Digital Commons @ George Fox University Doctor of Ministry Theses and Dissertations 2-1-2017 The Study of Brokenness as a Critical Success Factor in the Effective Leadership of the Pastor Robert Thompson George Fox University, [email protected] This research is a product of the Doctor of Ministry (DMin) program at George Fox University.Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Thompson, Robert, "The Study of Brokenness as a Critical Success Factor in the Effective Leadership of the Pastor" (2017).Doctor of Ministry. 213. http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/dmin/213 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctor of Ministry by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please [email protected]. GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY THE STUDY OF BROKENNESS AS A CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR IN THE EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP OF THE PASTOR A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GEORGE FOX EVANGELICAL SEMINARY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF MINISTRY BY ROBERT THOMPSON PORTLAND, OREGON FEBRUARY 2017 George Fox Evangelical Seminary George Fox University Portland, Oregon CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL ________________________________ DMin Dissertation ________________________________ This is to certify that the DMin Dissertation of Robert N. Thompson has been approved by the Dissertation Committee on February 24, 2017 for the degree of Doctor of Ministry. Dissertation Committee: Primary Advisor: Darrell Peregrym, DMin Secondary Advisor: Len Hjalmarson, DMin Expert Advisor: Steve Kroeker, BA Copyright © 2017 by Robert Thompson All rights reserved. ii CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ V ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... VI SECTION 1 THE PROBLEM ............................................................................................1 One Pastor’s Story .........................................................................................................1 Statement of the Problem and Purpose of the Study ......................................................2 Research Question and Definition of Terms ..................................................................5 A Return to the Old ........................................................................................................9 SECTION 2 ALTERNATE APPROACHES TO BROKENNESS .................................20 Alternate Approaches of Brokenness ...........................................................................23 Shock & Pain Approach .........................................................................................23 Denial (Pretend) Approach ....................................................................................24 Anger (Blame) Approach .......................................................................................25 Bargaining (Strive) Approach ................................................................................26 Depression (Reflection) Approach ........................................................................27 Testing Approach ...................................................................................................27 Acceptance Approach ............................................................................................28 Summary ......................................................................................................................29 SECTION 3 THESIS ........................................................................................................30 Introduction ..................................................................................................................30 Understanding the Process of Brokenness ...................................................................31 Voluntary/Involuntary Brokenness ..............................................................................36 Developing the Attitude of Brokenness .......................................................................41 Paul’s Leadership .........................................................................................................43 Field Research Findings ...............................................................................................54 Blessings ......................................................................................................................57 Summary ......................................................................................................................65 SECTION 4 ARTIFACT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................68 SECTION 5 ARTIFACT SPECIFICATION ....................................................................71 SECTION 6 POSTSCRIPT ..............................................................................................77 SECTION 7 ARTIFACT ..................................................................................................80 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................159 iii FIGURES 1. Alternate Approaches.………………………………………..30 2. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs………………………………..33 3. Hierarchy of Spiritual Needs…………………………………34 4. Self-Actualization versus Servant Mind……………………...35 5. Spiritual Disciplines …………………………………………40 6. Brokenness Brings Blessedness……………..…………..…...62 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to the many individuals who have walked with me on this journey: Jackie & Don Gaetz, Ruth Copeland-Holtz, Karen Flanagan, Barb & Rodger Heringer, Dan Russell, Jennifer & Richard Thompson, Kathy & Gerry Toms, and Bill Wong, thank you for all your encouragement and support. To Union Gospel Mission, for the past nine years, for encouraging me to complete my dissertation because you believed it would serve the people we care for and that it would impact the Church. May it be so. To George Fox University, Bakke Graduate School of Ministry and Regent College, thank you for investing in me over the years. To First Church of the Nazarene (Vancouver, British Columbia) and Granville Chapel (Vancouver, British Columbia) where I served as a youth pastor, you showed me grace and patience; to Tsawwassen Alliance Church (Tsawwassen, British Columbia) where my family and I attend, thank you for all your prayers and encouragement. With gratitude to my academic team: Dr. Loren Kerns, Dr. Clifford Berger, Dr. Darrell Peregrym, Dr. Leonard Hjalmarson, Rev. Stephen Kroeker, and Rochelle Deans, thank you for your patience, support, and encouragement in seeing me finish this part of the journey. I am so thankful and indebted to my family: my parents, Lucille and George Thompson; and my sister, Pam, and her husband, Lee, for their love and encouragement. Most of all, thank you to my amazing wife Terri for your love, sacrifice, advice, and encouragement. To my son, Kurtis, and my two daughters, Jenna and Amy, who have sacrificed so that I could complete this dissertation; and to my gracious Lord Jesus, who knows me well, and in spite of that, really likes me. v ABSTRACT In our western culture, many churches, pastors, and Christian leaders have adopted secular leadership that emphasizes performance and results rather than emphasizing spiritual leadership based in our identity in Christ as a servant leader and the process of brokenness that God uses to develop His servants. Recent literature has suggested that pastors and Christian leaders need to revisit the need for brokenness in their Christian formation as a critical success factor in their leadership. The Church should consider brokenness as a critical success factor in the effective leadership of the pastor. This dissertation will concentrate on the importance of brokenness in the life of the pastor as it relates to spiritual leadership in the midst of secular practices and leadership approaches used in the Church. Section 1 outlines the problem pastors and Christian leaders are facing in the church. Section 2 explores the various approaches to brokenness; these approaches fall short of expressing the life and Spirit of the Lord Jesus being released through us. Section 3 outlines the thesis of brokenness as a critical success factor in the life and leadership of the pastor/Christian leader and the blessings derived from a lifestyle of brokenness. Section 4 consists of the Artifact description. Section 5 is the Artifact specification (book proposal). Section 6 is the postscript. Appendix A is the artifact itself, a non-fiction e- book written to inform pastors and Christian leaders about brokenness as it relates to the spiritual formation of the leader and the benefits associated with brokenness. Appendix B shares survey answers regarding brokenness obtained from various pastors and Christian leaders. vi SECTION 1 THE PROBLEM One Pastor’s Story Mark has been a Senior Pastor of a large church for over 10 years. He’s been a visionary: he developed two other church campuses where he preaches via satellite every Sunday; he has taken on a large building project and has seen much fruit in his ministry. Mark has completed his MDiv and is now beginning a DMin with the hope of publishing or maybe even teaching in a Bible College or Seminary setting one day. He faithfully attends an annual Pastors’ Conference and seeks to collect new leadership strategies and programs that will enhance his ministry. Mark is well respected within his sphere of colleagues. Mark always believed that if he could improve his leadership skills, the church would increase and have a greater impact for the Kingdom. His Church Board was made up of business and professional people who were successful in their respective sectors and who expected good outcomes. After each Leadership Conference, Mark would bring back some new strategy, model, or principle that he felt would “ignite” his Church Board, staff, congregation, and himself to minister more effectively. After the most recent conference, Mark is encouraged to implement some changes that will bring better outcomes. Recently a number of setbacks have arisen: some of his key staff have moved on due to better opportunities; the Church has seen a recent downturn in attendance on Sundays; the number of newcomers has decreased (both in his main church and the 1 2 satellite campuses), possibly due to a recent increase in the housing market in Vancouver, as people either can no longer afford to purchase new homes in the city, or older people feel that it is the right time to sell and “downsize.” Mark has a growing sense that he is less and less in control. His 17-year-old son, Todd, has decided that he’s no longer a Christian and doesn’t want to attend youth group or even go to church on Sundays anymore. Mark’s marriage to Debbie is in trouble. She’s told him that she wants out of the marriage and is ready to file for divorce. The Church Board asked Mark to attend an unscheduled meeting on Monday night (board meetings are always on Thursdays) and Mark feels like the board is going to release him. The dreams Mark thought God wanted for him and his church don’t seem to be coming true. He knows he’s called to be a leader but everything he’s learned isn’t working. He is still committed to Jesus, he’s working hard, and he has strived to make an impact. What if God is bringing Mark to a place of brokenness so that he can acknowledge his brokenness and, in true submission, walk as Jesus did? Statement of the Problem and Purpose of the Study In the Western Church today, with its focus on individualism and professionalism, and its need to show results for its efforts, Christian leadership, it would appear, has adopted secular principles in addition to spiritual leadership. Kevin Mannoia writes, The secular leadership paradigm emphasizes function, results and performance. It says to would-be leaders, “learn the system” in an attempt to replicate results. Spiritual leadership must emphasize character, essence and nature while saying, “become.” At this point, spiritual leadership asserts itself as counter cultural and stands in stark contrast, and often opposition, to the basic elements of secular leadership. Becoming this kind of leader, then, is a process. Rooted in Scripture
Description: