ebook img

The Pharisees and Figured Speech in Luke-Acts PDF

467 Pages·2016·2.58 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview The Pharisees and Figured Speech in Luke-Acts

THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO THE PHARISEES AND FIGURED SPEECH IN LUKE-ACTS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVINITY SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY JUSTIN R. HOWELL CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JUNE 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLES.........................................................................................................................................vii INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 PART ONE: CONTEXTUALIZING THE QUESTION Chapter One: Defining Figured Speech.............................................................................6 1. Allusion (ἔμφασις).............................................................................................9 2. Discretion (εὐπρέπεια).....................................................................................15 3. Security (ἀσφάλεια).........................................................................................17 4. Freedom of Speech (παρρησία).......................................................................20 5. Irony (εἰρωνεία)...............................................................................................21 6. Indirect Speech (ὁ πλάγιος λόγος)...................................................................23 7. Figured Speech as an Art (τέχνη)....................................................................26 Chapter Two: Methodological Approach........................................................................30 1. Redactional Analysis.......................................................................................30 2. Intertextual and Interconceptual Analysis.......................................................33 3. Rhetorical and Literary Analysis.....................................................................35 4. Historical Analysis...........................................................................................41 5. The History of Reception.................................................................................49 Chapter Three: Scholarly Perspectives on the Historical Pharisees................................52 1. The Authority of the Pharisees: Political, Religious, Neither, or Both? ......... 54 2. The Pharisees in the Roman Empire................................................................70 Chapter Four: The Provenance of Luke-Acts..................................................................81 1. Judea................................................................................................................81 ii 2. Ephesus............................................................................................................84 3. Antioch in Syria...............................................................................................86 4. The Question about Diaspora Pharisees..........................................................95 Chapter Five: Luke and His Readers.............................................................................103 1. Authorship and Date......................................................................................103 2. Luke and Ethnic Perspective.........................................................................109 3. God-fearers in Luke-Acts..............................................................................117 4. The Question about Pharisaic Readers..........................................................127 PART TWO: THE PHARISEES AND THE SUPPRESSION OF FREE SPEECH Chapter Six: From Figured to Free Speech....................................................................132 1. Framing the Narrative of Luke-Acts..............................................................132 2. The Lukan Pharisees as Spies........................................................................140 3. Conclusions....................................................................................................150 Chapter Seven: Paul and Other Former Pharisees.........................................................152 1. Paul’s Feigned Ignorance about the High Priest (Acts 23.5).........................153 2. Ananias as Ruler of the People......................................................................162 3. Paul’s Appeals to his Pharisaism (Acts 23.6; 26.5).......................................166 4. The Lukan Paul and his Alleged Roman Citizenship....................................176 5. The Other Former Pharisees (Acts 15.5).......................................................179 6. Conclusions....................................................................................................186 Chapter Eight: Gamaliel and the God-fighters..............................................................188 1. Theudas, Judas, Gamaliel, and Their Respective Followers.........................193 2. Obedience to God versus Obedience to Gamaliel.........................................197 iii 3. The Sanhedrin among Other God-fighters.....................................................200 4. Distinguishing Gamaliel from the Apostles...................................................202 5. Theudas, Judas, and Jesus..............................................................................205 6. Persecution for (Speech in) the Name...........................................................213 7. Conclusions....................................................................................................221 PART THREE: LUKE’S MORAL DIAGNOSIS OF THE PHARISEES Chapter Nine: The Initial Symptoms of Illness.............................................................224 1. The Pharisees who Remain Seated (Luke 5.17-32).......................................225 2. The Folly of the Scribes and Pharisees (Luke 6.6-11)...................................228 3. The Textual Variant at Luke 5.17c................................................................235 4. The Lukan Jesus as a Doctor of the Soul (Luke 4.23; 5.31-32).....................238 5. Conclusions....................................................................................................242 Chapter Ten: The Passions of Injustice.........................................................................244 1. The Passion for Money..................................................................................245 2. The Passion for Glory....................................................................................247 3. The Passion for Luxury..................................................................................249 4. Passions of Injustice in Moral Philosophical Traditions................................252 5. The Rulers of the Pharisees and the Question of Justice...............................261 6. Conclusions....................................................................................................269 Chapter Eleven: The Evil Eye and its Cure...................................................................271 1. The Pharisees and the Evil Eye of Predatory Greed......................................272 2. Curing the Evil Eye........................................................................................276 iv 3. The “Some” and “Others” in the Beelzebul Controversy..............................280 4. Conclusions....................................................................................................291 PART FOUR: THE PHARISEES AND THE KINGDOM OF GOD Chapter Twelve: The Kingdom within Reach...............................................................294 1. Previous Interpretations of ἐντὸς ὑμῶν (Luke 17.21)....................................295 2. The Kingdom “within you”...........................................................................298 3. The Governing Part of the Soul.....................................................................302 4. The Kingdom “among you”...........................................................................307 5. The Lukan Jesus as Kingly Benefactor..........................................................309 6. Conclusions....................................................................................................313 Chapter Thirteen: Simon the Pharisee and the Feet.......................................................315 1. The Repetition of πόδας.................................................................................315 2. Psalms of Solomon 8 and Luke 7...................................................................318 3. The Pharisees in Luke 7.24-50.......................................................................323 4. Conclusions....................................................................................................328 Chapter Fourteen: The Pharisees and the Abandoned House........................................330 1. Inside and Outside the House (Luke 13.22-14.24)........................................330 2. The Function of ὑμῖν (Luke 13.35a)..............................................................337 3. “This Fox” and the Pharisees.........................................................................339 4. Conclusions....................................................................................................343 Chapter Fifteen: The Pharisees and the Kingly Entrance..............................................345 1. Silencing the Disciples (Luke 19.39-40).......................................................346 2. The “Citizens” and the Nobleman.................................................................351 v 3. Conclusions....................................................................................................366 Chapter Sixteen: Zacchaeus and the Pharisees..............................................................368 1. The Sycamore Tree........................................................................................369 2. To Climb and Come Down............................................................................375 3. Zacchaeus and Yohanan ben Zakkai..............................................................379 4. Conclusions....................................................................................................391 CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS .............................................................................................. 393 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................... 402 vi TABLES Table 1: Sitting and Standing in Luke 5.17-32..........................................................................225 Table 2: Comparing Psalms of Solomon 8 and Luke 7..............................................................319 Table 3: Chiasm signaled by ἰδού..............................................................................................325 vii INTRODUCTION A scholarly consensus holds that the author of Luke-Acts is ambivalent toward the Pharisees, or at least that he has left readers with an ambiguous depiction of them. Even though Jack Sanders views the Jews of the Lukan narrative “as being rejected by God because they have rejected him,” he regards the Lukan Pharisees as an exception, contending that this group either “falls outside this general pattern” or else “fits into it is a strange way.” According to Sanders, while the author displays a “variegated portrait of the Pharisees in the Gospel,” in Acts all the Pharisees are “friendly” except the so-called “Christian Pharisees.” Thus, as Sanders reads the evidence, the author displays “ambivalence” toward the Pharisees in both Luke and Acts.1 Robert Brawley argues that the author paints an “ambivalent picture” of the Pharisees and specifically that “Luke alludes to positive relationships” between Jesus and the Pharisees and that “Pharisees and Christians are kindred spirits” in Acts. Brawley claims that “in spite of the ambiguities, the Gospel already tends to present the Pharisees in comparatively favorable light and anticipates their posture in Acts. In the two volumes, Luke presents the Pharisees as possessing serious character flaws, but nevertheless as respected and authoritative representatives of Judaism who can hover close to the edge of Christianity.”2 John Carroll 1 Jack T. Sanders, The Jews in Luke-Acts (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1987), 84, 94-95, 127. As Steve Mason claims about the episode involving Gamaliel (Acts 5.33-40), “the narrative could go two ways” (“Chief Priests, Sadducees, Pharisees,” in The Book of Acts in Its Palestinian Setting [ed. Richard Bauckham; Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans / Carlisle: Paternoster Press, 1995], 115-77, here 151), which echoes Sanders’ larger position that “Luke’s Pharisees can ‘go either way’” (Jews in Luke-Acts, 130). In analyzing the question about “friendly Pharisees,” Raimo Hakola holds that “Luke’s portrait of the Pharisees is ambiguous” and furthermore argues that “both negative and positive appraisals of the Pharisees contribute to an early Christian identity” (“‘Friendly’ Pharisees and Social Identity in Acts,” in Contemporary Studies in Acts [ed. Thomas E. Phillips; Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, 2009], 181-200, here 193). 2 Robert Brawley, Luke-Acts and the Jews: Conflict, Apology, and Conciliation (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1987), 84. As J. Patrick Mullen views the evidence, “Luke’s unique information” 1 observes that the author’s presentation of the Pharisees is “puzzling” and “complex.” Although claiming that in his Gospel, the author does not “turn antagonists into friends,” Carroll also holds that in Acts not once “does Luke portray Pharisees as antagonists.”3 Similarly, Anthony Saldarini explains that “Luke’s attitude toward the Pharisees is complex and cannot be simply characterized as friendly or hostile.”4 David Gowler opens his study on the Lukan Pharisees with the statement that “the text of Luke-Acts seems to paint an ambiguous portrait of the Pharisees,” but then he concludes that the “portrait of the Pharisees in Luke is primarily negative, whereas the portrait of the Pharisees in Acts is primarily positive.”5 In asking whether the author and his contemporary readers might have encountered Pharisees, Mary Marshall explains, “His differing portrayals in the Gospel and Acts may indeed cultivate an ambivalent attitude to actual Pharisees (which may represent his own attitude) but if his contact with actual Pharisees was limited, then this ambivalence may have had only limited practical implications.”6 And in a recent survey of the Lukan Pharisees, Amy-Jill Levine asserts, “Whether approached primarily by literary or about the Pharisees “is sometimes negative,” at other times “neutral,” and in other cases “potentially positive” (Dining with Pharisees [Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical Press, 2004], 80). So also Leo Michel Abrami claims that the author “is ambivalent with respect to the Pharisees” (“Were All the Pharisees ‘Hypocrites’?” Journal of Ecumenical Studies 47 [2012]: 427-35, here 428). 3 John T. Carroll, “Luke’s Portrayal of the Pharisees,” CBQ 50 (1988): 604-21, here 604, 616. Similarly, David A. Neale asserts, “Luke is ambivalent in his treatment of the Pharisees and this fact is evidenced in an almost bewildering array of interpretations by scholars of Luke’s attitude towards Pharisees” (None but the Sinners: Religious Categories in the Gospel of Luke [JSNTSup 58; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1991], 103); and Laurence L. Edwards, “Luke-Acts, certainly more than any other New Testament work, presents a complex and ambivalent view of the Pharisees” (“Luke’s Pharisees: Emerging Communities,” in Contesting TEXTS: Jews and Christians in Conversation about the Bible [eds. Melody D. Knowles et al.; Minneapolis: Fortress, 2007], 119-35, here 133). 4 Anthony J. Saldarini, Pharisees, Scribes and Sadducees in Palestinian Society: A Sociological Approach (Wilmington, Del.: Michael Glazier, 1988), 179. 5 David Gowler, Host, Guest, Enemy, and Friend: Portraits of the Pharisees in Luke and Acts (New York: P. Lang, 1991), 1, 301. 6 Mary Marshall, The Portrayals of the Pharisees in the Gospels and Acts (FRLANT 254; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2015), 184. 2 historical questions, Luke’s Pharisees elude clear answers,” which leads her to conclude that this author’s view of the Pharisees “will remain debated.”7 What these previous evaluations of the Lukan Pharisees have left unanswered is why the author would present himself as ambivalent toward these characters, and also what might lie behind the rhetorical effects of “ambiguity.” Was he undecided or vacillating in his attitude toward the Pharisees? Did he view some of them positively and others negatively? When we analyze the evidence, it becomes clear that even in those seemingly positive characters, there is also an element of negativity in their portrayals. Can we therefore explain these ambiguous depictions on rhetorical grounds, and if so, what are those rhetorical grounds more specifically? If we can attribute this ambiguity to a deliberate rhetorical purpose, does this purpose also point to the author’s position on the Pharisees? One piece of evidence that may inform these questions appears in Demetrius, De elocutione 287-95, where he explains what is “so-called figured [ἐσχηματισμένον] in speech” (Eloc. 287).8 In some instances, Demetrius explains, statements can carry ambiguity (ἐπαμφοτερίζειν) and leave hearers uncertain about what the speaker meant. As an example, Demetrius describes Aeschines’ characterization of Telauges. “Almost the entire account [διήγησις] about Telauges,” Demetrius states, “might cause confusion as to whether it is admiration or ironic mockery [χλευασμός]. Such an ambiguous [ἀμφίβολον] form of speech, although not irony [εἰρωνεία], nevertheless has some hint [ἔμφασις] of irony” (Eloc. 291). Does the ambiguity scholars have noticed in the portrayals of the Lukan Pharisees reflect the author’s use of this kind of speech? This dissertation aims to reevaluate the Lukan Pharisees in order to 7 Amy-Jill Levine, “Luke’s Pharisees,” in In Quest of the Historical Pharisees (ed. Jacob Neusner and Bruce D. Chilton; Waco, Tex.: Baylor University Press, 2007), 113-30, here 113, 130. 8 Unless otherwise noted, all translations of ancient sources are mine. 3

Description:
PART THREE: LUKE'S MORAL DIAGNOSIS OF THE PHARISEES. Chapter Nine: .. outside this general pattern” or else “fits into it is a strange way.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.