ebook img

The Hand of the Lord: A Reassessment of the ''Ark Narrative'' of 1 Samuel (Society of Biblical Literature) PDF

128 Pages·2008·0.62 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview The Hand of the Lord: A Reassessment of the ''Ark Narrative'' of 1 Samuel (Society of Biblical Literature)

The hand of The lord The hand of the lord by Patrick d. Miller Jr. and J. J. M. roberts The hand of The lord a reassessment of the “ark narrative” of 1 Samuel Patrick d. Miller Jr. J. J. M. roberts Society of Biblical literature atlanta The hand of The lord Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Biblical literature all rights reserved. no part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permit- ted by the 1976 Copyright act or in writing from the publisher. requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the rights and Permissions office, Society of Biblical literature, 825 houston Mill road, atlanta, Ga 30329 USa. library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data Miller, Patrick d. The hand of the lord: a reassessment of the “ark narrative” of 1 Samuel / Patrick d. Miller, Jr., J. J. M. roberts. p. cm. originally published: Baltimore : Johns hopkins University Press, c1977, in series: Johns hopkins University. near eastern Studies. Includes bibliographical references and indexes. ISBn 978-1-58983-294-7 (paper binding : alk. paper) 1. Bible. o.T. Samuel, 1st, II, 12–VII, 1—Theology. 2. ark of the Covenant. I. rob- erts, J. J. M. (Jimmy Jack McBee), 1939– II. Title. BS1325.52.M55 2008 222'.4306—dc22 2007036001 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 08 5 4 3 2 1 Printed in the United States of america on acid-free, recycled paper conforming to anSI/nISo Z39.48-1992 (r1997) and ISo 9706:1994 standards for paper permanence. ConTenTS Preface .....................................................................................................................vii abbreviations .......................................................................................................viii 1. Introduction to the Study ...................................................................................1 2. The extent of the narrative ..............................................................................27 3. exegesis of 1 Samuel 2:12–17, 22–25, 27–36 .................................................37 4. exegesis of 1 Samuel 4 ......................................................................................43 5. exegesis of 1 Samuel 5 ......................................................................................53 6. exegesis of 1 Samuel 6 ......................................................................................69 7. The Structure and Intention of 1 Samuel 2:12–17, 22–25, 27–36; 4:1b–7:1 ..................................................................................................79 appendix ................................................................................................................95 Bibliography .........................................................................................................107 Index ...............................................................................................................113 PrefaCe This book had its inception out of the coincidence that both authors inde- pendently and within a short period presented papers on aspects of the so-called “ark narrative” to The Colloquium for old Testament research (Miller) and The Biblical Colloquium (roberts). each of us had an oppor- tunity to hear or read the other’s paper. The discovery that we had pursued different aspects of the passage within a common understanding of its nature and purpose that did not generally correspond to the scholarly consensus about these chapters led us to combine efforts in a larger study of this important unit that would give due attention to the illumination of it by reference to comparative materials, to the careful exegesis of its com- ponent parts, and to an overall analysis of its theological character. The work presented here is a joint effort in the full sense of the term. While each author necessarily had to prepare basic drafts of parts of the book, both authors participated fully in the shaping and content of all parts. The accomplishment of such a cooperative literary and scholarly endeavor has turned out to be more feasible and enjoyable than we had expected and encourages us about the possibility and usefulness of such team projects. We would like to express our gratitude to The Johns hopkins Univer- sity Press and the editors of the The Johns hopkins near eastern Studies for including this volume in that distinguished series. -vii- aBBreVIaTIonS The abbreviations used in this work follow the style sheet of the Journal of Biblical literature. Biblical works not listed in that work are cited accord- ing to the index of abbreviations given in otto eissfeldt’s standard The Old Testament: An Introduction (trans. P. r. ackroyd; new York: harper & row, 1965), 854–61. assyriological works are cited according to the Chi- cago Assyrian Dictionary or r. Borger’s Handbuch der Keilschriftliteratur (3 vols.; Berlin: de Gruyter, 1967–1875). -viii- 1 InTrodUCTIon To The STUdY In light of the two monographs on the ark narratives of 1 Samuel recently published by franz Schicklberger1 and antony Campbell,2 one may well question the need for a new monograph on the same topic. Certainly their work has rendered some aspects of the typical monograph redundant in this case. Schicklberger’s summary3 and especially Campbell’s survey4 of the earlier investigation of the ark narratives are adequate and need not be repeated as an introduction to our own analysis of the narratives. even on the more detailed level, Schicklberger’s critique5 of leonhard rost’s basic study6 is cogent enough that one need not rehash rost’s views before proceeding to an explication of one’s own. Moreover, one must commend both Schicklberger and Campbell for following up a potentially fruitful insight of M. delcor.7 They again call attention to the extrabiblical texts concerning the capture and return of divine images8 that delcor had noted as providing possible parallels to the biblical ark narratives.9 This open- ness to the broader cultural context in which Israel’s faith developed could freshen up a scholarly discussion grown stale within the narrow confines 1. Die Ladeerzählungen des ersten Samuel-Buches, Eine literaturwissenschaftliche und theologiegeschichtliche Untersuchung (forschung zur Bibel 7; Würzburg: echter, 1973). 2. The Ark Narrative (1 Sam 4–6; 2 Sam 6): A Form-Critical and Traditio-Historical Study (SBldS 16; Missoula, Mont.: SBl and Scholars’ Press, 1975). 3. Ladeerzählungen, 11–12, 17–25. 4. Ark Narrative, 1–54. 5. Ladeerzählungen, 11–17. 6. leonhard rost, Die Überlieferung von der Thronnachfolge davids (BWanT 111/6; Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1926); reprinted in rost’s Das kleine Credo und andere Studien zum Alten Testament (heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer, 1965), 119–253. 7. M. delcor, “Jahweh et dagon ou le Jahwisme face à la religion des Philistins, d’après 1 Sam. V,” VT 14 (1964): 136–54. 8. Schicklberger, Ladeerzählungen, 149, 181–86; Campbell, Ark Narrative, 179–91. 9. VT 14 (1964), 138. -1- 2 The hand of The lord of internal biblical analysis. Scholarly discussion of the ark narrative has undoubtedly suffered from a strange lack of interest in extrabiblical paral- lels10—a point to which we must return. nevertheless, while Schicklberger and Campbell have made our work easier, they have not made it unnecessary. We cannot accept the radically different literary-critical analysis of either author, and given that basic disagreement, it is not surprising that we must also reject much of their form- and genre-critical analyses, as well as their views on the date and intention of the narrative. Moreover, neither Schicklberger nor Campbell, as refreshing as their use of the comparative material is, exploits fully the valuable insights these sources provide. Schicklberger Schicklberger’s analytic work is quite original and will require a detailed discussion. The Katastrophenerzählung The key element in Schicklberger’s interpretation is his isolation and interpretation of 1 Sam 4:1a(lXX)b, 2–4, 10–12, 13 (without whnh ‘ly yšb ‘l hks’), 14b–18a, 19–21 as an old, relatively complete, “novelistic catas- trophe narrative.”11 he bases this analysis first of all on literary-critical observations that suggest the separation of 1 Sam 4 from the following 10. hugo Gressmann is one of the very few commentators of any note, prior to delcor, who cites parallels (Die älteste Geschichtsschreibung und Prophetie Israels [SaT 2/1; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & ruprecht, 1921], 16), and they are all quite late, if not remote. Most scholars after Gressmann seem to have given up the search for comparative material. leonard rost’s treatment of the ark narrative—the only one ever to achieve even a limited consensus—totally ignores the question of literary parallels, and few of his later critics have improved on him in this regard. even such thoroughgoing myth-and-ritual partisans as Sigmund Mowinckel (The Psalms in Israel’s Worship [2 vols.; new York: abingdon, 1962], 1:175–76) and aage Bentzen (“The Cultic Use of the Story of the ark in Samuel,” JBL 67 [1948]: 37–53) have been content with quite general comparisons between 2 Sam 6 and the cultic rites and processions associated with the Babylonian new Year festival. even less understandable is the lack of interest recent commentators have shown in delcor’s paral- lels. hans Joachim Stoebe, for instance, cites delcor’s work and then proceeds to ignore it in his exegesis of 1 Sam 5–6 (Das erste Buch Samuelis [KaT 8/1; Gütersloh: Mohn, 1973], 138ff.). 11. Ladeerzählungen, 42, 70, 177.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.