The Effect of Story Read-alouds on Children's Foreign Language Development1

16 Pages·2014·0.71 MB·English

tucKEr siGninG as a phonics instruction tooL
Gist Education and LEarninG rEsEarch JournaL. issn 1692-5777.
no. 8, (January - JunE) 2014. pp. 83-98.
The Effect of Story Read-alouds
on Children’s Foreign Language
Development1
La Eficacia de la Lectura de Cuentos en Voz Alta en el
Desarrollo del Idioma Extranjero en Niños
Catalina Norato Cerón2*
Fundación Universitaria Monserrate, Colombia
Abstract
This action research project examines the impact of reading stories aloud on
the development of children’s reading and critical thinking strategies as well
as on the improvement of English as a foreign language. Analysis of journal
entries and transcriptions of recordings of the sessions were used to gather the
information. Data collected revealed that children improved their speaking
skills by talking about the story, and that they also learned new words they used
to express their opinion even if they had a low proficiency in English. Findings
also revealed that resources and methodologies helped students develop their
critical thinking as well as their reading comprehension towards books.
Keywords: reading comprehension, critical thinking, reading aloud,
foreign language acquisition
Resumen
Este proyecto de investigación acción examina el impacto de la lectura de
cuentos en voz alta en el desarrollo de estrategias de comprensión lectora y
de pensamiento crítico así como también analiza el impacto en el aprendizaje
del inglés como lengua extranjera. Con el propósito de recolectar información
se analizaron las notas de los diarios y se hicieron transcripciones de las
grabaciones de las sesiones de lectura. Los datos recolectados revelaron que
los niños mejoraron sus habilidades de comunicación discutiendo diferentes
83
aspectos del cuento leído, al mismo tiempo aprendieron nuevas palabras que
emplearon para expresar su opinión, a pesar de tener un bajo nivel de inglés.
1 Received: January 6, 2014 / Accepted: April 4, 2014
2 [email protected]
No. 8 (January - June 2014) No. 8 (January - June 2014)
thE EffEct of story rEad-aLouds norato
Los resultados también revelaron que los materiales y metodologías utilizados
en las clases, contribuyeron a que los niños desarrollaran su pensamiento crítico
y su comprensión lectora.
Palabras clave: Comprensión lectora, pensamiento crítico, lectura en
voz alta, aprendizaje de una lengua extranjera
Resumo
Este projeto de pesquisa ação examina o impacto da leitura de contos em voz
alta no desenvolvimento de estratégias de compreensão leitora e de pensamento
crítico, assim como também analisa o impacto na aprendizagem de inglês como
língua estrangeira. Com o propósito de recolher informação se analisaram
as anotações dos diários e se fizeram transcrições das gravações das sessões
de leitura. Os dados recolhidos revelaram que as crianças melhoraram suas
habilidades de comunicação, discutindo diferentes aspectos do conto lido, ao
mesmo tempo aprenderam novas palavras que empregaram para expressar
sua opinião, apesar de ter um baixo nível de inglês. Os resultados também
revelaram que os materiais e metodologias utilizados nas aulas, contribuíram
a que as crianças desenvolvessem seu pensamento crítico e sua compreensão
leitora.
Palavras chave: Compreensão leitora, pensamento crítico, leitura em
voz alta, aprendizagem de uma língua estrangeira
Introduction
Reading aloud as a pedagogical activity has been one of the most
widely used methodologies in the elementary classroom. It
helps develop learners’ enjoyment of reading as well as literacy
skills. Participants in this action research study were students attending
classes once a week to learn English as a foreign language. The Reading
Corner is an additional voluntary space provided by the institute where
the study took place; these sessions are offered for students between 7
and 12 years of age. As the Reading Corner was an optional activity
after class, the number of participants changed each session. The data
was collected throughout one entire academic semester.
84
The main objective of the Reading Corner sessions is to help
students become successful readers by “developing critical thinking
skills which allow them to analyze facts, organize and generate ideas,
defend opinions and solve problems” (Centro Colombo Americano,
n.d.). In terms of social interaction, the purpose is to provide students
with a different space and environment that helps them be in close
contact with the language while they share ideas with other students.
No. 8 (January - June 2014) No. 8 (January - June 2014)
thE EffEct of story rEad-aLouds norato
The Reading Corner is intended to be a non-threatening activity since
students do not have the pressure of being tested. Nevertheless, some
of them feel reluctant to participate actively because they do not know
how to express what they want to say or they lack the words needed
to express their opinion. Consequently, this fear of participating often
prevents them from enjoying the story.
Reading aloud has been practiced in different settings with the
goal of improving reading behaviors and reading pleasure in students.
However, little research has been done on the impact of this methodology
on students who are learning English as a foreign language. This action
research study aimed to understand to what extent reading aloud can
develop reading comprehension and critical thinking skills, as well as
to what extent reading aloud can improve students’ English level.
Literature Review
Reading is one of the most important components of achieving a
balanced literacy in children. However, reading in a different language
is a demanding cognitive process where new words and structures have
to be understood in order to make sense of what is being read to enjoy
and understand the story. In the reading aloud context, the relationship
between the reader, the child and the book makes a huge difference. In
this perspective, constructivist and cognitive theories play an important
role in the development of the present study.
Within the constructivist theories, Vygotsky (as cited in Pentimonti
& Justice, 2009) is the pioneer of the instruction theory which emphasizes
the importance of providing children with an accurate instruction guide
in order for them to master the abilities they are still acquiring. This
theory is strongly related to the scaffolding process needed to learn and
internalize a new concept or idea. Indeed, learners require the support of
the teacher to make the new knowledge accessible and comprehensible
for them. Thus, scaffolding becomes a bridge for transforming reading
from a possibly dull activity into a fruitful and interesting one. In the
same way, scaffolding and constructivism have to do with how students
use their previous knowledge to build new mental structures.
85
It is also important to include cognitive theories about second
language acquisition, which are relevant to this study. Krashen’s
theory of comprehensible input (as cited in Curtain, & Dahlberg, 2004)
explains that input should be the amount of language that the student
understands plus a little more. This theory is derived from the input
hypothesis, which states that the message conveyed to the child must
No. 8 (January - June 2014) No. 8 (January - June 2014)
thE EffEct of story rEad-aLouds norato
be understandable even if all the words are not familiar. Cognitive
theory is important for this study because reading engagement can be
achieved if the child feels comfortable with the book and if its language
is comprehensible. Krashen’s concept of input just beyond the learner’s
language level (i + 1) has to be considered when choosing a book to
read aloud. McDavid (n.d.) developed a rule to know how to select the
right book to read. Books are too easy if children already know almost
all the words; books are too hard that contain more than five words in
one page that the child does not know, and finally books are just right
in which almost all the words on the page are known and just a few are
new. These new words can be easily understood with just a little bit of
help. Thus, taking into account the criteria to choose an appropriate
book will then enhance the child’s interest since the input would be i +
1 and the new vocabulary would not be above their level.
Story schemata or story grammar is also important to consider.
Understanding how a story is structured helps readers of all ages to
make real sense of the story and therefore, to personalize it. Mandler
& Johnson (as cited in Rand, 1984) define story grammar as a set of
episodes that occur in the story and allow the story to flow. Dealing
with story grammar helps readers define outcomes, expectations and
reactions towards what is being read. Lehr (1997) also considers the
importance of analyzing how the episode generates a certain reaction
in a character. This character then sets a goal that needs to be achieved
along the story, and when it is achieved, the story ends. This theory is
relevant for this study because the use of materials and methodologies
that foster story grammar may help children develop their literacy
understanding.
Vocabulary acquisition has also been studied when using interactive
reading aloud strategies since acquiring new words is a reading skill that
has to be developed to achieve comprehension and fluency. However,
teachers should define the most appropriate instruction to maximize
word learning without distracting children from the story itself.
Considering the previous aspect, Kindle (2009) developed a study in
which three different levels of instruction (incidental, embedded, and
focused) emerged when analyzing the data. First, incidental exposure
86 “occurred during the course of discussions, before, during, and after
reading and resulted from teachers’ efforts to infuse rich vocabulary into
class discourse” (Kindle, 2009, p. 3). Secondly, embedded instruction
emphasized the meaning of the words that were provided along with the
reading. Finally, focused instruction “occurred when target words were
considered important to story comprehension or when difficulties arose
communicating word meaning” (Kindle, 2009, p. 3). Kindle’s findings
No. 8 (January - June 2014) No. 8 (January - June 2014)
thE EffEct of story rEad-aLouds norato
show that students learned words from the three types of instruction,
and that this instruction promoted understanding without distracting
from the reading.
Reading engagement is also achieved by the degree of enjoyment
and comprehension of the book. Sipe (2002) studied how readers’
engagement can be expressed in different verbal or physical ways. The
author mentions how readers seek to understand the narrative elements
of the story, including plot, setting, and characters. However, this level of
comprehension does not necessarily increase engagement. That is why,
when readers make the story their own, they “compare and contrast the
events of the story to their own lives, saying ‘that happened [or didn’t
happen] to me’” (Sipe, 2002, p. 1). Sipe examined the construction of
literacy understanding (how readers construct meaning by supplying
what is not written) by means of children’s responses to read-alouds.
Five different categories of understanding resulted from the analysis
of the data: analytical, intertextual, personal, transparent, performative.
These five facets were also affected by the stances assumed, the actions
performed and the functions of the texts.
Children can also demonstrate engagement by drawing. Ducan’s
(1998) integrated competition hypothesis posits that visual input can
portray things that words cannot. Images in general are a great tool to
express feelings and thoughts in a more pictured and visual manner.
In this regard, Pflaum & Bishop (2004) asked students to draw one
experience in which they were not engaged and one activity in
which they were. In general, students demonstrated preferences for
collaborative reading experiences.
Engaged readers not only have acquired reading skills, but use
them for their own purposes in many contexts. They possess beliefs,
desires, and interests that energize the hard work of becoming literate.
From this perspective, motivation and social interactions are equal to
cognitions as foundations for reading (Guthrie & Anderson, as cited in
Pflaum & Bishop, 2004).
In this sense, reading in a collaborative environment helps
children feel comfortable about what they know and about what they
are learning. Reading aloud is a space for sharing ideas and thoughts 87
about a specific situation. Having the opportunity to listen to different
perspectives increases comprehension.
No. 8 (January - June 2014) No. 8 (January - June 2014)
thE EffEct of story rEad-aLouds norato
Methodology
Research Design
This action research study emerged from the need to take
advantage of the time students spend in the Reading Corner sessions
in order to develop reading comprehension, critical thinking skills
and to improve students’ English proficiency level. The purpose of the
intervention was for children in the Reading Corner to have contact
with the language in a different environment outside their scheduled
class and to learn by getting close to books and stories. Each week,
a story was chosen that could be appropriate for all the children who
attended the Reading Corner, which changed from week to week. The
story was read along with pre-, while- and post-activities. The activities
were designed based on students’ learning profiles and they are thought
to engage learners even more in the foreign language.
Context and Participants
The children who participated in the study came from different
school backgrounds and attended English classes once a week. The
Reading Corner sessions were offered to students between 7 and 12
years of age. Each group of students attended a fifty-minute session
every Saturday. Considering that the read aloud sessions were a
voluntary activity, the number of participants varied from eight to four.
Data Collection Instruments
Qualitative data collection techniques were used as the primary
research methods for this action research study. Field notes were taken
after each session during the semester. Different information was
gathered for the younger learners (7-9) than for the older learners (10-
12) as the type of strategies used and the didactic material varied. A
total of nine sessions of two hours each were audio recorded. Not all of
the sessions were recorded as parent’s consent was not obtained for all
the students in each session.
88
Transcriptions of nine sessions of audio recordings were used
to find patterns and to answer the research questions. Two different
surveys were carried out at the end of the semester in order to evaluate
the vocabulary strategies used and the students’ behaviors and attitudes
towards reading.
No. 8 (January - June 2014) No. 8 (January - June 2014)
thE EffEct of story rEad-aLouds norato
Data Analysis and Interpretation
In order to analyze the transcriptions of the nine hours of
recordings, basic concepts of Glaser and Strauss’s grounded theory
were used (as cited in Van den Heuvel-Panhuiizen, & Van den
Boogaard, 2008). The data analysis of the recordings generated a
coding framework, which was used to analyze the recordings and the
field notes. The transcriptions were divided into short dialogues that
came up during the discussions of the read alouds. In general, such
dialogues contained an answer to a given question or a spontaneous
response in the middle of a conversation. The story read aloud by the
children was neither transcribed nor taken into account for the present
study. During the open coding phase, five different categories emerged:
MSTO (made story their own), SE (story engagement), RC (reading
comprehension), FLD (foreign language development) and IC (inter-
textual connections).
Considering that the research questions were focused on the
students’ English improvement and the development of critical thinking
skills and literacy understanding, it was necessary to concentrate on two
of the categories in the first phase: RC (reading comprehension) and FLD
(foreign language development). Therefore, during the selective coding
phase, some other subcategories emerged. Within the LU category, the
following subcategories arose: LS (library-skills development), DT
(focus on decontextualized text), PI (prediction based on illustrations),
PBK (prediction based on background knowledge) and SS (story
schemata). Within the FLD category, the following subcategories arose:
SD (syntax development), WE (target words explanation, 2LC (mother
tongue and L2 combination), AW (asking for L2 words), SW (spelling
words), L2BK (L2 background knowledge). These categories classify
the different responses children produced and their analysis brought
the findings described later. Table 1 shows the final coding framework
that emerged after the data coding of the recordings. The framework
includes a definition of the category or the subcategory and an example
taken from the transcriptions.
89
No. 8 (January - June 2014) No. 8 (January - June 2014)
thE EffEct of story rEad-aLouds norato
Table 1. Coding classification of children’s responses during the read
aloud, open coding phase
Category R1: Reading Comprehension [RC]
Description
Child makes connections between the main narrative elements and their
background knowledge in order to understand the flow of the story.
Example
13:37 Teacher: Something wrong is happening
13:47 Children: the stairs
14:00 Samanta: they go down from the stairs and continue skating
14:03 Teacher: how do they go down?
14:04 Samanta: they sit down and go down
14:05 Lucia: they jump
Category R2: Inter-textual Connections [IC]
Description
Child makes connections between the story and other literacy products like
movies or TV shows.
Example
22:23 Teacher: what about the penguins? …
23:47 Lucia: I think I watch a movie…..
24:03 Santiago: Yes! The mother goes to get food and the father look after
the eggs
24:21 Lucia: mmm now I remember. The mother emigrates…the male
penguin keeps the eggs
24:39 Teacher: do you remember the name of the movie?
24:41 Santiago: “Happy Feet”
Category R3: Personal Engagement [SE, MSTO]
Description
Child asks for the turn to read during the session or makes connections
between the facts of the story and their personal lives.
Example (Story Engagement)
31:08 Teacher: volunteers for reading this page?
90
31:10 Children: MEEEE!!!!
31:11 Samanta: I don’t read.
Example (Made the story their own)
27:39 Bryan: George is in a swimming pool with apples
28:00 Samanta: No! It’s a game that you …. How do you say “poner la
cabeza en el agua”?
No. 8 (January - June 2014) No. 8 (January - June 2014)
thE EffEct of story rEad-aLouds norato
28:09 Lucia: put your head in the water …
28:13 Samanta: and you pick up the apple with your mouth
28:14 Lucia: I have played that game but with candy…you have to put
your head and pick up one candy and you close your eyes. There is another
game that you put in a bowl water with little balls.
Category R4: Foreign Language Development [FLD]
Description
Child asks for the meaning of new words or tries to give his opinion.
Example
05:28 Fernanda: How do you say “toallas” in English?
05:29 Children: towels
05:32 Teacher: t-o-w-e-l
Bearing in mind that conversations were not recorded in the
journal, none of the subcategories of the FLD category were considered
for the analysis. On the contrary, two new categories emerged throughout
the analysis of the field notes: SM (scaffolding methodologies) and
BV (building vocabulary). Table 2 includes the definition of these two
categories during the analysis of the journal. In the case of the sessions
that were recorded, transcriptions were compared with the field notes
and observations in order to identify patterns and in this way, to define
the codes that characterize the session as a whole.
Table 2. Coding classification of children’s responses during the read
aloud, selective coding phase
Category R1: Reading Comprehension
Subcategory 1.1: Library-skills development [LS]
Subcategory 1.1
Library-skills development
Description
Child identifies the different parts of a book and predicts based on the
information found in the cover. 91
Example
09:06 Teacher: what is the function of the author in the book?
09:09 Samanta: he writes the book
09:12 Teacher: and the illustrator?
09:15 Samanta: he puts the characters in the book, the image.
No. 8 (January - June 2014) No. 8 (January - June 2014)
thE EffEct of story rEad-aLouds norato
Subcategory 1.2: Focus on decontextualized text [DT]
Subcategory 1.2
Focus on decontextualized text
Description
Child focused his attention on the language used in the book rather than on
the images in order to comprehend the meaning of the text.
Example
10:20 Santiago: yellow woman [talking about the image]
10:26 Lucia: that is her sister
10:43 Teacher: how do you know?
10:49 Lucia: it’s in the text
Subcategory 1.3: Prediction based on Illustrations [PI]
Subcategory 1.3
Prediction based on Illustrations
Description
Child predicts what is going to happen in the story based on the images on
the page of the book.
Example
12:58 Teacher: so what does Gracie’s sister think it’s inside of the basket?
13:00 Sandra: fruit, a chicken…..
13:07 Lucia: ahhh because it’s moving
Subcategory 1.4: Prediction based on background knowledge [PBK]
Subcategory 1.4
Prediction based on background knowledge
Description
Child predicts what is going to happen in the story based on their
background knowledge.
Example
12:07 Teacher: what are they talking about in this page?
12:09 Samanta: the muscles
12:17 Lucia: they protect the bones
12:18 Teacher: they also help us move and stretch
92 Subcategory 1.5: Story Schemata [SS]
Subcategory 1.5
Story Schemata
Description
Child recognizes the main elements of a story such as characters, plot,
settings, climax and episodes (story grammar).
No. 8 (January - June 2014) No. 8 (January - June 2014)