The magic of advertising An analysis of a beauty product advertisement Tine Langballe Nielsen – 301843 Supervisor: Sinne B. Jakobsen BA Thesis – December 2013 Aarhus School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University Page 1 of 51 Tine Langballe Nielsen Abstract Branding is a way for companies to distinguish themselves from its competitors by the means of a product. One way to distinguish itself is by a celebrity endorser, who becomes the image surrounding the brand. The effectiveness of a celebrity endorser has been studied over 30 years and it demonstrated that a communicator that is 5 highly credible is more persuasive than the opposite. Therefore, this thesis has examined, how the company SK-‐II has applied a celebrity endorser in their print advertisement and how the celebrity becomes a part of the overall argumentation of the message. The thesis was based on an image-‐oriented advertisement, in which various rhetorical 10 strategies were chosen in order to respectfully analyse the advertisement SK-‐II. It was relevant to analyse what makes a consumer perceive Cate Blanchett as projecting a credible image. To that notion, her trustworthiness, likeability and physical attrac-‐ tiveness became relevant, as she is a beautiful woman that makes women desire her looks. 15 Furthermore, the advertisement attempted to express a “feel good about yourself” theme, which both the argumentation theory of Toulmin and the three modes of per-‐ suasion, logos, ethos, pathos, can be closely related to. Both the primary argument and the pathos appeal expressed the similar message -‐ that a consumer can start a luminous life with the SK-‐II Facial Treatment Essence. 20 To that notion, it was interesting to examine the analysis as the company attempted to appeal to logos from a scientific approach, however it was assumed that the ap-‐ peal to pathos was the most visible one. In addition, when identifying the primary argument, two arguments were identified with an implicit and explicit expression. Therefore, with relation to the “feel good about yourself” theme, the implicit argu-‐ 25 ment became the primary argument of the advertisement. Moreover, it became relevant to discuss the downsides of applying a celebrity en-‐ dorser in advertising as an endorser can have a negative impact on an endorsement if the endorser gets involved in a scandal. Page 2 of 51 Tine Langballe Nielsen As a conclusion to the thesis, the advertisement appeals to its audience by the means of Cate Blanchett as the celebrity endorser, the expertise of the company, the ability to make consumers dream about the possibility of looking like Cate Blanchett. 5 Characters: 1,964 Page 3 of 51 Tine Langballe Nielsen Indholdsfortegnelse 1. Introduction.........................................................................................................6 1.1 Problem statement.........................................................................................7 5 1.2 Scientific approach and method.....................................................................8 1.3 Choice of theories...........................................................................................9 1.4 Delimitation...................................................................................................9 1.5 Structure of the thesis..................................................................................11 2. History...............................................................................................................12 10 2.1 Brief explanation of the print advertisement................................................12 2.2 The SK-‐II Company........................................................................................12 3. Theories.............................................................................................................12 3.1 Celebrity endorsements ...............................................................................12 3.2 The Match-‐Up Hypothesis............................................................................13 15 3.3 The Meaning Transfer Perspective................................................................14 3.4 Credibility.....................................................................................................14 3.4.1 Expertise......................................................................................................15 3.4.2 Trustworthiness...........................................................................................15 3.4.3 Goodwill.......................................................................................................16 20 3.5 Communicator bias.......................................................................................16 3.5.1 Knowledge bias............................................................................................16 3.5.2 Reporting bias..............................................................................................16 3.6 Social attractiveness.....................................................................................17 3.6.1 Likeability.....................................................................................................17 25 3.6.2 Similarity......................................................................................................17 3.6.3 Physical attractiveness................................................................................17 3.7 Credibility and the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM)...............................19 3.8 The three modes of persuasion.....................................................................20 3.8.1 Logos............................................................................................................21 30 3.8.2 Ethos............................................................................................................21 3.8.3 Pathos..........................................................................................................21 3.9 Motivational appeals....................................................................................22 3.9.1 Sex...............................................................................................................22 3.9.2 Warmth.......................................................................................................22 35 3.10 The argument model..................................................................................23 3.10.1 Claim..........................................................................................................24 3.10.2 Data...........................................................................................................24 3.10.3 Warrant.....................................................................................................24 3.11 The argument types....................................................................................24 40 3.11.1 Sign............................................................................................................25 3.11.2 Cause.........................................................................................................25 3.11.3 Classification..............................................................................................25 Page 4 of 51 Tine Langballe Nielsen 3.11.4 Generalisation...........................................................................................25 3.11.5 Comparison...............................................................................................25 3.11.6 Authority....................................................................................................26 3.11.7 Motivation.................................................................................................26 5 4. Analyses.............................................................................................................26 4.1 Analysis of the Match-‐up Hypothesis............................................................26 4.2 Analysis of the meaning transfer perspective...............................................27 4.3 Analysis of credibility....................................................................................27 4.3.1 Expertise......................................................................................................27 10 4.3.2 Trustworthiness...........................................................................................28 4.3.3 Goodwill.......................................................................................................28 4.4 Analysis of communicator bias.....................................................................29 4.5 Analysis of social attractiveness in CB...........................................................30 4.5.1 Likeability.....................................................................................................30 15 4.5.2 Similarity......................................................................................................31 4.5.3 Physical attractiveness................................................................................31 4.6 Analysis of credibility in relation to ELM.......................................................32 4.7 Analysis of the three modes of persuasion ...................................................32 4.7.1 Logos............................................................................................................33 20 4.7.2 Ethos............................................................................................................34 4.7.3 Pathos..........................................................................................................34 4.8 Analysis of two visual motivational appeals..................................................35 4.8.1 Sex...............................................................................................................35 4.8.2 Warmth.......................................................................................................36 25 4.9 Analysis of Toulmin’s argumentation theory.................................................37 5. Discussion..........................................................................................................41 6. Conclusion.........................................................................................................42 7. Bibliography (Refworks).....................................................................................45 8. Appendices........................................................................................................47 30 Page 5 of 51 Tine Langballe Nielsen 1. Introduction “One of the signature strengths of the advertising industry lies in its ability to trans-‐ form seemingly mundane objects into highly desirable products” (Trampe et al. 2011) 5 Advertisements that involve beauty objects such as shoes, make-‐up and perfumes can change ordinary products into desirable ones. The reason is that advertisements can transfer symbolic meaning from a physical object to suggest a self-‐image of beauty and attractiveness. The abovementioned products are brands created to dif-‐ ferentiate from an increasing competitive market by leading the receivers to a de-‐ 10 sired ideal (Trampe et al. 2011: 1030-‐1034). In the same context, the products arise from branding, which is a process where, a company distinguishes itself from its competitors by means of their products (Jobber, 2010: 303). There are several approaches to branding and one of the popular ones is 15 the employment of celebrity endorsers to bring awareness. In addition, it will lead to positive associations of the brand, and therefore, increase buyer intentions. Employ-‐ ing celebrity endorsers in advertising is not a new phenomenon (Fleck et al. 2012: 651). More than 10 percent of television advertising contains celebrity endorsements (Gass & Seiter, 2011: 72). Several social psychologists have conducted research over 20 30 years on the effectiveness of celebrity endorsers to promote brands. The re-‐ searches have demonstrated that a source, which is perceived as highly credible, is more persuasive than a source with low credibility (Atkin & Block, 1983: 57). Most companies use sources in advertising that attempt to project a credible image. Such sources can be celebrity endorsers that can be associated with physical attractiveness 25 and personal qualities (Atkin & Block, 1983: 57). Advertising exists in our everyday life. When we pass ads on busses, billboards or store windows solely to mention some of the persuasion efforts (Corbett, 1990: 5), Page 6 of 51 Tine Langballe Nielsen we are surrounded by influence attempts (Gass & Seiter, 2011: 2). However, what makes companies employ celebrities to promote brands? What makes people believe that by employing the same product, they will look like a celebrity endorser? What makes a celebrity endorser have a credible image? How do a personal quote and a 5 persuasive text itself appeal to the audience? These are some of the questions I want to examine in my thesis. Therefore, this thesis attempts to examine what impact a celebrity endorser has on its audience and how the print advertisement persuades the audience into purchas-‐ 10 ing the product. For that reason, I want to analyse a print advertisement in which the company employs a celebrity endorser. Moreover, I want to focus on how the print advertisement applies a celebrity endorser and how the celebrity becomes a part of the persuasive arguments and personal quote. 15 Hence, my focus will be on an image-‐oriented advertisement. Such advertisements seek to persuade a receiver on the benefits that he/she will personally receive by purchasing a product. Furthermore, it seeks to create positive associations between the product and the idealised lifestyle (Gass & Seiter, 2011: 307). In this context, I want to analyse SK-‐ll‘s employment of a celebrity endorser in order to persuade its 20 audience into purchasing the proposed brand, thus changing the customers’ behav-‐ iour. 1.1 Problem statement How does the company SK-‐II linguistically and visually apply a celebrity endorsement 25 in the print advertisement and how does the celebrity become a part of the overall argumentation of the message? Page 7 of 51 Tine Langballe Nielsen 1.2 Scientific approach and method On the basis of the above-‐mentioned problem statement, I will be conducting a quali-‐ tative analysis i.e. analysing and interpreting the collected empirical data. The analy-‐ sis is thus based on a hermeneutical approach, which is the theory of interpreting all 5 forms of cultures and observations in human activity i.e. attaining an understanding of texts (Holm, 2011: 84). Within hermeneutics there is an assumption that human beings are not controlled by legality. However, they are controlled by the foundation on which they act, hence, the previously mentioned definition of attempting to understand human beings rather than explaining them (Holm, 2011: 84). This ap-‐ 10 proach to hermeneutics is based upon a scientist, Wilheim Dilthey and it is recognised as the classical hermeneutics. Within hermeneutics, understanding can be achieved through a circular process, which is called the hermeneutic circle. This circular process assumes that an individ-‐ 15 ual will understand the whole context of a text by understanding the single parts and likewise, such individuals will understand its single parts by understanding the whole (Holm, 2011: 86). Moreover, hermeneutics recognises another scientist, namely Gadamer, who had a 20 different understanding of hermeneutics. He believes that an individual will have prejudice when attempting to understand a given text. According to Gadamer, under-‐ standing is changing and always prepared to accept new perspectives of a text. Therefore, Gadamer attempts to create a new understanding and interpretation of a given text, which makes this approach the modern hermeneutics (Holm, 2011: 90-‐ 25 91). The thesis will employ the modern hermeneutics, as the purpose is to interpret and analyse a print advertisement. As mentioned above, it is acceptable to suggest a new understanding and interpretation of a text, hence Gadamer’s modern hermeneutics. 30 Page 8 of 51 Tine Langballe Nielsen 1.3 Choice of theories The thesis is structured around employing celebrity endorsers in an advertisement, for which it is relevant to begin with explaining a celebrity and an endorser. There-‐ fore, I will explain the match-‐up hypothesis and the meaning transfer perspective, in 5 order to explain how a company chooses a celebrity to endorse their brand. Following the theories, as mentioned above, it is relevant to explain the believability of both the advertisement and the celebrity endorser. Credibility involves five sub theories, which are the factor analytical approach, the communicator bias, the social attractiveness and the Elaboration Likelihood Model in relation to credibility. 10 Henceforth, the thesis will be supplemented by three other rhetorical strategies. Firstly, I will present the three modes of persuasion – logos, ethos and pathos. Such theory is relevant in the thesis in order to analyse how the text persuades, motivates and/or informs an audience about the brand. In continuation of the three modes of persuasion, the motivational appeals are ana-‐ 15 lysed. This theory is relevant in order to present how the communicator/sender at-‐ tempts to evoke a desired emotion in the receiver and to make the receiver take a desired action. The last rhetorical strategy is the argumentation theory of Toulmin. This theory is employed to identify and analyse various arguments in the advertisement, as it is 20 relevant to present how the advertisement attempts to persuade consumers into purchasing the product. 1.4 Delimitation There are several delimitations in the thesis as the amount of characters is limited. 25 In relation to the argumentation theory, I will not employ both the standard model and the extended model. The thesis will solely focus on the standard model and the various argument types thereof. This is on the grounds that the thesis is not struc-‐ tured around an analysis of arguments in the advertisement, however, solely to underline the various arguments and the types employed. 30 Page 9 of 51 Tine Langballe Nielsen Another limitation is the various motivational appeals that exist to evoke a desired emotion within the receiver i.e. anxiety, fear, guilt, health, honour, humour, patriot-‐ ism pity, pride, sex, warmth. Due to the extent of the thesis, it will solely focus on two appropriate appeals, namely sex and warmth. 5 In addition, motivational appeals may raise positive or negative reactions to what is acceptable in a consumer society. However, as it will be interesting to examine such ethical reactions to a print advertisement, the limitation of characters delimits a fur-‐ ther study into such reactions. The purpose of the thesis is to analyse how a celebrity is applied linguistically and visually in an advertisement and how the celebrity be-‐ 10 comes a part of the overall argumentation of the message. The purpose of the theory is therefore to identify the various motivational appeals that seem most appropriate for a print advertisement. Page 10 of 51