TThhee ssooiill ooff aabbaannddoonneedd ffaarrmmllaanndd,, CCuummbbeerrllaanndd PPllaaiinn WWooooddllaanndd aanndd rreessttoorreedd vveeggeettaattiioonn:: iimmpplliiccaattiioonnss ffoorr tthhee rreessttoorraattiioonn ooff aann EEnnddaannggeerreedd EEccoollooggiiccaall CCoommmmuunniittyy Jennifer Kit Fitzgerald A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Western Sydney, Australia. July, 2009. Cumberland Plain Woodland at Hoxton Park. Photo by Jennifer Kit Fitzgerald Abandoned farmland at Scheyville National Park. Photo by Jennifer Kit Fitzgerald ii DDeeccllaarraattiioonn This thesis does not incorporate, without acknowledgement, any material previously submitted for a degree or diploma in any university and to the best of my knowledge and belief it does not contain any material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text. Jennifer Kit Fitzgerald, July 2009. iii AAbbssttrraacctt The restoration and management of Cumberland Plain Woodland, an „Endangered Ecological Community‟ found only in western Sydney, has occurred without a sound understanding of soil-vegetation relationships within this community. Since 1992, large tracts of abandoned farmland, which were originally covered with Cumberland Plain Woodland, have been planted with native trees and shrubs to facilitate woodland development. This approach was based on the theory of (small-scale) patch dynamics since it was envisaged that the developing overstorey would facilitate changes to the soil environment, which would advantage native woodland species and disadvantage exotic pasture species. To date, this approach has had limited success and importantly, the restoration of Cumberland Plain Woodland has ignored: (a) characterisation of the soil environment; (b) how different patch types (e.g. tree and shrub) influence the soil; (c) how past land use has affected the soil; and (d) the effects of revegetation on soil properties and processes. These issues are of the utmost importance since soil-related barriers to natural regeneration and restoration may exist as a result of a very long history of agriculture. This thesis addressed these issues by investigating the soils of abandoned farmland, Cumberland Plain Woodland and restored areas of various ages. In addition to this, the impacts of various patch types (woodland tree, shrub and open, as well as improved perennial pasture) on soil properties and processes, as well as the ground flora were examined. Several soil chemical properties and ecological processes were identified as being of particular importance for the ecology of Cumberland Plain Woodland and its restoration on abandoned farmland. The greatest impact on the soil from past agricultural land use was an increase in the concentration of nitrate, ammonium and total nitrogen within the pasture compared to the woodland patch types, although there was an appreciable amount of site-to-site variability. Despite this, data from two different studies, which were carried out over different spatio-temporal scales, suggest that the abandoned pasture and Cumberland Plain Woodland function differently with respect to the cycling of nitrogen and this may hinder restoration efforts. iv AAcckknnoowwlleeddggeemmeennttss Special thanks to my Supervisor, Dr. E. Charles Morris (UWS), for his support and help in securing much-needed funds for this research. Thanks also to Associate Professor David Eldridge (DNR/UNSW), who co-supervised this work during 2006 and part-way through 2007. The financial support I received from the University of Western Sydney, by way of a Postgraduate Research Award, was invaluable. I am also grateful to the Penrith Lakes Development Corporation and the Linnaean Society of New South Wales for funding. A very big thank you is extended to those who helped with field and laboratory work, namely: Mark Emmanuel (UWS), Dorothy Yu (UNSW) and Chris Myers (UNSW) for their assistance with soil chemical determinations and analytical techniques; Nyree Webster (UNSW) for her untiring field assistance; Adam Birnbaum (UNSW) for his help with respiration measurements and Peter Nichols (UWS) and Alison Hewitt (UNE) for assistance in the field. Thanks also to Frank Hemming (UNSW) for his help with plant identification, Monique de Barse (UWS) for help with PRIMER, Dani Drewry (UWS) and Penny Watson (UWS) for early discussions on Cumberland Plain Woodland and Graeme Hastwell (UWS) for his input on various topics relating to this research. I gratefully acknowledge the National Parks and Wildlife Service (Col Davidson and Jonathon Sanders), the Botanic Gardens Trust (Peter Cuneo), the Department of Defence (Marina Peterson and Daryle McKone), the Sydney Catchment Authority (Jane MacCormick) and Greening Australia (Tim Beshara) for allowing me access to land that was under their control. Special thanks to Debra Little, Lotte von Richter and Doug Benson (all Royal Botanic Gardens) for sharing their knowledge on the Cumberland Plain Woodland at Mount Annan. Very special thanks to my dear friend Carolyn Stonham, my mother Jan Smith and my nanna Kitty Fitzgerald, for their continued support and encouragement. Most importantly, I thank my partner Scott Mooney. v TThhiiss tthheessiiss iiss ddeeddiiccaatteedd ttoo ttwwoo vveerryy ssttrroonngg wwoommeenn,, JJaann LLoouuiissee SSmmiitthh aanndd KKiittttyy FFiittzzggeerraalldd.. II aallssoo ddeeddiiccaattee tthhiiss wwoorrkk ttoo mmyy ggrraannddffaatthheerr,, AArrtthhuurr BBrriiddggeewwaatteerr,, wwhhoo wwaass aa mmaann wweellll--aahheeaadd ooff hhiiss ttiimmee.. vi TTaabbllee ooff ccoonntteennttss CHAPTER 1: The significance of Cumberland Plain Woodland and the need for soil-based research ..................................................................... 1 1.1 The importance of Cumberland Plain Woodland ............................................... 1 1.2 The New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 ................... 3 1.3 Recovery of threatened species, populations and ecological communities ......... 4 1.4 Previous research on the soils and vegetation of the Cumberland Plain ............. 7 1.5 The attempted restoration of Cumberland Plain Woodland ................................ 9 1.6 The impacts of agriculture on the soil and vegetation ...................................... 13 1.7 Changes to the soil and vegetation during old field succession ........................ 15 1.8 Potential effects of fire on the soil environment .............................................. 18 1.9 The restoration and management of degraded woodlands ................................ 20 1.10 Aims of this thesis .......................................................................................... 24 CHAPTER 2: Description of the Cumberland Plain and study sites ....................... 25 2.1 The Cumberland Plain .................................................................................... 25 2.1.1 Location ................................................................................................... 25 2.1.2 Climate .................................................................................................... 26 2.1.3 Physiography ........................................................................................... 31 2.1.4 Geology ................................................................................................... 32 2.1.5 Soil associations and soil landscapes ........................................................ 33 2.1.6 Soil types and soil materials ..................................................................... 35 2.1.7 European land use history ........................................................................ 36 2.1.7.1 Discovery and settlement of the Cumberland Plain 1789-1821 .......... 36 2.1.7.2 Agricultural consolidation of the Cumberland Plain 1821-1858 ......... 42 2.1.7.3 Industrialisation of the Cumberland Plain 1858-1900 ........................ 43 2.1.7.4 Urbanisation of the Cumberland Plain 1880-present day ................... 44 2.1.8 Vegetation ................................................................................................ 46 2.2 The study sites ................................................................................................ 49 2.2.1 Hoxton Park ............................................................................................. 49 2.2.1.1 Location ............................................................................................ 49 2.2.1.2 Climate and physical geography ........................................................ 49 2.2.1.3 Vegetation ........................................................................................ 51 2.2.1.4 European land use history ................................................................. 51 2.2.2 Mount Annan Botanic Garden .................................................................. 52 2.2.2.1 Location ............................................................................................ 52 2.2.2.2 Climate and physical geography ........................................................ 52 2.2.2.3 Vegetation ........................................................................................ 52 2.2.2.4 European land use history ................................................................. 53 2.2.3 Orchard Hills Defence Estate ................................................................... 53 2.2.3.1 Location ............................................................................................ 53 2.2.3.2 Climate and physical geography ........................................................ 53 2.2.3.3 Vegetation ........................................................................................ 54 2.2.3.4 European land use history ................................................................. 54 vii 2.2.4 Prospect Reservoir ..................................................................................55 2.2.4.1 Location ........................................................................................... 55 2.2.4.2 Climate and physical geography ....................................................... 55 2.2.4.3 Vegetation ....................................................................................... 55 2.2.4.4 European land use history ................................................................ 56 2.2.5 Scheyville National Park ......................................................................... 56 2.2.5.1 Location ........................................................................................... 56 2.2.5.2 Climate and physical geography ....................................................... 56 2.2.5.3 Vegetation ....................................................................................... 57 2.2.5.4 European land use history ................................................................ 57 CHAPTER 3: The soil of abandoned farmland and Cumberland Plain Woodland. 61 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 61 3.2 Methodology ................................................................................................. 62 3.2.1 Experimental design ................................................................................ 62 3.2.2 Field and soil sampling ............................................................................ 63 3.2.3 Soil physical and chemical determinations .............................................. 69 3.2.3.1 Bulk density ..................................................................................... 70 3.2.3.2 Soil moisture content ....................................................................... 70 3.2.3.3 pH .................................................................................................... 70 3.2.3.4 Electrical conductivity ..................................................................... 71 3.2.3.5 Active C .......................................................................................... 71 3.2.3.6 Extractable P .................................................................................... 72 3.2.3.7 Nitrate and ammonium ..................................................................... 72 3.2.3.8 Total C, total N and total S ............................................................... 73 3.2.4 Statistical analyses .................................................................................. 73 3.3 Results ........................................................................................................... 74 3.3.1 Bulk density and soil moisture content .................................................... 74 3.3.2 pH and electrical conductivity ................................................................. 75 3.3.3 Active C and total C ................................................................................ 80 3.3.4 Extractable P and total S .......................................................................... 82 3.3.5 Nitrate, ammonium and total N ............................................................... 82 3.4 Discussion ..................................................................................................... 87 CHAPTER 4: The ground flora of abandoned farmland and Cumberland Plain Woodland and its relationship with soil chemical properties .. 102 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 102 4.2 Methodology ............................................................................................... 104 4.2.1 Experimental design .............................................................................. 104 4.2.2 Vegetation and soil sampling ................................................................. 104 4.2.3 Univariate analysis ................................................................................ 105 4.2.4 Multivariate analyses ............................................................................. 105 4.2.4.1 Examining the floristic similarity of samples using cluster analysis and ordination .................................................................................................. 106 4.2.4.2 Investigating the effects of site and patch type on ground species composition and cover with analysis of similarity and the SIMPER routine ................................................................................................................... 106 viii 4.2.4.3 Linking the floristic and soil data using the BVSTEP procedure ..... 108 4.3 Results ......................................................................................................... 109 4.3.1 Univariate analysis ................................................................................ 109 4.3.2 Multivariate analyses ............................................................................. 109 4.3.2.1 Cluster analysis and ordination ....................................................... 109 4.3.2.2 Analysis of similarity and SIMPER analysis .................................. 113 4.3.2.3 BVSTEP analysis ........................................................................... 118 4.4 Discussion ................................................................................................... 121 CHAPTER 5: Soil chemical fertility and biotic processes of abandoned farmland, endangered woodland and restored vegetation at Hoxton Park .............................................................................................. 131 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 131 5.2 Methodology ............................................................................................... 133 5.2.1 Site description ...................................................................................... 133 5.2.2 Experimental design .............................................................................. 134 5.2.3 Soil sampling ........................................................................................ 137 5.2.3.1 Chemical properties and respiration ............................................... 137 5.2.3.2 Decomposition ............................................................................... 139 5.2.4 Statistical analysis ................................................................................. 142 5.3 Results ......................................................................................................... 143 5.3.1 Variables measured once during the year ............................................... 143 5.3.1.1 Bray 1 P ......................................................................................... 143 5.3.1.2 Total C ........................................................................................... 143 5.3.1.3 Total N .......................................................................................... 144 5.3.1.4 C:N ratio ........................................................................................ 144 5.3.2 Variables measured twice throughout the year ....................................... 144 5.3.2.1 pH .................................................................................................. 144 5.3.2.2 Active C ........................................................................................ 148 5.3.2.3 Respiration ..................................................................................... 148 5.3.3 Variables measured four times throughout the year ............................... 150 5.3.3.1 Soil moisture content ..................................................................... 150 5.3.3.2 Nitrate ............................................................................................ 150 5.3.3.3 Ammonium .................................................................................... 153 5.3.4 Decomposition ...................................................................................... 157 5.4 Discussion ................................................................................................... 159 CHAPTER 6: The implications of this research for the management and restoration of Cumberland Plain Woodland ............................................. 167 REFERENCES .................................................................................................... 172 APPENDICES ..................................................................................................... 204 ix LLiisstt ooff ttaabblleess TABLE 1.1 The recovery strategies and priority actions for Cumberland Plain Woodland .................................................................................6 TABLE 1.2 Previous research on the soils of the Cumberland Plain ......................8 TABLE 1.3 Previous research on the vegetation of the Cumberland Plain ........... 10 TABLE 2.1 Size of the Local Government Areas associated with the Cumberland Plain and the proportion of their area located within the region ................................................................................................ 26 TABLE 2.2 The dominant processes contributing to the formation of profile morphology in brown, red and yellow podzolic soils and their degree of development for each soil type ................................ 36 TABLE 2.3 Morphological properties of the soil materials from the Blacktown soil landscape and their limitations ................................................ 37 TABLE 2.4 The pre-1750 and current (2002) extent of the vegetation communities on the Cumberland Plain and the date they were listed on the TSC Act ................................................................................. 46 TABLE 2.5 The diagnostic floral species for the various strata within Shale Hills Woodland and Shale Plains Woodland ................................... 48 TABLE 2.6 Attributes and limitations for urban and rural development of the Blacktown and Luddenham soil landscapes ............................ 50 TABLE 2.7 Indicators of the extent and nature of agricultural activities on abandoned farmland at Scheyville .......................................... 59 TABLE 3.1 Sampling dates for each site, along with the mean minimum and maximum temperatures and total rainfall during the four week period (28 days) prior to sampling .......................................... 68 TABLE 3.2 Mean concentrations and the upper (L2) and lower (L1) 95% confidence limits for the physical and chemical soil properties, averaged over all patch types and soil depths, at each site ....... 76 TABLE 3.3 Mean concentrations and the upper (L2) and lower (L1) 95% confidence limits for the physical and chemical soil properties for the main effects of patch type ............................................ 78 TABLE 3.4 Mean concentrations and the upper (L2) and lower (L1) 95% confidence limits for the physical and chemical soil properties for the main effects of soil depth ............................................ 78 TABLE 4.1a Results of the 2-way crossed ANOSIM for the site factor based on ground species composition and cover .................................. 114 TABLE 4.1b Results of the 2-way crossed ANOSIM for the patch type factor based on ground species composition and cover .............................. 114 TABLE 4.2 The percentage dissimilarity, based on fourth root transformed data, for all pair wise combinations of sites and the individual and cumulative contributions from the top three species for each comparison ............................................................................ 115 x
Description: