The Issue with Antiquity. (History; Fiction or Science? Book 5)

270 Pages·2015·5.08 MB·English

HISTORY: FICTION OR SCIENCE? l BOOK 5
THE ISSUE WITH ANTIQUITY
ANATOLY FOMENKO
THE ISSUE WITH ANTIQUITY
By Anatoly Fomenko
Book 5 of History: Fiction or Science? series.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any
form or by any means, without the prior permission of the publisher. Critics are welcome, of course, to quote brief
passages by way of criticism and review.
Anatoly Fomenko asserts the moral right to be identified as the author of this work.
Translated from Russian by Mikhail Yagupov
Design & layout: Paul Bondarovski
Project management: Franck Tamdhu
On the cover: Photo John Foxx Images.
Copyright © 2003-2015 Delamere Resources LLC
Published by Delamere Resources LLC
Publisher’s website: http://history.mithec.com
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Fomenko, Anatoly Timofeevich (b. 1945). Full Member (Academician) of the
Russian Academy of Sciences, Full Member of the Russian Academy of Natural
Sciences, Full Member of the International Higher Education Academy of
Sciences, Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, Professor, Head of the Moscow
State University Section of Mathematics of the Department of Mathematics and
Mechanics. Solved Plateau’s Problem from the theory of minimal spectral
surfaces. Author of the theory of invariants and topological classification of
integrable Hamiltonian dynamic systems. Laureate of the 1996 National Premium
of the Russian Federation (in Mathematics) for a cycle of works on the
Hamiltonian dynamical systems and manifolds’ invariants theory. Author of 200
scientific publications, 28 monographs and textbooks on mathematics, a specialist
in geometry and topology, calculus of variations, symplectic topology, Hamiltonian
geometry and mechanics, computer geometry. Author of a number of books on the
development of new empirico-statistical methods and their application to the
analysis of historical chronicles as well as the chronology of antiquity and the
Middle Ages.
From the publisher
Hideous inconsistencies of history
History only makes sense to us when we don’t reflect upon it too much. Otherwise we
would expire of cognitive dissonance caused by the sheer lack of logic in how randomly
the chronological layers are shuffled together, interspersed by many centuries when
humans were apparently immersed into utter hibernation and didn’t bother with fighting,
inventing, migrating or trifles like that. Nonsensical, is it? But this is what the very
concept of the Dark Ages implies, just as the popular belief in Father Christmas implies
believing in reindeer-driven celestial sleighs as well.
One wonders how the minds of professional historians appear unaffected by all of
these hideous inconsistencies of history. The Orwellian concept of doublethink comes to
mind. Roman senators congregating among the ruins of the Capitol whose roof appears
to have been made of concrete (which apparently hadn’t been invented until the XVI
century), Gothic cathedrals that it took several centuries to erect, and so on, and so
forth. The most rational humans can invent the most implausible explanations where
simple ones would mean taking their holy cows to the altar of Reason, a most
intimidating deity. History as we know it now is just too bloated and too nonsequential
to fit it into your head for proper conceptualization. So we become experts in short
historical periods; should those, in turn, prove to contain insoluble problems or
paradoxical occurrences, these can always be blamed on the ignorant scribes or the
peculiar and idiosyncratic perception of our venerable ancestors.
It took one brilliant mind to notice that the inconsistencies all fit together in the most
bizarre way. A mathematician’s mind. Anatoly Fomenko, one of the world’s leading
experts in the field of mathematical statistics, has spent thirty years studying all the
ambiguities of human history using nothing but natural scientific methods for his
research. He is the first to have conceptualized an alternative chronological scale for
human history; a scale so short that it frightens poor historians into frenzy. The new
version of history is extremely logical in addition to its brevity, and can finally fit into
the cranium of a logical human being without causing too many pains; however, it leaves
no room for your old dogma, so be warned before you embark on your journey to the
crystalline peaks of the Professor’s logic. You won’t be the same after his latest
fundamental work entitled History: Fiction or Science? now available in English. You
won’t be able to hear the word “Troy” ever again without a smirk of righteous derision
upon your face. Judging by the successes of the modern cinematographic industry, it is
just as well.
The Da Vinci code broken for good
Unnerving as the idea might seem, popular fiction dealing with conspiracies of one sort
or another is actually quite tame as compared to reality. The Roman Catholic Church,
for instance, is involved in a much greater hoax than the most daring writer could
possibly conceive of – one that deals with the very foundations of history itself.
The above statement is neither an exaggeration, nor a metaphor. Very few people are
aware that the B.C./A.D. chronology as we know it was created by a handful of Jesuits
in the XVI-XVII century – Joseph Scaliger, Dionysius Petavius, and their successors.
We have grown so accustomed to a timeline that runs through many millennia, from the
Egyptian pyramids to the present day, that the mere thought of questioning its veracity
seems perfectly preposterous – just like the notion of a rotating earth must have seemed
in the epoch of Galileo Galilei, and just as heretical.
But nevertheless, the entire conception of ancient and mediaeval history known to us
today owes its existence to a XVI century Jesuit hoax. A hoax that has finally been
exposed with the aid of astronomy, mathematical statistics and modern computational
facilities.
* * *
The material of The Issue with Antiquity book crowns scores of years of meticulous
and extensive research performed by the eminent mathematician Anatoly Fomenko and
his colleagues. This book is also the 5th volume in History: Fiction or Science? e-
series, the fundamental oeuvre that exposes and expounds the numerous inveracities of
the traditional version of history.
The e-series History: Fiction or Science? contains data and conclusions that aren’t
anything short of revolutionary. The alternatives offered to classical history are
stunning, unorthodox to the extent of being labelled heretical by virtually every scholar
of history, and daring enough to be considered preposterous at first sight, although this
impression never lasts longer than it takes one to read a few pages attentively.
The author dissects every historical age and analyses the data from every source
imaginable – concensual chronology takes a good beating, and it goes rapidly downhill
from there. The Issue with Antiquity is actually the result of creation in XV-XVII
centuries of a mythical Classical Age that never was by misdating mediaeval events by
hundreds and thousands of years as very ancient ones.
Franck Tamdhu
July 2015
Contents
About the author
From the publisher
Are History and Astronomy incompatible? By Béla Lukács
Preface by Anatoly T. Fomenko
PART ONE: The Middle Ages referred to as the “Antiquity”. Mutual superimposition
of the Second and the Third Roman Empire...
1. Identifying the Second and the Third “ancient” Roman Empire as the same state. A
chronological shift of 330 years
1.1. A dynastic description of the Second and the Third Roman Empire
1.2. Biographical parallelism between the Second and Third Roman Empires. The
330-year shift
2. The correlation between two different dating methods illustrated by the
superimposition of two epochs from the history of Roman Papacy one over the other. A
brief scheme
3. The superimposition of the Israelite (Theomachist) Kingdom over the Third Roman
Empire in the West. A shift of circa 1230 years
4. Identifying the theocratic Kingdom of Judah as the Third Roman Empire in the East. A
shift of circa 1230 years (short diagram)
5. Saint Basil the Great in the alleged IV century a.d. and his prototype in the XII
century A.D. – Jesus Christ. The resulting shift of 820 years
PART TWO: The famous reform of the Occidental Church in the XI century by “Pope
Gregory Hildebrand” as the reflection of the XII century reforms of Andronicus
(Christ). The Trojan war of the XIII century A.D.
6. “Pope Gregory Hildebrand” from the XI century A.D. as a replica of Jesus Christ
(Andronicus) from the XII century.
6.1 Astronomy in the Gospels
6.1.1. The true dating of the evangelical eclipse
6.1.2. The Gospels apparently reflect a sufficiently advanced level of
astronomical eclipse theories, which contradicts the consensual evangelical
history
6.2. The Roman John Crescentius of the alleged X century a.d. as a reflection of the
Evangelical John the Baptist from the XII century a.d. A biographical parallelism
6.3. “Pope” Gregory VII Hildebrand from the Roman chronicles dated to the XI
century a.d. as the reflection of Jesus Christ (Andronicus) from the XI century a.d.
A biographical parallelism
6.4. The Bethlehem Star of the alleged I century and the famous supernova
explosion of circa 1150 (subsequently shifted to 1054 by the chronologists)
6.5. The Crucifixion of Jesus on Mount Beykos, or the evangelical Golgotha, which
is located outside Constantinople, near the shore of the Bosporus
7. Identifying Livy’s “Ancient Imperial Rome” as the Third Roman Empire after a 1053-
year shift
Overview of the e-Series
Bibliography
“Who controls the past controls the future;
who controls the present controls the past.”
George Orwell, 1984.
“History is a pack of lies about events that never happened
told by people who weren’t there.”
George Santayana, American philosopher.