The Old Testament in Its World Oudtestamentische Studiën Old Testament Studies published on behalf of the Societies for Old Testament Studies in the Netherlands and Belgium, South Africa, the United Kingdom and Ireland Editor J.C. de Moor Kampen Editorial Board H.G.M. Williamson Oxford H.F. Van Rooy Potchefstroom M. Vervenne Leuven VOLUME 52 The Old Testament in Its World Papers Read at the Winter Meeting, January 2003 The Society for Old Testament Study and at the Joint Meeting, July 2003 The Society for Old Testament Study and Het Oudtestamentisch Werkgezelschap in Nederland en België Edited by Robert P. Gordon & Johannes C. de Moor BRILL LEIDEN•BOSTON 2005 This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data LC Control Number: 2004058584 Becking, Bob. Between fear and freedom : essays on the interpretation of Jeremiah 30–31 / by Bob Becking. p. cm.—(Oudtestamentische studiën = Old Testament studies, ISSN 0169-7226; d. 51) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 90-04-14118-9 (alk. paper) 1. Bible. O.T. Jeremiah XXX–XXXI—Criticism, interpretation, etc. I. Title. II. Oudtestamentische studiën; d. 51. BS1525.52.B43 2004 224’.206—dc22 2004054639 ISSN 0169-7226 ISBN 90 04 14322 X © Copyright 2005 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill Academic Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. printed in the netherlands Contents Introduction ................................................vii K.J. Cathcart, The Comparative Philological Approach to the Text of the Old Testament .......................1 M. Dijkstra, ‘As for the other events ...’ Annals and Chronicles in Israel and the Ancient Near East .........14 R.P. Gordon, ‘Comparativism’ and the God of Israel ..... 45 A.C. Hagedorn, ‘Who would invite a stranger from abroad?’ The Presence of Greeks in Palestine in Old Testament Times .................................................68 P.S. Johnston, Death in Egypt and Israel: A Theological Reflection .............................................94 K.A. Kitchen, The Hieroglyphic Inscriptions of the Neo- Hittite States (c. 1200–700 bc): A Fresh Source of Background to the Hebrew Bible .....................117 M.C.A. Korpel, Disillusion among Jews in the Postexilic Period ................................................135 N. MacDonald, Whose Monotheism? Which Rationality? Reflections on Israelite Monotheism in Erhard Gersten- berger’s Theologies in the Old Testament .............158 M.E.J. Richardson, Textual Modification: Some Examples from Egypt ...........................................168 J.E. Tollington, Abraham and his Wives: Culture and Status ...................................183 P.J.P. van Hecke, PastoralMetaphorsintheHebrewBible and in its Ancient Near Eastern Context ..............200 vi Contents J.A. Wagenaar, The Priestly Festival Calendar and the Babylonian New Year Festivals: Origin and Transforma- tion of the Ancient Israelite Festival Year .............218 J.-W. Wesselius, Language Play in the Old Testament and in Ancient North-West Semitic Inscriptions: Some Notes on the Kilamuwa Inscription .........................253 P.J. Williams, Are the Biblical Rephaim and the Ugaritic RPUM Healers? ......................................266 Abbreviations .............................................279 Index of Authors ..........................................281 Index of Biblical Texts .................................... 288 Introduction This volume brings together papers read at the Winter Meet- ing of The Society for Old Testament Study in Birmingham, 6-8 January, 2003, and at the joint meeting of The Society for OldTestamentStudyandtheOudtestamentischWerkgezelschap in Nederland en Belgi¨e, in Cambridge, 21-23 July, 2003. The latter meeting was organised in coordination with the Society of Biblical Literature International Meeting (20-25 July, 2003). The meetings had as their overarching theme ‘The Hebrew Bible against its Ancient Near Eastern Background’, and most of the papers presented in this volume have a Near Eastern as well as an Israelite-Old Testament dimension. The benefits of drawing upon the linguistic stock of the neigh- bouring cognate languages for the illumination of obscure words andphrasesinthebiblicaltexthavelongbeenappreciated.Inthe opening essay, however, K.J. Cathcart argues the further point that it may on occasion be justifiable to emend the Hebrew text in the course of applying the insightsof comparativephilology to textual cruces. With the use of worked examples, he illustrates thewaysinwhichAkkadian,UgariticandOldAramaicmayhelp to solve problem readings in the Hebrew. M. Dijkstra is concerned with the content of texts of an his- torical complexion. He commends Hans-Gustav Gu¨terbock’s dis- tinction between what kings in antiquity had recorded for their own glorification and truly historical writing in which posterity ‘selected and wrote what it wanted to remember from the past’. It was the latter that gave rise to historiography in the ancient Near East, and Israelite historiography is to be seen within the contextof this development.Israel did not haveto wait for Hero- dotus to develop a view on its history. The conceptions of history held in Israel and in the adjacent countries are one of several topics that engage R.P. Gordon as he considers the question of comparativism’ and whether, and in what respects, it is possible to distinguish Israel from her neigh- bours. His conclusion is that the comparing and contrasting of intellectual and religious developments in Israel and among her neighbours is both legitimate and desirable. The essay by A.C. Hagedorn reminds us that Israel also had neighbours to the west. While acknowledging the likelihood of viii Introduction migrantcraftsmenfromtheeastsettlinginancientGreece,Hage- dorn is interested in the reverse process, focussing on the points of contact between Greek and oriental in Palestine as a means of discovering something about the social identity of those Greeks who settled in Palestine. Egypt, Israel’s most influential neighbour to the south, is the focus for comparison and contrast in the essay by P.S. Johnston on death and the dead in Egypt and in Israel. Johnston notes the positive aspects of death that are popularly associated with ancient Egypt, but also highlights a problem in that there are also clear indications that, in practice, the Egyptians failed to respect the dead, and were to a considerable degree sceptical and cynical about the afterlife. ‘Egyptian views on death and the afterlife were altogether more varied than often assumed.’ Such hope as there was and such preparations for death as were possible were the privilege of the well-to-do. In Israel, to judge from its scriptures, death was fairly uniformly regarded as ‘the negation of life, disrupting its activity and bringing separation from the divine presence’. K.A. Kitchen, best known for his Egyptological work, is con- cerned here with the ‘transitional era of Western mini-empires (c. 1180-950 b.c.)’, which saw the flourishing of the Neo-Hittite states,theAramaeanstateofAram-Zobah,andtheIsraelite‘em- pire’ of David and Solomon. The Neo-Hittite states are seen as important from an Old Testament perspective, not only on ac- count of their historical interaction with Israel but also for the cultural background that they provide for the accounts of Israel- ite history in Samuel-Kingsand Chronicles. Some filling in of the sparsenarrationofthebiblicalbooksispossibleinthelightofthe recentlypublishedcorpusofover220inscriptionsinHieroglyphic Luwian. M.C.A. Korpel takes us several centuries further on as she considers the negative effects on the Jewish people of the de- struction of the Jerusalem temple and the deportation of leading citizens to Babylonia. She claims that the general preoccupation with the restoration of Judah after the exile has deprived schol- arsofaproperappreciationofthedisillusionmentandpessimism thataffectedJewishcommunitiesintheNeo-BabylonianandPer- sianperiods.Theliteraryevidence,bothbiblicalandarchival,for Introduction ix the state of mind of Jews in Judah, Egypt and Babylon during thisperiodgivesampleillustrationofthedespairingre-evaluation of their religious faith and traditions that was going on. There was no full and instantaneous triumph of strict monotheism’ at the end of the exile. N. MacDonald does not address the question of monothe- ism expressly within a Near Eastern setting, but his conclusion directs discussion back towards that larger environing world in whichOld Testamentfaithdeveloped.MacDonaldseeks to apply insights from Systematic Theology to the discussion of mono- theism, noting that the term itself is a coinage of the English Enlightenment. He demonstrates the danger of imposing upon Old Testamenttexts a ready-made term and therewith a concep- tualitythat is more restrictivethan, and less truly descriptiveof, what the texts actually say in relation to Israelite belief about God. ItisthetransmissionoftraditionsthatengagesM.E.J.Richard- son,whoconcentratesonEgyptianliterature,rangingfromCoptic tradition, in which the Gospel account of the Holy Family in Egypt develops into a number of links with specific sites, to the much-cited Merenptah Stele, with its mention of ‘Israel’. It is suggested that some texts that share motifs with Old Testament passages are also deserving of recognition as comparative’ ma- terial and therefore of inclusion in anthologies devoted to the presentation of such. It is also urged that consideration be taken ofsuchmattersasthepurposeandthetransmissionofdocuments when they are cited in illustration of biblical texts. Though she does pay attention to ancient Near Eastern parallels occasionally,J.E.TollingtonretainsaspecificallyOldTestament- Israelite focus in her examination of the relationships between Abraham and his wives. The accounts of the lesser’ wives, Hagar and Keturah, are truly ‘patriarchal’ in outlook, but it is not so in the depiction of Abraham and Sarah: ‘A close reading indic- ates that neither patriarchy nor matriarchy is the appropriate authority for God’s people.’ P.J.P. van Hecke, writing on pastoral metaphors, discusses the depiction of God as shepherd in relation to his people, but Van Hecke does not limit himself to positive imagery: he is also interested in negative evaluations of God as sheep-owner and
Description: