The Trial Lawyer 2000: Vol 23 Index

7 Pages·2000·1.9 MB·English

Volume 23 Index
Achieving Success as a Litigator: Is It Different for Brainstorming Your Way to a Winning Case Strategy
Women?, V. Hale Starr, No. 2, p. 104 Greg Krehel, No. 1, p. 17
Admissibility of Medical Causation Expert Opinions in Carmichael-Jones, Clive, Clifford May, and Anthony
Federal Courts, Part I: The Current State of Dearsley, Computer Crime and Electroni
the Law, Lori G. Baer and J. Kennard Evidence, No. 3, p- 255
Neal, No. 4, p. 323
Cartron, Dominique, Barbara J. Graves, David Jordan,
Admissibility of Medical Causation Expert Opinions in Daniel B. Stephens, and Michael A. Francis,
Federal Courts, Part Il: A Practical Guide Allocating Responsibility for Groundwater
to the Daubert Challenge, Lori G. Baer and Remediation Costs, No. 2, p. 159
J. Kennard Neal, No. 5, p. 398
Casaubon, Denise, and Rose Sparks, Resources for
Advocacy Thorough Discovery in Health Care Cases
Trial Advocacy from the Plaintiff and No. 6, p. 495
Defense Perspectives, V. Hale Starr, No. 3,
p. 201 Case Management
Avoiding the Pitfalls when Handling
Allucating Responsibility for Groundwater Remediation Collateral Sources and Other Third-Party
Costs, Barbara J]. Graves, David Jordan, Payers, Stacey Mullins, No. 4, p. 285
Dominique Cartron, Daniel B. Stephens
and Michael A. Francis, No. 2, p. 159 Brainstorming 4 Your Way to a Winning
Case Strategy, Greg Krehel, No. 1, p. 17
Appealing Evidence, James Harris, No. 6, p. 449
Ex Parte Communications: Guidelines to
Atkinson, Linda Miller, The Juror Questionnaire Consider, Stacey D. Mullins, No. 5, p. 364
Interviewing Applicants for the Job of
Judgofe t he Facts,” No. 4, p. 296 Focus Groups for Small Cases, Stacey D
Mullins, No. 6, p. 433
Avoiding the Pitfalls when Handling Collateral Sources
and Other Third-Party Payers, Stacey Letters of Protec tion Whom Do They
Protect?, Stacey Mullins, No. 3, p. 212
Mullins, No. 4, p. 285
Baer, Lori G., and J. Kennard Neal, Admissibility of Ten Stairways to aH eavenly Jury Selection
Medical Causation Expert Opinions in Stacey Mullins, No. 2, p. 118
tFheed eLraawl , NCoou.r ts,4 , pP.a rt3 23I.: The Current State of Cohen, Larry J., Issues in the Treatment of Posttraumatic
Stress Disorder, No. 1, p 26
Baer, Lori G., and J. Kennard Neal, Admissibility of Complex and Class-Action Litigation
Medical Causati; on E; xpert Opinions in Expert Witnesses in Complex and Class
Federal Courts, Part Il: A Practical Guide Action Litigation Less Is More, Joel S
to the Daubert Challenge, No. 5, p. 398 Feldman, No. 3, p. 232
Bambergebh , David T and Frank N. Darras, How to Computer Crime
PIti, ckN o.a n 3,I nps.u r2a1n6c e Bad Faith Case and Win Computer Crime and Electronic Evidence
Clifford May, Clive Carmichael-Jones,
Bartimus, James, The Seven Most Common Mistakes by and Anthony Dearsley, No. 3, p. 255
Expert Witnesses in Professional Negligence Computer Data Discovery
Cases, No. 6, Pp 430 Computer Crime and Electronic Evidence,
Bartimus, James, and Anthony L. DeWitt, Defeating Clifford May, Clive Carmichael-Jones,
and Anthony Dearsley, No. 3, p. 255
the Pulse Oximetry Causation Defense
No. 4, p. 317
Data Mining: Discovery of Computer
Based Data in Commercial Litigation
vi2no3dl euBrainx-Dammaged Neweborns
Peter Schulman, No. 1, p. 46
he Brain-Damaged Newborn, Part I: Fetal
Distress, Stanley Tessel, No. 3, p. 226 Corker, W. Russell, Understanding Spinal Injuries, No
2, p. 182
The Brain-Damaged Newborn, Part Il: VBAC
ind Forceps, Stanley Tessel, No. 4, p. 303 Criminal Defense
To Call or Not to Call the Criminal Defend-
The Brain-Damaged Newborn, Part III ant to Testify, V. Hale Starr, No. 4, p. 273
Vaginal Delivery of Breech Presentations,
Cusimano, Gregory S., The Uncross Cross, No. 1, p. 15
Stanley Tessel, No. 5, p. 386
Darras, Frank N., and David T. Bamberger, How to
The Brain-Damaged Newborn, Part IV Pick an Insurance Bad Faith Case and Win
Dystocia, Stanley Tessel, No. 6, p. 471 It, No. 3, p. 216
Brain Injuries Daubert Decision
Winning for the Brain Injured, Michael Admissibility of Medical Causation Expert
Maggiano, No. 3, p. 247 Opinions in Federal Courts, Part I: The
503
504 The Trial Lawyer—Journal of Strategy, Technique & Case Management
Current State of the Law, Lori G. Baer and Environmental Litigation
J. Kennard Neal, No. 4, p. 323 Use of Geographic Information Systems in
. Sup} port of Environmental Lit Vtr ation
\dmissibiliittyy of Mededi cal Cauaus ation ExEpxep ert David L. Jordan and B3 arbara J. Graves
No 5 P 406
ractical Guide to the Daubert Challenge
LoriG . Baer and J. Kennard Neal, No. 5 Evidence
James Harris, No. 6
The itekeepe? Scientific Expert
1y in the Trial Process, David I Spoliation of Evidence in Product Liability
Faigman, No. 4, p. 335 Litigation, Joseph J. Ortego and Glen M
Vogel, No. 6 Pp 437
earsley Anthony, Clifford May, and Clive
Carmichael-Jones, Computer Crime and Lising INE Ef vidence as" a P<) f} 17
Electronic Evidence, No. 3, p. 255 Approach to Winning Your Case, John |
Romano, No. 6, p. 421
[ f rin [ ( } [ry Cat if n Defen
Anthony DeWitt and James Bartimus Ex Parte Communications
No. 4, p. 317 Ex Parte Communications: Gui f
' nsider, Stacey D. Mullins, No. 5, p. 364
Depositions
Depositions: TTheh e E| a BBiirdr dG etGetss ththe e WWoorrtn Expert Witnesses
EliotG . Disner, No. 5, p. 380 ld in sihpiuliitty y of VMi edicai Causation tf
A lal estr You in Indneedd Dj en p) s 1 Current State; offf the Law, Lori G. Baer and
Wit M than O1 ohn F. Romano }. Kennard Neal, No. 4, p. 323
Depositions in Japan pinions in Federal Courts. Part Il: A
l ) i r, My R nf ractical Guide to the Daubert Chall
Eliot G. Disner, N¢ Lori G. Baer and J. Kennard Neal, No. 5
No. 4, p. 317 Feldman, No. 3, p. 23
MA itt S tho | efit of th loctin t Ty
oubt, Mark S. Sobus, No p. 42 Faigman, No. 4, p. 335
Discovery Kumho Wrestling: Are Your
nput 1 Electronic Evider perty Expert Shape?, Alan Ratlif
Clifford May, Clive Carmichael-Jones No. 6, p. 45
vi2no3dl euxm e
lom Vesper, No. 6, p. 488
Volume 23 Index 505
Francis, Michael A., Barbara J. Graves, David Jordan, Robert Gordon, Alan Gordon, and
Dominique Cartron, and Daniel B Richard Waites, No. 4, p. 288
Stephens, Allocati Responsib for
Issues in the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Groundwater Remediation Costs 2
p. 159 Larry J. Cohen, No. 1, p. 26
Getting into Focus: Improving Trial Technique Throu us Jordan, David, Barbara J. Graves, Dominique
Groups, Stephen M. Gorny, No. 2, p. 111 Cartron, Daniel B. Stephens, and
Michael A. Francis, Allocating Respor
Goldsmith, Lee S., New Health Care Liabilities in the sisvhiilliittsy for Grouunnddw ater Kemedia
New Millennium, No. 1, p. 21 Costs, No. 2, p. 159
Gordon, Alan, Robert Gordon, and Richard Waites Jordan, David L., and Barbara J. Graves, Use of
Online Trial Science Research: Harvestir Geeot gr5 apahpiic Iln formatatiioonn Sy{ssttemes ms 1i n Suppypo rt
Intelligence About Jurors over the Internet of Eni ironmental Lit tion, No.5 Pp 406
No. 4 p 288
Juror Questionnaires
Gordon, Robert, Alan Gordon, and Richard Waites The Juror Oue sTIOnNNATLTE Intervie WING
Online Trial Science Research: Harvestin \pplicants for the Job of “Judge of the Fact
Intelligence About Jurors over the Internet Linda Miller Atkinson, No. 4, p. 296
No. 4 Pp 288
Supple mental Juror Questionnair
Gorny, Stephen M., Getting into Focus roving Trial Advantage in Voir Dire?, V. Hale Starr,
Tech-nique Through Focus Groups, No. 2
p. 111]
t
Jury Psychology
Graves, Barbara J., David Jordan Dominique Differences in Jurors’ Percey ition of Self and
Cartron, Daniel B. Stephens, and Others: Why So Many Plaintiffs Get the
Michael A. Francis, Alloca > Respon Benefit of the Doubt, Mark S. Sobus, No
ibility for Groundwater Remediation l, p. 42
Costs, No. 2 p 159
Motivating the Modern Juror, Michael
Graves, Barbara J., and David L. Jordan, Use of Ge Maggiano, No. 4, p. 279
graphic Information Systems in Support of
Environmental Litigation, No. 5, p. 406 Using History to Engage Today's Juror
lim Hely, No. 5 p 361
Groundwater Remediation Cost Allocation
Allocating Responsibility for Groundwater Jury Selection
Remediation Costs, Barbara J]. Graves Juror Questionnaire: Interviewing
David Jordan, Dominiqu| e Cartron Applicants for the Job of “Judge of the Fact
Daniel B. Stephens, and Michael A Linda Miller Atkinson, No. 4, p. 296
Francis, No. 2, p. 159 ) } 1a
tit innalre
Advantage in Voir Dir V. Hale Starr
5 Dp 361 |T ry St ti urways toa Heavenly Jury Selection
Stacey Mullins, No. 2 p. 118
| | / ra Bad Fa ( hy W f
Frank N. Darras and David 1 Kanner, Allan, Theor f Re ery in Toxic Tort
Bamberger, No. 3, p. 216 Litigation, No p. 130
Intellectual PropFe rty Liti8g ation Krehel, Greg, Brainstorming Your Way to a Winning
Kumho Wrest vg: Are Your Intel tua
lape?, Alan Ratliff Kumho Wrestling: Are Your Intellectual Property Expert
n Shape?, Alan Ratliff, No. 6, p. 457
iv2no3dl euxm e
» ui ri \ dis li l iti 4 NINN ations Eric
Oliver, No. 5, p. 36
Letters of Protection
Letters of Protection: Whom Do They
How to Pick an Insurance Bad Faith Case Protect?, Stacey Mullins, No. 3 p. 212
Frank N. Darras and David
| Bambe rye No. 3, p. 216 Maggiano, Michael, Motivating the Modern Juror, No
Internet Research
Med Legal Internet Research: Finding
Reliable Information, Alan T. Radnor and
Sebastian E. Proels, No. 2, p. 122
May, Clifford, Clive Carmichael-Jones, and Anthony
Online Trial S iC Research: Harvestin Dearsley, Computer Crime and Electroni
Evidence, No. 3, p. 255
wer the Internet
506 T} é Trial Lawyer—Journal of Strategy, Technique & Case Management
Medical-Legal Intern xesea rind R rl lict ) r Opponen1 t’si StI ratTeeeg in OSPA
> Radnor and Sebastiar Model, John F. Romano, No. 2, p. 101
Physician Defendant it Med
Medical-Legal Research Malpractice Case, V. t dale Starr, No. 1, p. 6
Product Liability Litigation
] \ ,) ”» >} al CvVId | il Lid
tigatior Joseph J Ortego and Glen M
reat } ;, Denise Casaubon and
Rose Sparks, No. 6, p. 49 els, Sebastian E., and Alan T. Radnor, M
Medical Malpr; actice Liotan igation | foril mat;I nternetN o. Res2,e arpc. h: 122 Findine R al 3
Witn y tha ) No. 3, p. 199
A C 1 Addy Paes F
Settlement Agreements, Robert W. Wood
No. 3, p. 238
Sexual Harassment Litigation
T} Role of Gender in Sexual Harassme
Online Trial Science Research tigation, Melissz 4. Pigott and Linda
} is IK ] riar 4. Foley, No. 1 p 44
vi2no3dl euxm e1} } { , yr thy nter }
Robert Gordor -
Richard Waites, No. 4, p. 288
Ortego, Joseph J., and Glen M. Vogel, Spoliation of Sobus, Mark S., Differences in Jurors’ Perception of Self
c} vid J , n. I Product ; L] iab" i} lity; Litigation and Others: Why So Many Plaintiffs Get
No. 6, p. 437 the Benefit of the Doubt, No. 1, p. 42
igott, Melissa A., and Linda A. Foley, The Role of Sparks, Rose, and Denise Casaubon, Resources for
Gender in Sexual Harassment Litigation Thorough Discovery in Health Care Cases
No. 1 Pp 49 No. 6, p 495
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Spinal Injuries
Issues in the Treatment of Posttraumatic Understanding Spinal Injuries, W. Russell
Stress Disorder, Larry ]. Cohen, No. 1, p. 26 Corker, No. 2, p. 182.
Volume2 3 Index 507
Spoliation of Evidence Toxic Tort Litigation
Spoliation of Evidence in Product Liability Theories of Recovery in Toxic Tort
Litigation, Joseph J. Ortego and Glen M Litigation, Allan Kanner, No. 2, p. 130
Vogel No 6, Pp 437
Trial Advocacy from the Plaintiff and Defense Perspectives
Starr, V. Hale, Achieving Success as a Litigator: Is It V. Hale Starr, No. 3, p. 201
Different for Women?, No. 2, p. 104
Trial Exhibits
Starr, V. Hale, Preparing the Physician Defendant in a Let's See: Using Visuals in Legal Communi
Medical Malpractice Case, No. 1 p.6 cations, Eric Oliver, No. 5, p. 367
Starr, V. Hale, “Stealing Thunder”: When It Works and Trial Strategy
When It Doesn't, No. 6, p. 425. Achieving Success as a Litigator: Is It
Different for Women?, V. Hale Starr, No
Starr, V. Hale, Supplemental Juror Questionnaires 2, p. 104
Advantage in Voir Dire?, No. 5, p. 353
Predicting Your Opponent’s Strategy—The
Starr, V. Hale, To Call or Not to Call the Crimina
OSPA” Model, John F. Romano, No. 2
Defendant to Testify, No. 4, p. 273 p. 101
Starr, V. Hale, Trial Advocacy from the Plaintiff and Preparing the Physician Defendant in a
Defense Perspectives, No 3, p 201 Medical Malpractice Case, V. Hale Start
Stealing Thunder”: When It Works and When It Doesn't No. 1 p 6
V. Hale Starr, No. 6, p. 425 Stealing Thunder”: When It Works and
Stephens, Daniel B., Barbara J. Graves, David Jordan When It Doesn't, V. Hale Starr, No. 6
p. 425
Dominique Cartron, and Michael A
Francis, Allocating Responsibility fo Sul ple mental Juror Ouest nnairre
Ground iter Nemediad; ; , C¢ ; \ No. 2, V. Hale Starr
p 159
’ 4 ;
Supplemental Juror Questionnaire idvantage in Voi? To Call or Not to Call the Criminal Defend
Dire?, V. Hale Starr, No. 5, p. 353 int to Testify, V. Hale Starr, No. 4, p. 273
laking Depositions in Japan (or, My Recent Adventures in [rial Advocacy from the Plaintiff and
Tokyo), EliotG . Disner, No. 2, p. 172
Defense Per pectives \ Hale Starr, No. 3
Tax Issues p 201
Why You Should Address Tax Issues in Trial Technique
Settlement Agreements Robert W. Wood Death on a Common Carrier: Getting the
No. 3 Pp 238 Recovery Your Client Deserve Alvin A
10 HiTIgVhillily SigVnI1iIffiIcCaa nt Sports Stories of the Centu Wolff, Ir, No. 3 p 210
What Trial Advocates Can Learn from tting into Focus: Improving Trial
Them, John F.R omano, No. 1, p. 1 Technique Through Focus Groups, Stephen
M. Gorny, No. 2, p. 111
Ten Stairways to a Heavenly Jury Selection, Stacey r
Mullins, No. 2, p. 118 Motivating the Modern Juror, Michael
Maggiano, No. 4, p. 279
Tessel, Stanley, The Brain-Damaged Newborn, Part |
Fetal Distress, No. 3, p. 226 The Seven Most Common Mistakes by
Expert Witnesses in Professional Negligence
essel, Stanley, The Brain-Damaged Newborn, Part Il
Cases, James Bartimus, No. 6, p. 430
VBAC and Forceps, No. 4, p. 303
The Uncross Cross, Gregory S. Cusimano,
Tessel, Stanley, The Brain-Damaged Newborn, Part Ill
No l,p 15
Vaginal Delivery of Breech Presentations,
iv2no3dl euxmNo 5,p e386 Using History to Engage Today's Jurors
Jim Hely, No. 5, p 361
Tessel, Stanley, The Brain-Damage5 d Newborn, Part IV
Dystocia, No. 6, p. 471 The Uncross Cross, Gregory S. Cusimano, No. 1, p. 15
Theories of Recovery in Toxic Tort Litigation, Allan The Underestimated Plaintiffs: Proof and Argument of
Kanner, No. 2, p. 130. Damages in Cases Involving the Elderly,
Third-Party Payers Tom Vesper, No. 6, p. 488
Aroiding the Pitfalls when Handling Understanding Spinal Injuries, W. Russell Corker, No.
Collateral Sources and Other Third-Party 2, p- 182.
Payers, Stacey Mullins, No. 4, p. 285
Use of Geographic Information Systems in Support of
To Call or Not to Call the Criminal Defendant to Testify, Environmental Litigation, David L. Jordan
V. Hale Starr, No. 4, p. 273. and Barbara J. Graves, No. 5, p. 406.
Journal of Strategy, Technique & Case Management
~< rs, Jim Hely, No. 5 Intelligence About Jurors over the Internet
No. 4, p. 288
tive Approach t Why u Should Address Tax Issues in Settlement
wu John F. Romano Agreements, Robert W. Wood, No. 3, p. 238
for the Brain Injured, Michael Maggiano, No
3, p. 247
“SS A. Jr., Deatohn a Common Carrier: Getting the
Recovery Your Client Deserves, No. 3, p. 210
Robert W Why You Sh uld Address Tax Issues
= Settlement Agreements, No. 3, p
Robert Gordon d Alan Gordoj n Maestro! ) an Indee "OSE | itness More t}h an
S ‘ Ha ting Once, John F. Romano,No . 3, p. 199
oN
c~]
vo
=
oe
=
=