THE SURGERY OF THE ALIMENTARY TRACT BY SIR HUGH DEVINE M.S., F.R.A.C.S., F.A.C.S., HON. F.R.C.S (ENG.) Formerly Senior Surgeon, St, Vincent's Hospital Clinical School, Melbourne, and other Stewart Lecturer in Surgery, Melbourne University ; President, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons ; Hon. Fellow of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland; Chairman, Editorial Committee of the Australasian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery WITH 690 ILLUSTRATIONS, SOME IN COLOUR BRISTOL: JOHN WRIGHT & SONS LTD. LONDON: SIMPKIN MARSHALL LTD. 1940 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY JOHN WRIGHT AND SONS LTD. STONEBRIDGE HOUSE, BRISTOL, I PREFACE THIS book deals with important aspects of the surgery of the alimentary canal and its adnexal organs. It is the fruit of many years' experience of clinical teaching and surgical practice. No attempt has been made to make it a complete and comprehensive treatise on the surgery of the abdomen ; such an attempt would destroy its individuality and defeat the author's purpose. In the first place the work represents a clinical research into the pathology of living tissue as seen at the operation table, with a view to adding to the standard diagnosis of text-books those refine- ments in clinical, radiological, and other forms of surgical diagnosis which help early and accurate recognition of disease and therefore successful surgical treatment. In the second place it represents the distillate of surgical experi- ence in regard to selection of operative methods, improvements in the operative technique of the commoner operations, and advantageous pre-operative and post-operative treatment—all with the object of trying to lessen the morbidity of surgical treatment and make it as safe as possible for the patient. Assuming as it does a certain amount of text-book knowledge, this work is intended mainly for the post-graduate. It will, I feel, be of use to the student as a reference work. But I hope it will be of special value to those who intend to practise, or who are practising, abdominal surgery. Part I is devoted to the diagnosis of dyspepsia. The reason for this is that the weakness in my own abdominal surgery has been incompetence in clinical diagnosis in contrast to increasing competence in radiological diagnosis and surgical treatment : cases did not reach the radiologist, and therefore the surgeon, as early as they might have done ; the organic significance of non-text-book-like syndromes of dyspepsia was not recognized. With this knowledge in mind, I have tried to add on to the clear-cut text-book pictures of dyspeptic syndromes (usually based on well-established disease) those dyspeptic ' patterns ' which are the manifestations of early disease, and which can only be learnt from observation on the pathology of living tissue at the operation VI PREFACE table and the post-operative review of the case-history in the light of the operation findings. With a view of helping in the early recognition of these early dyspeptic ' patterns ', I have attempted to show the mechanism of causation of dyspepsia : how it is that certain diseases produce certain ' patterns ' of dyspepsia ; how the same disease—for example, gastric carcinoma—may produce many varieties of dyspeptic ' patterns ' ; and how disease in one case may produce a dyspepsia and in another may be * silent '. Further, with the object of encouraging early discrimination between the forms of onset of diseases, and therefore early X-ray examination, I have tried to show that in many obscure dyspeptic manifestations a significance attaches to whether the inci- dence of a dyspepsia is on the filling or emptying of the stomach. I am quite conscious that some of the conceptions I have put forward will not afford a complete explanation in all circumstances, but they will serve, I hope, as directional thought in the search for clinical * clues ' to use in the solution of dyspeptic problems. With the idea, too, of further improving diagnosis and helping the surgeon to say ' no ' when an operation of doubtful value is recommended, I have added chapters on consultative radio-surgical diagnosis. In these I have attempted to overcome the tendency to divorce clinical from radiological diagnosis, and to correlate these by dealing with them as a hypothetical consultation into which I have also woven those equivocal radiological observations which I have been able to check at the operation table. In this part, Dr. John Horan had very kindly contributed a chapter on Gastroscopy. Part II deals with the surgical treatment of the diseases which give rise to dyspeptic syndromes. It also has to do with the treatment of diseases of those organs in the upper part of the abdomen other than the stomach—liver, gall-bladder, pancreas, and spleen—which may cause some dyspeptic manifestations. Here, by describing methods of technique in detail and introducing refinements and improvements in everyday operation procedures, I hope to achieve two objects : to lessen the unnecessary morbidity which I find often follows routine abdominal procedures ; and to minimize the dangers of operations in the upper part of the abdomen. The chapter on Hydatid of the Liver—incorporating mostly my own experiences—is concerned with pitfalls in diagnosis as well as operative difficulties. In Part III will be found chapters on the strategy of surgical approach to a case of intestinal obstruction or of a perforated hollow PREFACE VÜ organ—affections which may involve the upper or the lower part of the abdomen. In these I have attempted to reproduce the actual circumstances that are found in practice, and to provide the surgeon with a preconceived plan of attack. Part IV is mostly concerned with the surgery of the appendix, the large bowel, and the rectum. In the management of appendicitis I have kept in mind the facts that deaths in acute appendicitis generally result from a failure to recognize unusual and non-text-book-like syndromes and from an inability to deal with the unorthodox pathological conditions so frequently and so unexpectedly found in this disease. Accordingly, I have tried to present this subject in a way which will throw into perspective aspects of the disease which are of practical importance, and aspects the study of which will arm the surgeon so that he may detect early, and deal with successfully, the abnormal in acute appendicitis. In the chapters on the colon and fectum, I have attempted to indicate the way to improved results in the surgery of this region. Since the diagnosis and treatment of diverticulitis have led me along thorny paths, I present my experiences—successful and unsuccessful— for the value they may have to my readers. Because it is a fact that colon carcinoma—a relatively * benign ' malignancy—comes to opera- tion mostly in its middle or late stages, I have made the diagnosis of malignant colon the central point of colonie diagnosis. And for the reason that operations on the distal colon and rectum have a high mortality-rate owing to the surgical disabilities attendant on the peculiar function of these organs, I have described methods designed to ensure that operation and reparative processes in these regions shall take place in an organ temporarily deprived of its function— methods which experience has shown give a lower mortality-rate. In this work the pathogenesis of disease is not systemically considered, but only so far as it will explain the ' patterns ' of disease and the basis of surgical treatment. Many standard methods of technique are not dealt with as these can be found in other works. My thanks are due to the publishers, Messrs. John Wright & Sons Ltd., for the help I have received from them, and for the manner in which they have produced this work ; to Miss Elizabeth Sellenger for the illustrations ; and to Professor W. A. Osborne for his help in the correction of proofs. HUGH DEVINE. MELBOURNE, March, 1940. THE SURGERY OF THE ALIMENTARY TRACT Section I THE CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS OF SURGICAL DYSPEPSIA CHAPTER I DYSPHAGIA IN THE UPPER PART OF THE (ESOPHAGUS THE oesophagus is fairly well supplied with sensory nerves—better, at any rate, than the stomach—and for this reason a patient can localize an eesophageal lesion. The upper part of the oesophagus is sensitive, the lower part insensitive, to touch ; the oesophagus throughout its whole length is sensitive to pressure and to temperature. A patient with obstruction in the oesophagus can therefore generally point to the spot where swallowing is obstructed (Fig. i). In 85 per cent of cases, carcinoma of the oesophagus is the cause of the obstruc- tion. For this reason dysphagia, to the medical mind, generally means a malignant oesophagus. Sites of Obstruction in the (Esoph- agus : the Narrow Places.—Congenitally Fig. 1.—Shading indicates there are three ' narrow places ' in the the area to which pain is likely to be referred from the lower oesophagus: (1) The level of the larynx, end of the oesophagus. 7 in. from the incisor teeth ; (2) The bifur- cation of the trachea, 11 in. from the incisor teeth; (3) The lower end of the oesophagus, 17 in. from the incisor teeth, about 2 cm. above its opening into the stomach (Fig. 2). As swallowed fluid will impinge on these narrowings, organic strictures, which result from swallowing corrosive fluids, will naturally occur in these three situations. Spasm of the circular muscle of the oesophagus is also liable to occur in these positions. Furthermore, 4 THE DIAGNOSIS OF SURGICAL DYSPEPSIA they are the favourite sites for malignant growths. Thus it will be seen that the site of an obstruction is a very poor guide to its nature. In the upper part of the oesophagus the diagnosis of a dysphagia as a rule presents little difficulty, for a dysphagia in this situation is nearly always caused by a malignant growth. In this respect it differs from the lower part of the oesophagus, because in that region a diagnosis of a dysphagia presents considerable difficulties ; for the inno- cent condition cardio- spasm so frequently and unexpectedly occurs in that situation. Clinically, therefore, it is of advan- tage to discuss the ques- tion of dysphagia in relation to site, namely, the three ' narrow places ' of the oesophagus, the upper part, the middle part, and the lower part. In this discussion unusual conditions, such as aneu- rysm of the aorta, medi- astinal tumour, enlarged mediastinal glands, and mediastinal abscess, will Fig. 2.—The three narrow places in the œsophagus. . not be considered. DYSPHAGIA IN THE UPPER END OF THE ŒSOPHAGUS Before discussing dysphagia in the upper end of the oesophagus, it must be pointed out that there are certain malignant conditions which occur in the lower part of the pharynx adjoining the oesophagus and in the pyriform fossa, which lie close to the beginning of the oesophagus, and which give rise to discomfort on swallowing, and these should be considered in relation to this problem of dysphagia. Hidden Hypopharyngeal Malignancy. — A hypopharyngeal growth may abut on the upper end of the oesophagus and give rise DYSPHAGIA IN UPPER PART OF (ESOPHAGUS 5 to symptoms of dysphagia. Most malignant tumours of the pharynx, however, give some symptomatic evidence of their presence and are then easily detected when an examination is made. But there are in the pharynx or its vicinity some forms of malignant growth which are difficult to detect. The cases that follow will serve as examples to illustrate this point. Fig. 3.—A malignant fissure (A) with thickened edges, situated in the pyriform fossa. Epithelioma of the Pyriform Fossa.—A woman, aged 45, complained that she had a sensation as if something was stuck in the right side of her throat opposite the hyoid bone. She said she was continually * getting up ' mucus, which seemed to come from this spot. A careful examination with the laryngeal mirror revealed nothing. As the symptoms continued, a further examination was made with a direct laryngoscope. A fissure with infiltrated edges was found in the pyriform fossa (Fig. 3). Epithelioma of the Vallecula.—A man, aged 57, sought advice because he could feel a firm, hard lump in the upper part of his neck. On examina- tion, this lump was found to have all the characteristics of a malignant gland. The pharynx was carefully examined for a primary growth, but nothing abnormal could be found. The gland was removed and a section 6 THE DIAGNOSIS OF SURGICAL DYSPEPSIA showed that it had an epithelial structure and cell-nests. Repeated pharyngeal examinations were now made, but no primary growth could be discovered. Some eighteen months later an epithelioma was discovered growing from the area where the base of the tongue joins the pharynx, that is, from the vallecula. The reason why this epithelioma could not be seen at first was probably owing to the fact that in its early stages it was a malignant fissure like one of those found in leucoplakia of the tongue (the patient had a leucoplakia of the tongue), and that in the position in which it was situated it would be very difficult to distinguish it from the normal crease in this region. The history of this patient also exemplifies another important fact : it shows that a malignant gland in the upper part of the neck, even though no primary malignant condition is obvious, is nearly always secondary to a hidden malignancy either in the pharynx, the pyriform fossa, the vallecula, or in some part of the larynx or the upper part of the oesophagus. The causes of dysphagia in the upper part of the oesophagus are : (i) Carcinoma of the upper part of the oesophagus ; (2) Diverticula. Carcinoma of the Upper Part of the (Esophagus.—Carcinoma of the upper part of the oesophagus usually occurs in women. The patient complains that the food seems to stop in the region of the larynx ; she can point to the actual spot. She may be aphonie from the direct extension of the growth to the vocal cords. Usually she has salivary troubles and dribbles constantly because she cannot swallow her saliva. Examination generally reveals a hard, painless gland in the neck ; indeed, this may be the first sign, and may be present for many months before the patient complains of any sym- ptoms. A laryngeal examination easily reveals the growth. A woman, aged 45, complained that she could not swallow and that the food seemed to cling to a spot opposite her larynx. Two months after the onset of the dysphagia she noticed that her voice became hoarse. She constantly dribbled saliva, which she could not swallow. On examination of the neck, an enlarged, hard, painless gland was discovered. Diverticulum of the Upper Part of the (Esophagus.—Diver- ticula occur commonly at the junction of the oesophagus and the pharynx. However, they rarely cause a dysphagia in the upper part of the oesophagus. They are caused by pressure from the inside of the oesophagus and are called ' pressure diverticula ', and are con- genital. Patients generally give a history of : (a) Long-standing dysphagia ; (b) Régurgitations of portions of food after eating ; (c) Discomfort and pressure in the neck ; (d) A complaint that if DYSPHAGIA IN UPPER PART OF ŒSOPHAGUS J pressure be made on the pouch, some of its contents can be made to empty into the mouth. X rays will show the diverticulum. Treatment.—The treatment of the so-called pulsion diverticulum of the oesophagus, which actually arises in the pharynx, is removal of the sac and closure of the opening in the pharynx thus made. This may be carried out in a one- or two-stage operation. In the two- stage (Moersch and Judd1) the sac is first freed and sutured to the neck muscles. Eight days later it is exposed and removed and the neck sutured over. Shallow2 employs a one-stage operation. He recommends that after the usual exposure the eesophagoscope should be passed into the sac, which should be emptied by aspiration and pushed into the wound. The sac should then be grasped and the eesophagoscope passed into the oesophagus and kept there while the sac is dissected free, excised, the defect closed, and the wound in the neck closed. Dysphagia due to traction diverticula is not common, and, furthermore, traction diverticula occur less frequently than pressure diverticula ; they also occur farther down in the oesophagus. They are, as a rule, small, and do not give rise to trouble. DYSPHAGIA IN THE MIDDLE PART OF THE ŒSOPHAGUS This is generally caused by— Carcinoma of the Œsophagus at the Level of the Bifurcation of the Trachea.—In this condition the manifestations are as follows : (a) Symptoms of oesophageal obstruction referred to the level of the bifurcation of the trachea ; (b) Aphonia caused by paralysis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve ; (c) Symptoms of mediastinitis and of pleuritic effusion ; (d) Indications of pressure on either bronchus, such as evidence of deficient entry of air into either lung ; and (e) It is not uncommon for a carcinoma in this situation to perforate into the bronchus. The following is an example :— A man, aged 60, complained of a sensation under the upper part of the sternum, as if the food lodged there. He could not, he said, swallow solids, but could get down liquids. His voice had become husky. He regurgitated a small quantity of food after each meal. This had a nasty smell and taste, and was often mixed with blood. He had lost a lot of weight, and looked very pale and ill. REFERENCES 1 MOERSCH and JUDD, Surg. Gynecol. and Obst., 1934, 58, April, 781. 2 SHALLOW, Ibid., 1936, 62, March, 624.