TIlE PRESSURES ON AMERICAN MONETARY POLICY Second Edition THE PRESSURES ON AMERICAN MONETARY POLICY Second Edition by Thomas Havrilesky Duke University Springer Science+Business Media, LLC Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Havrilesky, Thomas M. The pressures on American monetary policy / by Thomas Havrilesky. -- 2nd ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-94-010-4285-7 ISBN 978-94-011-0653-5 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-0653-5 1. Monetary policy--United States. 2. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.) I. Title. HG540.H38 1995 332.4'973--dc20 95-1081 elP Copyright ~ 1995 by Springer Science+Business Media New York Originally published by Kluwer Academic Publishers in 1995 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 2nd edition 1995 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photo-copying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. Printed on acid-free paper. To my parents, Mike Havrilesky and Pauline Duranko Havrilesky TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PREFACE ix INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER One The Pressures on Monetary Policy: 11 An Overview Two Executive Branch Pressures on 28 Monetary Policy: 1914-1994 Three Legislative Branch Pressures on 83 Monetary -Policy: 1914-1994 Four Is the Federal Reserve Responsive 118 to Monetary Policy Signaling from The Administration Five Is Federal Reserve Responsiveness 158 to Signaling Propelled by Congressional Threats or Chairmen's Allegiances Six The Causes of Signaling from the 202 Administration and Threats from Congress to the Federal Reserve Seven Monetary Policy Signaling from Congress 227 to the Federal Reserve Eight Banking and Other Private Sector 255 Influences on Monetary Policy Nine The Power of Appointment and 288 Monetary Policy Ten Monetary Reform 332 INDEX 371 PREFACE The basic motivation for this book is my lifelong interest in the relationship between political processes and macroeconomic outcomes, especially in the area of monetary policy. Nowadays, monetary policy is an area where political considerations are believed by scholars to regularly impact upon economic results. In contrast, when my interest in this subject began thirty years ago, the scholarly literature on monetary policy hardly ever mentioned systematic political influences. My dissertation at the University of Illinois in 1966 and my first article (in the Joumal of Political Economy in 1967) addressed the modeling and estimation of the concerns that propel monetary policy. In the political and economic turbulence of the period from the late 1960s through the early 1980s, it became clear that the directions taken by monetary policy were changing with some frequency. My research during that period dealt with models of monetary policy. In attempting to measure these changes, it suggested that monetary policy reactions to the state of the economy were not stable over time. During this period I became interested in reforms which might reduce the resulting instability in the economy. For example, my 1972 article in the Joumal of Political Economy suggested systematic penalties Federal Reserve officials who failed to meet the goal of monetary stability by tying their budgets or salaries inversely to the rate of inflation. By the late 1970s it became obvious that (despite the elegant eqUilibrium models which were popular in the scholarly journals at the time) monetary x THE PRESSURES ON AMERICAN MONETARY POLICY policy's reactions to the state of the economy shifted in a rather irregular pattern. What were the reasons for this apparent instability? One reason seemed to be that the adverse side effects (on interest, exchange and unemployment rates) of the redistributive programs of politicians resulted in episodic bouts of pressure on the Federal Reserve for monetary expansion. However, up until this point the only evidence regarding political pressures on monetary policy was anecdotal. Moreover, there was a large volume of similarly anecdotal evidence which suggested that Federal Reserve officials did not respond to these pressures. Clearly, only hard statistical evidence could help to resolve the issue. By the mid 1980s I became convinced that sufficient data were available which would allow one to test if and how changes in monetary policy are related to political phenomena. Since that time my research program has been to investigate and to measure the political and private sector pressures on monetary policy and to estimate the extent to which the monetary authority assimilates and responds to them. This book reflects the results of that research program. While addressing a program of this magnitude requires knowledge of economic history and political and monetary institutions together with modern macroeconomic theory, a good deal of progress was made by following up hunches with time-consuming empirical work. Without the help and inspira tion of my colleagues in encouraging my hunches and my students in providing the manpower to follow up on them, this process could never have succeeded. I have been assisted by discussions of my research program with readers of earlier drafts of this book. These discussions have been invaluable and stimulating. Readers of all or parts of the book include: Elmus Wicker, Chris Waller, Robert Auerbach, Kevin Grier, William Barnett, Neil Beck, Richard Froyen, George Kaufman, Ray Lombra, Ed Kane, Roy Weintraub, Robert Eisenbeis, Thomas Mayer, James Buchanan, Phil Brock, Thomas Willett, Raburn Williams, Edward Tower, Dudley Wallace, Martin Bronfenbrenner, Roger Waud, Richard Timberlake, Milton Friedman, Murray Wiedenbaum, Henry Chappell, Rob McGregor, William Keech, James Granato, John Gildea, Alex Cukierman, Thomas Ferguson, Wyatt Wells, Robert Schweitzer, Manfred Gartner, Otmar Issing, Roland Vaubel and Jurgen von Hagen. Of this list of colleagues, John Gildea, Henry Chappell and Roger Waud were indispensable. Computational and proofreading assistance were provided by Beth Ann Beck, Paul Harrison, Dek Terrell, Alex Hartemink, Todd Gilmer, and Stan Preface xi Paskoff. Research assistance came from Heather Havrilesky, Maria Lawrence, John Haldi, Jason Jordan, Tony Rojas, Carlos Acevedo, Brian Abell, Charles Medrano, Roberto Laca, Chip Gage, Gene Hayes, Matt Neidel, Charles Wickliffe, Carmen Jones, Jon Blank, Ed Mitchell, Matt Bernstein, Tom Opdycke, Lisa Herskowitz, Tim Miller, Steve Rosen, Ted Broomfield, Craig Welter, Suzanne Bryan, Hoyt Morgan, Bo Hyde, Tomas Fernandez, Scott DiCristina, Ming Shu, Seung J ae Noh; Ben Saunders, Dan Hanks, Sergio Lagunes, Omar Rehman, Rob Campenella, Jason Clauss, Michael Urban, Jonathan Blaustein, Naoki Nagashima and Debra Regan. Special thanks go to Paul Harrison and Alex Hartemink whose statistical skills helped immense ly in putting the final package together. Typing and editorial assistance were provided by Forrest Smith, Jean Hyslop and Joyce Hemphill. Boundless credit goes to Joyce Hemphill for her patience and skill in managing this book's production process. I would like to thank the Federal Reserve Board for releasing the directives of the Federal Advisory Council and the Duke University Research Council and the National Science Foundation for grants which financed parts of this book. Thomas Havrilesky Durham, North Carolina INTRODUCTION The Organization This book deals with American monetary policy. In order to understand the subject one needs to know about the workings of the Federal Reserve System. This introduction provides an overview of the organization and structure of the System. The structure of the Federal Reserve System was designed to disperse power along regiona1lines, between the private sector and the government, and among bankers, businesspeople, and the public. This has resulted in the evolution of the Federal Reserve System to include the following entities: the Federal Reserve Banks, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), the Federal Advisory Council, and the member commercial banks. Federal Reserve Banks Each of the twelve Federal Reserve districts has a Federal Reserve Bank in a city in the district, some of which have several additional branches in other cities in the district. The three largest Federal Reserve Banks in terms of assets are those of New York, Chicago, and San Franclsco--combined they hold over fIfty percent of the assets of the Federal Reserve System. The New York Bank, with over thirty percent of the assets, is the most important of the Federal Reserve Banks. 2 THE PRESSURES ON AMERICAN MONETARY POLICY Each of the Federal Reserve Banks is a quasi-public institution owned by the private commercial banks in the district who are members of the Federal Reserve System. Member banks are required to have purchased stock in their district Federal Reserve Bank. The dividends paid by that stock are limited to six percent annually. Banks are located in Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Kansas City, Dallas, and San Francisco. Branches of Reserve Banks have been established in twenty-five other cities. The Board of Governor's offices in Washington are the System's headquarters. Each Bank has its own board. Each board has nine outside directors: three Class A directors, who represent member banks, and three Class B directors, who represent the public, are elected by the member banks in each Federal Reserve District. The Board of Governors appoints three Class C directors, who also represent the public, and it designates one of these three as chairman and another as deputy chairman of the Bank's board. No Class B or Class C director may be an officer, director, or employee of a bank, nor may Class C directors be stockholders of a bank. Each branch of a Reserve Bank has its own board of directors, composed of five or seven members. The majority (three or four, as the case may be) are appointed by the head-office directors, and the others by the Board of Governors. The twelve Federal Reserve Banks have nine nonmonetary policy functions: They (1) clear checks, (2) issue currency, (3) withdraw currency from circulation, (4) evaluate bank merger applications, (5) make discount loans to banks in their districts, (6) serve as liaisons between the business community and the Federal Reserve System, (7) examine state member banks, (8) collect data on local business conditions, and (9) conduct research on topics related to the conduct of monetary policy. The Federal Reserve Banks are also involved in monetary policy in five ways: (1) they indicate the discount rate (to be reviewed and determined by the Board of Governors), (2) they discount loans to banks, (3) they each select one commercial banker to serve on the Federal Advisory Council, and (4) their Bank Presidents have a vote on the twelve-person Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which directs open market operations (the purchase and sale of government securities). The President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank always has a vote in the FOMC, while the four votes allocated to four of the other the district banks rotate among the remaining eleven Presidents. The remaining members of the FOMC are the seven members of the Board of Governors who are appointed by the President of the United