Table Of Content

Contributors of Articles BRENDA BARRETI Health and Safety and Work: Whose Responsibility? ALAN BERG Recharacterisation after Enron Davip CAMPBELL Hamlet without the Prince: How Leng and Leong use Restitution to Extinguish Equity Stuart R. Cross Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000: Problems Ahead? E.sPpeTH DEARDS Limited Partnerships: Limited Reforms? VANESSA FINCH Re-Invigorating Corporate Rescue MicuHaet HALEY Reforming Business Tenancies: A Critique of the Current Proposals MIRGHANI Hassan Flight of the “Tabuk”: The Right of Subrogation in Salvage Claims Involving State Responsibility JENNIFER HILt Corporate Criminal Liability in Australia: An Evolving Corporate Governance Technique? PEARLIE KOH Economic Duress and a Drop of Fairness—A Singapore Perspective Pey-Woan Let Serving Two Masters—The Dual Loyalties of the Nominee Director in Corporate Groups SUSANNA H. S. LEONG Protection of Industrial Designs as Intellectual Property Rights: New Laws in Singapore GERARD MCCORMACK The Priority of Secured Credit: an Anglo- American Perspective Proressor A. MCGEE AND G. SCANLAN Copyright in Character M. H. Ociivit Change, Challenge, Opportunity: Canadian Banking Sector Restructured Again ANDREW PHANG The Crumbling Edifice?—The Award of Contractual Damages for Mental Distress NicHOLas RYDER Credit Unions in the United Kingdom: A Critical Analysis of their Legislative Framework and its Impact upon their Development CATARINA AF SANDEBERG From Caveat Emptor to Caveat Venditor—the Winding Road to Prospectus Liability in the Scandinavian Countries PROFESSOR RAZEEN SAPPIDEEN Cross-Border Electronic Funds Transfers Through Large Value Transfer Systems, and the Persistence of Risk CAROLINE VAN SCHOUBROECK The Quest for Private Insurance for Damage Caused by Natural Disasters: A Belgian Case Koji TAKAHASHI Right to Terminate (Avoid) International Sales of Commodities Cases A/S Awilco v Fulvia, see Chikuma, Argos Distributors v Commrs of € Customs & Excise Aberdeen Solicitors Property Centre v Armagas v Mundogas DGFT Armement Adolf Deppe v Robinson ... ACCC v ABB Transmission Armstrong v Allan ACCC v J McPhee (No.5) Arul Chandran v Gartshore ACCC v NW Frozen Foods ASIC v Grubb ACCC v Pioneer Concrete ASIC v Robyn AC Cochrane ACCC v Real Estate Institute Atkinson v Bettison ACCC vy Roche Vitamins Atlantic Baron, The ACCC v Safeway Stores Atlas Express v Kafco ACCC v Simsmetal Att-Gen for England & Wales v R ACCC v SIP Australia Att-Gen v Blake 131, 132, 134-137, Adams v Glibbery 139-141 Addis v Gramophone Co Att-Gen v Guardian Newspapers 356-358, 361-363, 365-374, 377, (No.2) 139 Att-Gen Reference (No.2 of 1999) ... 14, 33 ADT v Binder Hamlyn Autronic v Switzerland Advance Bank of Australia v FAI Avanti Cine-Video v Favreau Insurances Aegean Sea, The B&S Contracts v Victor Green Agamemnon, The Publications Agnew v Commissioner of Inland Bacon, MC (No.2), Re Revenue 218, 221, 228, 229, 233, 236, Baleares, The 394, 418, 419 Baltic Shipping v Dillon ...349, 350, 354, 364 Agrosin v Highway Shipping, see Mata Bankway Properties v_ Pensfold- K, The Dunsford 227 Airtours Commission, Case Barings v Coopers & Lybrand 298, 303, 308, 313 Barret Bros v Davies 287, 289, 294 Aitchison v Lohre 73 Barry v Crossley 520 Akerblom v Price 74 Barth v Pritchard 606 Alan v El Nasr Basic v Levinson 520 Allen v Gold Reefs BCCI (No.10), Re 231 Almak, The BCCI (No.8), Re 232, 237, 392 American Accord, The 165, 169, 178 Beach Petroleum v Johnson Amoena v Trulife Beaver, The 73 Amp Incorporated v Utilux 243, 248 Bedford v Bagshaw Andrews v Mockford Belvedere Court Anglo-Saxon Petroleum v Admiralty ... 74 Developments Ansell Rubber v Allied Rubber Bentsen v Taylor (No.2) Antoniades v Villiers Bergerco v Vegoil Apostolos v Trevor Rex Mountain, see Berlei Hestia v Fernyhough Italia Express, The Berry v Berry Aramis, The 168 Betty’s Cafes v Phillips Furnishing Arcos v Ronaasen 111 Arctic Trader, The 161, 162, 172 Bewlay v Bata Shoe Ardennes (Cargo Owners) v Ardennes Birch v PB (Sloane) (Owners) 290 Blackburn v Hussain [2003] J.B.L., November Issue; © Sweet & MAXweELt AND CONTRIBUTORS Cases Bliss v SE Thames RHA Charge Card, Re Blue Nile v Emery Customs Brokers ... Charlotte, The Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward, Charterbridge v Lloyd’s Bank Case C143/00 Bolivinter Oil vy Chase Manhattan Chikuma, The Bank 169 Chow Yoong Hong v Choong Fah Bolton Engineering v T] Graham Rubber 236 Botterill v Bedfordshire CC Christina v Seear 255 Boulting v ACTAT 451, 461, 462 City Offices v Europa Acceptance ....77, 605 Bowes v Shand 107, 111, 115 Clayton v The Harmony Bracey v Read 79 Coca-Cola TM Bradbury Agnew v Day Collins v State Rail (NSW) Brandt v Liverpool, Brazil & River Commission v UK, Case 61/81 Plate SN 168, 173 Commonwealth v Tasmania Brandt v Nixdorf Computer Commrs of Customs & Excise v Briggs v Hardie 14, 15 British Telecom Brightlife, Re Commrs of Customs & Excise v First Brikom Investments v Carr National Bank of Chicago Brimnes, The Compagnie Maritime Belge v Commis- Bristol-Myers Squibb v_ Paranova, sion, Cases C395 & 396/96 Cases C427/93, C429/93 & C436/ Compania Naviera Vasconzada_ v . 84, 86 Churchill & Sim ...167, 170-173, 175, 179 British & Beningtons v NW Cachar Cook v Mott Tea 120 Cooperative Vereniging Suiker vCy om- British Eagle v Air France mission, Case 40/73 British Leyland v Armstrong Patents ... 244 Coppen v Bruce-Smith ......78, 79, 513, 605 Brown Jenkinson v Percy Dalton Cox v Binfield 509 Brown v Waterloo Commrs. Cox v Bruce 161, 170 348, 354, 355, 367 Cremer v General Carriers, see Dona Brumark Investments, Re .....208, 209, 218, Mari, The 174 221-225, 227-229, 233, 236, 398, Crescendo Management v Westpac 418, 419 572, 573, 575 Bruton v London & Quadrant HT Crump v Wala 224, 233, 236, 237 CTN Cash & Carry v Gallagher Buchler v Talbot Bunge v Tradax Burgess v M/V Tamano Dairy Containers v NZI Bank 452, 455, 460 Cadle v Jacmarch Properties David Agmashenebeli, The ... 160-163, 172, Calderwood v SCI Operations 176 Camilleri’s Stock Feeds v EPA David Securities v Commonwealth Campbell v Christie Bank of Australia Caparo v Dickman ... 162, 163, 176, 519, 520 Dawson & Mason v Potter Capoccii v Gobal Day v Cook Carbone v Nikola Ursich DCT v Austin Card Protection Plan v Commrs of De Nul v Axa Royale Customs & Excise De Rosa v Barrie Cardbase Technologies v Valuecard .... Decca Navigator v GLC Carmichael v National Power DEG-Deutsche Investitions v Koshy Cassell v Broome (No.2) Castellain v Preston Delbrueck v Manufacturers Hanover Central Estates v Woolgar (No.2) R ... 296 Trust Central London Property Trust v High Demaglass, Re Trees House Dempster v NCSC Cerex Jewels v Peachey Property Dennis Willcox Pry v FCT Chaplin v Hicks Derry v Peek [2003] J.B.L., NovemBer Issue; © Sweet & MAXWELL AND CONTRIBUTORS Cases DGFT v Pioneer Concrete Franco British SS Co v Watson & Dias v Louis Dreyfus Youell 294 Discount Records v Barclays Bank Freeman & Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties 383 Dodd v Churton Frost v Chief Constable of S. Yorks Dolgellau Golf Club v Hett Police 370 Dona Mari, The Furniss v Dawson 234, 235 Dora, The Furst v Fricher DPP Reference No.1 of 1996 Future Express, The DPP v Esso Australia Duke Group v Pilmer Gatwick Parking Services v Sargent .... 505 Gefco v Mason 523 Edicron v William Whitely Gencor v Commission, Case ENTEC v Abacus Mouldings T102/96 301 Entwells v National & General 10, 11 Gerber Garment v Lectra Systems Environment Protection Authority v Giles v Rhind 421, 423-429 Caltex 24-26 Gill & Duffus v Berger EPA v McMurtry 42 Giustina International =v EPA v Sydney Water Corp. ......-.:-0:+0+ 41 Circle Equiticorp v Bank of NZ .....456, 457, 459, Glawe Spiel v Finanzamt Hamburg, 460, 581 Case C38/93 191-193, 195, 196, Espresso Coffee Machine v Guardian 198-202 Insurance 510, 512 Glaxo v Dowelhurst (No.2) Esselte & British Sugar v_ Pearl Goddard v Hounslow LBC Assurance 261 Golnay Barge v Shinoussa Etablissement Esefka v Central Bank of Governments Stock Investment Co v Nigeria 166 Manila Rly 230 Euro Brokers v Monecor 292 Granit v Benship International Eurus, The 167 Grant v Norway ... 164, 169, 170, 174, 176, Eusign Tankers v Stokes 292 177-180 Evans v Rival Granite Quarries 230 Graysim Holdings v P&O Property ... 607 Evia Luck, The 572 Greek Taverna, Re Evra Corp v Swiss Bank 587 Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Exxon Corp v Exxon Insurance 478 Greenmast Shipping v Jean see Saronikos, The Fairlie v Christie 289 Griffiths v Kingsley-Stubbs ...........-..++.- 139 Farley v Skinner .....135, 350, 375-381, 384, Grogan v Meredith 386-388 Gross v Lord Nugent Farrow Finance v Farrow Properties .... 453 Fawke v Viscount Chelsea Hadley v Baxendale Fenner v Blake Hale v Henkel Fernandez v Walding Halt Garage, Re Filipowski v Fratelli D’Amato Hamilton v Whitehead Filipowski v Thornloe Handelsgesellschaft v Cmack Finlay (James) v Kwik Hoo Tong Hanfstaengl v Baines First Steel Barges Hansa Nord, The ... 106, 109, 110, 114, 118 Fischer v Finanzamt Donaueshingen, Happy Day, The 284, 286, 288, 291, Case C283/95 191, 193, 194, 198 293-298 Fischer v Multi Construction Harmer v Bell Fitzsimmons v R 468 Harnas v Helm, Case C80/95 Flacker Shipping v Glencore Grain see Harris v Union Electric Happy Day, The Hart v Mills Fleet Electrics v Jacey Harvey v Johnson Foss v Harbottle Hatrock v Jones France v Commission, Cases C68/94 Hayes v Dodd and 30/95 301, 308 Heath v Drown 76 [2003] J.B.L., Novemper Issue; O Sweet & MAXWELL AND CONTRIBUTORS Cases Hedley Byrne v Heller ...164, 165, 167, 175 Kleinwort Benson v Lincoln CC ....205, 587 Helby v Matthews 210, 221 Koufos v Czarnikow, see Heron II, Helle Skou, The 297 The Henderson v Merrett Syndicates .. 176, 342 Kwei Tek Chao v British Traders ...118, 165, Heron Ii, The 354, 355 175 Heskell v Continental Express 166, 171, Kyzikos, The 285 175, 176, 178 Heywood v Wellers Laconia, The 296, 297, 591 Hishiya Seiko v Wah Nam Plastic Lance Court v Public Prosecutor Hobbs v London & SW Rly ...350, 377, 378, Landcatch v IPOC Fund 608-610, 612, 385 613 Hoffmann-La Roche v Centrafarm, Laura Prime, The Case 102/77 .-- 83, 86, 87 Lavin v Johnson Hogan v Koala Dundee LB (Plastics) v Swish Products Holpitt v Swaab 10 Le Lievre v Gould Homburg Houtimport v Agrosin, see Leduc v Ward Starsin, The Lefthero, The Home Theater, Re Levy v Martin Brent Hong Kong Fir v Kawasaki .... Lewis v Commissioners of IR Hopkins v Tanqueray Leyland Daf, Re Hornal v Neuberger Products Libyan Arab Foreign Bank v Bankers Houldsworth v City of Glasgow Trust 584, 587 Bank 96 Lidgett v Williams 290 Household Articles RD .......ssecssseseeseees 242 Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Housleys v Bloomer-Holt Lipton v Jescott Huddleston v Herman & Maclean Lithgow v UK 418 Hughes, Re Lloyd v Grace Smith 165, 175, 177 Humberclyde Finance v Hicks .....420, 428 Lloyds & Scottish Finance v Cyril Huyton SA v_ Peter Cremer Lord ....212, 213, 215, 217-220, 227, 229, 237, 419 Loendersloot v Ballantine Industrial Equity v Blackburn Lokumal v Lotte Shipping Inglefield (George), Re ....206, 208, 211, 219, Louisiana ex rel Guste v Testbank 231 Lovens Kemiske Fabrik v Paranova .... Lyderhon v Fox Interfoto v Stiletto 289 Intraco v Multi-Pak Singapore Macmillan v Bishopgate Investment Italia Express, The (No.3) ... Ivorygrove v Global Grange 602, 607 Mahmud v BCCI .. 342, 348, 356, 358, 359, Jackson v Chrysler Acceptances 362, 366-369, 371, 372, 374 Jackson v Horizon Holidays 352, 385 Mailer v Austin Rover James v UK 418 Manchester Garages v Petrofina Japan Abrasive v Australian Fused Manchester, Sheffield & Lincolnshire Jarvis v Swans Tours ......scsssssesesees 352, 385 Rly v Central Wagon ....210, 215, 218, 229 Joel v Swaddle 76, 78, 605 Mander Laundries vyC ommrs of Cus- Johanna Olderndorff, The toms & Excise 198 Johnson v Gore Wood ....365, 369, 375, 387, Mardorf Peach v Attica Sea Carriers, 420-429 see Laconia, The Johnson v Unisys 357, 358, 361, 364, 367, Maronis Holdings v Nippon Credit ....456, 368, 370, 375 457, 459, 460, 465 Jydsk Andels v Grands Moulins de Mass Glory, The Paris .. 107 Mata K, The McCullagh v Lane Fox King Features vO & M Kleeman ...470-475, McElroy Milne’ v Commercial 477 Electronics [2003] J.B.L., NovemBer Issue; © Sweet & MAXWELL AND CONTRIBUTORS Cases McEntire v Crossley .210, 213, 217, 218, Ocular Science v Aspect Vision 221 Oetker v IFA Internationale, McLoughlin v O’Brian Almak, The McNiven Vv Westmoreland Olds Discount v Playfair 208, 211, 215 Investments 208, 235 Ord v Belhaven Pubs Merck, Sharp & Dohme v Paranova, Orion Finance v Crown Financial Case C443/00 87 Management 218, 222, 236 Meridian Global Securities Orkem v Commission, Case 374/87 .... 25 Commission 13, 14, 18, 33 Messers v Morrison’s Export P&O Scottish Ferries v Braer Corp Metropolitan Police Receiver v Palace- gate Properties 253 Palisade Investments v Collin Estates .... 504, Mexico 1, The 286, 287, 297 515 Meyer v Kivisto 102 Panchaud Fréres v_ Etablissements Midland Bank v Hett, Stubbs & General Grain 118 Kemp 342 Pao On v Lau Yiu Long 572, 573, 576 Mirage Studios v Counter-Feat Partco v Wragg Clothing 475, 480 Pascoe v Lucas Momm v Barclays Bank Peek v Gurney International 591 Permanent BS v Wheeler Moorcock, The 363 Petre Schmidt, The Moore & Landauer, Re Petrotrade v Stinnes Handel ....107, 110, 114 Morgan Crucible v Hill Samuel Pharmacia & Upjohn v Paranova Morris v Bailey Philips v Brewer Dolphin Bell Motis Exports v Dampskibsselskapet ... 178 Phillips v Remington Mouat v Clark Boyce Pine Valley v Ireland Movitex v Bulfield 461 Polly Peck International, Re Mularezyk v Azralnove Investments .... 80 Possfund v Diamond Price Waterhouse/Coopers & Lybrand, N Ocean Shipping v Hyundai, see Case No.COMP/M.1016 Adlantic Baron, The Printing Center of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings v Supermind DGFT (No.4) 623 Proctor & Gamble v Becher Naviera Mogor v Société Métallurgique Prudential Assurance v Newman de Normandie, see Nogar Martin, (No.2) 420-429 The Pumperninks v Land Securities 77, 606 Naxos, The 110 Nea Tyhi, The 171, 172, 177 Quantum v Plane Trucking Nereide Spa di Navigazione v Bulk Oil see Laura Prime, The v Associated Octel New Bullas Trading, Re ...220-222, 224, 399 v British Steel 151 Newport County AFC, Re v De Berenger 520 Nicholls v Kinsey 253 v Ghosh 620 Noble Resources v Cavalier ee, v Kasim 297 The Atlas v Lockwood 621 Nogar Martin, The v Nanayakkara 296 Normaiec v Britton v Nelson Group Services 151 NRA v Empress cars aawoaoaoealclhlllllllll v Panel on Takeovers, ex p. NSW Aboriginal Land Council v Guinness 518 Jones R. v Preddy 586 NZ Netherlands Soc v Kuys R. v Saunders 621 R. v Swan Hunter 149 O’Neill v Phillips R. v Denbo 33, 34 O'Sullivan v MAM R. v Hatrick Chemicals Oasis Merchandising, Re Rayner v Rhodes Ocean Frost, The Reardon Smith v Hansen-Tangen ... 109, 114 [2003] J.B.L., November Issue; © Sweet & MAXWELL AND CONTRIBUTORS Cases Redfern v Reeves Soon Hua Seng v Glencore Reed v Young Spalding v Shotley Point Marine Regent Publishing v Bamforth Spalmatori, The Reoborn v Barry Corp Spreag v Paeson Ritz Hotel v Charles of the Ritz Spring v Guardian Assurance River Gurara, The Staatssectritaris van Financien Robinson v Page 290 Aardappelenbewaarplaats Romulus Trading v Henry Smith’s Stage Line v Board of Trade Trustees (No.2) 77, 78, 602, 606, 607 Standard Chartered v Pakistan Nation- Rookes v Barnard 345 al Shipping (Nos 2 & 4) Rowlands v Collow 346, 348, 349, 354 Starsin, The Royal Exchange v Hope Royal Products v Midland Bank State Rail Authority v Dawson Ruxley Electronics v Forsyth State Trading of India v Golodetz Stead v Dawber S Wales Miners v Glamorgan Coal Stein v Blake (No.2) Salomon v Salomon Steven v Bromley Salon, The Stocznia Gdanska =v Saronikos, The Shipping Saudi Crown, The Stoke on Trent CC v WJ Wass Scancarriers v Aotearoa Stone v Hitch Schneider Electric v Commission, Case Street v Mountford 222, 224, 227, 233 177/02 Stuart v Armourguard Security Schroeder Music v Macaulay Stuart v Farmer Schuler v Wickman Sun Alliance v Watson & Youell Scott v Brown, Doering & McNab Surrey CC v Bredero Homes Scottish CWS v Meyer Sea Empress, The 608, 609, 611-613 Seager v Copydex (No.2) 132, 136, 138, Tabuk, The 142 Tackey v McBain Sea-Land Services v Cheong Fook Teacher v Calder Chee 582 Tesco Supermarkets v Nattrass .. 10-14, 18, Shakelford, The wee 297 19, 33, 43 Shamshar Jute Mills v Sethia Tetra Laval v Commission, Case Sharon Global v LG International T5/02 299 Shelfer v City of London Electric Third World Development v Atang Lighting 142 Latief Shirlaw v Southern Foundries .............. 363 Timna, The SIAT Di Dal Ferro v Tradax Overseas ...107, 116-118 Toepfer v Lenersan-Poortman Silver v Ocean SS Town & Country Factors v Commrs of Silverstein v Chartered Bank Customs & Excise, Case C498/99 ....191, Simpson v Thomas 194-196, 198-200, 202 Skarp, The TPC v Abbco Ice Skeet v Powell-Sheddon TPC v CSR Smith & Fawcett, Re Smith (Administrator of Cosslett) v TPC v TNT Australia TPC v Tubemakers Bridgend CBC ....208, 209, 227-230, 236 Tradax Export v European Grain ...109, 110, Smith (Howard) v Ampol 451, 456, 457 Smith (Petitioner) 447 114 Smith New Court v_ Scrimgeour Tradax Internacional v Goldschmidt ....108, Vickers 97, 521 109, 114, 120 Smith v Anderson 438 Trade Star Line v Mitsui, see Alaskan Smith, Stone & Knight v Birmingham Trader, The Corp. 15 Trelawny, The 74 Soderberg v Gens 521 Tres Flores, The 285 [2003] J.B.L., NovemBer Issue; © Sweet & MAXWELL AND CONTRIBUTORS Cases Turner v Wandsworth LBC Watson v Dolmark Industries Two Friends, The Watts v Morrow .... 351, 353, 366, 376, 381, 385, 386 UK Safety Group v Heane Welsh Development Agency’ v UK v EU Council, Case C84/94 EXFINCO ..206, 208, 213-219, 221, 223, Ulster-Swift v Taunton 229, 237 Haulage West v Francis 474-476 Union Européenne de L’Artisanat v Westdeutsche Landesbank v Islington EU Council, Case T135/9 United City Merchants v Royal Bank Westminster CC v Clarke of Canada, see American Accord, Westpac Banking v Cockerill The Whelan v Waitaki Meats ..344, 345, 362, 367 Universal Thermosensors v Hibben ..... 132 White v Jones Universe Sentinel, The Whitehouse v Carlton Hotel Universe Tankships of Monrovia v Whitworth Street Estates v Miller ...225, 226 ITWE, see Universe Sentinel Wickman Machine Tools v Schuler V/O Rasnoimport v Guthrie 165, 169, Williams Porter, Re Williams v Natural Life 171, 173, 176, 178, 179 Vargas Pena v Peter Cremer Williams v Roffey & Nicholls Virginia M, The Wilmer v Hutchinson Vista Fjord, The Windsurfing International v Voest Alpine v Chevron Marine Vorvis v Insurance Corp of Brit. Wogan’s (Drogheda), Re Columbia 345, 354 Wool v Tandem Computers Wrotham Park Estate v_ Parkside Wagon Mound, The Homes 131, 133-135, 137, 139, 140 Walker v Wimborne Wallace v United Grain Growers Yoga for Health v Guest & Utilini ... 510, 511, 514 Ward (Maxley) v Sankey Yorkshire Rly v Maclure Washington Marine v Rainer, Mill & Lumber Zarvos v Pradhan [2003] J.B.L., Novemper Issue; © Sweet & MAXWELL AND CONTRIBUTORS Statutes Factory Act (1 & 2 Will. c.39)... 147. 1907 Limited Partnerships = Act Factories Act (3 & 4 Will, —cont. c.103) . 147 s.4(2) 435, 438 Mines & Collieries Act (5 & 6 442 NU II ickiciiiestinescntevietntas 146 437 Bills of Lading Act (18 & 19 :. 435, 438, 439 Vict., c.111) s. 435, 441, 442 446, 447 s.3 Factory Act (19 & 20 Vict., c.38) Joint Stock Companies Act (19 & 20 Vict., c.100) Chancery Amendment Act (21 & 22 Vict., ¢.27), a.k.a. Lord Cairns’ Act 5 133, 134, 137, 139, 5.10 pee sad Fine Arts Copyright Act (25 & Picests and Piesiens Acxt? Ol a 26 Vic., ¢.68) ~~ = esigns Act ( w. ae meet aise : ae 7. ' ag Po Ange ended Official Secrets Act (1 & 2 Geo. Elementary Education Act (33 5, 28) . 47 & 34 Vict., c.75) — Act (1 & 2 Geo. 5, mm =: ’ a Act7 (41 & , 424? VicPat ., 22c . one 471-474 ) Partnership Act (53 & 54 Vic., Law of Property Act (15 & 16 268, 269, 272, 278-280 Geo. 5, c.20) Companies Act (19 & 20 Geo. 5, c.23) a s.79 5.19 Trade Marks Act (1 & 2 Geo. 6, s.24(1) os, Education Act (7 & 8 Geo. 6, c.31) s.35 Coal Industry Nationalisation Act (9 & 10 Geo. 6, ¢.59) ..... 147 Companies Act (11 & 12 Geo. 6, s.45 436, 438 c.47) 46, 48 Directors’ Liability Act (53 & Companies Act (12& 13 Geo. 6, 54 Vic., c.64) c.38) 1899 Rivers & Harbours Act (62 & s.210 451 63 Vict., c.49) Registered Designs Act (13 & 14 s.13 614 Geo. 6, c.88) 239, 243-246, 1907 Limited Partnerships Act (7 248, 249, 251, 473 Edw. 7, c.24) s.1 241 $4. 437 (4) 242 [2003] J.B.L., Novemser Issue; © Sweet & MAXWELL AND CONTRIBUTORS Statutes 1954 Landlord & Tenant Act (2 & 3 1970 Water Quality Improvement Eliz. 2, ¢.56) Act (c.37) $.23(3) 79 s.11(b)(2) 614 s.24 511 1971 Merchant Shipping (Oil Pollu- (1) 260 tion) Act (c.59) 612, 613 (2b) 257 s.1(1) 609 Industrial Relations Act (c.72) ... 148 263 1974 Health & Safety at Work etc. 258, 259, 261, 265, 506 258 Act (c.37) s.2 151, 157 259, 261, 511 (1) 149 265 (2)(c) 149 (4) 149 (5) 149, 151 (6) 149 149 151, 155-157 149, 152 151, 157 157 76-79, 265, 504, 150 510-514, 602-608 153 (g) .-.-76, 255, 265, 504-507, 151 149 Trade Union & Labour Rela- 80, 81 tions Act (c.52) 148 76-78, 80 Sex Discrimination Act (c.65) s.11(5) Employment Protection Act (c.71) 151 505 1976 Restrictive Trade Practices Act 253, 255, 265 (c.34) 623 258 1977 Unfair Contract Terms Act (c.50) s.40(1) 257 s.42(1) 255 s.2(2) 517 (3) 255 1979 Credit Unions Act (c.34) ..45-48, 51, 52, 54, 55, 58, 63, 66 s.55 505 Part II .. 76, 81, 252-254, 504, 510 Factories Act (9 & 10 Eliz. 2, c.34) s.154 147 Trustee Investments Act (9 & 10 Eliz.2, ¢.62) Industrial & Provident Societi Act (c.12) 46 [2003] J.B.L., Novemser Issue; © Sweet & MAxwect AND CONTRIBUTORS