The Needs ABC Therapeutic Model for Couples and Families A Guide for Practitioners Tom Caplan New York London Routledge Routledge Taylor & Francis Group Taylor & Francis Group 270 Madison Avenue 27 Church Road New York, NY 10016 Hove, East Sussex BN3 2FA © 2011 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2011. To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk. International Standard Book Number: 978-0-415-87305-5 (Hardback) 978-0-415-87306-2 (Paperback) For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Dan- vers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged. Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. Library of Congress Cataloging‑in‑Publication Data Caplan, Tom. The needs ABC therapeutic model for couples and families : a guide for practitioners / Tom Caplan. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. Summary: “The Needs ABC Therapeutic Model for Couples and Families: A Guide for Practitioners shows readers how to successfully tailor a therapeutic approach to meet the needs of couples and families. It has been preceded by Needs ABC (Acquisition and Behavior Change), a model for group work and other psychotherapies published in the UK by Whiting and Birch. Beginning clinicians will come away from this book with concrete, practical skills and expanded theoretical base for their practice, and they’ll be able to apply their new knowledge directly and in ways that will help them create long-lasting change in clients who present with difficult behaviors. The book explains the concepts and theories behind the Needs ABC approach and provides tangible methods with which to perform as a Needs ABC therapist or integrate aspects of the Needs ABC approach into the reader’s own therapeutic techniques. Practitioners will find that the Needs ABC model complements cognitive-behavioral, integrative, and other therapeutic models, as well as general guides to couples and family therapy”--Provided by publisher. ISBN 978-0-415-87305-5 (hardcover : alk. paper) -- ISBN 978-0-415-87306-2 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Couples therapy. 2. Family therapy. I. Title. [DNLM: 1. Couples Therapy--methods. 2. Family Therapy--methods. WM 430.5.M3 C244n 2010] RC488.5.C362 2010 616.89’1562--dc22 2010018616 Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at http://www.taylorandfrancis.com and the Routledge Web site at http://www.routledgementalhealth.com ISBN 0-203-86557-X Master e-book ISBN For my children and their children Contents Preface: The evoluTion of The needs acquisiTion and Behavior change Model vii acknowledgMenTs xvii chaPTer 1 inTroducing The needs aBc Model 1 chaPTer 2 couPles TheraPy 31 chaPTer 3 inTroducing The needs aBc relaTional needs and eMoTion-focused coMPonenTs 75 chaPTer 4 exPecTaTions for an oPTiMal TheraPeuTic seTTing 105 chaPTer 5 using The needs aBc Model in couPles and faMily TheraPy 125 chaPTer 6 unconscious facTors and relaTional needs 141 chaPTer 7 Power and conTrol in couPles TheraPy 153 chaPTer 8 life sTages and couPles 175 chaPTer 9 addiTional Techniques 201 chaPTer 10 afTer TreaTMenT 211 chaPTer 11 conclusion 217 v vi Contents references 227 index 235 Preface: The Evolution of the Needs Acquisition and Behavior Change Model The thought manifests as the word. The word manifests as the deed. The deed develops into habit. And the habit hardens into character. So watch the thought and its ways with care. And let it spring from love, born out of concern for all beings. Buddha The Needs Acquisition and Behavior Change (Needs ABC) model emphasizes working with what clients are asking for in their interper- sonal relationships rather than focusing without exploration on the “bad” behaviors that ultimately bring them into the treatment setting. It also proposes that the way clients feel when they are frustrated in the realization of their relational goals will predict either more or less useful strategies for relational problem solving. This model evolved and developed as a result of my experience working in a number of treatment settings. My background in psy- chotherapy initially had a strong focus on group work along with an active private practice where I worked with individuals, couples, and vii viii PrefaCe families. I started learning about groups as a treatment modality when I did my master’s placement in the School of Social Work at the McGill Domestic Violence Clinic. At that time, the clinic was directed by two professors, Judy Magill (who passed away shortly after my gradu- ation) and Annette Werk. They both commented that, even though I had a lot to learn, my style seemed to be very encouraging to the clients—men who were perpetrators of abuse—and seemed to help them to discuss their problem more openly and honestly. Interestingly enough, this was the same style I used in all my work; it was just the way I did things, though I wasn’t sure exactly what I was doing. At the McGill Clinic, we did a lot of feelings work (“reaching for feel- ings”), and when I graduated and Annette, who surely felt a void with Judy’s passing, asked me to join the supervision team, I began to take my position seriously. Harle Thomas, a former student just a few years younger than myself, encouraged me to present at the next Group Work conference as he had done the previous year. The subject of my first paper, “Safety and Comfort, Content, and Process: Facilitating Open Group Work for Men Who Batter” (Caplan & Thomas, 1995), which I wrote and copresented with Harle, was the beginning of the deconstruction of what was to become my Needs ABC Model. When I started working at the McGill Domestic Violence Clinic in 1980, the therapeutic approach we used involved a twofold meth- odology: (1) the use of “process-oriented” interventions (looking past the concrete content of what a client was saying to what was implied in what was being said—or meta message); and (2) reaching for feel- ings (helping clients express how they were feeling with regard to what they were saying, often with the use of a “feelings chart”). In the men’s group, composed of male perpetrators of domestic violence, the chart had no “anger” column in an attempt to help them to recognize other relevant emotional components to what they had said—that fear or sadness, for example, could possibly be hidden behind their anger and that an understanding of this would be very helpful in address- ing their less than useful behaviors. We had no specific explanation of why this was important, but it was recognized that when the men were able to connect with these “softer” emotions they were also bet- ter able to communicate with their partners. PrefaCe ix In those days, the interpretation of the meta message, or the overall impression given by the client through his narrative, was quite general and concrete. For example, if a client stated that he was angry at his partner for scolding him about the way he tied the garbage bag for pick-up, the intervention used would be something like, “It must be pretty scary to be criticized by your wife,” with the focus more on the appropriate emotion than on anything else. The concept used was fairly simple: the facilitator would think about any emotion other than anger, with “fear” and “sadness” being favorite picks; any less dramatic or “dangerous” emotion would do. They then would do a “reaching for feelings” exercise with the group or group member, using the afore- mentioned chart. There was no thought about what else might be implied in the client’s statement. Even though I had a fairly good handle on Family Systems Theory, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), “feelings work,” and the tra- ditional social work skills (e.g., joining, mirroring, paraphrasing), I was exceedingly interested in learning all I could about therapeutic models and strategies. As time went on, my work gradually came to be influenced by Michael White’s Narrative School, especially his concepts of therapist “curiosity” and “externalization of the problem,” which allowed clients to look at what they were doing with more objectivity (White & Epston, 1990); de Shazer (1985, 1991) and De Shazer et al.’s (2007) Solution-Focused Therapy, where the “Magic Question” is a point of interest with regard to what the client was hoping to happen that would be curative for the situation at hand; and especially Greenberg and Johnson’s (1988) Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT). I had taken a workshop with Leslie Greenberg, who seemed to validate the concept of various levels of emotional states he had described as primary, secondary, and tertiary. This led me to consider that there were, in fact, different levels of emotions and that some emotions were more easily expressed than others, depending on the context. This was also the precursor to my definition of vari- ous levels of relational needs. Because I sensed that parts of each of these models, including the ones I had initially been taught, pro- vided opportunities to help clients in ways a monolithic model never could, I began to integrate these into my work with groups and with my individual, couple and family work. This led me, eventually, to
Description: