THE OTTOMAN SPECIAL ORGANIZATION - TEŞKİLAT-I MAHSUSA: A HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO ITS OPERATIONS AGAINST BRITISH OCCUPIED EGYPT (1914-1916) A Master’s Thesis by POLAT SAFİ THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA September 2006 To my family THE OTTOMAN SPECIAL ORGANIZATION - TEŞKİLAT-I MAHSUSA: A HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO ITS OPERATIONS AGAINST BRITISH OCCUPIED EGYPT (1914-1916) The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by POLAT SAFİ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA September 2006 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in History. Assist. Prof. Oktay Özel Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in History. Prof. Dr. Stanford J. Shaw Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in History. Assist. Prof. Nur Bilge Criss Examining Committee Member Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Erdal Erel Director ABSTRACT THE OTTOMAN SPECIAL ORGANIZATION - TEŞKİLAT-I MAHSUSA: A HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO ITS OPERATIONS AGAINST BRITISH OCCUPIED EGYPT (1914-1916) Safi, Polat M.A., Department of History Supervisor: Ass. Prof. Oktay Özel September 2006 The present level of the knowledge about the plans and operations of the Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa forces against Egypt during World War I is very poor in terms of the analysis of this phenomenon at a micro level in different localities. This study, in this context, is an attempt through the Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa concentration, nourished mainly from Sinai, Libya, and to a lesser extent Sudan, against Egypt between 1914 and 1916 to further our understanding of not only the details of the Teşkilat’s activities in these regions but also its administrative and operational characteristics. Keywords: Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa, Umur-i Şarkiye Dairesi, Sinai, Egypt, Libya, Sudan, Süleyman Askeri, Mümtaz Bey, Hasan Efendi, Eşref Kuşçubaşı, Nuri Paşa, Cafer el-Askeri, Afrika Grupları Kumandanlığı. iii ÖZET TEŞKİLAT-I MAHSUSA: İNGİLİZ İŞGALİ ALTINDAKİ MISIR’A KARŞI YÜRÜTTÜĞÜ EYLEMLERE MAHSUS ATIFLA TARİHİ BİR DEĞERLENDİRME (1914-1916) Safi, Polat Yüksek Lisans, Tarih Bölümü Tez Yöneticisi: Oktay Özel Eylül 2006 1. Dünya Savaşı esnasında, Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa kuvvetlerinin Mısır’a karşı planları ve operasyonları hakkındaki mevcut bilgi düzeyi bu hadisenin değişik mahallerde mikro bir seviyede analiz edilmesi bakımından oldukça fakirdir. Bu çalışma, bu bağlamda, Mısır’a karşı başlıca Sina, Libya ve daha az ölçüde Sudan’dan beslenen Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa konsantrasyonu yoluyla yalnızca Teşkilat’ın bu bölgelerdeki faaliyetlerinin ayrıntılarına ilişkin değil aynı zamanda idari ve eylemsel özelliklerine ilişkin anlayışın ilerlemesi için bir girişimdir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa, Umur-i Şarkiye Dairesi, Sinai, Egypt, Libya, Sudan, Süleyman Askeri, Mümtaz Bey, Hasan Efendi, Eşref Kuşçubaşı, Nuri Paşa, Cafer el-Askeri, Afrika Grupları Kumandanlığı. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to many people for help, both direct and indirect, in writing this thesis. First of all, I would like to thank my supervisor Oktay Özel for his support and guidance in the last three years. Without his enthusiasm, critical comments, analytical questions, and constant encouragement, I would have never been able to complete this dissertation. I would also like to thank Stanford Shaw for commenting on an early draft of the work and letting me make use of his valuable library. Moreover, I have to express my gratitude to Nur Bilge Criss for enhancing the quality of this thesis with her critical comments on the final draft. I am also thankful to Eugenia Kermeli, Hasan Ünal, and Hakan Kırımlı for encouraging me to become an historian for four years ago. This thesis would have never come into existence without the liberal attitude of the present ATASE administration. Therefore, I would like to express my thanks to Col. Dr. Ahmet Tetik, departmental chief of ATASE archive, not only for facilitating my research but also for his constructive comments on my thesis as an exact scholar. I am also greatly indebted to Arzu Yoğurtçuoğlu and Şeyda Büyükcan, archive experts in ATASE, for helping me in reading the materials and their entertaining friendship. My family, Macit, Sevgi, and Esra Safi, deserves the most profuse gratitude for spiritually and materially supporting me during my entire life. I would also like to express my gratitude to my uncle, Sacit Safi. I feel, moreover, obliged to voice my gratefulness to Eren Safi whose support, good will, and patience, as well as intellectual remarks has greatly contributed to the complementation of this study. I also thank the v staff of the periodical, Kılavuz, especially Turan Kandemir and Hakan Arslanbenzer, for supporting and critically evaluating my studies for years. Furthermore, I feel compelled to appreciate the close and exciting companionship of Emrah Safa Gürkan for almost eight years. My thanks also go to my friends, Fatih Durgun, Alphan Akgül, and M. Burak Özdemir, for not only generating new psychoanalytical methods to put up with my constant complaints about this study but also playing an active part in the realization of this thesis by their invaluable analysis and criticism. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ……..............................................................................................iii ÖZET .................................................................................................................iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................................................v TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................vii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ..................................................................1 A) Intelligence Studies in Turkey ...........................................................1 B) Literature on the Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa Revisited .................................6 C) Sources .............................................................................................23 CHAPTER TWO: THE TEŞKİLAT-I MAHSUSA FORCES IN SINAI ..........35 A) The Mission of the Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa in the 1st Canal Campaign ...39 1. Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa in the Turkish Plan of Attack ……………….....39 2. Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa Forces in the Region ……………….………….42 3. Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa’s Missions Across the Frontier: Military Activities and Intelligence .....................................................................................46 4. Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa’s Involvement in Local Conflicts .......................50 5. Formation of the Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa Units in the Districts ..............53 6. Concentration in Yafa .......................................................................55 7. The Situation in Egypt ......................................................................62 8. The Attack on the Suez Canal ……………………………………...70 vii
Description: