ebook img

The Regulatory Enterprise: Government, Regulation, and Legitimacy PDF

260 Pages·2010·2.152 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview The Regulatory Enterprise: Government, Regulation, and Legitimacy

THE REGULATORY ENTERPRISE 0000__PPrroosssseerr__PPrreelliimmss..iinndddd ii 55//1100//22001100 88::4444::0033 AAMM 0000__PPrroosssseerr__PPrreelliimmss..iinndddd iiii 55//1100//22001100 88::4444::0044 AAMM Th e Regulatory Enterprise Government, Regulation, and Legitimacy TONY PROSSER 1 0000__PPrroosssseerr__PPrreelliimmss..iinndddd iiiiii 55//1100//22001100 88::4444::0044 AAMM 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Th ailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © Tony Prosser, 2010 Th e moral rights of the author have been asserted Crown copyright material is reproduced under Class Licence Number C01P0000148 with the permission of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Prosser, Tony. Th e regulatory enterprise / Tony Prosser. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 978–0–19–957983–9 (hardback) 1. Administrative agencies—England. 2. Trade regulation—England. 3. Public utilities—Law and legislation—England. I. Title. KD4882.P76 2010 342.4290664—dc22 2010014344 Typeset by Newgen Imaging Systems (P) Ltd., Chennai, India Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by the MPG Books group in the UK ISBN 978–0–19–957983–9 (Hardback) 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 0000__PPrroosssseerr__PPrreelliimmss..iinndddd iivv 55//1100//22001100 88::4444::0044 AAMM Preface and Acknowledgements In 1998 I published a book entitled Law and the Regulators. I hope that it was found useful by readers, but it may have contributed to a narrow vision of reg- ulation. According to this vision, regulation is primarily economic regulation, concerned to make markets work, to mimic markets in areas of monopoly, or to protect consumers within them. Th e central examples are the work of the competition authorities and regulators of public utilities and fi nancial services. However, this vision neglects a diff erent world of regulation which is not pri- marily economic and is concerned with regulation for social reasons, not as a second best to correct market failures but as a preferred alternative to the opera- tions of the marketplace. Some of these regulators have been covered in detail in existing literature, notably the Health and Safety Executive, but others, such as regulators for health and social care, have attracted far less attention. Many of the institutions are closely linked to government, but also have their own areas of autonomy; the map of the regulatory terrain is highly complex. Th is book, which is very diff erent from its predecessor, is designed to correct this partial vision and expand the terrain of regulatory studies in a way which refl ects developments in academic theory of regulation. In addition to mapping a broader regulatory terrain, I shall suggest that its breadth does not prevent us from developing coherent means of understand- ing the terrain and normative principles about how regulators should operate. Th us I develop a set of models which can be used for analytical and critical work. Th ey are derived from the regulatory purposes evident in each case, and are in brief: regulation to maximize economic effi ciency and consumer choice; regulation to protect human rights; regulation to promote social solidarity and social inclusion; and regulation as providing a site for deliberation. Th ese mod- els are then applied to 10 diff erent regulatory bodies. In this way I hope to show that, despite the breadth of the regulation studied in this book, it is not simply a set of uncoordinated political and social interventions even after we leave the familiar shores of economic regulation. In brief, the regulatory enterprise is an enterprise of principle and one which, however broadly conceived, displays a certain coherence. Th ere are a number of institutions and individuals whom I must thank for their help in writing this book. Th e generous study leave of the University of Bristol School of Law made writing this book possible at a time when I was also heavily involved with the burdens of research assessment, and I have had very productive discussions with colleagues here. I gained much theoretical enlight- enment and was able to gather some empirical evidence through the European 0000__PPrroosssseerr__PPrreelliimmss..iinndddd vv 55//1100//22001100 88::4444::0044 AAMM vi Preface and Acknowledgements Commission FP6-funded project on Refl exive Governance in the Public Interest.¹ I have particularly benefi tted from exchanges with Jacques Lenoble, Colin Scott, Peter-Vincent Jones, and Helen Adlard. I gained immeasurable help from those members of regulatory staff who agreed to be interviewed, though I should stress that they should not be taken as agreeing with any of my conclusions. Th ey were Alison Spalding at the Food Standards Agency, Ed Mitchell at the Environment Agency, Gordon Macdonald at the Health and Safety Executive, Adrian Masters at Monitor, Chris Woolard at Ofcom, Maxine Frerk at Ofgem, Huw Brooker at Ofwat, and Michael Beswick at the Offi ce of Rail Regulation. I am most grateful for their time and cooperation. I am also grateful to the libraries of the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies in London and the European University Institute in Florence for access to materials on comparative developments, and to Th omas Perroud for some useful material on France. Most of all, I am grateful to Charlotte Villiers and to Amelia and Laurence for tolerating uncomplainingly the inevit- able disruption of writing and travel to family life. A word should be added on the geographical scope of the book. Within the UK, the coverage of regulators varies widely, with major diff erences as to which of the constituent nations is covered by a single institution. I concentrate here on the position in relation to England; important comparative work needs to be done on regulators in the diff erent nations comprising the UK, but unfortunately the question is outside the scope of this book. Th e law is as stated at the beginning of 2010. Tony Prosser Bristol January 2010 ¹ See <http://refgov.cpdr.ucl.ac.be/> (consulted 4 December 2009). 0000__PPrroosssseerr__PPrreelliimmss..iinndddd vvii 55//1100//22001100 88::4444::0044 AAMM Contents Table of Cases ix Table of Statutes xi Table of European Legislation xv 1. Introduction: Two Visions of Regulation and Four Regulatory Models 1 2. Th e Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority 21 3. Th e Food Standards Agency 44 4. Th e Environment Agency 66 5. Th e Health and Safety Executive 89 6. Th e Care Quality Commission and its Predecessors 111 7. Monitor, the Independent Regulator of NHS Foundation Trusts 136 8. Th e Offi ce of Communications 153 9. Th e Utility Regulators: Th e Offi ce of Gas and Electricity Markets, the Water Services Regulation Authority, and the Offi ce of Rail Regulation 176 10. Regulating the Regulators 201 11. Comparisons and Conclusions 223 Index 237 0000__PPrroosssseerr__PPrreelliimmss..iinndddd vviiii 55//1100//22001100 88::4444::0044 AAMM Table of Cases Th e European Court of Human Rights Dubus SA v France (5242/04, ECtHR, 11 June 2009) ...............................................................165 Evans v UK (2008) 46 EHRR 34 ..........................................................................................34, 35 The European Court of Justice C-205/03 Federacion Espanola de Empresas de Tecnologia Sanitaria (FENIN) v Commission [2006] ECR I-6295 ..........................................................................123 C-127/05, Commission v UK [2007] ECR I-4619 ................................................................99–100 C-82/07 Comisión del Mercado de las Telecomunicacions v Administración del Estado [2008] ECR I-1265 ...............................................................................................225 France Decision 86–217 DC du 18 septembre 1986 relative à la Commission nationale de la communication et des libertés, Rec. 141 ........................................................229 Decision 88–248 DC du 17 janvier 1989 relative au Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel, Rec. 18 ........................................................................................229 Decision 89–260 DC du 8 juillet 1989 relative à la Commission des operations de bourse, Rec. 71 ..........................................................................................229 Decision 2004–497 DC du 1 juillet 2004 relative aux communications électroniques et aux services de communication audiovisuelle, Rec. 107 ....................................................229 Decision 2009–580 DC du 10 juin 2009 relative à la diff usion et la protection de la création sur internet .....................................................................................229 United Kingdom Berkeley v Secretary of State for the Environment [2000] 3 WLR 420 (HL) ...................................85 Bettercare v Director General of Fair Trading [2002] CAT 7 .......................................................123 Dugmore v Swansea NHS Trust [2002] EWCA Civ 1689; [2003] 1 All ER 333 ............................99 Edwards v National Coal Board [1949] 1 KB 704 .........................................................................99 Great North Eastern Railway Ltd v Th e Offi ce of Rail Regulation et al [2006] EWHC 1942 (Admin); [2007] ACD 13 ................................................................................189 L v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2008] EWHC 2149 (Fam); [2008] 2 FLR 1999 ..................................................................................................................34 Marcic v Th ames Water Utilities [2003] UKHL 66; [2004] 2 AC 42 ...............................14, 81, 190 Offi ce of Communications v Floe Telecom Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 768; [2006] 4 All ER 688 ..............................................................................................................165 R v Chargot Ltd [2008] UKHL 73; [2009] 1 WLR 1 ...................................................................99 R v HTM Ltd [2006] EWCA Crim 1156; [2007] 2 All ER 665 ....................................................99 R (on the application of Alconbury Developments Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions [2001] UKHL 23; [2003] 2 AC 295 ......................................................................................165 R (on the application of Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport [2008] UKHL 15; [2008] 1 AC 1312 ........................................166 R (on the application of Begum) v Denbigh High School Governors [2006] UKHL 15; [2007] 1 AC 100 ......................................................................................234 0000__PPrroosssseerr__PPrreelliimmss..iinndddd iixx 55//1100//22001100 88::4444::0044 AAMM

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.