The Rule of Crisis PDF
Preview The Rule of Crisis
Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice 64 Pierre Auriel Olivier Beaud Editors Carl Wellman The Rule of Crisis Terrorism, Emergency Legislation and the Rule of Law Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice Volume 64 Series editors Mortimer Sellers, University of Baltimore James Maxeiner, University of Baltimore Board of Editors Myroslava Antonovych, Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Nadia de Araújo, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro Jasna Bakšic-Muftic, University of Sarajevo David L. Carey Miller, University of Aberdeen Loussia P. Musse Félix, University of Brasilia Emanuel Gross, University of Haifa James E. Hickey Jr., Hofstra University Jan Klabbers, University of Helsinki Cláudia Lima Marques, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Aniceto Masferrer, University of Valencia Eric Millard, West Paris University Gabriël A. Moens, Curtin University Raul C. Pangalangan, University of the Philippines Ricardo Leite Pinto, Lusíada University of Lisbon Mizanur Rahman, University of Dhaka Keita Sato, Chuo University Poonam Saxena, University of Delhi Gerry Simpson, London School of Economics Eduard Somers, University of Ghent Xinqiang Sun, Shandong University Tadeusz Tomaszewski, Warsaw University Jaap de Zwaan, Erasmus University Rotterdam More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/7888 Pierre Auriel Olivier Beaud (cid:129) Carl Wellman Editors The Rule of Crisis Terrorism, Emergency Legislation and the Rule of Law 123 Editors Pierre Auriel Carl Wellman UniversitéParis-II Panthéon-Assas Department ofPhilosophy Paris Washington University in St.Louis France St.Louis, MO USA Olivier Beaud UniversitéParis-II Panthéon-Assas Paris France ISSN 1534-6781 ISSN 2214-9902 (electronic) Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives onLawandJustice ISBN978-3-319-74472-8 ISBN978-3-319-74473-5 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74473-5 LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2018930126 ©SpringerInternationalPublishingAG2018 Thisworkissubjecttocopyright.AllrightsarereservedbythePublisher,whetherthewholeorpart of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission orinformationstorageandretrieval,electronicadaptation,computersoftware,orbysimilarordissimilar methodologynowknownorhereafterdeveloped. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publicationdoesnotimply,evenintheabsenceofaspecificstatement,thatsuchnamesareexemptfrom therelevantprotectivelawsandregulationsandthereforefreeforgeneraluse. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authorsortheeditorsgiveawarranty,expressorimplied,withrespecttothematerialcontainedhereinor for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictionalclaimsinpublishedmapsandinstitutionalaffiliations. Printedonacid-freepaper ThisSpringerimprintispublishedbytheregisteredcompanySpringerInternationalPublishingAG partofSpringerNature Theregisteredcompanyaddressis:Gewerbestrasse11,6330Cham,Switzerland Contents Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Pierre Auriel Conceptual Analysis and Emergency Legislation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Carl Wellman Part I Concepts and Justification of Emergency Legislations Emergencies in Sober Hobbesianism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Tom Sorell The State of Exception and the Terrorist Threat—An Obsolete Combination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 François Saint-Bonnet The Continued Exceptionalism of the American Response to Daesh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 Kent Roach Dignity, Emergency, Exception. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 Alon Harel and Assaf Sharon Part II Risk and Failure of Emergency Legislations Reconciling International Human Rights Law with Executive Non-trial-Based Counter-Terror Measures: The Case of UK Temporary Exclusion Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 Helen M. Fenwick Polish Martial Law on the Docket—Judging the Past and the Clash of Judicial Narratives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 Jerzy Zajadło and Tomasz Tadeusz Koncewicz v vi Contents Emergency as a State of Mind—The Case of Israel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185 Suzie Navot The French Case or the Hidden Dangers of a Long-Term State of Emergency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213 Cécile Guérin-Bargues “Anything Goes”: How Does French Law Deal with the State of Emergency?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 Olivier Beaud The German Reticence Vis-à-Vis the State of Emergency . . . . . . . . . . . 241 Matthias Jestaedt Contributors Pierre Auriel Centre de droit Européen, Institut Michel Villey pour la culture juridique et la philosophie du droit, University Paris-II Panthéon-Assas, Paris, France OlivierBeaud InstitutMichelVilleypourlaculturejuridiqueetlaphilosophiedu droit, University Paris-II Panthéon-Assas, Paris, France Helen M. Fenwick University of Durham, Durham, UK Cécile Guérin-Bargues Institut Michel Villey pour la culture juridique et la philosophie du droit, University Paris Nanterre, Paris, France Alon Harel Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel Matthias Jestaedt University of Freiburg, Institut für Staatswissenschaft und Rechtsphilosophie, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany Tomasz Tadeusz Koncewicz Department of European and Comparative Law, FacultyofLawandAdministration,UniversityofGdańsk,Gdańsk,Poland;LAPA CraneFellow,PrograminLawandPublicAffairs,PrincetonUniversity,Princeton, USA Suzie Navot The Striks School of Law, College of Management Academic Studies, Rishon Lezion, Israel Kent Roach Prichard Wilson Chair in Law and Public Policy, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada FrançoisSaint-Bonnet UniversityParis-IIPanthéon-Assas,InstitutMichelVilley pour la culture juridique et la philosophie du droit, Paris, France Assaf Sharon Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel vii viii Contributors Tom Sorell University of Warwick, Coventry, UK Carl Wellman Washington University, St. Louis, USA JerzyZajadło DepartmentofTheoryandPhilosophyofStateandLaw,Facultyof Law and Administration, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland Introduction Pierre Auriel Abstract In the aftermath of the November 2015 Paris Terrorist Attacks, the Maisonfrançaised’Oxfordorganisedaconferenceonemergencylegislationfroma comparative point of view. This conference forms the basis of this book. Having describedthisprojectanditsmethodologicalframework,thisintroductionpresents two central arguments of this book. First, the diversity of emergency or anti-terrorism legislation precludes the possibility of a universal category for all of themshouldberegardedasapreliminaryforanyresearchonthistopic.Second,the protectionagainstarbitrarypowerrestsultimatelyonacommonlegalandpolitical culture shared by a society and, especially, its political actors. 1 Background Remarks IntheaftermathoftheNovember2015ParisTerroristAttacks,theFrenchlegaland political discussion focused on the state of emergency declared by François Hollande. As a French Research Center specialised in humanities, the Maison françaised’Oxfordanditsmembersweredirectlyconcernedbytheseexchanges.Its specific situation as a part of a foreign university gave us the opportunity to think about these questions from a different point of view. France was not the only country experiencing terrorist attacks and, as a consequence, implementing emer- gency legislation. It appeared that a comprehensive comparative point of view might be the key of an engaging discussion on these topics. Our project was to bring together several highly qualified academics from different countries in order to think on this common experience. Could we build a common conceptual framework? Were the risks and adverse consequences common to each country? Were foreign experiences relevant to our P.Auriel(&) CentrededroitEuropéen,InstitutMichelVilleypourlaculturejuridique etlaphilosophiedudroit,UniversityParis-IIPanthéon-Assas,Paris,France e-mail:[email protected] ©SpringerInternationalPublishingAG2018 1 P.Aurieletal.(eds.),TheRuleofCrisis,IusGentium:ComparativePerspectives onLawandJustice64,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74473-5_1
The list of books you might like
