THE STATIC AND DYNAMIC STABILITY OF CLAMPED SHALLOW CIRCULAR ARCHES Thesis by Man Cheong Cheung In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement For the Degree of Doctor sf Phils sophy California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California n969 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author is deeply indebted to Dr. C. D. Babcock, Jr. for guidance and encouragement received during the course of this investi- gation. The valuable suggestions of Dr. E. E. Sechler are gratefully acknowledged. Appreciation is expressed for the help received from Mr. George Carlson of the Aeronautics Shop, Mr. Marvin Yessey of the Electronics Laboratory. Very much appreciated was the help of Miss Helen Burrus for the typing and of Mrs. Betty Wood for the graphs and figures. This study was supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific. Research, Office sf Aerospace Research, United States Air Force under Grant No. AFOSR 68- 1424. The financial aid of a GAECIT Fellowship is also deeply appreciated. iii ABSTRACT An experimental investigation of the relationship between the e hen omen on dynamic buckling and the static buckling was carried out. The first half of the paper studies the stability of shallow arches subjected to lateral forces. Concentrated static and step loads were applied to circular arches with geometric parameters 7 < ?'< 20. Equilibrium path and the dynamic response at the loading position were recorded. Dynamic buckling is distinct. Supercritical and subcritical responses were separated by 0.5 O /o of the total load. The sensitivity of the arch to loading imperfection was studied. The effect was pro- nounced in the static tests but moderate in the dynamic responses. The second half of the paper studies the response of clamped circular arches under lateral impulse. The motion of the arch was recorded by a high speed camera and the deflected arch shape was measured in detail. The response was expressed in terms of the average displacement and three generalized displacement coordinates representing the amplitudes of the assumed mode shapes. The critical impulse is defined as the impulse level at the inflection point of the curve of maximum response versus impulse. iv NOMENCLATURE 2 Cross sectional area of the arch (in ) Arch width (in) Young's Modulus (psi) Arch thickness (in) Central arch rise (in) 2' Specific impulse (lb- see /in ) 4 Moment of inertia (in 41 ' Jk2 Nondimensional impulse = h 4 p~ Arch length (in) Distance between load and center of arch (in) Concentrated load (1bB PW7r -q ' A l/2 Nondimensional load = ( m Generalized displacement coordinates Arch radius (in) Time (sec) Arc11 displacement (in) Nondimensional average displacement weight of explosive (gm) Arch coordinate (radians) Arch half angle (radians) - Geometric parameter = 4Rh -A E Percentage of eccentricity = L 3 Mass density (slug/in ) v NOMENCLATURE (Cont'd) Subscripts: CR Experimental critical value CE Clas sicaP theoretical value MAX Maximum value TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 11. STABILITY OF CLAMPED SHALLOW CIRCULAR ARCHES UNDER STATIC CONCENTRATED LOADS AND STEP CONCENTRATED LOADS A. Experiment 1. Test Specimens 2. Experimental Setup 3. Test Procedure B. Test Results C. Conclusions 119. STABILITY OF CLAMPED SHALLOW CIRCULAR ARCHES UNDER LJNIFQRaaLY DISTRIBUTED IMPULSIVE LOAD A. Experiment 1. Impulsive Load 2. Camera Setup 3. Response Measurement 4. Test Procedure B. Test Results C. Conclusion, REFERENCES APPENDIX I APPENDIX I1 TABLES FIGURES LIST OF TABLES TABLE Page I Geometric Descriptions of the Tested Arches 44 11 Nondimensional Static Critical Load 45 111 Critical Step Load 46 IV Geometric Description of Tested Arches 54 V Surnnnary of Impulse Tests 55 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page I Response of Linear Spring Mass System 56 2 Nonlinear Response of One Degree of Freedom 5 7 System Nonlinear Response of Two Degrees of Freedom System Coordinate System of Circular Arch Typical Tensile Test of Curved 2024 Aluminum Specimen Circular Arch Before and After Installation in Steel Frame The Static and Dynamic Test Apparatus Knife Edge Assembly Initial Imperfection Measuring Equipment Measuring of Initial Imperfection of Circuiar Arch Imperfections of the Tested Arches Nondimensional Critical Static Load vs. Loading Imperfection Comparison of Static Experiments to Theoretical Static Buckling Load Dynamic Response of Arch 32, 7 = 18.66, E = 0.00 Dynamic Response of Arch 29, Y = 14.40, = 0.00 Dynamic Response of Arch 28, 7 = 10.96, g: = 0.80 Dynamic Response of Arch 25, = 7. MCBa , = 0.00 Load Deflection Curve for Arch 32, 7 = 18.66 Load Deflection Curve for Arch 29, = 14.40 LIST OF FIGURES' (ContI d) Figure Page 15c Load Deflection Curve for Arch 28, = 10.96 74 15d Load Deflection Curve for Arch 25, = 7.40 75 . 16 Nondimensional Critical Step Load vs Loading 76 Imperfection Comparison of Dynamic Experiment to Theoretical 97 Step Buckling Load Calibration of Explosive (Silver Acetylide-Silver 78 Nitrate) Camera Setup 79 Film Reader to Measure Deformed Arch Shape 79 Performance and Synchronization of the High Speed 80 Camera Initial Imperfections of the Tested Arches 8 1 Initial Imperfections of the Tested Arches 82 Impulse vs Maximum Average Displacement for 83 Clamped Arch Comparison of the Present Results with Humphreys' 84 Experiments Deformed Shapes of Arch 339 85 Deformed Shapes of Arch 338 86 i Response of Arch B9, = 8.43 87 Response of Arch B6, .: 10.45 88 Response of Arch B7, += 12. 19 89 Response of Arch B8, ? = 14.82 90 i Response of Arch C3, = 12.60 9 1 LIST OF FIGURES (Contfd) Figure Page 26f Response of Arch C2, = 15.08 92 26g Response of Arch C5, -i = 16.66 93 26h Response of Arch C 4 , I = 16.95 94 26i Response of Arch C8, = 20.33 95 i 26j Response of Arch C7, = 21.65 96 T= 26 k Response of Arch C9, 27.75 97 = 27a Trajectories of Arches for Y 10 98 = 27b Trajectories of Arches for 7 20 99 = 28a Arch Antisymmetric Response for 'j' 10 100 28b Arch Antispmetric Response for ? ' = 20 101 29 Coordinate System for Finding Best Fit to the 102 Measured Hnitital Imperfections Coordinate System for the Clamped Circular Arches
Description: