ebook img

THE ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN AND FOREIGN-RELATED ARBITRAL AWARDS IN THE ... PDF

310 Pages·2014·1.18 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview THE ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN AND FOREIGN-RELATED ARBITRAL AWARDS IN THE ...

THE ENFORCEMENT OFFOREIGN AND FOREIGN-RELATED ARBITRAL AWARDS INTHE PEOPLE’S REPUBLICOFCHINA: ACALL FORREFORM SAMANTHAJAYNELORD Lawyer AdmittedtoPracticeintheSupremeCourt ofWesternAustraliaandHigh Court ofAustralia Bachelorof Laws withFirst Class Honours (MurdochUniversity) This thesis ispresented forthedegreeof Masters of Law 14May2014 StudentNumber: 30651386 ABSTRACT Over the past 25 years, China has experienced exponential growth. It has surpassed Japan as the second largest economy in the world, and the World Bank has predicted that it will overtakethe UnitedStates tobecome theglobal leaderby2030,ifnot before. As China’s economic success is underpinned by foreign trade and investment, it comes as no surprise that Chinese entities are, and will be, increasingly involved in disputes with foreign parties. Arbitration is the preferred method of dispute resolution in China, and indeed of the international business community, therefore if China is to take its place as a global leader, it must have a system for the enforcement of foreign and foreign-related arbitral awards that is in line with international best practice and that is reliable, predictable and transparent. However, in many respects China’s current system for the enforcement of foreign and foreign-related arbitral awards falls short of thestandardit ought toachieve. In light of this, this paper explains why China has the potential to become a leading arbitral jurisdiction, analyses China’s system for the enforcement of foreign and foreign-related arbitral awards and in doing so identifies flaws and areas in which it falls short of international best practice, and finally calls for reform of China’s current system bysetting out recommended legislative and practical reforms, which it is argued Chinamust makeifit is toultimatelytakeits placeas a,or eventhe, world leader. i TABLEOFCONTENTS Acknowledgements...........................................................................................................v I. Introduction...........................................................................................................1 II. China's Potential ToBecomeA LeadingArbitral Jurisdiction.............................3 A ArbitrationinChina: TheHistorical Foundations................................................3 B ArbitrationinChina: TheCultural Context........................................................26 C The ImportanceofArbitrationinChina's Future................................................30 D ChinaHas ThePotential ToBeA LeadingArbitral Jurisdiction.......................33 III. TheFrameworkforEnforcement of Foreign-relatedandForeignArbitral Awards inthePRC..............................................................................................35 A TheRoleoftheNational People’s Congress and Its StandingCommittee........35 B TheRoleofTheChinese Judiciary.....................................................................36 C Difference Between Foreignand Foreign-Related Arbitral Awards..................43 D Legislative Framework fortheEnforcement ofArbitral Awards.......................44 E The Framework For Enforcement of Foreign-Related and Foreign Arbitral Awards As A Basis forReform ..........................................................................53 IV. TheProcedurefor Enforcement of Foreign-relatedandForeignandArbitral Awards inthePRC..............................................................................................55 A MakinganApplicationforEnforcement............................................................56 B AcceptanceofanApplicationforEnforcement..................................................72 C NoticeofEnforcement........................................................................................77 ii D Objections toEnforcement.................................................................................78 E RepresentationinEnforcement Proceedings......................................................79 F Hearing................................................................................................................80 G Request for InformationFrom anArbitrationCommission................................81 H DecisiononEnforcement andthePriorReportingSystem................................82 I ExaminationofProperty.....................................................................................83 J Enforcement Assistance Notice..........................................................................86 K Entrustment.........................................................................................................86 L SuspensionofEnforcement Proceedings............................................................90 M EarlyTerminationofEnforcement Proceedings.................................................93 N Time Limits forEnforcement.............................................................................95 O Is There a Need for Reform of the Procedure for Enforcement of Foreign-related andForeignArbitral Awards?.............................................................................98 V. Grounds forRefusingRecognitionandEnforcement ofForeign-relatedand ForeignArbitral Awards...................................................................................108 A BurdenofProofandthe Court’s Discretion.....................................................109 B IncapacityofaParty.........................................................................................113 C Invalidityofthe ArbitrationAgreement...........................................................125 D Procedural Fairness...........................................................................................147 E Matters FallingOutsidetheScopeofthe Arbitration.......................................164 F Procedural IrregularityGround.........................................................................182 iii G ‘Not Yet Binding’or‘Set Aside’......................................................................206 H Non-Arbitrability..............................................................................................216 I ContrarytoPublicPolicy..................................................................................232 J Refusal Provisions: Is therea Need forReform?..............................................250 VI. Conclusion: ACall ForReform........................................................................262 Bibliography....................................................................................................................vi iv

Description:
Foreign trade and investment, which increased rapidly from 2001 when . 11 James M Zimmerman, China Law Deskbook: A Legal Guide for Isover-Saint-Gobain v Société Dow Chemical (1984) 1 Revue Arbitrage 98 the enforcement by the entrusted court is complete, that court shall collect an.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.