The War with God The War with God Theomachy in Roman Imperial Poetry Pramit Chaudhuri 1 1 Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries. Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 © Oxford University Press 2014 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available. ISBN 978–0–19–999338–3 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper For Ayelet and for my parents Contents Preface ix Texts and Abbreviations xiii Chronology of Poets and Emperors xv Introduction 1 1 Theomachy in Greek Epic and Tragedy 15 2 The Origins of Roman Theomachy: Lucretius and Vergil 56 3 Theomachy as Test in Ovid’s Metamorphoses 82 4 Deification and Theomachy in Seneca’s Hercules Furens 116 5 Theomachy in Historical Epic: Disenchantment and Remystification in Lucan’s Bellum Civile 156 6 Paradigms of Theomachy in Flavian Epic: Homer, Intertextuality, and the Struggle for Identity 195 7 The War of the Worlds: Hannibal as Theomach in Silius Italicus’ Punica 231 8 Theomachy and the Limits of Epic: Capaneus in Statius’ Thebaid 256 9 The Politics of Theomachy 298 Epilogue 322 Bibliography 329 Index of Passages 357 General Index 375 Preface The war with god (‘theomachy’) forms one of the foundational themes of mythology and literature, including the Christian story of Lucifer’s rebellion, Ravana’s domination of the Devas in the classical Hindu tradition, and the Greco-Roman myth of the battle between huge, serpent-legged Giants and the Olympian gods (‘Gigantomachy’).1 The result of these conflicts is almost always the same: the gods, multiple or single, eventually emerge victorious and the cosmic order is maintained. Within Greco-Roman mythology, the early his- tory of the universe witnesses some exceptions to this pattern: Cronus’ usurpa- tion of Uranus and Zeus’ subsequent usurpation of Cronus demonstrate the possibility of successfully overturning the divine order in a way thoroughly alien to the monotheist conception of an omnipotent and eternal God. In practical terms, however, antagonism towards Zeus and his fellow Olympians appears as futile and disastrous as Satan’s towards God. Mortals, too, fight their own wars against the Olympian gods, but after the defeat of the supernatural and immortal Titans and Giants, human antago- nism to the divine appears especially hopeless. Greek and Roman literature is filled with accounts of such human-divine clashes. Sometimes these battles are martial, like Capaneus’ challenge to Jupiter and his consequent death by the god’s thunderbolt (discussed in Chapter 8); at other times they are more figur- ative, as when Niobe’s children are killed because she had boasted that her fertility was greater than that of the goddess Latona (Chapter 3). What brings these diverse conflicts together is a common threat to divine authority—a pre- sumption on the part of the mortal ‘theomach’ to greater power than he or she actually possesses and a concomitant dismissal of the power of the gods. Those characters, and their representation in classical literature, are the broad subject of this book. At first glance, the act of fighting against the gods appears paradigmatically impious and absurdly foolish: in opposing the divine, one rejects correct moral authority and misunderstands the order of power in the world. Thus, literary accounts of such conflicts have often been interpreted in a didactic vein, with the punishment of the rebels seen as a warning against arrogance and trans- gression and as an exhortation to religious piety. If the lesson against overreaching 1 The relative status of Ravana and the Devas is made more complex by Ravana’s godlike qualities and his invulnerability to all beings except humans. He is eventually killed by Rama, a human avatar of the god Vishnu. Hercules is a similarly ambiguous figure, both divine and human, who comes to the aid of the Olympians against the Giants yet in other myths attacks various gods (see Chapter 4).
Description: