The Evolution Of Man Scientifically Disproved by William A Williams

83 Pages·2021·0.53 MB·English

The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Evolution Of Man Scientifically Disproved, by William A. Williams

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of
the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have
to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook.

Title: The Evolution Of Man Scientifically Disproved

Author: William A. Williams

Release Date: July 18, 2003 [EBook #8508]
[Most recently updated: April 13, 2020]

Language: English

Character set encoding: UTF-8

*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EVOLUTION OF MAN SCIENTIFICALLY DISPROVED ***

Produced by Dave Maddock

cover

The Evolution Of Man
Scientifically Disproved

by Rev. William A. Williams, D.D.

In 50 Arguments

Designed (1) As an up-to-date text book, and a companion to all other text books on evolution; and
(2) As an antidote to books in libraries teaching evolution, infidelity and atheism; and
(3) As an aid to all students, parents, teachers, ministers, lawyers, doctors, and all other lovers of the

truth.

Contents

INTRODUCTION
MATHEMATICS THE ACID TEST
THEORIES OF EVOLUTION

PART ONE: Evolution of the Human Body Mathematically Disproved
The Unity of the Human Race

1. The Population of the World
2. The Unity of Languages
3. Religions
4. Place of the Origin of Man
5. Civilizations
6. The Mendelian Inheritance Law
7. Biometry
8. No New Species Now
9. Mathematical Probability
10. The Age of the Earth

11. Geology and History
12. Geographical Distribution
13. God Not Absent Nor Inactive
14. Chance or Design?
15. Evolution Atheistic
16. Brute Descent Impossible
17. Eight Impassable Gulfs
18. Ancestral Apes and Monkeys
19. A Staggering Speculation
20. Sex
21. Man Hairless and Tailless
22. Hybrids
23. The Instinct of Animals
24.Special Creation: Gen. I
25. Analogy; Mathematics, Laws
26. Desperate Arguments
27. Twenty Objections Admitted
28. Scientists Condemn Evolution

PART TWO: Evidence Answered
29. Paleontology
30. Confessed Collapse of Proof
31. Pictures in Caverns
32. Vestigial Organs
33. Serology, or Blood Tests
34. Embryology

PART THREE: The Soul
35. The Origin of the Soul
36. Personality
37. Intellect, Emotions and Will
38. Abstract Reason
39. Conscience
40. Spirituality
41. The Hope of Immortality
42. Sin
43. Redemption
44. Evolution Aids Infidelity and Atheism
45. Evolution Wars With Christianity
46. Camouflage of Terms
47. What Are We to Believe?
48. What Can We Do?
49. Problems for Review
50. The Supremacy of Jesus

The Evolution of Man

Mathematically

Disproved

Introduction

Let it be understood, at the outset, that every proved theory of science is to be accepted. Only the

most intense prejudice and the maddest folly would lead any one to reject the proved conclusions of
science. Moreover, we should examine any new hypothesis with open minds, to see if it has in it
anything truthful, helpful or advantageous. It should neither be accepted nor rejected simply because it
is new. But if a theory is evidently or probably untrue, or pernicious, or at all harmful, it is to be rejected
and condemned.

Some facts and objections are herein submitted to the serious seeker after truth, in the hope that a

theory so out of harmony with the facts, and so destructive to the faith and the cherished hopes of man,
may be completely discarded. As Evolution can not stand the acid test of mathematics, it will be
repudiated by all.

We shall discuss the theory upon its merits, from a scientific standpoint, and will also demand an

explanation of all facts concerned, as we have a right to do, even where they are associated with the
theological and the spiritual as well as the material. We do not oppose true science but “science falsely
so called.” We do not ban research, but will not allow the wild vagaries of the imagination to pass as
truth.

We shall not declare arbitrarily that evolution is untrue; neither will we allow scientists to decide what

we shall believe. But we shall appeal to the facts, and evolution must stand or fall by the evidence.
“Evolution is not to be accepted until proved.” It is not yet proved and never will be.

MATHEMATICS THE ACID TEST

Every theory to which mathematics can be applied will be proved or disproved by this acid test.

Figures will not lie, and mathematics will not lie even at the demand of liars. Their testimony is as clear
as the mind of God. Gravitation is proved a true theory by numerous calculations, some of them the
most abstruse. The Copernican theory is proved true, and the Ptolemaic theory false, by mathematical
calculations. The calculations, leading to the discovery of Neptune, went far to establish the Copernican
theory as well as the law of gravitation, and to disprove the Ptolemaic theory. The evolution theory,
especially as applied to man, likewise is disproved by mathematics. The proof is overwhelming and
decisive. Thus God makes the noble science of mathematics bear testimony in favor of the true theories
and against the false theories. We shall endeavor to marshal some of the mathematical proofs against
the false and pernicious theory of evolution. True theories, such as the gravitation and Copernican
theories, harmonize with each other as every branch of mathematics harmonizes with every other. If
evolution were true, it would harmonize with all other true theories, rather than with so many false
theories.

THEORIES OF EVOLUTION

Evolution in one sense, means growth or development,—literally, unrolling or unfolding. It is difficult

to give a clear definition that will apply to each of the various theories that are held. Theories differ
vastly in the extent of their application, as held by their various advocates, resulting in great confusion of
terms:—

1. The atheists believe that there is no God. Hence, matter was not created, but was eternal, or came

by chance. Only a mere handful of the whole human race have ever yet believed such an untenable
doctrine. The existence of a Creator, is doubted or denied by extreme atheistic evolutionists, who
would dethrone God, “exalt the monkey, and degrade man.”

2. The first of modern scientific men to adopt the theory that all plants and animals, including man,

are developed from certain original simple germs, was Lamarck, a French naturalist, in 1809. He
conceded that God created matter,—nothing more. He believed in spontaneous generation, which
scientific investigation has utterly disproved.

3. Darwin goes a step further and concedes there may have been a Creator of matter, and of one, or

at most, a few germs, from which all vegetation and all animals came by evolution,—all orders, classes,
families, genera, species, and varieties. He differs from Lamarck, by allowing the creation of one germ,
possibly a few more. He says in his “Origin of Species,” “I believe that animals are descended from at
most only four or five progenitors; and plants from an equal or lesser number.... Analogy would lead me
one step further, namely, to the belief that all animals and plants are descended from one prototype....
All the organic beings, which have ever lived on the earth, may be descended from some one
primordial form.” Darwin, because of his great scholarship, fairness, and candor, won for his theory
more favor than it inherently deserves. Darwin taught that, “The lower impulses of vegetable life pass,
by insensible gradations, into the instinct of animals and the higher intelligence of man,” without purpose
or design. None of these three hypotheses can admit the creation of man.

4. Other evolutionists, believing in the evolution of both plants and animals, nevertheless refuse to

believe in the evolution of man—the most baneful application of the whole theory. Even if there were
convincing proof of the evolution of plants and animals from one germ, there is no real proof of the
evolution of man. To prove this is the chief purpose of this book.

5. A fifth theory of evolution is held by many. It is called polyphyletic evolution, which means that

God created numerous stocks, or beginnings of both plant and animal life, which were subject to
change and growth, deterioration and development, according to his plan and purpose. So much of
evolution in this sense as can be proved, is in harmony with the Bible account of the creation of plants,
animals and man. The false theory of evolution is called the monophyletic, which teaches that all species
of plants and animals including man, developed from one cell or germ which came by creation or
spontaneous generation. Evolution is used throughout this book in this latter sense, unless otherwise
indicated by the context. God does not create by evolution, for it can only develop what already exists.

This book is divided into three parts: In Part One, material evolution, especially the evolution of the

human body, is disproved. In Part Two, the alleged proofs of evolution are examined and refuted. In
Part Three, the evolution of the soul is shown to be impossible.

There are in all fifty numbered arguments, including answers to the arguments of evolutionists.

Part One

The Evolution of the Human Body Mathematically Disproved

Any scientific theory or hypothesis must be proved first possible, then probable, then certain. To be

a possible theory, it must be reconcilable with many facts; to be a probable theory, it must be
reconcilable with many more; to be a certain and proven theory, it must be reconcilable with all the
facts. Whenever it is irreconcilable with any fact, it should be rejected, as it can not be a true theory.
Every true theory passes through these three stages,—possibility, probability, and certainty. A theory is
not science, until it is certainly true, and so becomes knowledge. The evolution of man from the brute is
in the throes of a desperate struggle to show that it may possibly be a true theory or hypothesis. Yet
some who are ready to admit that they are “scientists,” claim evolution a proven theory.

If it can be shown possible for man to have descended or ascended from the lower animals, it will

require enormous additional evidence to show that such descent is probable; and still much more to
make it certain.

Every scientific theory, proposed as possible, is reconcilable with some facts. Otherwise, it would

not have been considered for a moment. Many false hypotheses have been proposed, and accepted as
possible and even probable, because reconcilable with some facts. The Ptolemaic theory of the
universe, making the earth the centre, around which the heavens revolved in great concentric spheres,
was accepted for 1400 years from A. D. 140, because it explained many things. It corresponded with
appearances. It appealed to all. Its advocates had great difficulty in reconciling it with the motions of the
planets, which were therefore called planets or “wanderers.” But in time the Copernican theory
prevailed, because it was reconcilable with all the facts. The evidence is so abundant that all claim it the
true theory. It is science. It is knowledge.

Because the Copernican hypothesis, the true theory of the universe, was opposed and rejected, it

does not follow that the evolution of man is true because it is likewise opposed and rejected. If this new
theory, hypothesis, or guess stands, it can only do so, because it harmonizes with all the facts. The law
of gravitation, and every other proven theory harmonizes with all the facts and with all other true
theories.

It will be shown in this book, that a large number of facts can not be reconciled with evolution,

especially the evolution of man, thus proving that it can not be a true theory. We really have a right to
demand the proof of a theory, and to refuse consent until proved. While we are under no obligation to
disprove an unproven theory, yet it is the shortest way to settle the matter once for all, before it has led
multitudes more astray, and wrecked the faith and hopes of the young.

Prof. H. H. Newman, in his “Readings in Evolution,” p. 57, says, “Reluctant as we may be to admit

it, honesty compels the evolutionist to admit that there is no absolute proof of organic evolution.” “If all
the facts are in accord with it, and none are found that are incapable of being reconciled with it, a
working hypothesis is said to have been advanced to a proven theory.” Note this admission by a
leading evolutionist.

Even if it should ever be proved that all plant and animal life came by evolution from one primordial

germ, it would not follow that either the body or the soul of man came by evolution. All the arguments
against evolution in general are valid against the evolution of man. In addition, there are many other
arguments, that prove the evolution of man impossible, even if the evolution of plants and animals should
ever be proved possible.

In this volume, the claim is made that the evolution of man is irreconcilable with a large number of

facts. If investigation proves that we have erred in any statement of facts, or if our reasoning in any one
argument or more is fallacious, we will not lose our case, as long as evolution remains irreconcilable
with any other single fact. If every argument in this book were invalid, save one, that one valid argument
would overthrow evolution, since every true theory must be reconcilable with all the facts. One
irreconcilable fact is sufficient to overthrow evolution. And there are many!

THE UNITY OF THE HUMAN RACE

The evolution of man is not only a guess, but a very wild one; and it is totally unsupported by any

convincing arguments. It can be mathematically demonstrated to be an impossible theory. Every proof
of the unity of the human race in the days of Adam or Noah shatters the theory of the evolution of man.
If the evolution of the human race be true, there must have been, hundreds of thousands of years ago, a
great multitude of heads of the race, in many parts of the earth, without one common language or
religion. The present population of the globe proves that mankind must have descended from one pair
who lived not earlier than the time of Noah. The unity of languages also proves one common head
about the same time. Certain beliefs and customs, common to various religions, point to one original
God-given religion in historic time, in contrast to the evolution idea of many religions invented by ape-
men in millions of years. The history of the world and the migration of nations point to one locality
where the human race began in times not more remote, and show that man was created in a civilized
state, and, therefore, never was a brute. If evolution were true, there would have been many billion
times as many human beings as now exist, a great multitude of invented languages with little or no
similarity, a vast number of invented religions with little, if anything, in common. Even the sciences
invented and exploited by evolutionists, the Mendelian Inheritance Law and Biometry, also prove
evolution impossible.

The unity of mankind is also conclusively shown by the fact that all races interbreed, the most certain

test of every species.

All these facts pointing to the unity of the race in the days of Noah and of Adam are irreconcilable

with the theory of evolution which denies that unity within the last two million years.

We shall present these arguments more in detail. The arguments immediately following, especially the

first eight, show the unity of the human race in the days of Noah, and thus present insuperable
objections to evolution, and confirm the story of man’s creation and his destruction by the flood. The
following is the first of fifty Arguments against the evolution of man.

1. THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD

The population of the world, based upon the Berlin census reports of 1922, was found to be

1,804,187,000. The human race must double itself 30.75 times to make this number. This result may
be approximately ascertained by the following computation:—

At the beginning of the first period of doubling there would just be two human beings; the second, 4;

the third, 8; the fourth, 16; the tenth, 1024; the twentieth, 1,048,576, the thirtieth, 1,073,741,824; and
the thirty-first, 2,147,483,648. In other words, if we raise two to the thirtieth power, we have
1,073,741,824; or to the thirty-first power, 2,147,483,648. Therefore, it is evident even to the school
boy, that, to have the present population of the globe, the net population must be doubled more than
thirty times and less than thirty-one times. By logarithms, we find it to be 30.75 times. After all
allowances are made for natural deaths, wars, catastrophes, and losses of all kinds, if the human race
would double its numbers 30.75 times, we would have the present population of the globe.

Now, according to the chronology of Hales, based on the Septuagint text, 5077 years have elapsed

since the flood, and 5177 years since the ancestors of mankind numbered only two, Noah and his wife.
By dividing 5177 by 30.75, we find it requires an average of 168.3 years for the human race to double
its numbers, in order to make the present population. This is a reasonable average length of time.

Moreover, it is singularly confirmed by the number of Jews, or descendants of Jacob. According to

Hales, 3850 years have passed since the marriage of Jacob. By the same method of calculation as
above, the Jews, who, according to the Jewish yearbook for 1922, number 15,393,815, must have
doubled their numbers 23.8758 times, or once every 161.251 years. The whole human race, therefore,
on an average has doubled its numbers every 168.3 years; and the Jews, every 161.251 years. What a
marvelous agreement! We would not expect the figures to be exactly the same nor be greatly surprised
if one period were twice the other. But their correspondence singularly corroborates the age of the
human race and of the Jewish people, as gleaned from the word of God by the most proficient
chronologists. If the human race is 2,000,000 years old, the period of doubling would be 65,040 years,
or 402 times that of the Jews, which, of course, is unthinkable.

While the period of doubling may vary slightly in different ages, yet there are few things so stable and

certain as general average, where large numbers and many years are considered, as in the present case.
No life insurance company, acting on general average statistics, ever failed on that account. The Jews
and the whole human race have lived together the same thirty-eight centuries with very little
intermarriage, and are affected by similar advantages and disadvantages, making the comparison
remarkably fair.

Also, the 25,000,000 descendants of Abraham must have doubled their numbers every 162.275

years, during the 3,988 years since the birth of his son Ishmael. These periods of doubling which tally
so closely, 168.3 years for the whole race, 161.251 for the Jews, and 162.275 years for the
descendants of Abraham, cannot be a mere coincidence, but are a demonstration against the great age
of man required by evolution, and in favor of the 5,177 years since Noah. None of the other various
chronologies would make any material difference in these calculations. The correspondence of these
figures, 168.3, 161.251 and 162.275 is so remarkable that it must bring the conviction to every serious
student that the flood destroyed mankind and Noah became the head of the race.

Now the evolutionists claim that the human race is 2,000,000 years old. There is no good reason for

believing that, during all these years the developing dominant species would not increase as rapidly as
the Jews, or the human race in historic times, especially since the restraints of civilization and marriage
did not exist. But let us generously suppose that these remote ancestors, beginning with one pair,
doubled their numbers in 1612.51 years, one-tenth as rapidly as the Jews, or 1240 times in 2,000,000
years. If we raise 2 to the 1240th power, the result is 18,932,139,737,991 with 360 figures following.
The population of the world, therefore, would have been 18,932,139,737,991 decillion, decillion,
decillion, decillion, decillion, decillion, decillion, decillion, decillion, decillion; or 18,932,139,737,991
vigintillion, vigintillion, vigintillion, vigintillion, vigintillion, vigintillion.

Or, let us suppose that man, the dominant species, originated from a single pair, only 100,000 years

ago, the shortest period suggested by any evolutionist (and much too short for evolution) and that the
population doubled in 1612.51 years, one-tenth the Jewish rate of net increase, a most generous
estimate. The present population of the globe should be 4,660,210,253,138,204,300 or
2,527,570,733 for every man, woman and child! In these calculations, we have made greater
allowances than any self-respecting evolutionist could ask without blushing. And yet withal, it is as clear
as the light of day that the ancestors of man could not possibly have lived 2,000,000 or 1,000,000 or
100,000 years ago, or even 10,000 years ago; for if the population had increased at the Jewish rate for
10,000 years, it would be more than two billion times as great as it is. No guess that ever was made, or
ever can be made, much in excess of 5177 years, can possibly stand as the age of man. The
evolutionist cannot sidestep this argument by a new guess. Q. E. D.

All these computations have been made upon the supposition that the human race sprang from one

pair. If from many in the distant past, as the evolutionists assert, these bewildering figures must be
enormously increased.

Yet we are gravely told that evolution is “science”. It is the wildest guess ever made to support an

impossible theory.

That their guesses can not possibly be correct, is proven also by approaching the subject from

another angle. If the human race is 2,000,000 years old, and must double its numbers 30.75 times to
make the present population, it is plain that each period for doubling would be 65,040 years, since
{2,000,000/30.75} = 65,040. At that rate, there would be fewer than four Jews! If we suppose the
race to have sprung from one pair 100,000 years ago, it would take 3252 years to double the
population. At this rate, there would be five Jews!

Do we need any other demonstration that the evolution of man is an absurdity and an impossibility? If

the evolutionists endeavor to show that man may have descended from the brute, the population of the
world conclusively shows that MAN CERTAINLY DID NOT DESCEND FROM THE BRUTE. If
they ever succeed in showing that all species of animals may have been derived from one primordial
germ, it is impossible that man so came. He was created as the Bible declares, by the Almighty Power
of God.

The testimony of all the experts in the famous Scopes trial in Tennessee (who escaped cross-

examination) was to the effect that evolution was in harmony with some facts and therefore possibly
true. The above mathematical calculations prove that the evolution of man was certainly not true. They
fail to make their case even if we grant their claims. These figures prove the Bible story, and scrap
every guess of the great age and the brute origin of man. It will be observed that the above calculations
point to the unity of the race in the days of Noah, 5177 years ago, rather than in the days of Adam
7333 years ago, according to Hales’ chronology. If the race increased at the Jewish rate, not over
16,384 perished by the Flood, fewer than by many a modern catastrophe. This most merciful
providence of God started the race anew with a righteous head.

Now, if there had been no flood to destroy the human race, then the descendants of Adam, in the

7333 years, would have been 16,384 times the 1,804,187,000, or 29,559,799,808,000; or computed
at the Jewish rate of net increase for 7333 years since Adam, the population would have been still
greater, or 35,184,372,088,832. These calculations are in perfect accord with the Scripture story of
the special creation of man, and the destruction of the race by a flood. Had it not been for the flood, the
earth could not have sustained the descendants of Adam. Is not this a demonstration, decisive and final?

2. THE UNITY OF LANGUAGES

The unity of the languages of the world proves the recent common origin of man. Prof. Max Muller,

and other renowned linguists, declared that all languages are derived from one. This is abundantly
proven by the similarity of roots and words, the grammatical construction and accidents, the
correspondence in the order of their alphabets, etc. The words for father and mother similar in form, for
example, are found in many languages in all the five great groups, the Aryan, the Semitic, the Hamitic
the Turanian and Chinese groups, showing a common original language and proving the early existence
of the home and civilization. The similarity of these and many other words in all of the great Aryan or
Indo-European family of languages, spoken in all continents is common knowledge. Lord Avebury
names 85 Hamitic languages in Africa in which the names of father and mother are similar; 29 non-
Aryan languages in Asia and Europe, including Turkish, Thibetan, and many of the Turanian and
Chinese groups; 5 in New Zealand and other Islands; 8 in Australia; and 20 spoken by American
Indians. The French, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese are daughters of the Latin; Latin is a daughter of
the Aryan; and the Aryan, together with the other sister languages is, no doubt, the daughter of the
original language spoken by Noah and his immediate descendants. There can not well be more than 4
generations of languages, and the time since Noah is sufficient for the development of the 1000
languages and dialects. The American Indians have developed about 200 in 3,000 or 4,000 years. The
life of a language roughly speaking, seems to range from 1000 to 3,000 years. The time since Noah is
sufficient for the development of all the languages of the world. But if man has existed for 2,000,000 or
1,000,000 years, with a brain capacity ranging from 96% to normal, there would have been multiplied
thousands of languages bearing little or no resemblance. There is not a trace of all these languages. They
were never spoken because no one lived to speak them.

Many linguists insist that the original language of mankind consisted of a few short words, possibly

not over 200, since many now use only about 300. The Hebrew has only about 500 root words of 3
letters; the stagnant Chinese, 450; the Sanscrit, about the same. All the Semitic languages have tri-literal
roots. As the tendency of all languages is to grow in the number and length of words, these consisting of
a few small words must have been close to the original mother tongue. No language could have come
down from the great antiquity required by evolution and have so few words. Johnson’s Eng. Dictionary
had 58,000 words; modern Dictionaries over 300,000. The evidence points to the origin and unity of
languages in the days of Noah, and proves the great antiquity of man an impossibility and his evolution a
pitiful absurdity.

3. RELIGIONS

The unity of ancient religions proves the creation of man who received a divine revelation. According

to evolution, all religions were evolved or invented by humanoids. In that case, we would expect them
to be widely divergent; and we would be surprised, if they agreed on great and important points, and
especially on points which could not be clearly arrived at by reason. For instance, what in reason
teaches us that an animal sacrifice is a proper way to worship God? How could unassisted reason ever
arrive at the conclusion that God is properly worshipped by sacrificing a sheep or an ox? If we grant
that one section of the anthropoid host might have stumbled on the idea, how can we account for its
prevalence or its universality? A very high authority says, “Sacrifices were common to all nations of
antiquity, and therefore, traced by some to a personal revelation.” By revelation, we learn that the
animal sacrifice prefigured the Lamb slain on Calvary. It was revealed. No race of monkey-men could
ever have invented the idea.

The most ancient nations worshipped God by sacrifices. Homer’s Iliad (1000 B. C.) and other

works of Grecian poets are full of it. All the classics, Greek and Latin, are crowded with accounts of
offerings. The earliest records of the Egyptians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Hindus and Chinese speak of
sacrifices long in vogue. This unity of religions on the point of animal sacrifices bespeaks revelation and
not evolution.

The division of time into weeks of 7 days, prevalent among the ancients, suggests an ancient

revelation in commemoration of creation as against evolution, which denies creation. The following
statements from Dr. J. R. Dummelow, an eminent commentator, show that the Babylonians both
divided time into weeks, and offered sacrifices, pointing to the unity of religions. “The Babylonians
observed the 7th, 14th, 21st and 28th of each lunar month as days when men were subjected to certain
restrictions; the king was not to eat food prepared by fire, nor offer sacrifice, nor consult an oracle,
nor invoke curses on his enemies.” They also observed the 19th of each month. It was customary,
therefore, in the days of Abraham, for the Babylonians to offer sacrifices and to observe the 7th day as
especially sacred. This can only be accounted for upon the assumption, that God had revealed to the
human race that creation occupied 6 days or periods, and the 7th was to be observed,—all of which
was doubtless handed down by tradition. There were priests and temples in the most ancient empire
known.

Dr. Dummelow says: “It is now widely admitted that the Genesis account of creation contains

elements of belief which existed perhaps thousands of years before the book of Genesis was written,
among the peoples of Babylonia and Assyria.” Many of the primeval revelations were handed down by
tradition. God communed with Adam. There are many relics of the original religion: the division of time
into weeks, and the institution of the Sabbath day; the sacrifices so common in the ancient religions; the
general existence of priests and temples in all ages, and among all nations; marriage, the divinely
authorized pillar of society; the early institution of the family, and the use of the root words for father
and mother, in all the most ancient languages, and families of languages, as well as in the scattered
languages of the earth spoken by the most savage. The belief in the immortality of the soul, is well nigh
universal, even among tribes, who, unlike Plato, possess no power to reason it from the light of nature.
In contrast, we behold the sorry spectacle of the anthropoid evolutionists of our day trying to drive from
the hearts of men the hope of immortality by their “science falsely so-called.” The burial of the dead is,
no doubt, a relic, since animals, even of the monkey tribe, do not bury their dead.

4. PLACE OF THE ORIGIN OF MAN

The unity of the human race is further proved by the fact that it originated in one locality and not in

many. The locality is the one described by Moses. And the fact that Moses correctly located the
beginning of the race, when he himself had no personal knowledge, proves that he was inspired and
taught of God. He never could have guessed the spot to which history and the migration of nations
point, and which the evolutionists themselves are obliged to concede.

The habitable countries of the world total 50,670,837 sq. mi. We are making a generous estimate,

when we suppose the garden of Eden to have been 100 mi. wide and 125 mi. long,—12,500 sq. mi.
There are 4005 such areas in the habitable globe. It is located in Mesopotamia on the Tigris and
Euphrates rivers.

Maps of ancient nations show that mankind radiated from this centre. The great nations of antiquity

were clustered about it. The beginning of the race after the flood was in the same general locality.

Ridpath in his great history of the world, graphically shows the migrations of races and nations. With

this, even evolutionists agree. They draw a line “according to Giddings,” running through western Asia,
in the region of the garden of Eden. Since there are 4005 such areas in the habitable globe, Moses had
only one chance out of 4005 to guess the spot, if he had not been inspired of God. Anyone guessing,
might have located the origin of man in any of the countries of Europe, Asia or Africa. This clearly
demonstrates that God revealed the truth to Moses, and that the story of creation is true and of
evolution false.

If evolution were true, there must have been, 6,000 years ago, many heads to the race, in many

places. It is incredible that there would be but one spot where brutes became humans. There would be
an innumerable host of anthropoid brutes, in many parts of the world, in all gradations. Who can believe
that one species or one pair forged ahead so far as to become human?

5. CIVILIZATIONS

The early civilization of man points to his creation, not his evolution. Evolution requires many centers

of civilization; creation, only one. Of course, if man is descended from an ancient ape-like form, and
from the Primates and their brute progeny, he must have been as uncivilized and brutish as any baboon
or gorilla today, or the apes, which, last year, horribly mangled the children at Sierra Leone. He must
have worked his way up into civilization. The records, as far back as they go, prove that the original
condition of man was a state of civilization, not savagery. Man fell down, not up.

The recent explorations in the tomb of Tutankhamen, in Egypt, and the more recent explorations of

the tomb of a still more ancient Egyptian monarch, show that a high degree of civilization prevailed from
2000 to 1300 B.C. The art displayed in the carvings and paintings, and the skill of the artisans are
beyond praise. They had knowledge even of what are now lost arts. They had a written language 300
years before Homer wrote his immortal Iliad. Yet many higher critics claim that writing was unknown in
the days of Moses and Homer. They declare that the Iliad, a poem in 24 books, was committed to
memory, and handed down from generation to generation, 400 years with all its fine poetic touches.
Monstrous alternative! Indeed we are even told that “Many men must have served as authors and
improvers.” The mob of reciters improved the great epic of Homer! Scarcely less brilliant is the
suggestion of another higher critic that, “Homer’s Iliad was not composed by Homer, but by another
man of the same name”!

The laws of Hammurabi, who is identified as the Amraphel of Scripture, Gen. 14:1, and who was

contemporary with Abraham, were in existence many hundred years before Moses, and showed a high
state of civilization, which began many hundred years before Abraham. The literature of China goes
back to 2000 B. C. The earliest civilization of China, Egypt, Assyria, and Babylonia, reaching to 2500
B.C., or earlier, points to a still earlier civilization, which likely reaches back to the origin of the human
race.

It is admitted that the earliest (Sumerian) civilization began on the Euphrates, near the garden of

Eden. They had temples and priests, and, therefore, religion prevailed as well as civilization. The first
great empires clustered around the places where Adam and Noah lived. No other civilization recorded
in any quarter reaches farther back.

We quote from the New International Encyclopedia: “The Sumerian language is probably the oldest

known language in the world. From the Sumerian vocabulary, it is evident that the people who spoke
this language had reached a comparatively high civilization.”

The monuments show that in early historical times, man was in a state of civilization. There are no

monuments of man’s civilization prior to historical time.

Higher critics have said that Moses could not have written the Pentateuch because writing was

unknown in his day. Yet Prof. A. H. Sayce, D.D., LL.D., of Oxford University, one of the greatest
archaeologists the world ever knew, writes: “Egypt was the first to deliver up its dead. Under an almost
rainless sky, where frost is unknown, and the sand seals up all that is entrusted to its keeping, nothing
perishes except by the hand of man. The fragile papyrus, inscribed it may be 5,000 years ago, is as
fresh and legible as when its first possessor died.

“In Egypt, as far back as the monuments carry us, we find a highly-developed art, a highly organized

government, and a highly-educated people. Books were multiplied, and if we can trust the translation of
the Proverbs of Ptah-hotep, the oldest existing book in the world, there were competitive examinations,
[civil service!] already in the age of the sixth Egyptian Dynasty.... We have long known that the use of
writing for literary purposes is immensely old in both Egypt and Babylonia. Egypt was emphatically a
land of scribes and readers. Already in the days of the Old Empire, the Egyptian hieroglyphs had
developed into a cursive hand.”

From the Tel el-Amarna tablets, discovered in Upper Egypt, we know that for 100 years people

were corresponding with each other, in the language of Babylonia in cuneiform characters. Libraries
existed then, and “Canaan in the Mosaic age, was fully as literary as was Europe in the time of the
Renaissance.” Ancient Babylonian monuments testify to the existence of an ancient literary culture. The
results of the excavations by the American Expedition, published by Prof. Hilprecht, of the U. of Pa.,
show that in the time of King Sargon of Accad, art and literature flourished in Chaldea. The region of
the garden of Eden was the pivot of the civilization of the world. From this region radiated the early
civilization of Babylonia, Assyria and Egypt. And the advanced degree implies centuries of prior
civilization. The origin of man and the earliest civilization occurred in the same region. Ur explorations
(1927) show high art, 3000 B.C.

The earliest records show man was civilized. He lived in houses, cities and towns, read and wrote,

and engaged in commerce and industry. To be sure, he did not have the inventions of modern times. If
all these were necessary, then there was no civilization prior to the 20th century. Prof. J. Arthur
Thompson, of Aberdeen, an evolutionist, says: “Modern research is leading us away from the picture of
primitive man as brutish, dull, lascivious and bellicose. There is more justification for regarding primitive
man as clever, kindly, adventurous and inventive.”

It is admitted that cannibalism was not primeval. The two great revolting crimes of barbarism,

cannibalism and human sacrifices, only prevailed when man had fallen to the lowest depths, not when he
had risen out of savagery to the heights. The assertion that man was originally a brute, savage and
uncivilized is pure fiction, unsupported by the facts. The original civilization of mankind supports the
Bible, and upsets evolution.

6. THE MENDELIAN INHERITANCE LAW

The unity of the human race is further established by Mendel’s Inheritance Discovery on which

evolutionists so much rely. G. Mendel, an experimenter, found that when he crossed a giant variety of
peas with a dwarf variety, the off-spring were all tall. The giants were called “dominant”; the
disappearing dwarfs, “recessive”. But among the second generation of this giant offspring, giants and
dwarfs appeared in the proportion of 3 to 1. But when these dwarfs were self-fertilized, successive
generations were all dwarfs. The recessive character was not lost, but appeared again. Experiments
with flowers likewise show that the recessive color will reappear.

Also experiments with the interbreeding of animals have shown similar results. The recessive or

disappearing characteristics, or the disappearing variety, will appear again, in some subsequent
generation, and sometimes becomes permanent. This law prevails widely in nature, and the recessive
traits appear with the dominant traits. “If rose-combed fowl were mated with single-combed fowl, the
offspring were all rose-combed, but when these rose-combed fowl were mated, the offspring were
again rose-combed and single-combed.... If gray rabbits were mated with black rabbits, their hybrids
were all gray, the black seemingly disappearing, but when the second generation were mated, the
progeny were again grays and blacks.”—God or Gorilla—p. 278. The recessive character always
reappears.

Apply these widely prevalent laws to dominant man and his recessive alleged brute ancestor. The

simian characteristics would appear in some generations, if not in many. We would expect many
offspring to have the recessive character of the ape, and we ought not to be surprised, if some
recessive stock became permanent.

Following analogy, we ought to look for a tribe of human beings that had degenerated into apes.

That we find no such recessive characteristics even among the most degenerate savages, and no such
ape-like tribe of human beings, is a decisive proof that man never descended from the brute. Else such
recessive characteristics, according to the Mendelian Law, would be sure to appear. We would also
find monkeys and apes,—the recessive species—descended from man.