Table Of Content

Contess for Esvraenical Concezas Tite! Chueh. of Christ ceukenioal achievements af the sonmer of 1997, which édewified the mujor vaananical wark before the United © rar i she coming twa veer nl which nie 19 We hove, F late wha we are al parinéry sn varius relationship suntsizetly eneosrage us ra be more ericalate =né confident ia our weofhaving wo tteolegy aly the unformed hie lasire thut we neemce mire bold ane © our pesspect.ves and offer ow gifts in ways Ecamenica’ This ts corto aay th tes ee ‘squid make chat eluien, Bet | heas over & systematic ie our expression and thet ve arent lhat are ascoserzbie i Ibe Gest Ueaait-an of the Creret eathal, thereby avoiding hecoming soctatiaa in our wimess, Even seumenisal pantess who disagree itt us on Zmporsact issues seera 22 be prepared (bo in onanrvonian with us su len as hey perceive ia Us tae integrity af the Gaspat aa we seek ta mee we histaric faith eur own ir wack gereratioa. What does it mean fer us to ground contet: a the cathotie scbsteree of Dee Cleésciam faith? 1 ‘soule salt by affiaming he coslowirg: We ace ners chet cha: anda ens and lesbians Yee are, esther,» cured hak 1 hocoe fally tae gilts and callings af 7 sexta orieaation, ly thai sve seele 1 ofl person sanory We uplies reyurl 2: we ceuvented with isuee of justice ant nese, fhe Praphets, <9 sempausive tn {brig:© amnaumeer emunot fail 1 partie in chs: ceign crough wores ‘Wee ure nal a sae 4 sleepin appreuing Resim af Ged, al v fa deeds of j We ure cola church Gat orcmotes ‘elusive langeage, ‘Me ane a surch sp aveare af (oa tat every Henzing se wecledng radgmenl and draws sewurd seoentanee corign tHe ol Gow! encenrpassing alo havior acd spoect Se ame ge # chur: “hes warts the cle of bpaccuns where 2 : buchatist Crist’s oresense avacebie te all and eat reergnies tat whee: we stand at the Table ia monocheeette :2on0:inguai. ar mopaculaural condigursions, we deny the ad seh vision sl Gou's Fusure shiv ths Zacher st We are not a shurch that prowe:s lnea, autonome, We area chusch so eomeineed of the Holy Spleit’s aekvity that we refese to limit che capactsy er she Teepecsibilty ofthe hered coramaulty in any setting t0 distern the sly Spicl’s vail fr ds particular time and its paiculir ples Weare aot an evamenica, church, Se ae a chmmch thar secks eo porteay' in its ife nd wsiteess the uniey and koinonia oF che aly Trinity, the Trinily whose diverse persons esome an icon lor the amity and diversity he eoumcenical movemeat hopes to cxubody fim ways that ‘Our partness pessisiontly euccurage usa articulate our theology and stu oar: rineet the tanuies and convictions for which we ate known ta tie Great Seory ef the ciurch shrough the ages, and so hevarte calhoite gilts rather than soctorias udventares. May we listen well /Mataber 38, 1997