ebook img

Thin plates and shells: theory, analysis, and applications PDF

672 Pages·2001·3.347 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Thin plates and shells: theory, analysis, and applications

Part I Thin Plates 1 Introduction 1.1 GENERAL Thin plates are initially flat structural members bounded by two parallel planes, called faces, and a cylindrical surface, called an edge or boundary. The generators ofthe cylindrical surfaceareperpendiculartotheplanefaces.The distancebetween theplanefacesiscalledthethickness(h)oftheplate.Itwillbeassumedthattheplate thicknessissmallcomparedwithothercharacteristicdimensionsofthefaces(length, width,diameter,etc.).Geometrically,platesareboundedeitherbystraightorcurved boundaries (Fig. 1.1). The static or dynamic loads carried by plates are predomi- nantly perpendicular to the plate faces. The load-carrying action of a plate is similar, to a certain extent, to that of beams or cables; thus, plates can be approximated by a gridwork of an infinite number of beams or by a network of an infinite number of cables, depending on the flexural rigidity of the structures. This two-dimensional structural action of plates results in lighter structures, and therefore offers numerous economic advan- tages. The plate, being originally flat, develops shear forces, bending and twisting moments to resist transverse loads. Because the loads are generally carried in both directions and because the twisting rigidity in isotropic plates is quite significant, a plate isconsiderablystifferthanabeamofcomparablespanandthickness.So,thin plates combine light weight and a form efficiency with high load-carrying capacity, economy, and technological effectiveness. Because of the distinct advantages discussed above, thin plates are extensively used in all fields of engineering. Plates are used in architectural structures, bridges, hydraulic structures, pavements, containers, airplanes, missiles, ships, instruments, machine parts, etc. (Fig. 1.2). Weconsideraplate,forwhichitiscommontodividethethicknesshintoequal halvesbyaplaneparalleltoitsfaces.Thisplaneiscalledthemiddleplane(orsimply, 1 2 Chapter1 Fig. 1.1 Fig. 1.2 Introduction 3 the midplane)of the plate (Fig. 1.3). Being subjected to transverse loads,an initially flat plate deforms and the midplane passes into some curvilinear surface, which is referred to as the middle surface. With the exception of Secs 3.8 and 4.8, we will consider only plates of constant thickness. For such plates, the shape of a plate is adequatelydefinedbydescribingthegeometryofitsmiddleplane.Dependingonthe shapeofthismidplane,wewilldistinguishbetweenrectangular,circular,elliptic,etc., plates. A plate resists transverse loads by means of bending, exclusively. The flexural properties of a plate depend greatly upon its thickness in comparison with other dimensions. Plates may be classified into three groups according to the ratio a=h, wherea isatypicaldimensionof aplate in aplane andh isaplate thickness. These groups are 1. Thefirstgroupispresentedbythickplateshavingratiosa=h(cid:1)8...10.The analysisofsuchbodiesincludesallthecomponentsofstresses,strains,anddisplace- mentsasforsolidbodiesusingthegeneralequationsofthree-dimensionalelasticity. 2. Thesecondgroupreferstoplateswithratiosa=h(cid:2)80...100.Theseplates are referred to as membranes and they are devoid of flexural rigidity. Membranes carry thelateralloadsbyaxialtensileforces N(andshearforces)actingintheplate middle surface as shown in Fig. 1.7. These forces are called membrane forces; they produce projection on a vertical axis and thus balance a lateral load applied to the plate-membrane. 3. The most extensive group represents an intermediate type of plate, so- called thin plate with 8...10 (cid:1)a=h(cid:1)80...100. Depending on the value of the ratio w=h, the ratio of the maximum deflection of the plate to its thickness, the part of flexural and membrane forces here may be different. Therefore, this group, in turn, may also be subdivided into two different classes. a. Stiffplates.Aplatecanbeclassifiedasastiffplateifw=h(cid:1)0:2.Stiffplates areflexurallyrigidthin plates. Theycarry loads twodimensionally,mostlyby inter- nalbendingandtwistingmomentsandbytransverseshearforces.Themiddleplane deformations and the membrane forces are negligible. In engineering practice, the termplateisunderstoodtomeanastiffplate,unlessotherwisespecified.Theconcept of stiff plates introduces serious simplifications that are discussed later. A funda- Fig. 1.3 4 Chapter1 Fig. 1.4 mental feature of stiff plates is that the equations of static equilibrium for a plate element may be set up for an original (undeformed) configuration of the plate. b. Flexible plates. If the plate deflections are beyond a certain level, w=h(cid:2)0:3, then, the lateral deflections will be accompanied by stretching of the middle surface. Such plates are referred to as flexible plates. These plates repre- sent a combination of stiff plates and membranes and carry external loads by the combined action of internal moments, shear forces, and membrane (axial) forces. Such plates, because of their favorable weight-to-load ratio, are widely used by the aerospace industry. When the magnitude of the maximum deflection is con- siderably greater than the plate thickness, the membrane action predominates. So, if w=h>5, the flexural stress can be neglected compared with the membrane stress. Consequently, the load-carrying mechanism of such plates becomes of the membrane type, i.e., the stress is uniformly distributed over the plate thickness. The above classification is, of course, conditional because the reference of the plate to one or another group depends on the accuracy of analysis, type of loading, boundary conditions, etc. WiththeexceptionofSec.7.4,weconsideronlysmalldeflectionsofthinplates, a simplification consistent with the magnitude of deformation commonly found in plate structures. 1.2 HISTORY OF PLATE THEORY DEVELOPMENT Thefirstimpetustoamathematicalstatementofplateproblems,wasprobablydone by Euler, who in 1776 performed a free vibration analysis of plate problems [1]. Chladni, a German physicist, discovered the various modes of free vibrations [2]. In experiments on horizontal plates, he used evenly distributed powder, which formedregularpatternsafterinductionofvibration.Thepowderaccumulatedalong the nodallines,where noverticaldisplacementsoccurred. J.Bernoulli [3]attempted to justify theoretically the results of these acoustic experiments. Bernoulli’s solution was based on the previous work resulting in the Euler–D.Bernoulli’s bending beam theory.J.Bernoullipresentedaplateasasystemofmutuallyperpendicularstripsat right angles to one another, each strip regarded as functioning as a beam. But the governingdifferentialequation,asdistinctfromcurrentapproaches,didnotcontain the middle term. Introduction 5 The French mathematician Germain developed a plate differential equation thatlackedthewarpingterm[4];bytheway,shewasawardedaprizebytheParisian Academy in 1816 for this work. Lagrange, being one of the reviewers of this work, corrected Germain’s results (1813) by adding the missing term [5]; thus, he was the first person to present the general plate equation properly. Cauchy[6]andPoisson[7]werefirsttoformulatetheproblemofplatebending onthebasisofgeneralequationsoftheoryofelasticity.Expandingallthecharacter- isticquantitiesintoseriesinpowersofdistancefromamiddlesurface,theyretained onlytermsofthefirstorderofsmallness.Insuchawaytheyobtainedthegoverning differential equation for deflections that coincides completely with the well-known Germain–Lagrange equation. In 1829 Poisson expanded successfully the Germain– Lagrange plate equation to the solution of a plate under static loading. In this solution, however, the plate flexural rigidity D was set equal to a constant term. Poissonalso suggested setting up three boundary conditionsfor any point on a free boundary. The boundary conditions derived by Poisson and a question about the number and nature of these conditions had been the subject of much controversy and were the subject of further investigations. The first satisfactory theory of bending of plates is associated with Navier [8], who considered the plate thickness in the general plate equation as a function of rigidityD.Healsointroducedan‘‘exact’’methodwhichtransformedthedifferential equation into algebraic expressions by use of Fourier trigonometric series. In 1850 Kirchhoff published an important thesis on the theory of thin plates [9]. In this thesis, Kirchhoffstated two independentbasic assumptions that are now widelyacceptedintheplate-bendingtheoryandareknownas‘‘Kirchhoff’shypoth- eses.’’ Using these assumptions, Kirchhoff simplified the energy functional of 3D elasticity theory for bent plates. By requiring that it be stationary he obtained the Germain-Lagrange equation as the Euler equation. He also pointed out that there exist only two boundary conditions on a plate edge. Kirchhoff’s other significant contributions are the discovery of the frequency equation of plates and the intro- duction of virtual displacement methods in the solution of plate problems. Kirchhoff’s theory contributed to the physical clarity of the plate bending theory and promoted its widespread use in practice. LordKelvin(Thomson)andTait[10]providedanadditionalinsightrelativeto theconditionofboundaryequationsbyconvertingtwistingmomentsalongtheedge of a plate into shearing forces. Thus, the edges are subject to only two forces: shear and moment. Kirchhoff’s book was translated by Clebsh [11]. That translation contains numerous valuable comments by de Saint-Venant: the most important being the extension of Kirchhoff’s differential equation of thin plates, which considered, in a mathematically correct manner, the combined action of bending and stretching. Saint-Venant also pointed out that the series proposed by Cauchy and Poissons as a rule, are divergent. The solution of rectangular plates, with two parallel simple supports and the other two supports arbitrary, was successfully solved by Levy [12] in the late 19th century. At the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th centuries, shipbuilders changed their construction methods by replacing wood with structural steel. This change in structural materials was extremely fruitful in the development of various

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.