ebook img

The Oxford Handbook of Digital Technology and Society PDF

1076 Pages·2020·10.157 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview The Oxford Handbook of Digital Technology and Society

Copyright Page Copyright Page Edited by Simeon J. Yates and Ronald E. Rice The Oxford Handbook of Digital Technology and Society Edited by Simeon J. Yates and Ronald E. Rice Print Publication Date: Aug 2020 Subject: Sociology Online Publication Date: Aug 2020 Copyright Page (p. iv) Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries. Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America. © Oxford University Press 2020 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer. Library of Congress Control Number: 2020938283 ISBN 978–0–19–093259–6 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed by LSC Communications, United States of America Page 1 of 1 PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice). Preface Preface Edited by Simeon J. Yates and Ronald E. Rice The Oxford Handbook of Digital Technology and Society Edited by Simeon J. Yates and Ronald E. Rice Print Publication Date: Aug 2020 Subject: Sociology Online Publication Date: Aug 2020 Preface (p. v) Introduction THIS book is based upon work undertaken as part of the UK Economic and Social Re­ search Council commissioned project “Ways of Being in a Digital Age”—for which Simeon was Principal Investigator and Ronald was a member of the Steering Group. The primary goal of the project was to identify the upcoming research questions and challenges facing the social sciences as they address the impacts that digital media and technologies are having and may have. This included a systematic review of prior work and a “horizon scanning” derived from expert opinion. This book is therefore as full of questions as it is of findings or answers. In particular, it identifies the topics that the social sciences, often in interdisciplinary collaboration, will need to tackle—probably sooner rather than later. The book is structured around the themes of the project—slightly reworked in the light of the findings. We have called these “domains.” The following list presents their initial de­ scriptions, while the last part of Chapter 1 describes the ESRC and subsequent confer­ ence and workshops in more detail, the final domains, and their main questions. Initial Domains and Scoping Questions 1.Citizenship and politics How does digital technology impacts on our autonomy, agency, and privacy—illus­ trated by the paradox of emancipation and control? Whether and how our understanding of citizenship is evolving in the digital age— for example whether technology helps or hinders us in participating at individual and community levels? 2.Communities and identities How we define and authenticate ourselves in a digital age? What new forms of communities and work emerge as a result of digital technolo­ gies—for example, new forms of coordination including large-scale and remote collaboration? Page 1 of 7 PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice). Preface 3. Communication and relationships How are our relationships being shaped and sustained in and between various do­ mains, including family and work? (p. vi) 4. Health and well-being Does technology make us healthier, better educated, and more productive? 5. Economy and sustainability How do we construct the digital to be open to all, sustainable, and secure? What impacts might the automation of the future workforce bring? 6. Data and representation How we live with and trust the algorithms and data analysis used to shape key features of our lives? 7. Governance and security What are the challenges of ethics, trust, and consent in the digital age? How we define responsibility and accountability in the digital age? Challenges Interdisciplinary Views of the Digital Society The project, the book, and research on the social impacts of digital media and technology have faced and will continue to face a number of key challenges. One of the great chal­ lenges of working in this field is that of avoiding simplistic “technological determinism”— or what Grint and Woolgar (2013) call “technism”—an inherent or implied reliance on “obvious or intrinsic” features of the technology in explanations of technology develop­ ment, use, or effects. Technism falls short of “technological determinism”—an approach that Grint and Woolgar argue is very rarely fully taken—but implies the assumption that technologies have intrinsic features that determine outcomes. We hope that we have sought to avoid this as much as we can, and to have captured the reflective and reflexive nature of the interactions among technologies, social systems and structures, and people. Another major challenge is that of interdisciplinary collaboration. Many questions require multiple disciplinary perspectives—across the social sciences, into health and engineer­ ing, but very often in collaboration with computer science and information studies col­ leagues. How does one understand the uses, implications, and role of the smartphone in any social domain without also understanding the telecommunications infrastructure, hardware, software, security, and design issues underlying the device? As a result, many of the contributions to this book are from very different disciplines (see Chapter 1), and this has enriched the perspective and critical analysis that have been considered. The interdisciplinary perspectives and the way new technologies have been developing have also introduced new ethical challenges in our research objects as well as our prac­ tices as researchers. Questions around automation, security, surveillance, and privacy Page 2 of 7 PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice). Preface (chapters 10, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 22) have complicated how we think about the (p. vii) relationship between humans and machines and what are the roles of govern­ ments, technology companies, and civil society in their design, use, and regulation. When it comes to conducting research on these subjects or using digital technologies to exam­ ine them, researchers also face new ethical challenges of what they can and should ac­ cess, collect, analyze, and then present or publish. Digital media and technologies, then, have complicated how we do research, how we think about our research objects and sub­ jects, and who is involved in these processes. Volume of Literature and Digital Tools Another challenge is the volume of work out there needing to be reviewed and assessed. As we note in chapter 2, it is a feature of our contemporary world that the volume of aca­ demic work continues to increase at a far greater rate than can be followed. As Petticrew and Roberts note: The problem is not just one of inconsistency, but one of information overload. The past 20 years have seen an explosion in the amount of research information avail­ able to decision makers and social researchers alike. With new journals launched yearly, and thousands of research papers published, it is impossible for even the most energetic policymaker or researcher to keep up-to-date with the most recent research evidence, unless they are interested in a very narrow field indeed. (Petticrew & Roberts, 2008, p. 7) In the ESRC project, and in many of the non-ESRC chapters, we have turned to digital tools to help manage this mass of literature—to extract topics and concepts from close to thousands of articles in few hours rather than in tens of thousands of hours. This is an ex­ ample of the well-documented fact that digital tools are therefore transforming how we undertake many aspects of social research. The project therefore provided an opportunity to experiment with several of these tools and methods (see chapter 2). Thus, two charac­ teristics of this Handbook of Digital Technology and Society is the broad range of litera­ ture covered in most chapters, and the frequent use of computer-based programs and techniques for collecting, analyzing, and displaying the results of that literature. Constant Change Another key challenge for work in this field is the constantly changing nature of the arte­ facts, contexts, and social practices as technologies develop and change, and are adapted and socially constructed. This is often a clearly two-way street as social change (p. viii) and regulation change systems and new systems create new opportunities, debates, and challenges. This influences research as scholars seek to address current issues, new tech­ nologies, new behaviors, and new implications. The ESRC chapters have reflected on this by contrasting the development of concepts and topics over the period of the sampled lit­ erature and through the reflections of the experts involved in the ESRC project. Page 3 of 7 PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice). Preface This constant change generates a specific set of challenges for theory and methods: Do we need new theory and methods? Or do our existing tools still work—if slightly modi­ fied? We have found in exploring the literature a highly varied mix of work. In many cases the work is inductive, documenting and evidencing digital media and technology use and impacts but not testing or evaluating theory—with a good number of papers being “theo­ ry free.” Having said this, many papers draw on key social theories—with the notable re- use and revision of older theory. Uses and Gratifications is one notable “older” social the­ ory that has been given new life by examinations of digital media use (see chapters 8, 9, 18, and 21). In other cases, new theory has had to be developed and honed to explore specific issues or to address challenges specific to digital technology use. An example here would be “unified user acceptance” theory or models (see chapter 13). Questions concerning theory that we might address include, • How is the digital socially and technically conceptualized? • Which theories are predominant in which domains? • What new theory has been developed, and/or is “old theory” adequate to the task of explaining the social impacts and use of the digital? • To what extent is digital research theoretically or empirically driven? • Which concepts and key themes cluster and link regardless of theoretical or empiri­ cal approach? • Can a new “theoretical framework” for understanding the digital be generated, and is this needed? • To what extent have interdisciplinary approaches modified or developed theory? • Which methods predominate in which domains of work? • Does the availability of large volumes of digital data change how the digital is stud­ ied and/or the approaches taken to the social in a digital world? • Are certain methods intrinsically linked to certain domains or theories? How are methods tied to the social contexts around digital research? • Have interdisciplinary approaches modified or prioritized certain methods in the study of the digital? We hope that by documenting issues of theory and method the book can help colleagues reflect on issues of theory selection and testing, as well as appropriate methodology. In this way, the book provides a snapshot from a brief period in time, assembling what has been studied in the area of digital media and technologies with an eye to the future of this research. (p. ix) Chapters in the Book The chapters in the book either present the outcomes from the respective domains of the ESRC project or they are developed from responses to an open call as part of the Ways of Being Conference held in 2017 (both of which are described more fully in chapter 1). The non-ESRC contribution chapters represent reviews, reflections on the state of the art, or Page 4 of 7 PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice). Preface the application of reviews to various kinds of evidence in each of the domains. The Table of Contents provides detailed listings of the sections of each chapter as a guide to their content and focus. The online versions of each chapter also provide an abstract. All of the chapters should help provide overviews for, and spark ideas for and debates about, future research directions in the broad and evolving area of digital technology and society. As such, we would hope that current and future scholars can draw upon these as a resource when planning their work, using these chapters as foundations and baselines for literature reviews, as well as identifying central concepts and topics and larger re­ search areas that need more attention and explication. We have also provided a range of supporting materials and visualizations via the project website at https:// waysofbeingdigital.com. The production of the materials presented in the ESRC chapters was a complex process involving contributions of the core research team, the project post-doctoral researchers, and other colleagues. The ESRC chapters follow a fairly similar and standard initial for­ mat developed by the core team—especially Sim Yates, Jordana Blejmar, and Elinor Carmi —and revised and finalized by Ron Rice. In listing the authorships of these chapters, we have tried to reflect as accurately as we can the contributions to these chapters from core project team members, either directly or via Delphi or workshop materials. We more gen­ erally acknowledge the contributions made by all across the project. Ron conceptualized the structure and flow of chapters, worked with Oxford University Press to develop a shared approach to the book, worked with the chapter authors through multiple versions of all 25 chapters, and developed and continually updated the surround­ ing material to ensure consistency of text and reference format, correspondence of terms, cross-referencing, and style. Ron and Sim engaged in multiple iterations of the materials, raising questions, resolving questions, and sharing detailed descriptions of all the things going on in our personal and academic lives that continually got in the way of completing the book. Irony, dark humor, encouragement, promises, arcane analysis details, Byzantine university politics, strikes, Brexit, floods, fires, emergency administration meetings, changes in contributors’ affilia­ tions, reshuffling of chapter order, and debates about the proper use of “concept” or “top­ ic” pervaded these email and Skype conversations. (p. x) Potential Audiences Primary audiences for the Oxford Handbook of Digital Technology and Society are re­ searchers, faculty, and graduate students, in one or more of the seven theme areas. The entire book, and certainly specific chapters, provide required reading for anyone interest­ ed in the multifaceted nature of relationships between digital technology and society. Se­ condary audiences are policymakers, research funding agencies, libraries, and upper-lev­ el college students working on academic projects. The chapters should provide exception­ al resources for those working on projects needing literature background and sources for deeper insights, research results, and theoretical foundations. Readers will benefit from Page 5 of 7 PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice). Preface this book’s disciplinary, multidisciplinary, and interdisciplinary perspectives. Given the seven theme sections—Health, Age, and Home; Communication and Relationships; Orga­ nizational Contexts; Communities, Identities, and Class; Citizenship, Politics, and Partici­ pation; Data, Representation, and Sharing; Governance and Accountability—as well as a Synthesis section, different portions of the proposed book could be of interest to diverse audiences, including, for example, those interested in sociology, political science, commu­ nication, psychology, media policy, management, organizational community, community studies, environment, economics, public administration, political communication, digital design, socio-technical systems, public health, and media research. No prior training or expertise is required to read or benefit from the chapters. Conclusion This book was born out of a need to understand what the future research challenges will be for social research in understanding the relationships among digital technology and society. It is not meant as a definitive guide to this, but as rather a set of starting points and provocations to fellow scholars (and ourselves) as to the next steps in research, prac­ tice, and policy. Simeon J. Yates, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom Ronald E. Rice, University of California, Santa Barbara, United States (p. xi) Acknowledgments Particular thanks need to go to our colleagues Jordana Blejmar and Elinor Carmi. Jordana was instrumental in organizing the conference from which the non-ESRC chapters came. Both Jordana and Elinor managed many of the practicalities of getting the ESRC chapters together, and they were quick and detailed in providing additional literature reviews and editorial suggestions for all the ESRC chapters. We obviously need to thank all the con­ tributors to the project and to the book without whose input neither the research nor the contributions to this volume would have been possible. Sim thanks the ESRC, which funded the project, and the UK Defence Science Technology Laboratory and the US National Science Foundation, which funded the workshops. He al­ so thanks Ron, Jordana, and Elinor for their patience as he got distracted over the life of the project and book writing by role changes, a secondment to government, and a univer­ sity promotion. As ever, thanks to his family: Rachel, Ciaran, Ethan, and Niamh for just being there (and typing up workshop “yellow stickies”—if only for extra pocket money!). Ron thanks the Arthur N. Rupe Foundation for funding his UC Santa Barbara endowed professorship, which supported travel and other resources involved in this project. He al­ so thanks Claire for her ongoing tolerance of his frequent late-night editing work, and our cats Tinker and Belle for their frequent occupation of his desk and keyboard during those times. Page 6 of 7 PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice). Preface We very much appreciate the enthusiastic initial response to our book proposal by Hallie Stebbins at Oxford University Press, and the ongoing support by the Oxford University Press Editor Sarah Humphreville. Thanks, too, to the copyeditor Suzanne Copenhagen, the production team at SPi Global, and indexer Robert Swanson. Grint, K., & Woolgar, S. (2013). The machine at work: Technology, work and organization. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Page 7 of 7 PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice). List of Figures List of Figures   Edited by Simeon J. Yates and Ronald E. Rice The Oxford Handbook of Digital Technology and Society Edited by Simeon J. Yates and Ronald E. Rice Print Publication Date: Aug 2020 Subject: Sociology Online Publication Date: Aug 2020 List of Figures (p. xxi) 1.1 Trends over time in mention of four major digital terms in books through 2008, based on Google Ngram Viewer. 11 1.2 Hierarchical clustering of main codes based on co-occurrence (correlation) of main and subcodes within each source text. 25 2.1 Delphi process. 41 2.2 Bubble map of concept pairs. 48 2.3 Tree map of concept pairs. 49 2.4 Interactive topic modelling graph–topic. 50 2.5 Interactive topic modelling graph–keyword. 51 2.6 WordStat topic modelling. 52 3.1 Health and Well-Being 2000–2004: Most frequent concept pairs. 60 3.2 Health and Well-Being 2012–2016: Most frequent concept pairs. 61 4.1 Distribution of nine core topics over time. 94 4.2 Top 20 journals. 94 4.3 Distribution of articles per discipline over time. 95 4.4 Distribution of mental health concepts over time. 96 8.1 Communication 2000–2004: Most frequent concept pairs. 226 8.2 Communication 2012–2016: Most frequent concept pairs. 227 11.1 Economy 2000–2004: Most frequent concept pairs. 327 11.2 Economy 2012–2016: Most frequent concept pairs. 328 13.1 Digital roll-outs (or not) by company size. 375 13.2 Number of digital roll-outs by organization size (area represents proportion of cases). 375 13.3 Roll-outs or not by sector. 376 13.4 Digital solution roll-outs by sector (area represents proportion of cases). 377 13.5 Increase in roll-outs over the last two years by sector. 378 13.6 Reasons for digital roll-outs. 379 13.7 Knowledge worker and number of roll-outs. 384 13.8 Proportion of digital roll-outs UK workforce thought successful. 384 Page 1 of 2 PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice). List of Figures (p. xxii) 13.9 Level of employment and number of roll-outs experienced. 385 13.10 Positive impacts of new digital tools. 386 13.11 Reasons for a negative attitude. 387 13.12 Organization size and challenges to implementation of digital solutions. 389 13.13 Levels of organizational challenge and successful digital roll-outs. 389 13.14 Communication channels used. 390 13.15 Adequate communication and communication channel. 391 13.16 Communications channels and successful roll-outs. 392 13.17 Leadership and successful roll-outs. 392 13.18 Leadership by sector. 393 13.19 Regression model of perceptions of successful digital roll-outs. 397 14.1 Communities and Identities 2000–2004: Most frequent concept pairs. 409 14.2 Communities and Identities 2012–2016: Most frequent concept pairs. 410 15.1 Mean of frequency of social media use by social class (NS-SEC). 437 15.2 Type of Internet user by social class (NRS). 438 15.3 MCA analysis—overall results. 440 15.4 Mean number of social media platforms used by class. 443 15.5 Social media platforms used by social class (NS-SEC). 444 16.1 Citizenship 2000–2004: Most frequent concept pairs. 453 16.2 Citizenship 2012–2016: Most frequent concept pairs. 454 18.1 Data and representation 2000–2004: Most frequent concept pairs. 506 18.2 Data and representation 2012–2016: Most frequent concept pairs. 507 21.1 Summary of review of motivations for online knowledge sharing. 592 22.1 Governance and security 2000–2004: Most frequent concept pairs. 610 22.2 Governance and security 2012–2016: Most frequent concept pairs. 611 23.1 Governance tools and their application at different levels of IoT activity. (Smith, 2012) 632 24.1 Productivity graph. 662 24.2 Clustering of ideas: ESRC-NSF workshop. 665 24.3 Political, economic, social, technical, legal, and environmental clustering: ESRC-NSF workshop. 666 24.4 Final research topic template: ESRC-DSTL workshop. 667 25.1 All seven domains 2000–2004: Most frequent concept pairs. 701 25.2 All seven domains 2012–2016: Most frequent concept pairs. 702 25.3 Hierarchical clustering of non-ESRC chapters based on co-occurrence of coded themes. 716 Page 2 of 2 PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.