Document file:///D|/Export1/www.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlreader.dll@bookid=5821&filename=cover.html [4/27/2007 9:58:30 AM] Document Page 1of 1 Page iii Problems of a Political Animal Community, Justice, and Conflict in Aristotelian Political Thought Bernard Yack UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley • Los Angeles • London http://www.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlreader.dll?bookid=5821&filename=cover-0.html 4/27/2007 Document Page 1of 1 Page iv University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 1993 by The Regents of the University of California Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Yack, Bernard, 1952- The problems of a political animal : community, justice, and conflict in Aristotelian political thought / Bernard Yack. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-520-08166-8 (alk. paper). — ISBN 0-520-08167-6 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Aristotle—Contributions in political science. 2. Community. 3. Justice. 4. Social conflict. I. Title. JC71.A7Y34 1993 320'.01'1—dc20 92-23296 CIP Printed in the United States of America 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. http://www.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlreader.dll?bookid=5821&filename=cover-1.html 4/27/2007 Document Page 1of 1 Page v In memory of Judith Nisse Shklar (1929–1992) http://www.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlreader.dll?bookid=5821&filename=cover-2.html 4/27/2007 Document Page 1of 2 Page vii Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 Political Community as a Term of Distinction 6 Distorted Images of Aristotelian Politics 10 Interpretive Approaches 18 1. Community 25 The Communal Animal 27 The Forms of Friendship and Justice 33 Aristotelian Community and Modern Social Theory 43 2. Political Community 51 The Defining Characteristics of Political Community 53 The Political Animal 62 The Ancient Polis and Modern Political Communities 71 Appendix. Monarchy and Political Community 85 3. Political Teleology 88 The Naturalness of the Polis 90 Politics and the Good Life 96 An Anthropocentric Universe? 100 The Good Life in Imperfect Political Communities 102 http://www.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlreader.dll?bookid=5821&filename=cover-3.html 4/27/2007 Document Page 2of 2 4. Political Friendship 109 Neither Brothers nor Comrades 110 The Dangers of Political Intimacy 118 Political Friendship and the Inconveniences of Political Life 122 http://www.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlreader.dll?bookid=5821&filename=cover-3.html 4/27/2007 Document Page viii 5. Political Justice 128 Political Justice and Reciprocity 133 Natural and Conventional Right 140 The Subject of Justice 149 General and Distributive Justice 157 A Political Conception of the Common Good 166 6. The Rule of Law 175 What Is Law? 178 Adjudication 184 A Political Conception of the Rule of Law 194 7. Class Conflict and the Mixed Regime 209 Class Conflict in Ancient Greece 210 A Political Understanding of Class Conflict 215 Perceived Injustice and Class Interests 218 Political Friends, Class Enemies 224 The Mixed Regime and Political Justice 231 Appendix. "Political Revolution": A Missing Aristotelian Category 239 file:///D|/Export1/www.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlreader.dll@bookid=5821&filename=page_viii.html (1 of 2) [4/27/2007 9:58:32 AM] Document 8. The Good Life in Political Context 242 Moral Character in Political Context 243 Misfortune and the Asymmetry Between Praise and Blame 251 Moral Conflict in Political Context 259 9. The Good Life in Extrapolitical Context 268 How Good Is the Aristotelian Good Life? 269 The Tensions Within a Good Human Life 277 Conclusion 281 Bibliography 285 Index of Citations from Aristotle's Works 301 General Index 305 file:///D|/Export1/www.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlreader.dll@bookid=5821&filename=page_viii.html (2 of 2) [4/27/2007 9:58:32 AM] Document Page ix Acknowledgments Earlier versions of arguments presented in chapters 2, 3, 5, 8, and 9 have appeared in articles published in The Review of Politics 47, no. 1 (Jan. 1985): 92–112; History of Political Thought 12 (1991): 15–34; Political Theory 18 (May 1990): 16–37; and Soundings 72, no. 4 (Winter 1989): 607–29. I'd like to thank these journals for allowing me to alter and reprint portions of these articles. I owe a great debt to all those friends and colleagues who read parts of this book as it developed over the years and who shared their insights with me. I'd especially like to thank Peter Euben, William Galston, Harvey Goldman, Jack Gunnell, Don Herzog, Stephen Holmes, Bernard Manin, Harvey C. Mansfield, Jr., Martha Nussbaum, Stephen Salkever, Arlene Saxonhouse, Lauren Schulz, Gary Shiffman, Judith Shklar, and Jeffrey Stout. It has been my great good fortune in life to be able to share my ideas with Marion Smiley. In good times and bad, her extraordinary intelligence and intellectual honesty have been my constant inspiration. file:///D|/Export1/www.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlreader.dll@bookid=5821&filename=page_ix.html [4/27/2007 9:58:33 AM] Document Page 1 Introduction The shared sentiments and commitments that constitute a community are often the source of its deepest conflicts. Anyone who has lived in a family rather than merely longed for a home knows that all too well. Strangers may cheat you, but only brothers or sisters, comrades or colleagues can betray you. In the end, intense and ugly forms of distrust and conflict are part of the price we pay for the pleasures of communal life. Aristotle, unlike many of his contemporary followers, is deeply aware of the special conflicts associated with human communities. The intensity of our conflicts, he notes, increases with the closeness of our relationships. Anger is something that individuals "express more strongly against their companions, when they think they have been treated unjustly…. Hence the sayings 'Cruel are the wars of brothers' and 'Those who love extravagantly will hate extravagantly as well.' … And it is reasonable," Aristotle concludes, "that this should happen. For, in addition to the injury, they also consider themselves robbed of this [companionship]" (Politics [hereafter Pol.] 1328a10).1 Critics of modern liberal democracies often invoke Aristotle's understanding of political community when they complain that our political 1. See Aristotle, Rhetoric 1379b2 and Nicomachean Ethics 1160a3, for similar remarks. Like Georg Simmel, Aristotle is familiar with "the wholly disproportionate violence to which normally well- controlled people can be moved within their relations to those closest to them"; G. Simmel, Conflict, 43–44. file:///D|/Export1/www.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlreader.dll@bookid=5821&filename=page_1.html [4/27/2007 9:58:33 AM]
Description: