THE SHOCK OF THE OLD Technology and global history since 1900 DAVID EDGERTON SShhoocckk ooff OOlldd..iinnddbb iiiiii 2222//1111//0077 1133::0055::1199 THE SHOCK OF THE OLD ‘Offers a view of technology that matters in a world convinced that it is discovering everything for the fi rst time’ Guardian ‘Alan Bennett’s history boys have a keen rival in audacious revisionism in David Edgerton’s latest book. Where the young historians delighted in proclaiming that “Stalin was a sweetie and Wilfred Owen was a wuss”, Edgerton focuses on unquestioned assumptions about the history of technology.’ TLS ‘A quiet pleasure and salutary corrective … Edgerton leaves us with an infi nitely more nuanced, balanced and perceptive account of technology and social change than conventional accounts would allow.’ David Goldblatt, Independent ‘The Shock of the Old is a book I can use. I can take it in two hands and bash it over the heads of every techno-nerd, computer geek and neophiliac futurologist I meet.’ Simon Jenkins ‘I liked Edgerton’s challenging thesis, and I want to cheer it on in the face of our throw-away world of non-stop neophilia’ John Cornwell, Sunday Times ‘Edgerton’s innovation is to focus on the technologies we actually use rather than Tomorrow’s World-style bright new things that mostly never catch on or last.’ Peter Forbes, Daily Mail ‘Original and timely … a compelling tour de force’ Nature ‘A pathbreaking work’ American Scientist ‘Newfangled things are sexy, but how signifi cant are they? … Edgerton provides a corrective by emphasising some of the overlooked technologies that affect the lives of many’ John Sparks, Newsweek SShhoocckk ooff OOlldd..iinnddbb ii 2222//1111//0077 1133::0055::1188 ‘Packed with iconoclastic, thought-provoking ideas that challenge our innovation-centric view of technology.’ Icon ‘Lucid and completely convincing … points are made without a trace of romanticism, which only adds to the power of his argument. [The] optimistic political message is merely one of this splendid book’s strengths.’ Journal of American History DAVID EDGERTON is the Hans Rausing Professor at Imperial College London, where he was the founding director of the Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine. He has challenged conventional analyses of technology for twenty years, and is a regular in the press, on television and radio. He is married with three children and lives in London. SShhoocckk ooff OOlldd..iinnddbb iiii 2222//1111//0077 1133::0055::1199 This paperback edition published in 2008 First published in Great Britain in 2006 by PROFILE BOOKS LTD 3a Exmouth House Pine Street Exmouth Market London ec1r 0jh www.profi lebooks.com Copyright © David Edgerton, 2006, 2008 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 Typeset in Minion by MacGuru Ltd [email protected] Printed and bound in Great Britain by Bookmarque, Croydon, Surrey The moral right of the author has been asserted. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978 1 86197 306 1 This book is printed on FSC certifi ed paper Cert no. TT-COC-002227 SShhoocckk ooff OOlldd..iinnddbb iivv 2222//1111//0077 1133::0055::1199 CONTENTS Introduction ix 1 Signifi cance 1 2 Time 28 3 Production 52 4 Maintenance 75 5 Nations 103 6 War 138 7 Killing 160 8 Invention 184 Conclusion 206 Notes 213 Selected Bibliography 240 Acknowledgements 248 List of Illustrations 250 Index 251 SShhoocckk ooff OOlldd..iinnddbb vv 2222//1111//0077 1133::0055::2200 For Andrew SShhoocckk ooff OOlldd..iinnddbb vvii 2222//1111//0077 1133::0055::2200 I stood on a hill and I saw the Old approaching, but it came as the New. It hobbled up on new crutches which no one had ever seen before and stank of new smells of decay which no one had ever smelt before. Bertolt Brecht (1939), from ‘Parade of the Old New’, in Bertolt Brecht: Poems 1913–1956, John Willett and Ralph Manheim (eds) (London: Methuen, 1987), p. 323 SShhoocckk ooff OOlldd..iinnddbb vviiii 2222//1111//0077 1133::0055::2200 SShhoocckk ooff OOlldd..iinnddbb vviiiiii 2222//1111//0077 1133::0055::2200 Introduction Much of what is written on the history of technology is for boys of all ages. This book is a history for grown-ups of all genders. We have lived with technology for a long time, and collectively we know a lot about it. From economists to ecologists, from antiquarians to historians, people have had different views about the material world around us and how it has changed. Yet too often the agenda for discussing the past, present and future of technology is set by the promoters of new technologies. When we are told about technology from on high we are made to think about novelty and the future. For many decades now the term ‘technol- ogy’ has been closely linked with invention (the creation of a new idea) and innovation (the fi rst use of a new idea). Talk about technology centres on research and development, patents and the early stages of use, for which the term diffusion is used. The timelines of technological history, and they abound, are based on dates of invention and innovation. The most signifi cant twentieth-century technologies are often reduced to the following: fl ight (1903), nuclear power (1945), contraception (1955), and the internet (1965). We are told that change is taking place at an ever- accelerating pace, and that the new is increasingly powerful. The world, the gurus insist, is entering a new historical epoch as a result of technol- ogy. In the new economy, in new times, in our post-industrial and post- modern condition, knowledge of the present and past is supposedly ever less relevant. Inventors, even in these post-modern times, are ‘ahead of their time’, while societies suffer from the grip of the past, resulting in a supposed slowness to adapt to new technology. There are new things under the sun, and the world is indeed changing radically, but this way of thinking is not among them. Although the emphasis on the future itself suggests originality, this kind of ix SShhoocckk ooff OOlldd..iinnddbb iixx 2222//1111//0077 1133::0055::2200
Description: