ebook img

The present perfective paradox across languages PDF

236 Pages·2017·1.41 MB·English
by  De Wit
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview The present perfective paradox across languages

The Present Perfective Paradox across Languages OXFORD STUDIES OF TIME IN LANGUAGE AND THOUGHT GENERAL EDITORS: Kasia M. Jaszczolt, University of Cambridge and Louis de Saussure,UniversityofNeuchâtel ADVISORY EDITORS: Nicholas Asher, Université Paul Sabatier; Johan van der Auwera, University of Antwerp; Robert I. Binnick, University of Toronto; Ronny Boogaart, University of Leiden; Frank Brisard, University of Antwerp; Patrick Caudal, CNRS; Anastasia Giannakidou, University of Chicago; Hans Kronning, UniversityofUppsala;RonaldLangacker,UniversityofCalifornia,SanDiego;Alex Lascarides,UniversityofEdinburgh;PeterLudlow,NorthwesternUniversity;Aliceter Meulen, UniversityofGeneva;RobinLePoidevin,Universityof Leeds;PaulPortner, GeorgetownUniversity;TimStowell,UniversityofCalifornia,LosAngeles;Henriëttede Swart,UniversityofUtrecht PUBLISHED Time Language,Cognition,andReality EditedbyKasiaM.JaszczoltandLouisdeSaussure FutureTimes,FutureTenses EditedbyPhilippeDeBrabanter,MikhailKissine,andSaghieSharifzadeh Time,Language,andOntology TheWorldfromtheB-TheoreticPerspective byM.JoshuaMozersky ThePresentPerfectiveParadoxacrossLanguages byAstridDeWit The Present Perfective Paradox across Languages ASTRID DE WIT 1 OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,7/9/2016,SPi 3 GreatClarendonStreet,Oxford,OXDP, UnitedKingdom OxfordUniversityPressisadepartmentoftheUniversityofOxford. ItfurtherstheUniversity’sobjectiveofexcellenceinresearch,scholarship, andeducationbypublishingworldwide.Oxfordisaregisteredtrademarkof OxfordUniversityPressintheUKandincertainothercountries ©AstridDeWit Themoralrightsoftheauthorhavebeenasserted FirstEditionpublishedin Impression: Allrightsreserved.Nopartofthispublicationmaybereproduced,storedin aretrievalsystem,ortransmitted,inanyformorbyanymeans,withoutthe priorpermissioninwritingofOxfordUniversityPress,orasexpresslypermitted bylaw,bylicenceorundertermsagreedwiththeappropriatereprographics rightsorganization.Enquiriesconcerningreproductionoutsidethescopeofthe aboveshouldbesenttotheRightsDepartment,OxfordUniversityPress,atthe addressabove Youmustnotcirculatethisworkinanyotherform andyoumustimposethissameconditiononanyacquirer PublishedintheUnitedStatesofAmericabyOxfordUniversityPress MadisonAvenue,NewYork,NY,UnitedStatesofAmerica BritishLibraryCataloguinginPublicationData Dataavailable LibraryofCongressControlNumber: ISBN–––– PrintedinGreatBritainby ClaysLtd,StIvesplc LinkstothirdpartywebsitesareprovidedbyOxfordingoodfaithand forinformationonly.Oxforddisclaimsanyresponsibilityforthematerials containedinanythirdpartywebsitereferencedinthiswork. OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,7/9/2016,SPi Contents GeneralPreface x Acknowledgments xii ListofGlosses xiii  Introduction  . Thepresentperfectiveparadox:Afirstglance  . Selectedlanguages  . Acognitive-semanticapproachtocross-linguisticvariation  . Thestructureofthestudy   Anepistemicapproachtothecategoriesoftenseandaspect  . Tense  .. Temporalandnon-temporalusesoftenseconstructions  .. Amodalaccountofthepresenttense  . Aspect  .. Lexicalandgrammaticalaspect:Aunifiedaspectmodel  .. Grammaticalaspect  ... Perfectiveandimperfectiveaspect  ... Othertypesofgrammaticalaspect  .. Lexicalaspect  . The perfect   Thepresentperfectiveparadox:Thestateoftheart  . Theincompatibilityproblem  . Previousanalysesoftheincompatibilityproblem  . Objectivesofthecurrentstudy   ThepresentperfectiveparadoxinEnglish  . UsagetypesoftheEnglishsimplepresent  .. Present-timereference  .. Historicalpresent  .. Futurate  .. Non-counterfactualconditionals  .. Habitualandgenericcontexts  .. Theuseofthesimplepresentversusthepresentprogressive incomparablecontexts  .. OverviewoftheusagetypesoftheEnglishsimplepresent  OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,7/9/2016,SPi vi Contents . PreviousanalysesofthesemanticsoftheEnglishpresenttense  .. Analysesofthetemporalmeaningofthesimplepresent  .. Analysesoftheaspectualmeaningofthesimplepresent  .. Thesimplepresentversusthepresentprogressive:Aspectual andmodalaccounts  . ThesemanticsoftheEnglishpresenttenseandtheriseofthe presentperfectiveparadox  .. AsemanticanalysisoftheEnglishsimplepresent  ... Basicmodalandtemporalmeaning  ... Aspectualmeaning  ... Themodalcontrastbetweenthesimplepresent andthepresentprogressive  ... Thedevelopmentofthepresentprogressive andtheriseoftheperfectivemeaningofthesimple presentinEnglish  .. Interactionsbetweenthesimplepresentandtypesof lexicalaspectindifferentcontexts  ... Statesversusevents  ... Present-timereferencewitheventsinnon-virtual contexts  ... Present-timereferencewitheventsinvirtual contexts  . Twotypesofsolutionfortheincompatibilityproblems  .. Astructuralinterpretation  .. Typeshifting  ... Thepresentperfect  ... Thepresentprogressive  . Conclusion   ThepresentperfectiveparadoxinFrench  . UsagetypesoftheFrenchsimplepresent  .. Present-timereference  .. Historicalpresent  .. Futurate  .. Non-counterfactualconditionals  .. Habitualandgenericcontexts  .. OverviewoftheusagetypesoftheFrenchsimplepresent  . PreviousanalysesofthesemanticsoftheFrenchsimplepresent  . ThesemanticsoftheFrenchsimplepresentandhowitavoids theriseofthepresentperfectiveparadox  .. Thebasicmodalandtemporalmeaningofthesimplepresent  .. Theaspectualambiguityofthesimplepresent  OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,7/9/2016,SPi Contents vii ... Aspectualambiguityandthecontinuative presentperfect  ... Epistemicimplicationsoftheaspectualambiguity  .. TheFrenchsimplepresentandthepresentperfective paradox  .. Themodalcontrastbetweenthesimplepresentandthe presentprogressive  . Adiachronicexplanationfortheaspectualambiguityofthe simplepresent  . Conclusion   ThepresentperfectiveparadoxinSranan  . Preliminaryobservations  . Methodology:Actionalclassificationandcorpusanalysis  .. Classesoflexicalaspect  .. Corpusdataandelicitations  . Usagetypesofzero  .. Present-timereference  .. Presentperfect  .. Narrativecontexts  .. Past perfectiveoutsidenarrativecontexts  .. Non-counterfactualconditionalclauses  .. Overviewoftheusagetypesofzero  . Previousanalysesofzero,ben,ande  . Analysis:Zeroasapresentperfectivemarker  .. Zeroasapresentperfectivemarkerandtheriseofthe presentperfectiveparadox  .. Twotypesofsolutionforthepresentperfectiveparadox  ... Typeshifting:Theprogressive/habituale  ... Alternative‘non-present’interpretations  . Conclusion   ThepresentperfectiveparadoxinSlavic  . Slavic-styleaspectinthisstudy  . Usagetypesofthepresent(perfective)tenseacrossSlaviclanguages  .. InnortheasternSlavic(RussianandPolish)  ... Future-timereference  ... Habitual  ... Historicalpresent  ... Realisconditionals  ... Actualpresent  OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,7/9/2016,SPi viii Contents .. InnorthwesternSlavic(Czech)  ... Future-timereference  ... Habitual  ... Historicalpresent  ... Non-counterfactualconditionals  ... Actualpresent  .. InsouthwesternSlavic(Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian)  ... Habitual  ... Historicalpresent  ... Realisconditionals  ... Actualpresent-timereference  .. Overview  . TheriseofthepresentperfectiveparadoxinSlavic  .. Argumentsinfavorofapresent-tenseanalysis  .. Whydoesthepresent-timereportingofperfectiveevents seemmoreproblematicintheeasternSlaviclanguages thaninthewesternSlaviclanguages?  . Twotypesofsolutionfortheincompatibilityproblems  .. Imperfectiveandperfectconstruals  ... Imperfectivization  ... Thelimitedtype-shiftingfunctionoftheperfect inSouthSlavic  .. Non-presentreadings:The‘prospectivestrategy’andthe ‘structuralstrategy’  ... Theexploitationofthe‘prospectivestrategy’in differentSlaviclanguages  ... The‘structuralstrategy’andeastern–western differences  . Conclusion   Conclusionandwiderrelevance  . Theriseandresolutionofthepresentperfectiveparadoxacross languages  .. Theconceptualproblemsunderlyingthepresentperfective paradox  .. Preemptiveblockingofthepresentperfectiveparadox: Present-tenseconstructionswithanimperfectivevalue  .. Theroleof(typesof)lexicalandgrammaticalaspect  .. Present-timeeventreportsinspecific(perfective)contexts  .. Solutionstothepresentperfectiveparadox  OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,7/9/2016,SPi Contents ix ... Alternative‘non-present’readings:The‘prospective’, ‘retrospective’,and‘structuralstrategy’  ... Type-shiftingconstructionsthatenablepresent-time reference  . Widerrelevanceandfutureresearch  References  Index 

Description:
This book presents an analysis of how speakers of typologically diverse languages report present-time situations. It begins from the assumption that there is a restriction on the use of the present tense to report present-time dynamic/perfective situations, while with stative/imperfective situations
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.