History of History: Politics and Scholarship in Modern India - Oxford Sc... https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/... The History of History: Politics and Scholarship in Modern India AUTHORS Affiliations are at time of print Vinay Lal publication. ABSTRACT Vinay Lal, author History and historians in India have gained prominence in the public sphere in recent years. The Associate Professor, undisputed ascendancy of history in modern India may be briefly gauged by two developments. Department of History, University of California, Los The first was Amartya Sen's keynote address at the annual meeting of the Indian History Congress Angeles, USA in early January 2001. Sen warned against the manipulation of history in the service of sectarian political interests, and the diminishing of India's ‘magnificently multireligious and heterodox history’ at the hands of bigots. The second was the controversy over the overt politicization of the Indian Council of H ... More Keywords: history, India, historians, Amartya Sen, Indian History Congress, Indian Council of Historical Research, Hindutva, politics BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Print publication date: 2005 Print ISBN-13: 9780195672442 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2012 DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195672442.001.0001 Contents Go to page: Front Matter Title Pages Dedication Acknowledgements Introduction 1 of 2 9/3/2020, 5:42 AM History of History: Politics and Scholarship in Modern India - Oxford Sc... https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/... 1 The History of Ahistoricity 2 Contours of the Past, Shape of the Future 3 History as Holocaust 4 Subalterns in the Academy 3 Aryavarta and Silicon Valley Postscript End Matter Select Bibliography Index Copyright © 2020. All rights reserved. Access brought to you by: 2 of 2 9/3/2020, 5:42 AM Title Pages The History of History: Politics and Scholarship in Modern India Vinay Lal Print publication date: 2005 Print ISBN-13: 9780195672442 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2012 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195672442.001.0001 Title Pages (p.i) The History of History (p.ii) (p.iii) The History of History (p.iv) YMCA Library Building, Jai Singh Road, New Delhi 110 001 Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press Page 1 of 2 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 03 September 2020 Title Pages in the UK and in certain other countries Published in India by Oxford University Press, New Delhi © Oxford University Press 2003 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2003 Oxford India Paperbacks 2005 Sixth impression 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from Oxford University Press. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer ISBN-13: 978-0-19-567244-2 ISBN-10: 0-19-567244-5 Typeset in Palatine 10/12 by Jojy Philip, New Delhi 110 027 Printed at Sapra Brothers, New Delhi 110 092 Published by Oxford University Press YMCA Library Building, Jai Singh Road, New Delhi 110 001 Access brought to you by: Page 2 of 2 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 03 September 2020 Dedication The History of History: Politics and Scholarship in Modern India Vinay Lal Print publication date: 2005 Print ISBN-13: 9780195672442 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2012 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195672442.001.0001 Dedication (p.v) for Bernard S. Cohn scholar extraordinary, radical democrat, teacher, friend and for Ishaan Satej and Avni Sunaina in the hope that as they grow up they will not eschew ‘myths’ for ‘history’ (p.vi) Access brought to you by: Page 1 of 1 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 03 September 2020 Acknowledgements The History of History: Politics and Scholarship in Modern India Vinay Lal Print publication date: 2005 Print ISBN-13: 9780195672442 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2012 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195672442.001.0001 (p.ix) Acknowledgements Through much of the substance of the five chapters that comprise this volume has appeared in print before in various journals, some of which are with extreme difficulty if at all available in India, the entire manuscript has been thoroughly revised and much new material has been added. However, it is not the mere inclusion of new information, or the greatly enhanced length of the chapters in their revised form, as well as the new introduction to the volume, which lend to the book, taken as a whole, an entirely different set of characteristics than what is encountered in any of the single chapters, which show their origin as discrete pieces of scholarship. Historiography has not developed as a field of inquiry in India even down to the present day, and I am not aware of its inclusion in courses of study in postgraduate programs in history at Indian universities. Though there have been previous studies of Indian historiography before, they tend to be collections of biographies of leading historians, or enumerative and descriptive in their treatment of historical works. Needless to say, I believe that the singularity of this present study arises from not only the wide scope of my inquiry, which brings together under one rubric widely divergent strands of the study of Indian history, but from the philosophical positions I have adopted and from my insistence on giving full consideration to the politics of knowledge. This book has been ten years in the making, though the earliest version of Chapter I dates back to an earlier date, more precisely to the spring of 1988. I remember the enthusiasm with which the core of what would later become Chapter I was then received by Ashis Nandy, Roby Rajan, and my brother Anil, and am grateful to them for their critical reading of the text. It was another seven years before I endeavored to bring that paper into print. (p.x) An earlier version of Chapter I was first published as ‘On the Perils of Historical Thinking: The Case, Puzzling as Usual, of India’, Journal of Commonwealth and Post-colonial Studies 3, no. 1 (Fall 1995):79–112; a more Page 1 of 3 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 03 September 2020 Acknowledgements elaborate version, nonetheless considerably different from the present version, appeared in the Journal of the Indian Council for Philosophical Research, Special Issue: Historiography of Civilizations (June 1996):95–137, under the title of ‘History and the Possibilities of Emancipation: Some Lessons from India’. Chapter II is a revised version of a chapter that appeared in India Briefing, edited by Philip Oldenburg and Marshall Bouton (New York: M. E. Sharpe for Asia Society, 1999), under the title ‘History and Politics’; the opening section, in particular, is considerably altered. I am grateful to Philip Oldenburg for his incisive remarks on this chapter in its earlier incarnation, and I have followed many of his concrete suggestions. Dipesh Chakrabarty kindly shared with me some of his thoughts on the political debates over history that took place in India in the 1960s and 1970s. Chapter III was first published under the title of ‘The Discourse of History and the Crisis at Ayodhya: Reflections on the Production of Knowledge, Freedom, and the Future of India’, in Emergences, nos. 5–6 (1993–4):4–44. I am grateful to my friends, especially Teshome Gabriel, Jim Wilgten, and Patrick Malloy, in what was then the ‘Emergences’ collective at UCLA, for fruitful discussions on portions of this chapter; and I would also like to express my gratitude to one of the anonymous readers for Oxford University Press who alerted me to the necessity of placing the debates between historians over Ayodhya in their wider context. I would like to thank my student, Mitch Numark, for a careful reading of Chapter IV, an abbreviated version of which was first presented by invitation at an international conference, held in Buffalo in August 1999, on ‘Turning Points in Historical Thinking: A Comparative Perspective’. It has since been published as ‘Walking with the Subalterns, Riding with the Academy: The Curious Ascendancy of Indian History’;, Studies in History (New Series) 17, no. 1 (2001): 101–33, and I am grateful to the journal's editor, Neeladri Bhattacharya, for his comments. The final chapter first took shape as a paper presented at the annual conference on South Asian studies at the University of California, Berkeley, in February 1999; at the invitation of Stephan Astourian, holder of the William Saroyan Chair in Armenian Studies, University of California, Berkeley, a lengthier version of the paper was presented at a conference at Berkeley on ‘Diasporas: Transnational Identity and the Politics of the Homeland’, November 1999. I am (p.xi) extremely grateful to David Palumbo-Lin, and in particular Khachig Tölölyan, who offered a learned commentary, for incisive comments on Chapter 5. Yossi Shain's enthusiasm for my work on diasporic internet histories is still fresh in my mind. The financial assistance of the Asian American Studies Center, UCLA, which helped in the completion of Chapter V, is gratefully acknowledged. The intellectual friendship of Frederique Apffel-Marglin has also meant a lot to me in recent years, and she offered a perceptive commentary on the entire manuscript. My friend, Henry Ranjeet of Kolam Travels; Chennai, is an Page 2 of 3 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 03 September 2020 Acknowledgements intellectual maverick and iconoclast, and his unflagging interest in my work prodded me to move on with this book. No words are adequate to describe the intellectual support that I have received from Ashis Nandy over the course of the last decade and more. He has always displayed the keenest interest in the arguments put forth in this work. Some of his writings have been critical in helping to shape my thoughts on the enterprise of history in India, and those familiar with his writings will at once recognize the intellectual debt I owe to him. I had been familiar with Gandhi's writings long before I encountered the work of Nandy, but Nandy offered a fresh perspective on Gandhi, one that was immensely desirable in an India where many Gandhians and politicians had succeeded in transforming one of the few great dissenters of our times into a dull, pious, sanctimonious, moralizing ‘role model’, the very ‘Father of the Nation’. Gandhian studies took the politics out of Gandhi. Of contemporary Indian intellectuals, no one has contributed more than Nandy to putting a spark back in Gandhi. I hope this book will resonate with Shiv Viswanathan, Ramchandra Gandhi, Douglas Lummis, Gustavo Esteva, Claude Alvares, Ziauddin Sardar, and other deprofessionalized academics and dissenting intellectuals whose writings have also been inspirational, or whose friendship has sustained me in the belief that the insights of this book are not without some promise. I am hopeful that this book will endear itself as well to people outside the profession of history, indeed outside the academy, but expect that its demonstrable engagement with a broad swathe of historiography will also persuade professional historians to take its arguments seriously. Access brought to you by: Page 3 of 3 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 03 September 2020 Introduction The History of History: Politics and Scholarship in Modern India Vinay Lal Print publication date: 2005 Print ISBN-13: 9780195672442 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2012 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195672442.001.0001 Introduction History in the Ascendant Mode Vinay Lal DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195672442.003.0001 Abstract and Keywords This book explores the politics underlying the rise of history to prominence in modern India. It offers an account of the nationalist obsession with history in nineteenth-century India, examines the relationship between nation-building and the making of Indian history, and discusses the emergence of subaltern history in relation to strand of Indian historiography known as the Cambridge School. It also looks at the debate between historians over the origins of the Babri Masjid, recent attempts to communalize such figures as Vivekananda, the attempted legitimization of ‘fringe’ historical scholarship, and the revisionism of those who purport to establish Aryanism as the only foundation of Indian civilization. Finally, this book extends the discussion of Indian histories to those being generated in cyberspace in the North American Indian and specifically Hindu diaspora. Keywords: history, India, politics, nation-building, subaltern history, Cambridge School, historiography, Babri Masjid, Hinduism, cyberspace Almost nothing must appear more remarkable to a student of the social sciences, or of the wider intellectual scene, in India than the recent ascendancy of ‘history’ and the elevation of historians to a position of public recognition if not eminence. Outside the hard sciences, as well as those disciplines, such as economics, which have self-consciously fashioned themselves after the sciences and mathematics, and in all of which Indian achievements have acquired something of an international dimension, no discipline has gained as much Page 1 of 24 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 03 September 2020 Introduction visibility as has history in the course of the previous two to three decades. Its prominence in the public sphere in recent years may be briefly gauged by two developments. Amartya Sen, whose Nobel Prize in Economics conferred on him not merely instant recognition but the kind of celebrity that is generally reserved only for Bollywood stars, cricketing heroes, ‘colourful’ Indian politicians, and authors of multi-million rupee scams, consented to deliver the keynote address at the annual meeting of the Indian History Congress in early January 2001. Meetings of the Indian History Congress in recent years have not been without some excitement, and it may also well be the case that Sen, who has lately acquired something of a habit of uttering oracular pronouncements on a diverse array of subjects—from the films of Satyajit Ray, the humanism of Tagore, and Indian calendrical systems to secularism, the mode of scientific reasoning, the virtues of reason, and the perils facing democracy—and shows no disinclination to distance himself from the reputation gradually accruing to him as the repository of wisdom, relished the opportunity to speak from yet another platform of authority. But that he would at all consent to give the keynote address for a profession to which he is (p.2) a relative outsider points to the public visibility of the profession just as much as it suggests the importance that someone such as Sen has come to attach to the discipline of history. Warning against the manipulation of history in the service of sectarian political interests, and the diminishing of India's ‘magnificently multireligious and heterodox history’ at the hands of bigots, Sen made himself heard: his remarks were reported widely in the press and received profuse circulation in cyberspace.1 Only some months before Sen's lecture, the most intense controversy raged over the overt politicization of the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR), a national body formed to promote historical thinking and research. Less than a week after Murli Manohar Joshi was appointed Union Minister for Human Resources Development, he promoted B. R. Grover, an historian of no great standing, to the chairmanship of the ICHR. Having previously served in the ICHR for twelve years and then gone into retirement, Grover was plucked from near obscurity and again nominated to its membership in June 1998 after the Bharatiya Janata Party's ascendancy to power. His political predilections, according to one commentator, can be surmised from his voting record at the Indian History Congress, the most prestigious association of professional historians: he apparently opposed a resolution against communal strife in 1984, and likewise voted, in 1987, against a resolution which objected to the politicization of history in the media. Grover only came to be known to a somewhat wider public during the controversy over the Babri Masjid, when he affiliated himself with the position advocated by the VHP and other proponents of what might be termed ‘the temple theory’.2 Thus, considering Grover's background, it cannot have been a complete surprise when the ICHR, with Grover at the helm and the BJP government looking over its shoulder, announced in early 2000 its decision to withdraw from publication two volumes, by the well- Page 2 of 24 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 03 September 2020