INFORMATION TO USERS This dissertation was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation. Silver prints of "photographs" may be ordered at additional charge by writing the Order Department, giving the catalog number, title, author and specific pages you wish reproduced. University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor. Michigan 48106 A Xerox Education Company Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 72-19,498 MUDGE, Charles R., 1940- THE PENNSYLVANIA CHANSONNIER: A CRITICAL EDITION OF NINETY-FIVE ANONYMOUS BALLADES FROM THE FOURTEENTH CENTURY WITH INTRODUCTION, NOTES AND GLOSSARY. [Portions of Text in French}. Indiana University, Ph.D., 1972 Language and Literature, general University Microfilms, A XEROX Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan ©Copyright by Charles R. Mudge 1972 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE PENNSYLVANIA CHANSONNIER, A CRITICAL EDITION OF NINETY-FIVE ANONYMOUS BALLADES FROM THE FOURTEENTH CENTURY WITH INTRODUCTION, NOTES AND GLOSSARY BY CHARLES R. MUDGE Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree, Doctor of Philosophy, in the Department of French and Italian Indiana University February, 1972 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. February 15, 1972 We, the undersigned committee for Mr. Charles E. Mudge accept this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree at Indiana University. Profes^br Roy E. Leake, Jr. * Professor Frank G. Santa Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PLEASE NOTE: Some pages may have indistinct print. Filmed as received. University Microfilms, A Xerox Education Company Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. i i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I should like to express my gratitude to Professor Samuel N. Rosenberg, the chairman of my doctoral committee, with whom I have worked these past several years, for his encouragement and perceptive guidance. His unstinting generosity with time and counsel has been of Incalculable service to me. I owe a debt of thanks to Professors Anna Granville Hatcher and Frank G. Banta who read an early draft of the dissertation and assisted me through their criticisms and useful advice. My thanks must also go to Professors Francis W. Gravit and Roy E. Leake, Jr. who served as members of my examining committee. I was first encouraged in this project by Professor Richard F. O'Gorman (now of the University of Iowa), and to him I am especially indebted, as well as to Mr. Rudolf Hirsch, Associate Director of Libraries at the University of Pennsylvania, through whose good offices the manuscript was made available to me for this edition. I am also Indebted to Mr. Lyman W. Riley, former Bibliographer of the Rare Book Collection of The Charles Patterson Van Pelt Library and now Head of the Cataloguing Department, and to Mrs. Neda M. Westlake, Librarian of the Rare Book Division, who supplied me with microfilm and xerox copies of the manuscript and with notes on the codex itself which have aided me invaluably in covering Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. iii certain thorny points in my discussion of the manuscript. I am particularly indebted to Mrs. Westlake for allowing me to make a thorough examination of the manuscript on the spot. The courteous, ever-helpful staffs of Olin, Sterling and Widener libraries were of great service to me in the course of this work, and to them I am very grateful. Finally, I wish to express my gratitude to my very good friends, Professor and Mrs. J. D. Vedvik of Washington, D. C., for their unfailing confidence and encouragement. C. R. M. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION....................................... 1 A. Description of the Manuscript ............ 1 3. Contents of the Manuscript...................3 C. Provenance of the Manuscript..................10 D. The B a l l a d e ................................ 16 1. Historical Considerations ............. 16 2. Formal Types and Themes.................. 24 E. The Language of the Poems.................... 41 1. Spelling and Pronunciation ............ 41 2. G r a m m a r ................................ 43 3. Vocabulary............................. 48 F. Establishment of the Text.................... 54 G. Arrangement of the P o e m s .................... 58 II. THEP O E M S .......................................... 59 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Page III. APPENDIX....................................... 150 IV,. N O T E S ...........................................155 V. INDEX OF PROPER NAMES............................199 VI. GLOSSARY....................................... 208 VII. LIST OF INCIPITS OF THE PENNSYLVANIAC HANSONNIER . 244 VIII. ALPHABETICAL INDEX OF FIRST LINES OF THE POEMS OF THIS EDITION...............................345 IX. A SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY........................ 348 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. INTRODUCTION A. Description of the Manuscript The “Pennsylvania Chansonnier,” as I have labeled this manuscript,^ dates from the second half of the fourteenth century, and is in an excellent state of preservation. The 310 poems in this collection are written in several very similar and legible cursive hands in red and brown ink on 2 101 vellum folios, 30 x 24 cm, in double columns of 36 lines, carefully ruled by the scribes. Pinholes, as well as most of the quiring and the catchwords at the ends of the quires, are visible. Marginal notes to the rubricator remain intact. The manuscript is bound in modern leather, probably English. The contents and the appearance of the document itself amply support the view that a significantly large portion of the lyrics were copied during the last few years of the fourteenth century.^ Rertoni has suggested that the manuscript dates 1. In the University of Pennsylvania Rare Book Collection, it is known as Ms. Fr. 15. The manuscript was purchased in 1954 from Laurence Witten. I have been unable to learn from whom Witten obtained it. 2. Since foliation repeats fol. 68, there are actually 101 leaves, rather than 100 as indicated in the manuscript. A final leaf, doubtless blank, was cut away at an early date. In Indicating folios, I have retained the manuscript foliation. 3. All of the ballades with envoi contained in this manu script are found in the last third of the volume, and nine of them are found among the last forty-three poems, the last thirteen percent of the manuscript. The addition of the envoi to the ballade form was an elaboration made by the non-musician poets of the later fourteenth century, when poetry was no longer associated with music: a ballade with envoi Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.