THE MORAL PROBLEM il ________ MICHAEL SMITH Philosophical Theory 0 'Extraordinarily clear and well organized. Reading this book takes you right into the centre of the intense contemporary debate on moral theory. Smith knows exactly what he is doing, and slowly puts together a redoubtable argument for the broadly realist position he favours/ Jonathan Dancy, University of Keele Ά marvelous volume: it is not only an important contribution to philosophical ethics, but also an exciting introduction to the subject. The book is an excellent model of how to do philosophy, a model I hope students (and their teachers) will adopt for themselves/ Gilbert Harman, Princeton University 'An outstanding and ambitious work, it serves at once as a lucid introduction to meta-ethics and a wide-ranging inquiry into some of its hardest problems.' Brad Hooker, University of Reading 'Vigorous, engaging, and marvelously sophisticated, Michael Smith's The Moral Problem faces head-on the challenge of reconciling morality's motivational relevance with its claims to objectivity and categorical force - without abandoning a Humean account of human action and without metaphysical extravagance.' Geoffrey Sayre-McCord, University of North Carolina This widely anticipated book offers a systematic introduction to and striking analysis of the central issues animating current debate in moral philosophy. It will be of interest to anyone with a serious interest in the philosophical foundations of ethics. Topics discussed include: realist vs. anti-realist accounts of moral truth, cognitivist vs. expressivist accounts of moral judgement; internalist vs. externalist accounts of the relation between moral judgement and the will; Humean vs. anti-Humean theories of motivation; and the debate between those who think that morality is a system of hypothetical imperatives and those who think that moral requirements are categorical imperatives. Michael Smith The author is SeniorSH^SS^ Hlosophy Program, Research School of Social Sciences, at th< < Jional University. He taught previously at the University of Oxfo.&^rinceton University and Monash University. He is the author of several essays in ethics and moral psychology. Printed in Great Britain ISBN O-bBl-lTBHL-fl BLACKWELL Oxford UK & Cambridge USA The Moral Problem PHILOSOPHICAL THEORY SERIES EDITORS John McDowell, Philip Pettit and Crispin Wright For Truth in Semantics Anthony Appiah Abstract Particulars Keith Campbell Tractarian Semantics Peter Carruthers Truth and Objectivity Brian Ellis The Dynamics of Belief Peter Forrest Abstract Objects Bob Hale Facts and Meaning Jane Heal Conditionals Frank Jackson Sense and Certainty Marie McGinn Reality and Representation David Papineau Facts and the Function of Truth Huw Price Moral Dilemmas Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Unnatural Doubts Michael Williamson Identity and Discrimination Timothy Williamson The Moral Problem MICHAEL SMITH BLACKWELL JB P u b I i s h e r s Copyright © Michael Smith 1994 The right of Michael Smith to be identified as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 1994 First published in USA 1995 Reprinted 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2001 Blackwell Publishers Ltd 108 Cowley Road Oxford OX4 1JF, UK Blackwell Publishers Inc. 350 Main Street Malden, Massachusetts 02148, USA All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Except in the United States of America, this book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Smith, Michael (Michael A.) The moral problem/Michael Smith p. cm. — (Philosophical theory) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-631-18941-6 (alk. paper) — ISBN 0-631-19246-8 (pbk) 1. Ethics. 2. Rationalism. I. Title. II. Series BJ103I.S64 1994 94-6156 170—dc20 CIP Typeset in Baskerville on 11/13pt by Best-set Typesetter Ltd, Hong Kong Printed and bound in Great Britain by MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall This book is printed on acid-free paper For my parents Phyl and Roy Smith Acknowledgements Grateful acknowledgement is made for permission to reprint extracts from the following previously published material by Michael Smith: ‘Should We Believe in Emotivism?’ in Graham Macdonald and Crispin Wright, eds, Fact, Science and Morality: Essays on A. J. Ayer’s Language, Truth and Logic, 1986, Basil Blackwell; ‘The Humean Theory of Motivation’, Mind, 1987, Oxford University Press; ‘Dispositional Theories of Value’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 1989; ‘Realism’ in Peter Singer, ed., A Companion to Ethics, 1991, Basil Blackwell; ‘Valuing: Desiring or Believing?’ in David Charles and Kathleen Lennon, eds, Reduction, Explanation, and Realism, 1992, Oxford University Press; and Objectivity and Moral Realism: on the Significance of the Phenomenology of Moral Experience’ and ‘Colour, Transparency, Mind-Independence’, both in John Haldane and Crispin Wright, eds, Reality, Representation and Pro jection, 1993, Oxford University Press. Contents Preface x 1 What is the Moral Problem? 1 1.1 Normative Ethics vs. Meta-Ethics 1 1.2 Meta-Ethics Today 3 1.3 The Moral Problem 4 1.4 Towards a Solution to the Moral Problem 13 1.5 Summary and Preview 14 2 The Expressivist Challenge 16 2.1 Descriptivism vs. Expressivism 16 2.2 An Apparent Dilemma Facing Descriptivists 17 2.3 Ayer’s Objection to Non-Naturalism 20 2.4 Non-Naturalism and Epistemology 21 2.5 Ayer’s Objection to Naturalism 25 2.6 The Open Question Argument and Metaphysical Naturalism 27 2.7 The Open Question Argument and Definitional Naturalism 35 2.8 What are the Platitudes Surrounding our Moral Concepts? 39 2.9 Subjective vs. Non-Subjective Definitional Naturalism 41 2.10 Definitional Naturalism as the Search for Network Analyses of our Moral Concepts 44 2.11 How Network Analyses can be Defective: The Permutation Problem 48 2.12 Can We Provide Network Analyses of Moral Terms? 54 2.13 Can We Avoid Ayer’s Dilemma? 56 2.14 Summary and Preview 58 3 The Externalist Challenge 60 3.1 Internalism vs. Externalism 60 3.2 Rationalism as a Conceptual Claim vs. Rationalism as a Substantive Claim 63 3.3 Brink’s ‘Amoralist’ Challenge 66 3.4 Reply to Brink’s Claim that Amoralists Really Make Moral Judgments 68 3.5 An Argument for the Practicality Requirement 71 3.6 Foot’s ‘Etiquette’ Challenge 77 3.7 Reply to Foot’s Claim that Morality and Etiquette are Analogous 80 3.8 Reply to Foot’s Objection to the Rationalists’ Conceptual Claim 84 3.9 An Argument for the Rationalists’ Conceptual Claim 85 3.10 Summary and Preview 91 4 The Humean Theory of Motivation 92 4.1 Two Principles 92 4.2 Motivating Reasons vs. Normative Reasons 94 4.3 A Preliminary Objection from Nagel 98 4.4 Why Should We Believe the Humean Theory? 101 4.5 Desires and Phenomenology 104 4.6 Desires, Directions of Fit and Dispositions 111 4.7 Desires, Directions of Fit, Goals and Motivating Reasons 116 4.8 Summary of the Entire Argument So Far and Preview 125 5 An Anti-Humean Theory of Normative Reasons 130 5.1 From Motivating Reasons to Normative Reasons 130 5.2 The Intentional and the Deliberative 131