………….6 Figure 2. The Lewis structure diagrams or urea and hydroxyurea…………….………..….12 Figure 3. Leucoraja erinacea embryos at different stages of development…………..........25 Figure 4. Visual representation of the assay performed to measure hydroxyurea and nitrite following the procedure described by Fabricius and Rajewsky (1971)………….28 Figure 5. The Lewis structure diagrams of urea cycle intermediates (arginine, ornithine, citrulline and argininosuccinate), alternative sources of urea (creatine and allantoate), and N-hydroxyarginine………………………………………..…….31 Figure 6. Hydroxyurea (µM±SE) and urea concentrations (mM±SE) measured in the blood and tissues of adult Leucoraja erinacea…………....……………………………39 Figure 7. Whole body hydroxyurea (µM±SE) concentrations measured in Leucoraja erinacea embryos at stages 2 and 3 of development……........………40 Figure 8. Overlaid GC-MS chromatograms of a 10 µg/ml standard of hydroxyurea, deproteinized liver sample from Leucoraja erinacea, and deproteinized plasma sample from Leucoraja erinace......................…………………………………...41 Figure 9. Hydroxyurea (µM±SE) concentrations measured in deproteinized plasma samples from euryhaline (Dasyatis sabina) and freshwater elasmobranchs (Potamotrygon motoro, Himantura signifer) held in saltwater (SW, 35ppt), brackish (BW, 15- 18ppt) and freshwater (FW, 0-0.7ppt) conditions………………………………..43 Figure 10. (A) Hydrolysis of arginine catalyzed by arginase to produce ornithine and urea. (B) Theoretical hydrolysis of hydroxyarginine catalyzed by arginase…………..63 Figure 11. Proposed mechanism and subcellular localization of hydroxyurea formation in elasmobranchs tissue……………………………………………………………..64 v LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Summary of features of the metabolism and biochemistry of elasmobranch fishes that may confer disease resistance through beneficial antineoplastic and/or antimicrobial effects……………………………………………………………....9 Table 2. Measurement of hydroxyurea (µM±SE) concentrations in deproteinized plasma samples of marine (Raja rhina, Leucoraja erinacea, Chiloscyllium indicum), euryhaline (Dasyatis sabina) and freshwater (Potamotrygon motoro, Himantura signifer) elasmobranchs………………………………………………………….38 Table 3. Measurement of hydroxyurea (µM±SE) concentrations in deproteinized liver samples from an elasmobranchs (Leucoraja erinacea) and three teleost species, the bowfin (Amia calva), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and African lungfish (Protopterus sp.)………………………………………………………..44 Table 4. Potential precursors of hydroxyurea synthesis incubated at 15 ºC with liver and spiral valve tissue samples from Leucoraja erinacea (n=3)……………………..46 Table 5. Predicting the presence of mitochondrial targeting pepetides (mTP) from protein sequences of elasmobranch and teleost neuronal and inducible nitric oxide synthetase………………………………………………………………………...48 Table 6 Literature summary of effective dose levels of hydroxyurea at which 50% of a cellular process (e.g. DNA synthesis) is inhibited (ED ) for cancer cell lines, 50 bacterial, viral, and protozoan systems…………………………………………..54 vi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ADC arginine decarboxylase AFB aflatoxin B1 1 AGM agmatinase ALLC allantoicase ALLN allantoinase ARG arginase ASL argininosuccinate lyase ASS argininosuccinate synthetase ATP adenosine-5'-triphosphate Bac1p arginine transporter of inner mitochondrial membrane BSTFA N,O-Bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide BW brackish water CAD carbamoyl phosphate synthetase II-aspartate transcarbamoylase-dihydroorotase complex CPS carbamoyl phosphate synthetase CPS I carbamoyl phosphate synthetase I CPS III carbamoyl phosphate synthetase III CRT creatinase ddH O double distilled water 2 diTMS dimethylsilyl group DNA deoxyribonucleic acid ED effective dose at which 50% inhibition of a cellular process occurs 50 eNOS endothelial nitric oxide synthetase FAU Florida Atlantic Unviersity FDA food and drug administration FW freshwater GAMT guanidinoacetate methyltransferase GAPDH Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate GAT glycine amidinotransferase GCMS gas chromatography-mass spectrometry GS glutamine synthetase HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus HU hydroxyurea iNOS inducible nitric oxide synthetase LDH lactate dehydrogenase LLC Lewis lung carcinoma mTP mitochondrial targeting peptide vii NADH nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide NADPH nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate ND not detectable NED N-(1-Naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride NM not measurable nNOS neuronal nitric oxide synthetase NOS nitric oxide synthetase NOx nitric oxide OTC ornithine transcarbamylase OUC ornithine urea cycle PCA perchloric acid RBC red blood cell RNA ribonucleic acid RC reliability class (1 most reliable-5 less reliable) SE standard error SLC solute carrier transporters SP secretory pathway signal SW saltwater TMCS trimethylchlorosilane triTMS trimethylsilyl group UGL ureidoglycolate lyase UOD urate oxidase UTA urea transporter A UTB urea transporter B XOD xanthine oxidase viii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Subclass: Elasmobranchii Elasmobranchs (sharks, skates, and rays), a subclass of Chondrichthyan fishes, are an ancient group of primarily marine fishes distributed widely throughout the world’s oceans, and occasionally in tropical rivers and lakes. Marine elasmobranchs are characterized by their unusual solute system; most notably their ability to synthesize and accumulate urea to high concentrations in their tissues (Smith 1935). Urea is a nitrogenous waste product and is used to detoxify ammonia in many vertebrates. However, in marine species of elasmobranchs, urea accumulation is part of a strategy to maintain an internal osmolarity close to that of seawater with urea being the primary solute accumulated (Ballantyne 1997). This strategy enables marine species to function as osmoconformers. A consequence is that the metabolism of elasmobranchs has been greatly shaped by the high requirement to produce and retain urea (Ballantyne 1997). In species inhabiting freshwater and brackish conditions the need to produce and retain urea is reduced, although euryhaline species, such as the bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas Müller and Henle 1839) and Atlantic stingray (Dasyatis sabina Lesueur 1824), do maintain an ability to produce high concentrations of urea and can alter urea content by changing urea biosynthesis and/or excretion during movement between variable salinity habitats (Ballantyne and Fraser 2012). 1.2 The ornithine urea cycle (OUC) and urea biosynthesis in elasmobranchs The majority of urea accumulated by elasmobranchs is produced by the OUC with the liver being the primary site of urea biosynthesis, although extrahepatic urea synthesis is also known to occur, especially in the skeletal muscle (Ballantyne 1997; Steele et al. 2005; Kajimura et al. 2006). The key enzymes involved in the OUC of elasmobranch are carbamoyl phosphate 2
Description: