TThhee UUnniivveerrssiittyy ooff SSoouutthheerrnn MMiissssiissssiippppii TThhee AAqquuiillaa DDiiggiittaall CCoommmmuunniittyy Dissertations Summer 8-2017 HHyyppeerrmmaassccuulliinnee,, AAnnttiiffeemmiinniinnee:: TThhee RRoollee ooff MMaassccuulliinnee IIddeennttiittyy iinn RReellaattiioonnaall AAggggrreessssiioonn AAmmoonngg GGaayy MMeenn Daniel Locke Deason University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations Part of the Counseling Psychology Commons, and the Other Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons RReeccoommmmeennddeedd CCiittaattiioonn Deason, Daniel Locke, "Hypermasculine, Antifeminine: The Role of Masculine Identity in Relational Aggression Among Gay Men" (2017). Dissertations. 910. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/910 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HYPERMASCULINE, ANTIFEMININE: THE ROLE OF MASCULINE IDENTITY IN RELATIONAL AGGRESSION AMONG GAY MEN by Daniel Locke Deason A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School and the Department of Psychology at The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Approved: ________________________________________________ Dr. Eric R. Dahlen, Committee Chair Associate Professor, Psychology ________________________________________________ Dr. Michael B. Madson, Committee Member Professor, Psychology ________________________________________________ Dr. Bonnie C. Nicholson, Committee Member Associate Professor, Psychology ________________________________________________ Dr. Richard S. Mohn, Committee Member Associate Professor, Educational Research and Administration ________________________________________________ Dr. Karen S. Coats Dean of the Graduate School August 2017 COPYRIGHT BY Daniel Locke Deason 2017 Published by the Graduate School ABSTRACT HYPERMASCULINE, ANTIFEMININE: THE ROLE OF MASCULINE IDENTITY IN RELATIONAL AGGRESSION AMONG GAY MEN by Daniel Locke Deason August 2017 Relational aggression is a form of aggression that targets a victim’s relationships or sense of inclusion. Depression, social ostracism, anxiety, and poor psychological adjustment are some of the negative correlates that have been identified in child and adolescent victims of relational aggression. For older adolescents and emerging adults, similar negative correlates have been found. Despite the efforts to identify these correlates, little research has been conducted on relational aggression among minority groups. The present study addressed relational aggression among college-aged gay- identifying men through the lens of Exclusively Masculine Identity Theory (EMIT), which was developed to account for anti-gay attitudes among heterosexual men and women. Although the factor structure of Kelley and Robertson’s measure of relational aggression in gay male relationships could not be confirmed in the present sample, the use of an alternative measure of relational aggression permitted us to test the study hypotheses. The present study found that participants with an exclusively masculine identity reported less perpetration of relational aggression, rather than more as was expected. Additionally, domains of masculine ideology appeared to be more relevant in predicting relational aggression/victimization than EMIT. Further, participants endorsed less anti-effeminacy attitudes than previous research would suggest. Similar to other ii studies, there was a positive relationship between relational aggression perpetration and victimization. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge my advisor, Dr. Eric Dahlen, for his important role in both this project as well as my graduate education. Additionally, I would like to acknowledge my committee, Drs. Madson, Nicholson, and Mohn for helping to make this project possible through their continued feedback and support. I would lastly like to acknowledge Margo Villarosa for her incredible help with the statistics in this project as well as her friendship and support throughout graduate school. iv DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this project to my partner, Robby Byrd, for his continued support of me throughout my time in graduate school and through many long days and nights of completing this dissertation. I truly believe I would not have made it this far without him, and I can never truly express how much I value his love and encouragement. I would also like to dedicate this work to my parents. My father was incredibly influential in instilling in me a sense of pride in my work and, of course, giving me plenty of laughs along this journey. I want to thank my mother for introducing me to psychology through her own work and for always being an amazing role model for me both professionally and personally. I love you both very much. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iv DEDICATION .................................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. ix LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS .............................................................................................. x CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 Relational Aggression and Victimization ....................................................................... 3 Adverse Correlates of Relational Aggression ............................................................. 5 Adverse Correlates of Relational Victimization ....................................................... 15 Cultural Differences in Relational Aggression and Victimization ............................... 17 Gay Men and Aggression.............................................................................................. 23 Relational Aggression in Gay Men ............................................................................... 25 Anti-Effeminacy Attitudes, Masculinity, and Aggression in Gay Men........................ 27 Aggression and Masculinity ..................................................................................... 30 Exclusively Masculine Identity Theory ........................................................................ 35 The Present Study ......................................................................................................... 39 CHAPTER II – METHOD................................................................................................ 43 Participants .................................................................................................................... 43 Instruments .................................................................................................................... 44 vi Demographic Questionnaire. .................................................................................... 44 Relational Aggression Scale and Relational Victimization Scale ............................ 44 Self-Report Measure of Aggression and Social Behavior Measure (SRASBM) ..... 45 Gay Identity Questionnaire (GIQ) ............................................................................ 45 Sex Stereotypically Index (SSI) ................................................................................ 46 Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory-46 (CMNI-46) ..................................... 47 Procedure ...................................................................................................................... 48 Statistical Analyses ....................................................................................................... 49 Stage 1: Data Clean-Up and Preliminary Analyses .................................................. 49 Stage 2: Confirmatory Factor Analysis..................................................................... 49 Stage 3: Primary Analyses ........................................................................................ 50 CHAPTER III - RESULTS ............................................................................................... 53 Data Clean Up and Preliminary Analyses .................................................................... 53 Primary Analyses .......................................................................................................... 61 Secondary Analyses ...................................................................................................... 76 CHAPTER IV – DISCUSSION........................................................................................ 83 Ideal and Undesirable Selves ........................................................................................ 83 Exclusively Masculine Identity and Relational Aggression/Victimization .................. 85 Normative Masculine Ideology..................................................................................... 87 Assessing Relational Aggression and Victimization Among Gay Men ....................... 89 vii Limitations and Future Directions ................................................................................ 90 APPENDIX A – Study Questionnaires ............................................................................. 97 APPENDIX B – Consent Form (SONA Participants) .................................................... 111 APPENDIX C – Consent Form (Non-SONA Participants) ............................................ 114 APPENDIX D – IRB Approval Letter ............................................................................ 117 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 118 viii
Description: