THE USE OF PERSONALITY PROFILES IN PERSONNEL SELECTION

151 Pages·2004·3.97 MB·English

THE USE OF PERSONALITY PROFILES IN PERSONNEL SELECTION:
AN EXPLORATION OF ISSUES ENCOUNTERED IN PRACTICAL
APPLICATIONS

A Dissertation

by

MATTHEW LARRENCE SHELTON

Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of
Texas A&M University
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree
of

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

August 2004

Major Subject: Counseling Psychology
ii
THE USE OF PERSONALITY PROFILES IN PERSONNEL SELECTION:
AN EXPLORATION OF ISSUES ENCOUNTERED IN PRACTICAL
APPLICATIONS

A Dissertation

by

MATTHEW LARRENCE SHELTON

Submitted to Texas A&M University
in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the degree of

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

Approved as to style and content by:

_________________________ _______________________
Daniel Brossart Winfred Arthur, Jr.
(Chair of Committee) (Member)

_________________________ _______________________
Michael Duffy Cecil Reynolds
(Member) (Member)

_________________________
Victor L. Willson
(Head of Department)

August 2004

Major Subject: Counseling Psychology
iii
ABSTRACT

The Use of Personality Profiles in Personnel Selection:
An Exploration of Issues Encountered in Practical
Applications. (August 2004)
Matthew Larrence Shelton, B.A., Southern Methodist
University; M.A. University of Missouri – Kansas City
Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Daniel Brossart

The purpose of this study was to explore the issues
that are typically encountered when using personality
instruments for personnel selection. Cattell’s Sixteen
Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) was used in the
study to predict job performance in a small team-based
manufacturing organization. Issues including the utility of
the 16PF in this setting, the bandwidth fidelity argument
(to use narrow or broad traits), and whether job-specific
versus company-wide profiles provide better prediction
success were addressed. The usefulness of the
organization’s current selection process of using the 16PF
to generate interview questions was also investigated.
Results indicate that the 16PF can be a useful tool
for personnel selection in this setting and that the 16PF
was able to correctly classify if an applicant was going to
iv
be successful over 86% of the time. Evidence for using
narrow factors instead of broad factors was also presented,
and the benefits of using job specific profiles were
discussed. The limitations of this study were addressed,
which included conducting this type of research with
relatively small sample sizes. Additionally, this study
provides suggestions for additional research in the future.
v
DEDICATION

This dissertation is dedicated to my grandfather,
Okley Kinder. He has taught me the power of perseverance
through the many obstacles that he has overcome throughout
his lifetime and how he has always approached new
challenges in his life with unbridled optimism about the
future. These values have always helped me get through the
challenges in my own life. Thank you for your love and
support.
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to thank my family for all of their
support and encouragement. Thank you, Dr. Charlotte
Shelton, my mother, for all of the support and guidance you
have given me over the years. You have had a dramatic
influence on both my career and who I am today. Your
assistance and consultation on this project were invaluable
and I truly appreciate all that you have done for me. I
would also like to thank my father, Larry Shelton, for his
unwavering support and encouragement for all of my
endeavors. I appreciated the financial contributions and
sacrifices that both of my parents made in contributing to
my education. I would also like to thank my sister, Laura
Shelton. The mountains that you have had to overcome in
your own career path to get to where you are today are
inspirational.
I would like to thank my chair, Dr. Dan Brossart, for
his constant support and encouragement. Your positive
attitude and brilliant problem solving have been a huge
help in the project. I would also like to thank Dr. Winfred
Arthur, Jr. for all of the help that he has provided me on
this project. Thank you for investing such time and energy
vii
into a student outside of your department. This
dissertation would never have happened without your input
and help. Thanks to Dr. Michael Duffy for the support and
encouragement that you have provided me. I use the skills
that I learned from you on a daily basis and you have been
the most influential person on my own professional frame of
reference. I would also like to thank Dr. Cecil Reynolds
for his help on experimental design. You have pushed me to
consider factors that I had not previously considered and
to look at problems in different ways. I would also like to
thank the College of Education faculty and staff for their
support.
Finally, I would like to thank my wife, Jenny Shelton.
You are my best friend and my biggest supporter. You always
seem to know the perfect words of encouragement whenever I
feel stuck and have demonstrated incredible patience with
me throughout this journey. I know it has been a long haul
for you as well, and I am grateful for all of your
wonderful help and support. I look forward to spending many
years with you and our growing family.
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… iii
DEDICATION………………………………………………………………………………………………………… v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………………………………… vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………………………………………………………… viii
LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………………………………… xi
LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………………………………………… xiv
CHAPTER
I INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………… 1
Research Questions…………………………………………… 5

II REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE………………………………………… 6

The 16PF for Personnel Selection……… 7
The Five Factor Model/The Big Five… 11
The Bandwidth-Fidelity Argument………… 17
Contextual and Task Performance………… 20
RIASEC Theory… 24
Situational Constraints… 25
Score Corecting… 27
Legal Isues… 28
Statement of Problem……………………………………… 32

III METHOD………………………………………………………………………………………… 37

Participants… 37
Instruments… 39
Job Performance… 42
Procedure… 4
Data Analysis… 45
ix
CHAPTER Page

IV RESULTS… 52

Research Questions One, Two, and
Thre… 52
Additional Analysis………………………………………… 64
Summary of the Findings for the
First Three Research Questions…………… 71
Research Question Four………………………………… 75
Summary of Findings for the Fourth
Research Question… 98

V SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION……………………………………………… 100

Research Question One…………………………………… 100
Research Question Two…………………………………… 101
Research Question Three……………………………… 104
Research Question Four………………………………… 106
Limitations……………………………………………………………… 108
Implications for Future Research……… 111

REFERENCES………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 114

APPENDIX A………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 122

APPENDIX B………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 123

APPENDIX C………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 124

APPENDIX D………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 125
APPENDIX E………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 126
APPENDIX F………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 127
APPENDIX G………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 128

APPENDIX H………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 129

APPENDIX I………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 130

APPENDIX J………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 131
APPENDIX K………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 132
x
Page
APPENDIX L………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 133
APPENDIX M………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 134
APPENDIX N………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 135
APPENDIX O………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 136
VITA………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 137