ebook img

THOMAS WALTER TYPIFICATION PROJECT, VI: NEOTYPES FOR AN ADDITIONAL 18 WALTER NAMES PDF

2008·4 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview THOMAS WALTER TYPIFICATION PROJECT, VI: NEOTYPES FOR AN ADDITIONAL 18 WALTER NAMES

— THOMAS WALTER TYPIFICATION PROJECT, VI: AN NEOTYPES FOR ADDITIONAL WALTER NAMES 18 B.Ward Daniel ABSTRACT as published by Thomas Walter in 1788. Because of the early date of this flora, many of species were new its t es to represent an additional 18 Thomas Walter names. RESUMEN In the 1780s, Thomas Walter (1740-1789) owned and operated a rice plantation on the Santee River, Berkeley him County, South Carolina. His interest in the plants of the area led to compile a simple flora in which he gave them descriptions and Latin names. This book, Flora Caroliniana (1788), the treatment of is first American plants employing the binomial nomenclature and sexual classification system of Linnaeus. Of even greater importance, the early date of this publication has given many of his names priority over those of later authors. This paper largely completes typification of the plant names published by Walter in his pioneer Flora. By the selection of type specimens to represent these names, they become fixed in their meaning, bringing nomenclature stability to the of this portion of the Southeastern flora. Walter kept no herbarium (Ward 2007a). In the absence of authentic original materials, the International — Code of Botanical Nomenclature (McNeill et 2006) permits selection of another specimen a neotype al. to represent the missing type. The Thomas Walter Typification Project (Ward 2006a, 2007b, 2007c, 2007d, 2008) and ancillary studies (Ward 2006b, 2007e, 2007f, 2007g) have addressed the typification of many of the names assigned to American plants by Walter. These studies also treat aspects of the relationship between Walter and the Scottish horticulturist John Fraser. Fraser's herbarium (the Fraser/Walter herbarium, BM), gathered in the Carolinas and Georgia in 1787, was briefly seen by Walter, but largely irrelevant to typification of Walter's is names. Selection of collections made by other persons is the only pathway to stability of the great majority names. of Walter's In previous numbers of the Project (2007d, 2008), the Harvard University Herbaria (GH) were the source of selected specimens. Here, for those species not adequately represented in the holdings of that institution, the herbaria of the University of South Carolina (USCH) and Duke University (DUKE) have provided specimens of quality appropriate for selection as neotypes. With common names inclusion of the species treated here, essentially of Walter's that are in use have all now been assigned types, as have an appreciable number of Walter's names usually referred synonymy. to Still other of his names that have been treated as synonyms, or are unidentified as to their modern mean- A ing, remain unaddressed. subsequent number of the Project, now in preparation, provide an index Thomas to typification or other disposition of Walter names. all An Specimen not otherwise additional 18 of Walter's species are here assigned neotypes. citations, if (Ward The attributed, are to the Fraser/Walter herbarium (BM) as described elsewhere 2006a). typifications are presented in the format employed previously, in alphabetical sequence, using the names given them by Thomas Walter. TYPIFICATIONS Walter's name: Amsonia Tabernaemontana Walter 98) (p. Modern Amsonia tabernaemontana name: Walt. Typical Amsonia tabernaemontana, with ovate leaves, rare in eastern SC, frequent westward. The narrow- is leaved (Pursh) Woodson frequent on the SC coastal plain. Walter described his plant with var. salicifolia is leaves "ovatis" Spm. 5-C, labeled "Amsonia Tabernaemontana" by Fraser, has the broader leaves of the typical may variety; there no evidence was seen by Walter. Though the ovate-leaved form not have been the is it (Woodson variation most familiar to Walter, to preserve accepted usage 1928: 406) a wide-leaved speci- men, Smith 1114, 3 June 1941 - USCH, from Witherspoon Island, Darlington County, South Carolina, is here name neotype Amsorda tabernaemontana Walt. has been suggested that Walter's must have selected as for It been taken from Tabernaemontana amsonia L. (1762) and that Walter's type must therefore be the same as Linnaeus Pringle, pers. comm, Dec 2005). In such case, Walter's name would be superfluous and thus (J.S. illegitimate. Selection of a Walter neotype leaves the suggestion in the realm of conjecture. Anemone Walter's name: caroliniana Walter 157) (p. Anemone Modern name: caroliniana Walt. Very rare in SC counties, inland), rare also in central GA. This distant range indicates the species (3 all was probably brought to Walter by John Fraser. There is no specimen in the Fraser/Walter herbarium (BM). SW DUKE Pyron2109, 19 Mar 1938 - (annot. Carl S. Keener 1980), from 3 mi. of Irwinville, Irwin County, Anemone Georgia, here selected as neotype for caroliniana Walt. is Walter's name: Arethusa spicata Walter 222) (p. Modern name: Hexalectris spicata (Walt.) Barnhart Infrequent throughout. Blake (1915: 136) has stated Walter's diagnosis is "quite distinctive" of this spe- USCH cies. There is no specimen. Evett s.n., 9 July 2000 - (annot. John Nelson 2000), from Rucker Road, basionym Chapin, Richland County, South Carolina, here selected as neotype for Arethusa spicata Walt., is of Hexalectris spicata (Walt.) Barnhart. Walter's name: Athanasia paniculata Walter 201) (p. Modern name: Verbesina walteri Shinners Ridan paniculata (Walt.) Small] [= known Verbesina walteri is rare in SC, only from three counties. Walter's epithet is not transferrable to Verbe- sina (not V. paniculata Poir., 1808). Shinners (1964) formed a new name, basing it upon Walter's name and description. No specimen has been identified in the Fraser/Walter herbarium (BM). The species is infrequent through much of range, west to Texas. Available material, though from far beyond the reach of either its Walter or Fraser, believed representative of plants Walter might have known. Thieret 24848, 27 Sep 1966 is DUKE Denham - (annot. James R. Coleman 1969), from 8 mi. SE of Springs, Livingston Parish, Louisiana, here selected as neotype for Athanasia paniculata Walt., the basis for Verbesina walteri Shinners. is Walter's name: Frasera Walter 88) caroliniensis (p. Modern name: Swertia caroliniensis (Walt.) Kuntze Very rare (3 counties in SC: Abbeville, Greenwood, Laurens, all on piedmont); undoubtedly a Fraser dis- A covery. supposed specimen (48-B), labeled "Frasera Caroliniensis" by Fraser, has since been identified as May USCH, Dodecatheon meadia (Britten 1921: 70). Horn 6581, 8 1993 - from Sumter National Forest, ca. NE 11 mi. of Clinton, Laurens County, South Carolina, here selected as neotype for Frasera caroliniensis is Walt., basionym of Swertia caroliniensis (Walt.) Kuntze. , Walter's name: Hydrolea Walter quadrivalvis 110) (p. Modern name: Hydrolea quadrivalvis Walt. No N USCH, Frequent in eastern SC. specimen has been identified. Horn 4246, 30 July 1990 - from just of Laurel Hill Plantation, 2 mi. SE of Goose Creek, Berkeley County, South Carolina, here selected as neotype is Hydrolea Walt. for quadrivalvis Walter's name: Hypericum tubulosum Walter 191) (p. Modern Triadenum tubulosum name: Gleason (Walt.) Very rare in SC (2 counties, both inland from Walter's Berkeley Co.); rare in central GA; not known in NC. T But Walter's description seems unambiguous, clearly contrasted with virginicum and walteri. This T. probably is a Fraser discovery, perhaps obtained on his trip to the Flint River, west-central GA, in spring NE DUKE, of 1787. There no specimen. Allison 10271, 16 Oct 1997 from corner of Benning Military is - Ft. NE Reservation, 17.5 mi. of Cusseta, Chattahoochee County, Georgia, here selected as neotype of Hypericum is tubulosum Walt., basionym of Triadenum tubulosum (Walt.) Gleason. Walter's name: hexagona Walter 66) Iris (p. Modern hexagona name: Iris Walt. Very rare in SC (known only in Charleston There no specimen. Hutto 4 June 1993 USCH, Co.). is s.n., - Wambah from branch of Creek, Hampton Plantation State Park, Charleston County, South Carolina, here is selected as neotype hexagona Walt. for Iris Walter's name: Laurus Walter melissaejolia 134) (p. Bloom ia (Walt.) SC known named Rare; in only in 3 counties (Berkeley, Colleton, Darlington). Spm. 63-C was "Laurus melis- saefolium" by Walter and later annotated "Benzoin melissaefolium" by A. Kosterman. leaves are smaller than Its J. other specimens of that species. Spm. 63-H is similar, but was annotated by Kosterman as "Benzoin odoriferum," synonym An a of L. benzoin (L.) Blume, which could well be. independent specimen of certain identity it NE Williamson 1550, 23 July 1961 - USCH, from 1 mi. of Honey Hill, Darlington County South Carolina, is here selected as neotype for Laurus melissaejolia Walt., basionym of Lindera (Walt.) Bloom. melissifolia Walter's name: Melanthium hybridum Walter 125) (p. Modern Melanthium hybridum name: Walt. Veratrum Zomlefer] [= latifolium (Desr.) NC; No Rare in SC, frequent in western likely a Fraser discovery. specimen has been identified. Nelson 8431 W USCH 12 Sept 1989 (2 sheets) - (annot. D. E. Kennemore), from of Marietta, Greenville County, South Carolina, is here selected as neotype for Melanthium hybridum Walt. Walter's name: Melanthium racemosum Walter 126) ? (p. Modern racemosa name: Tofieldia (Walt.) BSP. Frequent in eastern SC. Walter was the to form the combination Melanthium racemosum. [Others: M. first racemosum Michx., 1803 (= M. virginicum), and M. racemosum Roth, 1821 (= Iphigenia indicd).] His expression & name No of doubt does not invalidate his (Art. 34.1). specimen has been identified. Pittman Darr s.n., 1 July 1999 - USCH, from Shirley tract, Lynchburg-Savanna area, near SC 327, Lee County South Carolina, is here selected as neotype for Melanthium racemosum Walt., basionym of Tofieldia racemosa (Walt.) BSP. Walter's name: Ophioglossum crotalophoroides Walter 256) (p. Modern Ophioglossum name: crotalophoroides Walt. Very rare in SC (two counties, one of which Berkeley). There no specimen. Douglas 12 March is is s.n., W SW 1991 - USCH, from along Simons Road, 1/2 mi. of SC 68, just of Yemassee, Hampton County, South Carolina, is here selected as neotype for Ophioglossum crotalophoroides Walt. 1282 Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 2(2) Walter 117) i (p. (Walt.) BSP. i Infrequent along SC shore. No specimen. Nelson 5850, 28 July 1987 - USCH, from South Island, Yawkey NEOTPE Wildlife Center, Georgetown County, South Carolina, here selected as for Pharnaceum maritimum is Walt., basionym oiSesuvium maritimum (Walt.) BSP. Walter's name: Rajania ovata Walter 247) (p. Modern name: Brunnichia ovata (Walt.) Shinners [= Brunnichia cirrhosa Banks ex Gaert.] known SC Rare in the Carolinas, but from three coastal counties (Charleston, Georgetown, Jasper). Shinners known Spm. (1967) accepted Walter's description as applying to the plant also as Brunnichia cirrhosa. 91-A, marked by Walter as "Rajania (monoica)" and noted by Fraser to be the "ovata" of the Flora, is a worthless NW USCH, scrap. Aulbach-Smith 3144, 15 July 1984 - from near Forks Lake Bluff, ca. 5 mi. of Hardeeville, basionym Jasper County, South Carolina here selected as neotype for Rajania ovata Walt., of Brunnichia is ovata (Walt.) Shinners. Walter's name: Silphium scabrum Walter 217) (p. Modern Silphium scabrum name: Walt. [= Silphium dentatum Ell] Common Guy more from throughout. Silphium asteriscus L. a scabrous plant, essentially absent SC. is is Nesom (pers. comm, Aug 2007) has identified Walter's name as dentatum. Spm. 98-C was labeled "Silphium" S. by Walter and "Scabrum" by Fraser; a fragment without meaningful characters. Nelson 5571, 9 June 1987 it is USCH (2 sheets) - (annot. A. Clevinger 1999), from West Springs, Union County, South Carolina, is here J. selected as neotype for Silphium scabrum Walt. Walter's name: Sophora lanceolata Walter 135) (p. Modern name: Baptisia lanceolata (Walt.) Ell. USCH, Rare in SC sandhills; perhaps a Fraser discovery. There is no specimen. Stanford 16, 4 April 1993 - from Compartment Savannah River Barnwell County, South Carolina, here selected as neotype 84, site, is basionym for Sophora lanceolata Walt., of Baptisia lanceolata (Walt.) Ell. Walter's name: Thymbra caroliniana Walter 162) (p. Modern Macbridea name: caroliniana (Walt.) Blake m No Infrequent eastern SC. Blake (1915: 132) noted Walter's description to be "definitive." specimen has N been Horn 2362, 28 Aug 1987 USCH, from Shaws Creek, 4 mi. of Aiken, Aiken County identified. - South Carolina, is here selected as neotype for Thymbra caroliniana Walt., basionym of Macbridea caroliniana (Walt.) Blake. Walter's name: Utricularia Walter 64) fibrosa (p. Modern name: Utricularia fibrosa Walt. [= Utricularia striata LeConte ex Torr.] Rare on SC coastal plain, frequent in piedmont. There no specimen. Utricularia fibrosa Walt, was left in is who limbo by Taylor (1989: 586) determined Walter's plant was either Lam. (1791) or U. striata bifiora 17. May USCH, LeConte ex Torr. (1819), but then rejected both. Nelson 12474, 18 1992 - from Training Area 25D, Fort Jackson, Richland County, South Carolina, a plant identifiable also as striata, is here selected 17. as neotype for Utricularia fibrosa Walt. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS made The specimens listed here, not available from our other cooperating herbarium, were available by John Nelson (USCH) and Robert Wilbur (DUKE). Their cooperation in locating adequate materials of B. L. well-known As Spanish has been prepared by these less species greatly appreciated. before, the abstract is And Christine M. Housel (ABT). as always, Charles E. Jarvis (BM), by virtue of his long-ongoing efforts to names Thomas typify the of Carl Linnaeas, godfather to the entire Walter Typification Project. is REFERENCES Some neglected names Rhodora 29-1 Blake, S.F. 91 5. in Walter's Flora Caroliniana. 7:1 37. 1 1 921 Thomas Walter 7407-88) and 59:69-74. Britten, his grass. Bot. J. 1 (1 J. . McNeill, Demoulin, D.L Hawksworth, Marhold, D.H. Nicolson, Prado, Scog, J.H.Wiersema, F.R. Barrie,V. K. P.C. Silva, J.E. J., J. and NJ.Turland 2006. International code of botanical nomenclature (Vienna Code). Gantner Veriag; (eds.). Ruggell, Liechtenstein. Notes 964. Verbesina Sida Shinners, L.H. [re waiter!]. :253. 1 1 Shinners, LH. 967. Brunnichia ovata (Walter) Shinners, comb. nov. (Polygonaceae). Sida 3:1 5. 1 1 — Kew The genus taxonomic monograph. 14:1-724. Taylor, 1989. Utricularia a Bull., Addit. Ser. P. London. Walter, 1788. Flora Caroliniana. T. Ward, D.B. 2006a. Thomas Walter Typification Project, Observations on the John Fraser folio. Sida 22: I: 1111-1118. name endangered Ward, D.B. 2006b. Silene catesbaei, rather than Silene polypetala, the correct of the Fringed Castanea :324-329. Catchfly. 71 Thomas Ward, 2007a. The Walter herbarium not the herba D.B. is Thomas The Ward, D.B. 2007b. Walter Typification Project, k II: 407-423. Ward, D.B. 2007c. Thomas Walter Typification Project, Lectotypes and neotypes for 20 Walter names, as rec- III: ognized the Fraser/Walter herbarium. Texas 1:425-430. in Bot. Res. Inst. J. Ward, D.B. 2007d.Thomas Walter Typification Project, Neotypes and epitypes for 43 Walter names, of genera IV: A through Texas 1:1091-2007. C.J. Bot. Res. Inst. Ward, 2007e. What the world did Thomas Walter mean by Xxxxxyyyyyl Partone:The complete unknowns. D.B. in Phytologia 89:228-235. What Thomas mean The Ward, 2007f. the world did Walter by Xxxxxyyyyyl Part two: quite doubtfuls. D.B. in Phytologia 89:300-314. Ward, 2007g. Quercus sinuata Walter—the hybrid of falcata and phellos— rediscovered and neotypi- D.B. Q. Q. Castanea 77-1 fied. 72:1 81. Thomas D Ward, 2008. WalterTypification Neotypes and epitypes 63 Walter names, of genera D.B. Project, V: for through Texas 2:475-486. Z. Bot. Res. Inst. J. Woodson, R.E. 1928. Studies in the Apocynaceae. A monograph of the genus Amsonia. Ann. Missouri Bot. Ill: Gard. 15:379-427. atrum. Ph.D. Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison. diss.,

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.