ebook img

THE MAYA AND THE VEGETATION OF THE YUCATAN PENINSULA PDF

8 Pages·1991·5.4 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview THE MAYA AND THE VEGETATION OF THE YUCATAN PENINSULA

135-142 Ethnobiol. 11(1): /. MAYA AND THE THE VEGETATION YUCATAN OF THE PENINSULA VICTOR RICO-GRAY Centro de U.N.A.M. Ecologia, Apdo. Postal 70-275, Mexico, D.F. 04510 Mexico GARCIA-FRANCO JOSE G. AC. Institute de Ecologia, Apdo. 91000 Mexico Postal Xalapa, 63, Ver. ABSTRACT.— compo- Several hypotheses have been formulated explain the to and sition structure of the lowland tropical forest of the Yucatan Peninsula, in com- particular, the abundance and dominance of useful trees in mature forest They commonly Maya munities. assume the lowland area are that forests in man-made, but tend to dismiss or generalize environmental conditions in the area. Recent studies in northern Yucatan do not reflect the pattern described in Why the abundance literature: of useful trees in the forests. are useful trees, Maya lowland especially fruit-bearing trees, not present in mature forest of the all Our area? concerning objectives are to present a brief review of the literature (i) how the origin of the vegetation in the Yucatan Peninsula; explain the original (ii) human vegetation structure could have changed under influence, resulting in why abundance not of useful and discuss the reason useful trees are trees; (iii) present in all mature forest communities of the lowland Maya area, as generally assumed or suggested by many authors. The abundance of useful tree species in forests of the lowland Maya was probably human-induced, through the area human now where environ- years, without only present the assistance, they are mental Maya may have played Even though conditions allow the their survival. even an a expect significant shaping too variable to role the vegetation, rainfall is human distribution of useful fruit-bearing trees without assistance. RESUMEN.-Se composicion han formulado hipotesis para explicar la y varias en estructura de de Yucatan, particular, Ios bosques de Peninsula tropicales la maduros; bosques abundancia en la y dominancia de especies arboreas utiles asumem de actividad y que bosques de mayas son producto la los bajas las tierras humana, medioambientales pero condiciones tienden a relegar o generalizar las patron no del area. Estudios en norte de Yucatan reflejan el recientes realizados el Nuestros objetivos descrito en abundancia de especies arboreas utiles. la literatura: de vegeta- son: presentar una breve de referente al origen la (i) revision la literatura de vegetacion cion de como original la las peninsula; estructura explicar la (ii) pudo de especies en abundancia cambiar humana bajo influencia y resultar la especies arboreas razon por que no estan presentes estas utilies; y (iii) discutir la la asumen como en todas mayas, lo las comunidades boscosas de bajas tal las tierras en o arboreas utiles los sugieren diversos autores. La abundancia de especies hombre, por bosques de mayas probablemente inducida el las tierras bajas fue donde ahora las pasar presentes al humana, estan los aiios, sin asistencia solo la mayas hayan A que de condiciones pesar los medioambientales se los permite. jugado un estructura de la vegetacion, la papel modificando significative las como una uniforme de precipitation es tan variable para esperar distribution humana. especies arboreas utiles sin asistencia RESUME.— On formule quelques hypotheses pour expliquer compo- a divers la sition et la structure de la foret basse tropicalle de la Peninsule Yucatanne, parti- communautes culairement abundance et dominance des arbres utiles dans les 1' On forestales mures. suppose en generate que les forets de la region basse des Maya soient de l'origine humaine, mais on congedie ou generalise les conditions environmentelles de region. Les etudes recentes dans Nord de Yucatanne la le la ne pas models dans abundance des arbres reflechissent les decrit la literature: 1' utiles dans la foret. Nos objectifs sont: presenter un resume bref de la literature (i) concernante de l'origine de vegetation de Peninsule Yucatanne; expli- la la (ii) comme quer on pouvrait changer la structure originalle de la vegetation sous influence humaine, avec de abundance des arbres et le resultat utiles; (iii) 1' 1' communautes discouter pourquoi les arbres utiles ne se trouvent pas dans tous les comme forestales mures plusieurs auteurs ont suppose ou suggere. L'abundance Maya du des espece des arbres dans de region basse probable- utiles la foret la est ment humaine, de humaine. Apres l'origine plusieurs annees, sans l'influence les arbres se trouvent aujourd'hui seulement dans les sites ou les conditions Maya environmentelles permittent leur survivance. Bien que pouvront avoir les un joue role important dans la formation de la vegetation, la chute de pluie est pour une trop variable s'artendre a distribution unie des arbres fruitiers utiles sans humaine. l'aide INTRODUCTION and Several hypotheses have been composition formulated explain the to structure of the lowland tropical forests of the Yucatan Peninsula; in particular, abundance Barrerad the of useful mature communities al. trees in forest (e.g., Gomez-Pompa Gomez-Pompa and Kaus Gomez-Pompa 1977; et al. 1987; 1987; the 1987; Rico-Gray et 1985, 1988b). These hypotheses assume that forests in al. Maya tend lowland man-made and but area are dominated by species, useful tree Many studies to dismiss or generalize the environmental conditions in the area. on man generated to the interaction between and were vegetation originally explain the abundance ramon Sw. (Moraceae), of the Brosimum alicastrum tree, on Maya, for or in the immediate surroundings of archaeological sites of the abundance example: Folan and proposed the Puleston et (1979) (i) al. (1972) and was human Lambert clearly the result of cultivation and management; (ii) Arnason environments explained optimal (1978, 1982) that archaeological are sites for the ramon; autoecological Peters suggested the atypical (1983) that (iii) ramon tree some characteristics (phenology, breeding systems, productivity) of Maya; by the populations (Tikal) are the product of selection practiced artificial and archae- Ogata of (iv) (1990) suggests the abundance oiramon in the vicinity summary, Maya. In ological sites reflects the defaunation of Post-Classic activity we species group the explanations abundance and dominance of useful tree for the Gomez-Pompa in the Yucatecan two main hypotheses (modified from forests into of and consequence Kaus The 1987): abundance of useful tree species is a (1) during their biological characteristics, which enables them to be very successful man-made the occupying natural regeneration process of the vegetation, or in JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY ecological niches; and The were human trees present in the area before (2) occupancy man but not necessarily abundant, and by and selection (protecting was cultivating) the determinant factor to account for abundance. Recent vegetation studies in northern Yucatan, near an archaeological site (Thien and Mayan 1982) a (Rico-Gray and et al. village 1988a, 1988b, et al. unpublished do data), not reflect the pattern described above: abundance of useful Why tree species. are useful trees, especially fruit-bearing trees, not present in mature Maya Our all forests of the lowland area? objectives are present to: (i) a brief review of the literature concerning the origin of the vegetation in the Yucatan how Peninsula; explain the original vegetation structure could have (ii) changed human under abundance and influence, resulting in the of useful trees; why finally discuss the reason useful trees are not present in mature forest (iii) all communities Maya of the lowland area, as generally assumed or suggested by many The Maya authors. abundance lowland of useful tree species in forests of the was human area probably human-induced, through the years, without assistance, now they are only present where environmental conditions allow their the survival. Even though the Maya may have played a significant role shaping the vegetation, rainfall too variable to expect an even distribution of useful fruit- is bearing human without trees i The changes vegetation of southeastern Mexico has experienced a series of as the result of abrupt temperature and fluctuations during the precipitation Pleistocene (Toledo 1982). The study of lake sediments (pollen) in the Peten area in Guatemala (Lewin Leyden and western Honduras (Rue 1987), sug- 1984; 1984) gest that the mesic deciduous dominated by Brosimum originated tropical forest during the early Holocene, approximately 10,000 to 11,000 years ago. Forests to north, the Mexican would be considerably portion of the Yucatan Peninsula, younger compared and more The abundance Brosimum pollen, to of xericphytic. due pollen from probably to other tree species characterizing this vegetation, is Ramon and most of the its relative abundance. wind-pollinated (Peters 1983) is few other pollen trees in the community thus contributing are insect-pollinated, open grains savannas and areas to sediments (Rue With appearance of the 1987). (milpas?), by lower levels Brosimum dominance indicated probably declined, as of Byrsonima, Melastomataceae, pollen and its in sediments, the appearance of and dominance ascribed the presence of Maize/Zea (Rue This decrease in is 1987). Peten in to the Maya B.P. for the initial occupation of the region (3,000-1,700 and Rue con- Guatemala, Leyden western Honduras, 1987), 1984; 3,000 B.P. for note tinuous use same interesting to At time, until the sixteenth century. the it is (Leyden the and Trema appearance and Cecropia increase of pollen depositions of which Rue genera, 1984; two pioneer tree 1987), typical tropical deciduous forest probably Rue suggests that reflects major vegetation recovery processes. (1987) change the Holocene climatic lack of any palynological evidence significant late for assumption in the allows the present or previous American sequences, Central A between the that human comparison list all vegetational changes induced. are by Miranda and one presented of plant genera in the palynological analyses the composition vegetation survey, reveals that tree species of in his classical (1958) lowland Maya must have remained very the deciduous tropical forests of the area Maya only changes must have occurred similar since occupation; the significant abundance, dominance) the vegetation. in the structure (diversity, of CHANGES VEGETATION STRUCTURE EM AND DOMINANCE OF USEFUL TREES Whether change the Vegetation structure subject to continuous change. is human main should due to the effect of natural forces or activity, three aspects is when denudated patch: be considered studying the recovery process of a forest was during period, the length of time the area cleared, the type of activity this and yield the extent of the clearing. Different combinations of these factors will and to forests with very similar or very different composition structure, relative common any the original. In order to start the regeneration process one factor to combination of the above the need of a source of propagules, whether the seed is abandonment, or bank already existing in the the seed rain following soil, no doubt were from Changes regeneration coppice trunks. in vegetation structure On induced by Maya. the other directly the agrosilvicultural techniques of the reproduc- hand, denudated mature, the presence, relatively close to forest areas, of tive individuals of useful tree species, had undoubtedly a significant quantitative aban- advantage over newcomers during forest regeneration that followed the donment from useful Abundant of agricultural land or urban centers. seed rains tree species could originate from trees directly managed in the forest (Bartlett 1935; & Denevanef Soemarwoto Soemarwoto from those growing in 1984; 1982), al. seed homegardens or in the pet kot, and from remnant forest tree individuals; movement from open by wind, bats trees to areas could have been effected & mammals, Peters other Martin 1984). (e.g., 1983), or birds Scott (e.g., Present day Yucatecan Maya homegardens reproductive individuals contain many 1988a, of useful tree species (Anderson 1952; Barrera 1980; Rico-Gray et al. the Maya thus 1990; Vargas 1983). Ancient followed this practice (Marcus 1982), a abundance from abandonment of of seeds useful species guaranteed after is denudated forest area. Gomez-Pompaef Maya forest certain (1987) suggested that ancient selected al. stone-walled, areas, the pet kot, to plant and protect useful These tree species. and could man-made forests are recognizable today in certain areas of Yucatan, be an abundant also source seeds of for useful trees. number many when a purposes, In instances, a forest cleared for agricultural is that suggested been of individual trees are left untouched for later use. has It and resident remnant trees will become natural perching for both migratory sites and seeds (Guevaras birds 1986). Frugivorous birds will drop or regurgitate al. species, which under accumulation of an fruits the canopies, contributing fall to which make remnant these regeneration trees nuclei. to prior summary, Maya were the area In the useful trees of the present in were event and their arrival, the changes in vegetation structure that followed this Summer JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY 1991 no doubt influenced directly or indirectly by their This activities. i have been number important particularly in the of seeds of useful species available abandoned for the colonization of agricultural land or urban centers. FOREST COMPOSITION TODAY YUCATAN IN If the presence of useful tree species was uniform in past Maya communities now Why (Marcus 1982), as (Rico-Gray then: are forests it is ef al. 1990), (1) all in the Yucatan Peninsula not dominated by same the useful tree species (especially Why Maya useful fruit-bearing Yucatecan trees)? are certain forests, close to (2) And archaeological sites or villages, not dominated by these useful trees? (3) Maya If a great variety of useful trees have been cultivated and protected in homegardens why for the past five centuries, are they not present in forest communities today? In other words, why should widely used species as Brosimum Sw. alicastrum (Moraceae), Cedrela odorata (Meliaceae), Chrysophyllum cainito L. L. (Sapotaceae), A.DC. Cordia dodecandra (Boraginaceae), Crescentia cujete L. (Bignoniaceae), Ehretia A.DC. (Boraginaceae), Enterolobium cyclocarpum tinifolia (Jacq.) Griseb. (Leguminosae), mexicana A.DC. (Caricaceae), Manilkara Jacaratia achras Fosberg (Sapindaceae), (Miller) (Sapotaceae), Melicoccus bijugatus Jacq. Persea americana mammosa Cronquist (Sapota- Miller (Lauraceae), Pouteria (L.) ceae), Psidium King (Meliaceae), guajava L. (Myrtaceae), Swietenia macrophylla be practically absent northern Yucatean in forests? We way answered consider think that the only these questions can be to is the mosaic penin- of ecological and environmental conditions prevalent in the sula; in short, the Yucatan Peninsula not an ecological and environmental is uniform The Yucatan, unit. answer given by of Tixcacaltuyub in central locals or Tixpeual in northern Yucatan, why these useful tree species are present as to in their village but not in the different-age forest communities that surround it, is that they are not there because they do not belong to that type of forest. To support we (Sorensen Similarity compared composition this idea, species Index) between shrubs the homegardens and surrounding forests (all village their and The and 22.6% for trees). 18.2% Tixcacaltuyub resulting for similarities are, Tixpeual. These low by the presence of secon- percent can be explained similarities and dary shrubs homegardens (mainly species in the non-tended portions of the a few non- homegarden and shrubs are important The trees important trees). only do not other- they present in this environment surviving as tended species; wise survive. Yucatan Man-induced of the dominance forests useful trees in of certain mm Peninsula has been more than 1,100 of total with reported; in general, areas andBrosimum annual Manilkara abundance of precipitation. Bartlett (1935) reports report for forests in Belize and the Peten Guatemala; and Rico-Gray tf al. (1985) in and a Cedrela in forest dominated by Spondias, Brosimum, Bursera, Manilkara, seem hold the Yohaltun does not to valley Campeche. This characteristic in forest were surveys for though the forests even in the dry portions of the peninsula, and conducted a village (Thienet 1982) in the vicinity of an archaeological site al. (Rico-Gray some useful tree species have The et al. 1988a, 1988b). latter forests Gymnopodium (Polygonaceae), (Chemas and Rico-Gray floribundum Rolfe 1991), like M. achras), but lack the useful fruit-bearing trees (e.g., B. alicastrum, C. cainito, and the important timber species (e.g., C. odorata, E. cyclocarpus, S. macrophylla). may where be found the north The only areas individuals of these tree species in with and northwest portions of the Yucatan Peninsula are: the cenotes, their man-made (Gomez- and humidity the pet kot, a forest special characteristics; soil Pompa tended whether homegardens or dispersed in villages, in 1987); et al. and throughout the village (Smith and Cameron 1977; Rico-Gray et al. 1990); in Duran (Rico-Gray the petenes, a very particular coastal vegetation association 1982; Rico- Gray Barrera argues that the presence of useful 1987; et 1988c). (1982) al. tree species (Annona, Manilkara, Sabal, Swietenia) in the petenes is the result of human activity. CONCLUSION today clear from the analysis of the above information, that the presence It is of useful tree species in mature forest communities of the Yucatan Peninsula is were correlated with their ecological characteristics, whether or not they intro- Maya duced by the in the past. In particular, their presence today in the drier human portions of the peninsula has be associated with present and not past to activity. Most of the useful tree species the Maya have been utilizing for at least more humid, tropical the past six centuries are originally native to the southern, mm from were brought forests of the peninsula annual or (1,500 total rainfall), humid conquest, and Spanish similar forests of other areas (before after the when Marcus an area 1982). In the drier portions, these species cannot survive abandoned and process is are left to compete with native species in the recovery of the vegetation. In even though fruit-bearing short, useful species (especially Mayan must have been with trees) present the whole peninsula associated in more why and activity, the reason they are not abundant, are not dominant, , many those in dramatically, are not present in Yucatecan forests (particularly consequently, northern Yucatan), is because they are not native to the flora and, to cannot under central survive the environmental conditions prevalent in the from northwest portions of the Yucatan Peninsula. Tended species were brought more humid from other areas of the peninsula, from other areas of Mexico, or where countries; both before and after the Spanish conquest. The only places pet we the find combinations of these species northern Yucatan Peninsula are in that and been suggested kot, the cenotes, the petenes, tended has in villages; it man propagules of these species were brought by these areas. to ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We to suggestions would comments and especially like to thank L.B. Thien for his by We provided the manuscript. acknowledge assistance will like to the excellent field were study Paulino Sima (Tixcacaltuyub) and Armando Puch (Tixpeual). Funds for this World and the provided by Rim Program the Pacific of University of California-Riverside Fund-U.S. Wildlife JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY LITERATURE CITED ANDERSON, EDGAR. man KAUS. The 1952. Plants, 1987. of re- i i and Brown and Co., Boston. sources by traditional cultures in the life. Little, BARRERA, ALFREDO. World Wilderness Congress, Sobre unidad 1980. la tropics. campesina Estes Park, Colorado. y el 1 PURATA GUEVARA, SERGIO, SILVIA en E. bioticos el ; EDDY VAN DER MAAREL. maya and 1986. yucatanense. Arboles y I. huertas familiares. Biotica The role of remnant forest trees in tropi- s Vegetatio secondary succession. 66: 5:115-128. cal BARRERA, ALFREDO. 1982. Los petenes 77-84. THOR ARNA- JOHN LAMBERT, and Sue D.H. . SON. vegetation 1978. Distribution of on Maya and relationship to ruins its BARRERA, ALFREDO, ARTURO GOMEZ- POMPA CARLOS VAZQUEZ and 28:3341. Turrialba ARNASON. LAMBERT, and -YANES. 1977. El manejo de selvas J.D.H. J.T. las Ramon and Maya ruins: an eco- por mayas: los sus implicaciones 1982. silvi- an economic, relation. not colas y agricolas. Biotica 2:47-60. logical, HARLEY A BARTLETT, HARRIS. 216:298-299. Science 1935. ROGER. implied method procedure work LEWIN, 1984. Fragil forests of for field in Science 226:36-37. by pleistocene pollen. BARBARA W. Guatemalan upon LEYDEN, 1984. a botamcal reconnaissance in parts pleistocene aridity. of British Honduras and the Peten forest forest systhesis after Academy of National of Guatemala. Carnegie Institution of Proceedings of the USA 81:4856-4859. Washington, Publ. No. 461:1-25. Sciences, CHEMAS, ALEXANDRA VICTOR MARCUS, JOYCE. 1982. The plant world of and and seventeenth-century RICO-GRAY. and man- the sixteenth- 1991. Apiculture Maya sub- agement lowland Maya. Pp. 239-273 in by of associated vegetation Aca- maya (Kent V. Flannery, editor). the of Tixcacaltuyub, Yucatan, sistence N.Y. demic Mexico. Press, Agroforestry Systems 13:13-25. de MIRANDA, FAUSTINO. Estudios la DENEVAN," WILLIAM JOHN 1958. M. M., Losrecursos TREACY, JAMS ALCORN, CHRIS- vegetacion. Pp. 0:213-272 in B. aprovechami- TINE PADOCH, DENSLOW sureste y su and naturales del JULIE SALVADOR Instituto FLORES PAITAN. ento (Enrique Beltran, editor). 1984. Reno- Naturales Mexicano de Recursos Indigenous Peruvian agroforestry in the Mexico, D.F. vables, Explicacion alter- OGATA, NISAO. 1990. swidden fallows. Interciencia 9:346-357. ramon (Bro- DURAN, abundancia del RAFAEL. de de native la 1987. Lista floristica en Sw./Moraceae) el simum alicastrum region de Campeche, la los petenes, Yucatan. In de Peninsula de Mexico. centra la Biotica 12:199-208. manejo tradi- FOLAN, WILLIAM LARAINE Etnoecologia y el press A. in J., (Mano bioticos recursos FLETCHER and ELLEN KINTZ. tional de los R. 1979. Brown, editors), Dennise Alipnat and Fruit, fiber, bark, resin: social organi- [ i National Instituto Trabajo, Maya zation of a urban center. Science le Mexico, D.F. Antropologia e Historia, de 204:697-701. Observations CHARLES M. GOMEZ-POMPA, On 1983. ARTURO. PETERS, 1987. and ecology of the maya subsistence Mayan on Mexican Studies/ silviculture. American Antiquity 48: Estudios Mexicanos a tropical tree. 3:1-17. GOMEZ-POMPA, ARTURO, JOSE SAL- 610-615. Bn DENNIS VADOR 1972. PULESTON, E. FLORES and VICTORIA SOSA. a" subsistence as a 1987. The "pet man-made alicastrum kot": a tropi- southern Maya the central of the classic cal forest of the maya. Interciencia 12: University of M.A. Thesis, lowlands. 10-15. GOMEZ-POMPA, ARTURO ANDREA Pennsylvania. and LITERATURE CITED (continued) RICO-GRAY, VICTOR. 1982. Estudio de la de zona inundable vegetation costera la del noroeste del estado de Campeche, Honduras. Nature 326:285-286. i SCOTT, PETER and ROBERT MARTIN. Mexico: los petenes. Biotica 7:171-190. E. F. VICTOR ARTURO GOMEZ- RICO-GRAY, Avian consumers 1984. oiBursera, Ficus, POMPA CASTULO CHAN. and and 1985. Ehretia fruit in Yucatan. Biotropica Las manejadas por mayas de selvas los 16:319-323. MARGUERITA EARLE Campeche. SMITH, and Yohaltun, Biotica 10:321-327. C. L. RICO-GRAY, GARCIA-FRANCO CAMERON. Ethnobotany the V., 1977. in J.G. CHEMAS. and A. 1988a. Yucatecan Puuc, Yucatan. Economic Botany 31: mayas knowledge and of pollination 93-110. SOEMARWOTO, OTTO IDJAH SOE- breeding systems. Journal of Ethno- and MARWOTO. Homegarden: biology 8:203-204. 1982. its RICO-GRAY, VICTOR, JOSE G. GARCIA- nature, origin and future development. ARMANDO FRANCO, PUCH and work- Pp. 130-139 Proceedings of a in PAULINO SIMA. 1988b. Composition shop on rational ecological basis for and humid structure of a tropical dry forest resource utilization in the tropics in Yucatan, Mexico. International Journal of South East Asia. University Pertanian of Ecology and Environmental Sciences Malaysia. ANNE THEN, LEONARD BRAD- 14:21-29. S. B., MONICA RICO-GRAY, VICTOR, PALA- BURN ARTHUR WELDEN. and 1982. L. RAFAEL CIOS-RIOS, LIRA and JORGE The woody Dzibilchaltun-a vegetation of MARTINEZ. La Maya northwest 1988c. interaction estab- archaeological in site un American ilidad-sucesion, ejemplos: vegeta- Yucatan, Mexico. Middle la tion costera del estado de Yucatan, Research Occasional Paper 5. Institute, New Mexico. Brenesia 28:61-70. Tulane Orleans. University, RICO-GRAY, VICTOR, JOSE G. GARCIA- TOLEDO, VICTOR M. Pleistocene 1982. FRANCO, ALEXANDRA CHEMAS, tropical changes vegetation in of the ARMANDO PUCH PAULINO and diversi- Mexico. Pp. 93-111 Biological in SIMA. Prance, 1990. Species composition, simi- fication in the tropics (Gillian T. and mayan home- N.Y. larity, structure, of Colombia University Press, editor). una gardens in Tixpeual and Tixcacaltuyub, VARGAS, CARLOS. ElKa'anche': 1983. Yucatan, Mexico. Economic Botany maya. 8:151-173. 44: practica hordeola Biotica 470-187.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.