TTTTTHHHHHRRRRROOOOOUUUUUGGGGGHHHHH OOOOOUUUUURRRRR EEEEENNNNNEEEEEMMMMMIIIIIEEEEESSSSS’’’’’ EEEEEYYYYYEEEEESSSSS Also by Michael Scheuer Imperial Hubris: Why the West Is Losing the War on Terror TTTTTHHHHHRRRRROOOOOUUUUUGGGGGHHHHH OOOOOUUUUURRRRR EEEEENNNNNEEEEEMMMMMIIIIIEEEEESSSSS’’’’’ EEEEEYYYYYEEEEESSSSS Osama bin Laden, Radical Islam, and the Future of America Revised Edition Michael Scheuer Potomac Books, Inc. Washington, D.C. For the brilliant officers of Alec who gave America opportunities not taken. They now know, with Lieutenant General Daniel Harvey Hill (C.S.A.), that “it is unfortunate to have different views from the rest of mankind. It secures abuse.” and For the Bay, past and present; the Class of ’52; the Inchon-Chongju Duo; Ranch Hands Beth and Bernice; and, as always, “So long, Chiefy.” and For America’s clandestine service and the U.S. Marine Corps—bringers of victory, if unleashed. Copyright © 2006 by Michael Scheuer First edition published in 2002. Published in the United States by Potomac Books, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Scheuer, Michael. Through our enemies’ eyes : Osama bin Laden, radical Islam, and the future of America / Michael Scheuer.— 2nd ed. p. cm. First edition published: Washington, D.C.: Brassey’s, c2002, and entered under title. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-57488-967-2 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1. Bin Laden, Osama, 1957- 2. Terrorists—Saudi Arabia—Biography. 3. Jihad. 4. Violence—Religious aspects—Islam. 5. Qaida (Organization) 6. Terrorism— Government policy—United States. I. Title. HV6430.B55.S34 2006 958.104’6’092—dc22 2005024233 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper that meets the American National Standards Institute Z39-48 Standard. Potomac Books, Inc. 22841 Quicksilver Drive Dulles, Virginia 20166 Second Edition 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CCCCCooooonnnnnttttteeeeennnnntttttsssss Foreword by Bruce Hoffman vii Preface to Revised Edition ix Preface xv Acknowledgments xix Introduction xxi Part 1: Context 1. Context for Understanding bin Laden’s Aims 3 Part 2: Arrogance, Money, and Ideas 2. Obstacles to Understanding bin Laden 17 3. Chasing bin Laden’s Money 31 4. Getting to Know bin Laden: Substantive Themes of the Jihad 45 5. Getting to Know bin Laden: Character Traits 75 Part 3: Years of Preparation, 1957–1996 6. The Young bin Laden, 1957–1979: Family, Education, and Religion 85 7. Bin Laden and the Afghan War, 1979–1989: Facilitator, Engineer, Fighter, and Visionary 97 8. Bin Laden and the Saudis, 1989–1991: From Favorite Son to Black Sheep 119 —v vi— Through Our Enemies’ Eyes 9. Bin Laden in Exile: Afghanistan and Sudan, 1991–1996 129 10. Bin Laden Begins: Inciting and Waging Jihad from Sudan, 1992–1996 145 Part 4: War Years, 1996–2001 11. Bin Laden Returns to Afghanistan: Getting Settled and Politicking 163 12. Bin Laden in Afghanistan: Targeting America and Expanding al Qaeda 181 13. Bin Laden Stands at Armageddon and Battles for His Lord 205 Part 5: No End in Sight 14. What to Expect from al Qaeda 257 15. Spring 2002: Where Are We? Where Are We Going? 275 Epilogue: “That They May Go in and Look Their Redeemer in the Face with Joy” 287 Epilogue to the Revised Edition 291 Appendix: “We Are Not Ashamed of Our Jihad”: Bin Laden’s Growth as an Islamic Leader and Hero After 1996 299 Note on Sources 315 Notes 323 Glossary 385 Bibliography 395 Index 439 About the Author 443 FFFFFooooorrrrreeeeewwwwwooooorrrrrddddd Through Our Enemies’ Eyes is among the most important books published on terrorism since September 11, 2001. At a time when it has become fashion- able to blame the U.S. intelligence community for the failures that led to those tragic events, Through Our Enemies’ Eyes provocatively challenges such broad-brush indictments, clearly showing that not everyone was asleep at the wheel. Written during 1998 and completed the following year, it not only “connected the dots,” but did so in a uniquely authoritative and com- pelling manner that would eventually establish its reputation as a classic in the field. First published in 2002, Through Our Enemies’ Eyes was arguably a most unlikely candidate to attain that stature. Written by a long-serving Central Intelligence Agency officer, it initially attracted scant attention. The nature and importance of its author’s national security work required that he re- main anonymous. This meant that there was no intriguing photograph of a suitably contemplative figure available for publicity purposes. There was no one to invite onto television and radio talk shows for interviews or to profile in the features sections of newspapers. There could also be no public book launches, signings, or opportunities to field interested readers’ ques- tions. That the author also had the temerity to compare Osama bin Laden to some of America’s most hallowed statesmen and political figures in order for readers to better understand our enemy and comprehend his magnetism and standing within the Muslim world, doubtless rendered Through Our Enemies’ Eyes a publishers’ and publicists’ nightmare. Yet Through Our Enemies’ Eyes slowly but inexorably began to gather a loyal readership and increasingly enthusiastic following. Among the “war on terrorism cognoscenti” in and around Washington, D.C., mere word-of- mouth established the book as required reading for anyone seeking to under- stand bin Laden, the movement that he cofounded and led, and the profound threat that it posed (and continues to pose) to the United States and to inter- national peace. Accordingly, the book’s reputation spread as a thoroughly —vii viii— Through Our Enemies’ Eyes reliable, trenchant, and commendably clear exegesis of al Qaeda’s ideology, goals, and alarming ambitions. Through Our Enemies’ Eyes is especially noteworthy for another rea- son: it was based entirely on open source literature—that is, nonclassified information. This is particularly significant at a time when America’s na- tional security architecture and intelligence community have undergone the most extensive reorganization and reorientation since their creation follow- ing World War II. Through Our Enemies’ Eyes incontrovertibly demonstrates that probing analysis, deductive reasoning, and accurate conclusions can be drawn about even highly secretive movements and reclusive leaders inde- pendently of classified and other highly restricted government information. As a result of a second book published in 2004 titled Imperial Hubris— which also challenged the conventional wisdom, this time in the context of America’s conduct of the war on terrorism—we now know the identity of the anonymous author of both works. He is Michael Scheuer, a twenty-two- year CIA veteran who headed its bin Laden unit from 1996 to 1999 and was at the vortex of the intra- and interagency disputes and disagreements since laid bare by the 9/11 Commission, congressional investigations, and other inquiries into the events leading up to the attacks that fateful day. Scheuer’s academic training as a historian—and his longstanding personal interest in the American Civil War—explains his command of primary sources, his iden- tification and interpretation of seminal events, and most importantly, his profound understanding of the role of leadership and ideology in shaping world events and affecting the course of history. Publication of this second edition of Through Our Enemies’ Eyes is timely. Four years into the war on terrorism, the United States seems at a crossroads in this monumental struggle. The sustained successes of the war’s early phases appear to have been stymied by the protracted insurgency in Iraq, the inability to kill or capture bin Laden and his chief lieutenant, Ayman al- Zawahiri, and most critically by an inability to break the cycle of recruit- ment and regeneration that has sustained a terrorism campaign that, as Through Our Enemies’ Eyes persuasively argues, commenced long before 9/11. The recent bombings in Bali and London, no less those in Madrid, Istanbul, Jakarta, Casablanca, Riyadh, and elsewhere, demonstrate the continued reso- nance and appeal of a movement and an ideology that Scheuer magisteri- ally charts and describes in these pages. The key to success in warfare, the Chinese strategist Sun Tzu wrote, is to “know your enemy and you will know yourself.” In Through Our Enemies’ Eyes, Scheuer answers the first part of that irrefutable formulation. It is up to the book’s readers to answer the second. Thanks to Mike Scheuer they have a very solid foundation from which to begin. Bruce Hoffman Washington, D.C. PPPPPrrrrreeeeefffffaaaaaccccceeeee tttttooooo ttttthhhhheeeee RRRRReeeeevvvvviiiiissssseeeeeddddd EEEEEdddddiiiiitttttiiiiiooooonnnnn The future always comes as a surprise, but political wisdom consists at least in some partial judgement of what may sur- prise us. And for my part I cannot but believe that a main unex- pected thing of the future is the return of Islam. Since religion is at the root of all political movements and changes and since we have here a very great religion physically paralyzed but mor- ally intensely alive, we are in the presence of an unstable equi- librium which cannot remain permanently unstable. Hilaire Belloc, 1938 The great Catholic apologist and historian Hilaire Belloc believed Islam a heresy and a permanent enemy of Christianity, but he recognized and re- spected its mobilizing power, vitality, and durability. Belloc, in 1938, mar- veled that over Islam’s history, “No fragment of Islam ever abandons its sacred book, its code of morals, its organized system of prayer, its simple doctrine. . . . [it] has always possessed a reservoir of men, newcomers pour- ing in to revivify its energies.” Lost in the confusion and feverish politics and intrigues of the final prewar years, Belloc’s 1938 warning to the West never received the attention it deserved. “It has always seemed to me,” he wrote in The Great Heresies, possible, and even probable that there would be a resurrection of Islam and that our sons or our grandsons would see the renewal of that tremendous struggle between the Christian culture and for what has been for more than a thousand years its greatest oppo- nent. . . . I say the suggestion that Islam may re-arise sounds fan- tastic—but this is only because men are always powerfully affected by the immediate past:—one might say they are blinded by it!”1 —ix
Description: