The Mecca Mystery - Probing the Black Hole at the Heart of Muslim History Peter Townsend Copyright Peter Townsend 2018 All rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the author, except for the use of brief quotations in a book review. Cover and Book Design by [email protected] ISBN-13: 978-0-6483132-0-5 Contents Introduction Navigating this Book A Brief Geographical Orientation 1. What is the Basis for Traditional Beliefs About the Early Years of Islam? 1.1. The Past as a Battlefield 1.2. Dealing with Sources: Some Basic Historiographical Principles 1.3. Primary and Secondary Historical Sources 1.4. The Place of Oral Tradition in Historiography 1.5. The Islamic Sources under the Lens 1.5.1. The Qur’an as a Historical Source 1.5.2. The Hadiths to the Rescue? 1.5.3. Biographies of Muhammad 1.5.4. Early Islamic Historical Texts and Their Legacy 1.5.5. The Current State of Play: A Puzzling Lack of Critical Engagement 1.6. Not So Silent After All: Finding Alternative Sources 1.7. Chapter Summary 2. The Incredible Vanishing City: Mecca and Pre-Islamic Arabia 2.1. The Centrality of the ‘Mother of all Cities’ 2.2. Najran: A Case Study 2.3. Investigating the Evidence for the Ancient Existence of Mecca 2.3.1. Mecca and its Near Neighbors 2.3.2. Mecca and Ancient Imperial Records 2.3.3. Mecca as a great trading city? 2.3.4. Mecca as an Ancient Religious Center? 2.3.5. Could Ptolemy’s ‘Macoraba’ be Mecca? 2.3.6. Psalm 84, ‘The Valley of Baka’ and Mecca 2.4. Chapter Summary 3. Setting the Scene: The Arabian Peninsula at the Dawn of Islam 3.1. The Religious Make-Up of the Arabian Peninsula at the Dawn of Islam 3.1.1. Arabian Paganism 3.1.2. Judaism in the Arabian Peninsula 3.1.3. Christianity in the Arabian Peninsula 3.2. The Arabian Geopolitical Scene at the Dawn of Islam 3.2.1. Arab Tribalism 3.2.2. The Roman Empire and the Arabian Peninsula 3.2.3. The Persian Empire and the Arabian Peninsula 3.3. Chapter Summary 4. Where did Islam Originate? Examining the Islamic Sources 4.1. Geographical Clues in the Qur’an 4.1.1. Linguistic Clues Relating to the Origins of the Qur’an 4.1.2. Geographical References in the Qur'an 4.1.3. Mecca in the Qur'an 4.1.4. Bakka, Mecca and the Possibility of an Alternative Focus for Early Muslim worship 4.1.5. Indirect Geographical References in the Qur'an 4.2. Geographical References in the Hadiths 4.2.1. The Reliability of the Hadiths Revisited 4.2.2. The Holy City of Islam in the Hadiths and Classical Sources 4.2.3. Geographical Clues Related to Place of Composition of the Hadiths 4.2.4. Zoroastrianism and the Rise of Islam 4.2.5. Mesopotamian Judaism and its Influence of Islam 4.3. Chapter Summary 5. Finding Muhammad behind the Shadows 5.1. In Search of the Historical Muhammad 5.2. Muhammad in the Qur’an 5.3. Muhammad in the Hadiths and Traditional Sources 5.3.1. Muhammad as a Prophet 5.3.2. Muhammad’s Family Life and Relationships 5.3.3. Muhammad as a War Leader 5.3.4. Cross Referencing Key Events from Muhammad’s Biography with Recorded History 5.3.5. Muhammad in Contemporary Arabic Sources 5.3.6. Muhammad in Contemporary Non-Arabic Sources 5.4. Chapter Summary 6. The Qur’an: Proof of Islam’s Origin Narrative? 6.1. Examining the Official Account of Qur’anic Origins 6.2. The Traditional Account of Qur’anic Origins under Scrutiny 6.3. A Text Critical Investigation of the Qur’anic Text 6.3.1. Investigating the Earliest Qur’anic Manuscripts (the Uthmanic Mushafs) 6.3.2. Divergence within the Accepted Textual Tradition 6.3.3. The Sana’a Qur’an and the Uthmanic Tradition 6.3.4. What about the Birmingham Folios? 6.3.5. The Hadiths on Qur’anic Completeness 6.3.6. The Crucifixion Verse: Evidence of a Later Addition? 6.4. How did the Qur’an Came into Being? 6.4.1. Syrian Christian Material 6.4.2. Jewish Writings 6.4.3. Extra-Biblical Christian Gospels 6.4.4. Stories, Legends and Myths 6.4.5. Zoroastrian Influence 6.4.6. The Compilation and Editing of the Qur’anic Text 6.5. Chapter Summary 7. The Post-Muhammad Period: Muslim Conquest and Victory? 7.1. Muslim or Arab Conquest? 7.2. Non-Arab Writings on the Arab Conquests 7.3. The Missing Caliphs 7.4. Misdirected Mosques 7.5. The Survival of Paganism 7.6. The Early Umayyad Caliphate: Archaeological and Documentary Sources 7.7. Civil War, the Marwanids and the Emergence of Islam 7.8. The Dome of the Rock: Islam Finally Steps from the Shadows 7.9. Chapter Summary 8. What Happened? Some Tentative Conclusions 8.1. Nabataea: A Forgotten Kingdom Worth Remembering 8.2. Arabian Paganism as the Bedrock of Proto-Islam 8.3. The Arabs and the Superpowers 8.4. A ‘Hijra’, But Not as You Know It. 8.5. The Arab-Syriac Encounter 8.6. Proto-Islam and Judaism 8.7. Proto-Islam and Near Eastern Christianities 8.8. In Search of Identity 8.9. Muawiya and Pan-Arab Monotheism 8.10. The Marwanids and the Birth of Islam 8.11. Salvation in the Desert: Why it was Necessary to Invent Mecca 8.12. The Creation of a Scriptural Tradition 8.13. By the Rivers of Babylon: The Final Strand is Added 8.14. Chapter Summary: An Attempt at an Updated History 9. Whereto from Here? 9.1. Commit to Honest, In-Depth Research 9.2. Bring Questions about Islam’s History into the Open 9.3. Challenge the Culture of Fear 9.4. Use Historical Facts to Undermine Islam 9.5. Conclusion: What if the ‘Full Light of History’ is a Mirage? More from Peter Townsend Bibliography Endnotes Introduction There is total silence in the mosque as the Imam begins his Friday sermon. Over the next few minutes he holds the congregation in breathless sway as he recounts the glorious occasion of the Prophet Muhammad entering Mecca, after years of struggle, at the head of a victorious army. You can almost feel the elation as the assembled believers hang on to every word of the preacher as he transports them to a time and place that are in some ways more real to them than their present surroundings. As they delight in their beloved prophet’s victory in the name of Allah, at a location which some of them have visited in person, not a few of those present reflect on how very grateful they are that their faith is based on such a rock-solid historical foundation. History. It underpins every aspect of the Muslim faith. From the descriptions of how a man named Muhammad was called from his humdrum existence to a life of prophethood, to blow-by-blow accounts of the major battles of the post- Muhammad conquests. Historical accounts are pervasive when it comes to Muslim self-understanding and these accounts act as the foundation for Islamic faith and practice at every turn. How could it be otherwise? Islam is based upon the fundamental idea that God intervened at a specific time, in a specific place and through a specific person to bring his message to an unbelieving world. It is, therefore, of the utmost importance that the historical record upon which Islamic teaching is based should be accurate and verifiable. Most practicing Muslims would instinctively and passionately argue that this is indeed the case. As far as they are concerned, there exists an unbroken and impeccable historical record that links modern Muslims with the distant Islamic past; a past during which events played out exactly as described in the countless biographies of the prophet and descriptions of the early Arab conquests that line the shelves of Islamic bookshops all around the world. A lot will depend on whether this is, in fact, the case. In light of the above, it is of the utmost importance that historians honestly and seriously strive to get to the bottom of the questions relating to the origins of early Islam. A basic question to start with is: "How reliable are the historical accounts upon which the faith of more than a billion Muslims rest?" I fully realize that many people will see this question as verging on the nonsensical. It is, after all, common knowledge that Islam, as Ernest Renan memorably put it, 1 emerged in the 'full light of history'. The problem is that the 'common knowledge' about Islam’s origins rests, as is so often the case with common knowledge, on some potentially profound untested assumptions. Chief among these assumptions is the conviction that certain key historical documents, written hundreds of years after the time of Muhammad, are the most reliable window into the early origins of Islam that we have. The issue of the reliability of the Islamic historical record is too important to allow the mostly uncritical acceptance of certain entrenched positions to remain untested. The purpose of this book is, therefore, to pursue the following related lines of enquiry: Whether the classical sources underpinning Muslim history stack up as reliable records of the period and the events they seek to describe? Whether there are other reliable sources, perhaps largely ignored by those responsible for the traditional accounts that provide alternative yet credible perspectives into the periods and events under discussion? These are the type of questions that historians should ask as a matter of course when the history of any period is discussed, but the traditional version of Islamic history has largely received a 'free pass' when it comes to serious critical scrutiny. The result is that documents claiming to shed light on the earliest years of Islam are often accepted as intrinsically trustworthy without even the most basic questions about historical accuracy or reliable transmission being asked. This happens despite the fact that the key texts of other major world religions have 2 now been subjected to more than a century of the most searching investigations. There are several reasons behind the fact that Islamic sources have so far escaped thorough historical re-examination. Perhaps most significant is the simple fact that this is an exercise fraught with danger. Scholars in the Muslim world face the prospect of being branded as apostates if they are perceived to be deviating too far from accepted versions of Islamic theology and history. This can have very serious consequences. Throughout history, those who challenged Islamic orthodoxy from within the bosom of Islam quickly discovered that this is not something to undertake lightly. The fact that this is not an observation that 3 only applies to the distant past (e.g. the slaughtering of Mutazalite scholars in 10th century Baghdad4) can be seen in the case of Muhammad Taha, who was executed by the Sudanese government in 1985 for proposing a re-evaluation of 5 the way in which the Qur’an is interpreted. The fear-factor and the sheer ubiquity of the traditional sources means that very little is happening inside the Muslim world itself as far as a critical re-
Description: