ebook img

Three Mile Island, Unit 2, Revised of Accident Analysis, NSAC-80-1, March 28, 1979. PDF

448 Pages·2012·20.28 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Three Mile Island, Unit 2, Revised of Accident Analysis, NSAC-80-1, March 28, 1979.

S 4, ', . .. . V,I Analysis of Three Mile Island Unit 2 Accident - 4NSAC-80-1 . : NSAC-1 RevisediM arch 1980 *1 Prepared by the Nuclear Safety Analysis Center Operated by the Electric Power Research Institute 3412 HilMew Avenue P.O. Box 10412 Palo Alto, California 94303 '''I I, 8307050509 800331 ' PDR ADOCK 03000289 Az P HOL ... .* .4, 100mapo.-Rommý NUCLEAR SAFETY ANALYSIS CENTER SEQUENCE OF EVENTS TMZ 2 Accident - March 28, 1979 COMMENTARY The intent of this sequence of events (SOE) prepared by the Nuclear Safety Analysis Center (NSAC) staff is to present a factual account of the event at the Three Mile Island, Unit 2, nuclear power plant on. March 28, 1979. It is not meant to explain why the event occurred or to speculate 'on why, certain actions were taken. This SOEEhas been verified, when possible, by raw data such as computer output, reactimeter data, strip charts, ete. Events have also been identified and verified by thermal hydraulic or core analysis. EIn tries concerning radiation readings were the only ones which p. were not substantiated by raw data because of the una'vailability of readable, reproduced or original, strip charts at NSAC. Limited use was *" made of interviews by others with persons involved in the event. NSAC had * no first-hand interviews with TMI-2 operators on duty at the time. Commentary as to why certain actions were taken have been generally ' omitted, except. by inference. Certain actions may have been omitted if they could not be confirmed, even though they have been reported by other sources, as long as these actions did not appear to play an important role in the event. Appendices have been prepared to further explain the actions and remarks, and to give a narrative description of the events from a thermal hydraulic and core assessment viewpoint. System related appendices are not meant to be independent system descriptions, but are written to clarify or amplify remarks in the SOE. In some cases, it has been difficult to interpret the available data and the interpretation is still in progress. An example of this is the interpretation of make up pumps status alarms and engineered safeguard actuation status alarms. WICLZAR SAFETY ANALYSIS COMR SEQUqD4CZ OF EVENITS TH! 2 Accident - March 28, 1979 Plant Status Prior to Start of Event fUI Unit 2 a operating at 97% power with the Integrated aontrol system (ICS) in full automatic. The reactor coolant system was o"erating with four1 reactor coolant ps at & pressure of 2155 p.1g. Roactor coolant makeup -9 Is wa in: service providing normal makeup and reactor ooolant pump meal injectiou flow. Roactor coolant system letdown flow was approximately 70 gpm. 2he reactor coolant system boron concentration was aproKimately 1030 parts per million. Red groups oe through five were fully vithdrawn, rod groups six and sevem We"e 9 withdrawn and rod groupeight .was :27% ' withdrawn. Reactor coolant system leakage was a-.p proximately .,6 -.- h. mate system was operating vith two. condensate pumps and two condensate booster pumps In service. both turbine driven. feed pump.. were in service. The pressurizer spray valve and the pressurizer heaters were in manual control while spraying the pressurizer to equalize the-ý boron concentrations between the pressurizer and the rest of the reactor coolant system. This eqialization WAs necessary because of steam leakage past either the electromatic relief valve ar the pressurizer safety valves. This- leakage was evidenced by periodic safety valve discharge header temperature alarms. ; Operators were experiencing difficulties in transferring resins from an isolated condensate polisher to the receiving tank. AttAmpts to free the plugged transfer line had bee.a in progress for about eleven hours. TM Ounit I was in hot shutdown for low power physics testing following refueling. here was a vacuum on the c0nden0se and al iliary steam ws being supplied from Wit 2. 2 TINE~~~7.i RDAK RN - TIKE -00O00:01 Condensate pump IA & 13 (Co-P-lA) tripped. Ref. 3.a., Appendix C/FV. p.3. (0400:36) START OT EVENT I OS00000 Feedvater pumps IA G M (lh-P-lA & f-P-Il) Ref. 3.a.e lore l(cid:127)se The trips werep caused by :low (0400037) tripped. feedvater pump suctIon pressurme s eewalter f low was lost to both steian generators. 0 00:00:00 The main turbine tripped.. Ret. 3. .o The turbine tripresultsau (0400:37) from the trip of both feedvater: pumps. 00:00:00 Three emergency feedvater pump 1 2A a 23 Ref. 3.a. Automatic start of tbese pumps-isnaue (0400:37) (SF-IP-i. I-P-2A& and 7r-P-28) started. -by the trip of both feed"ate pu - *" " "ergency feedwater pump I (Wr-P-1) -Is a steam turbine driven pump, and emergency feedvaet pump 2A 9.28 (EF-P-2h and Xr-P-23) are electric noto driven pu~s I' GOMM:003 The pressure setpoLnt (2255 paig) of electro- Ref. 1.k, S.b. The rate-ot-chanije of the reactor- 90400140) matic relief valve (ERV) (MC-2) located an the coolant system pressure Indicated that the relief - pressurizer was exceeded. valve lifted. A:4 3 J TIMR USV1110 TIEMAE~K~~ ama VRfE MENECES 00:00:04 Pressure began increasing in the reactor I (0400:41) coolant drain tank. Ref. 1.J. This was another indication that the EIW lifted. Reactor coolant drain tank pressure at this. time was approximately 4 psig. 00:00:06 I Secondary side steam pressure reached 1074 I (0400:43) sptseimg ing ensteeraamto rg e3n.erator A and 1052 peig in cRheaf.r ts1 .uin, di1c.avt. ed Ptrheasstu sroems e fmroamin thstee armea cstaLfmeteyt ervalves lifted. 00:00:08 2be reactor tripped on high reactor coolant (0400:45) 2s3y5s5te mps ipgr.essure. The nominal trip setpointt is 2R7e.f . 3R.e*a, cto1rA k coo11l an- t S"eycst.t em2 .p2r-e1s. suArpep ernedaicxh eIdH , 23p4.4 WSg at 040z46, as indicated on the reactimetor. ftb higher reading of approximately 2435 ptig - observed on the wide range reactor coolant system,. -atripchart could he caused by a 50 to 60 peig higher'' rea"ding at the start of the event cpled with Pen *overshoot during the rapid preasm.leIncrease. ! 00:00308 Pressurizer beater groups 1 through 5 (0400:45) Indicated off. Wef 3.a# 2.* -P. 2 . Appendlx, 1CSK -pp. 2-5. *This event could signify the operator's-reported action of placing the pressuri zer, beater control in t.he automatic mode to mitigate expected -reactor I ,coolant system pressure transients following any:. reactor trip. 4 1 j 'I- A S - RW,&W~ & RERFtEIICES TIME Ref. 1.k, 5.b. Appendixes EIV - p. 1, qPCS - pp. 3, 00:00:12 Reactor coolant system pressme decreased 6-7. The ERV should have reseated (closure setpoint (0400:49) below the uetpoint value for WI'7 (PC-R2) was 2205 psig), but it remained in the full open closure. position. Ref.. A nmenmtaxr coolant insurge followed by a 00:00:12 Xndicated pressurizer coolant level peaked at -1.g. rapid coolant outsurge is a nzrmal event. follovwin a (0400%49) 256 in. and began a rapid decrease. reactor trip. Rae. 3.d, 2.d, -p. 1, 2.e ,p. 2l.Appeni DPI. - 00:00:12 Letdown flow was stopped. pp. 1. 3, 6. This step and the next are initial (0400t49) .actions for operators to take aft er' reactor trip. accidents to compensate for the expected reduction of pressurizer level. Ref. 3.a., 3.d, 2..c p. 2, 2.d. -p. 2, Appendix One or more attempts were made to start makeup (0400&50) pump IA (MV-P-IA). The pump did not start. UPI -pp. 1, 6 , 7. OOsOOMl 00:00:13 A condenser hotwell l(cid:127)w water level alarm was -Ref. 3.a, Appendices, C/FO[l - p. 5, PDS pp.- 12 - 13. The level was 21.72 in. Because of the 15 (0400:50) ivceld on the alarm typewriter. (Noninal second scan interval of this-parameter, the actual alarm setpoint was 22.5 in.) alarm many have been aecived before this time.2 S TIME EVENT TIMEE VDFWa tARMEFKE RENCES 00:00014 The emergency feedwater pmpe (EF-PI, EF-P-2A, Ref. 3.a, Appendix PDS - pp. 12-13. (0400:51) and EF-P-28) low pressure alarms cleared on F-P1 1237 psig I the alarm typevriter. EF-P2-A 1471 psig EF-P2-B .1445 psig secause of the 15 second scan interval of these parameters, these pressures were probably reached before the time printed out. 2~. 00:00014 Pressurizer hbater goupe I through 5 indicated Ref. 3.a, 2.e -p. 2, Appendix RPCS- pp.- 2. 3-5. S. (0400s51) on. A low reactor coolant system pressure with the- beater control in automatic would came the beaters to energize. OOsOOS steam generator A water level indicated 74 in. Ref. 1.q,A .x, Appendix otsG - pp. 2-3.' Steam (0400M52) on the startup range. Steam generator 3 water generator water levels vere decreasing, 4, level indicated 76 in. on the startup range. S00tOslS The pressurizer spray valve (RC-V1) closed). WOf. 1.1, 2.e -p. 2, Appendix NPC p.- 5,-6. ? (0400:52) This clsure Indicated that the spray valve was I responding normally to reactor coolant system pressure transients and supports the operator' s;,- .- reported action of placing the pressuriser spray in" - automatic.- 6 - -- r~>.W-. --- - -- 4 ,~-(cid:127) -i¸-(cid:127) TIME EVENT REMARKS & REERENCZS 00:00s28 The condenser hotwell low water level alarm (0401,07) cleared. (Nominal alarm setpoint was 22.5 Ref. 3.a. Appendix C/roW - p. 5. The level was in.) 26.44 in. The computer scan interval wan 15 sec. 00:00:30 The ZW (PC-32) and pressurizer safety valve (0401:07) Ref. 3.c, Appendix ERV - pp. 3-4. (DtC-RID) outlet temperatures alarmed high. RC-R2 292.26F DC-RIB 203.507 . - - RC-RtI outlet temperature had b',u operating close to Its high alarm setpoint prior to the reactor trip. Computer scan Interval wa8 .30 sec.*- 00:00:30 The reactor coolant system low pressure trip (0401s07) setpoint vas reached. Rtef. I.q, 5.b, Appendices CV=G pp. 2-4, IVDS. p.2. •ergency teedwater valves Ell-VA - Er-V11W.. should open when levels reach 30 inches. Feedwater vwa not admited to the steam generators. ZR ergency. teedwater block'vlven Er-V 12A and.XF-V1231, which .1 should have been 'open, vere closed. This fact was':'.. not recognized by the operators, at this time. 00200S33 Steam generator B water level decreased to (0401s10) 28.0 in. in the startup range. Ref. U.x, 5.b, Appendices OaTG -- pp. 2-3, OS- p.2. .See entry at 0401:07 .. 000t0O41 Makeup I 1A (NP-P-IA) was started. (0401:18) Ret. 3.a, 1.g. With makeup pumps 1A a 15 operating, the pressurizer level rate of, decrease slowed. 7 I I TIME TIENVEN T FENARKS REY RENCES O0000t46 Pressurizer coolant reached an indicated (0401s25) I miniwim level of 158 in. Ref. 1,.g. Indicated presusiizer ooolant level began to increase. 0000158 A pressurizer low coolant level alarm was (0401035) received. (nominal alarm setpoint Was " Ref. 3.a, Appendix P?3 - pp. 2, 15. 12-13. Because 200 in.) of the scan intervals and computation involved with pressurizer coolant level, ttie alarm typewriter 00:01100 entry lagged the actual pressrizer low level. Preasurtzer (0401t37) sakety valMI (W-RUA) outlet temperature alarned high. Ref. 3.a. Appendix C p-p. 3, 5-6. JW-RIA 29415. 00*01t13 (0401T50) Are cceoinvdeedn. ser (Nhoomtwinealll ahliagrhm wgaetetpr olieavt ewl asa la3r6m i nw.)as Ref. 3.5. 2.C -p. 3. 2., p. 2, Appendix C/N - p. 5. Indicated levl was 37.77 in* The computer scan Interval was IS see* 00,01#26 (0402:03) The Indicated reactor coolant drain tank liquid tsmperature was S5.Se?. Ref. 3... This alarm typewriter entry indicated that the reactor coolant drain tank liquid returned to a normal temperature range. secause of the heat addition to the tank at this tUim Ii I* probable that It was a low temperature alarm that had cleared. I a I I *1 TIME rEv~r TIMErmREM6 ARRrKESN OCE 80:01:45 Ib steam generalu boiled dry on the Urf. l.b, 1.c, i.4. I.e. 1.u, I.v. ITS ev-t WA 10402:22) seomndary side. indicated by a steodily decreasing tm 90enerator Approximate sndary side pressure while reacum coolant hot and cold leo temperatures were i ung Zf~C- tiw beat transfer from the primary coolant to the I secondary system is stopped when the sm gemm- &taow are dry. I M*02:01 osgimmered safety 0 for highI psure .ef. 3.&, 2.c- p. 2, 2.0 - p. 4. In11S ee. 3.3.2.-1. 96402:38) Samjectiom actuated-. Bppemdces 35 - pp. 6. 7, 9, UPI -- pS. 9 . Tbis s caia by reactor cooant rystem a re droupftg bello 1640 pui,. SZ -wam pum In 3iWU tripped. let. 3.a. 2.q - p. 2. appendix 3W - wp. 14-15. Tbis is an autmatic trip before bi* pressure injectio pumps SA a IC (MU-P-IA and m-P-1C) start. 3tr-gh vmS pressure injectiem pamp IC (KU-P--iC) started automatic&il1'. Vat. 3.a, 2.9 - p- 2, Appendices W - pp. 9. 14. "IP -- P. 9. Po IA (IU-P-IA) was already operating. 9

Description:
A letcko cooler 1D h1qj tratu~u (RB) as a result of the core degradation event and coolant flow from the was forcibly evaporated, In addition, ýthe majority of the radioactivity in the residual water will be left behind:after naturalevaporation occurs, much like salt is left when seawater evapor
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.