<DOCINFOAUTHOR""TITLE"TheFunctionofFunctionWordsandFunctionalCategories"SUBJECT"LinguistikAktuell/LinguisticsToday,Volume78"KEYWORDS""SIZEHEIGHT"240"WIDTH"160"VOFFSET"4"> TheFunctionofFunctionWordsandFunctionalCategories LinguistikAktuell/LinguisticsToday LinguistikAktuell/LinguisticsToday(LA)providesaplatformfororiginalmonographstudies intosynchronicanddiachroniclinguistics.StudiesinLAconfrontempiricalandtheoretical problemsasthesearecurrentlydiscussedinsyntax,semantics,morphology,phonology,and systematicpragmaticswiththeaimtoestablishrobustempiricalgeneralizationswithina universalisticperspective. SeriesEditors WernerAbraham EllyvanGelderen UniversityofVienna ArizonaStateUniversity AdvisoryEditorialBoard CedricBoeckx IanRoberts HarvardUniversity CambridgeUniversity GuglielmoCinque KenSafir UniversityofVenice RutgersUniversity,NewBrunswickNJ GüntherGrewendorf LisadeMenaTravis J.W.Goethe-University,Frankfurt McGillUniversity LilianeHaegeman StenVikner UniversityofLille,France UniversityofAarhus HubertHaider C.Jan-WouterZwart UniversityofSalzburg UniversityofGroningen ChristerPlatzack UniversityofLund Volume78 TheFunctionofFunctionWordsandFunctionalCategories EditedbyMarceldenDikkenandChristinaM.Tortora The Function of Function Words and Functional Categories Editedby Marcel den Dikken TheGraduateCenter,TheCityUniversityofNewYork Christina M. Tortora TheCollegeofStatenIslandandTheGraduateCenter, TheCityUniversityofNewYork JohnBenjaminsPublishingCompany Amsterdam(cid:1)/(cid:1)Philadelphia TM Thepaperusedinthispublicationmeetstheminimumrequirements 8 ofAmericanNationalStandardforInformationSciences–Permanence ofPaperforPrintedLibraryMaterials,ansiz39.48-1984. LibraryofCongressCataloging-in-PublicationData Thefunctionoffunctionwordsandfunctionalcategories /editedbyMarcel denDikken,ChristinaM.Tortora. p. cm.(LinguistikAktuell/LinguisticsToday,issn0166–0829;v.78) Includesbibliographicalreferencesandindex. 1.Grammar,Comparativeandgeneral--Functionwords. 2. Functionalism(Linguistics) 3.Grammar,Comparativeandgeneral-- Grammaticalcategories. I.Dikken,Marcelden,1965- II.Tortora, Christina. III.Linguistikaktuell;Bd.78. P283.F86 2005 415--dc22 2005048395 isbn9027228027(Hb;alk.paper) ©2005–JohnBenjaminsB.V. Nopartofthisbookmaybereproducedinanyform,byprint,photoprint,microfilm,or anyothermeans,withoutwrittenpermissionfromthepublisher. JohnBenjaminsPublishingCo.·P.O.Box36224·1020meAmsterdam·TheNetherlands JohnBenjaminsNorthAmerica·P.O.Box27519·Philadelphiapa19118-0519·usa JB[v.20020404] Prn:8/07/2005;9:01 F:LA78CO.tex / p.1(46-95) Table of contents Acknowledgements vii Thefunctionoffunctionwordsandfunctionalcategories 1 MarceldenDikkenandChristinaM.Tortora VerbsecondasafunctionofMerge 11 Jan-WouterZwart Nonnativeacquisitionofverbsecond:Ontheempirical underpinningsofuniversalL2claims 41 UteBohnacker Clauseunionandclausalposition 79 JosefBayer,TanjaSchmidandMarkusBader ExplainingExpl 115 MarcRichardsandTheresaBiberauer Reflexivesincontextsofreducedvalency:Germanvs.Dutch 155 MarikaLekakou Simpletense 187 GuidoVandenWyngaerd Possessorlicensing,definitenessandcaseinScandinavian 217 MaritJulien Pronounsaredeterminersafterall 251 DorianRoehrs Index 287 JB[v.20020404] Prn:1/06/2005;14:08 F:LA78AC.tex / p.1(46-94) Acknowledgements We would like to thank severalparties associated with the 19th Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop (CGSW19) here. First, we are very grateful to AlisonGabriele,ShukhanNg,andErikaTrosethfortheirhelpinorganizingthe conference.There were severalother papers presentedat this conference,be- yondthecontributionstothisvolume.Wewouldliketothankthetwoinvited speakers, Hans Bennis and Alison Henry, as well as Jonathan Bobaljik, Ellen Brandner,HansBroekhuis,SiobhánCottell,VeraLee-Schoenfeld,ThomasLeu, Lisa Levinson, Erik Magnusson, and Eric Stenshoel for their contributions to the event. We thank the many colleagues who reviewed the abstracts sub- mitted to the workshop, and would also like to express our gratitude to the reviewersofthe paperssubmittedtothisvolume:SjefBarbiers,HansBennis, JudyBernstein,JonathanBobaljik,CédricBoeckx,AnnaCardinaletti,Norbert Corver, Mürvet Enç, Gisbert Fanselow, Kleanthes Grohmann, Barbara Hem- forth,ChristerPlatzack,CeciliaPoletto,HenkvanRiemsdijk,IanRoberts,Ken Safir, Cristina Schmitt, BonnieSchwartz, MarkusSteinbach, PeterSvenonius, Øystein Alexander Vangsnes, Susi Wurmbrand, and Martha Young-Scholten. Finally,wewouldliketothankWernerAbrahamforinvitingustopublishthis collectionofpapersfromCGSW19intheLinguistikAktuell/LinguisticsToday series. JB[v.20020404] Prn:1/06/2005;14:43 F:LA78IN.tex / p.1(46-130) The function of function words and functional categories MarceldenDikkenandChristinaM.Tortora The papers containedin this volume were all presentedat the 19th Compar- ative Germanic Syntax Workshop, held at The Graduate Center of The City UniversityofNewYork,3–5June2004.Whiletheworkshopitselfhadnospe- cialtheme,theselectedpapersbroughttogetherherealladdress,inonewayor another,thequestionraisedbythetitleofthevolume:whatisthefunctionof functionwordsandfunctionalcategories?Inthesepages,webrieflyintroduce thecontributionstothisvolumewiththiscentralthemeasourguide,relating thepaperstooneanotherbypresentingtheminaparticularorder,andhigh- lighting what we believe are their most significant theoretical and empirical results.Byrelatingthevariouscontributionstooneanotherinthisparticular way,thisintroductionalsoservestoprovidearationalefortheorderinwhich thepapersarepresentedinthevolume. The syntax of function words and functional projections has dominated research in generative grammar in the last two decades, with perhaps the strongestimpetus tothis research having been givenbyBorer’s (1984)hypo- thesisthatallparametricvariationisconfinedtomorpho-lexicalpropertiesof functionalcategories–ahypothesisthathassincebecomethebasisofworkon parametric variation within various different paradigms of research, includ- ing that defined by Chomsky’s (1995 et passim) minimalist program. In his contribution to the volume, Jan-Wouter Zwart departs in an interesting way fromthis widely accepted hypothesis, denying that morphological properties of functional heads in the leftperiphery(their ‘richness’, in particular) could beresponsibleforthequestionofwhetheralanguagedoesordoesnotexhibit Verb Second. Zwart’s approach to Verb Second is profoundly different from those which take some morphological property (be it feature strengthor the