INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find ja good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation. Silver prints of "photographs" may be ordered at additional charge by writing the Order Department, giving the catalog number, title, author and specific pages you wish reproduced. 5. PLEASE NOTE: Some pages may have indistinct print. Filmed as received. University Microfilms International 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 USA St. John’s Road, Tyler's Green High Wycombe, Bucks, England HPiO 8HR Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 77-29,354 RAYMOND, H. Bruce, 1939- THE COURTLY ANCESTRY OF AMADIS DE GAULA. The University of Arizona, Ph.D., 1977 Literature, medieval Xerox University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48io6 @ 1977 H. BRUCE RAYMOND ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE COURTLY ANCESTRY OF AMADIS DE GAULA by H. Bruce Raymond A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ROMANCE LANGUAGES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WITH A MAJOR IN SPANISH In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 7 7 Copyright 1977 H. Bruce Raymond Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by H. Bruce Raymond____________________________________ entitled _THE COURTLY ANCESTRY OF AMADIS DE. GAULA________________ be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy________________________________ Dissertation Director After inspection of the final copy of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and^recommend its acceptance:* -?///.V7 7 7-/r- y; *i ■ •^*1 This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is’evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examination. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the copyright holder. SIGNED: Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my deepest thanks to my director H. Reynolds Stone who very patiently and kindly has guided me through this dissertation. His wife Susan and their children have also been especially important as friends and morale builders. Robert Anderson, too, receives my very special thanks for his continued encouragement and his unique approach to certain problems related to completion. I am also greatly indebted to Timothy Brown for his diligence as a reader and for his generous interest in my successful termination; and to my other committee members, Dana Nelson and Frank Chambers, whose valuable suggestions have added coherence and readability to this dissertation. Finally, I am deeply thankful to my wife Alicia and to my parents and three sisters for their constant and loving support; and to Terry Clark for her friendly advice, organizational skills, and superb completion under pressure of a difficult typing job. iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT . vi CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION.. , . . , ........................ 1 II. AN OVERVIEW OF AMATORY LITERATURE............ 9 Classical Antecedents to Fin'amors and the Dispute Over "Ovid Misunderstood" .................... ... 9 The Troubadours and the "Newness" of their Conception........................ 12 Chretien's Lancelot and the Initial Definition of Amour Courtois ........... 15 Chretien's Amour Courtois in the Light of Moralizing Theories ................. 18 A Digest of the Philosophical and Theological Background of Andreas and the Troubadours ...... 23 Andreas Capellanus and the De Amore ... 26 Chivalry, Fin'amors, and the Roman de la Rose . . . ........................ 32 III. COURTLY DEFINITIONS AND THEORIES: A CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT OF COURTLY TRADITION..................... , 36 The Troubadour "System" ........... 36 Critical Vagueness in the Use of the Term Courtly Love . . . . . . . . . . . 36 A Critical Reappraisal of Early Definitions . . . . . . . . ........... 38 The Problem of the Definition of Courtly Love ..... 41 Social and Moral Aspects of Courtoisie . . 44 Cortezia and Fin'amors ............. 52 Fin'amors and Amour Courtois . . . . . . . 58 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS— Continued Page IV. CHIVALRY AND THE COURTLY TRADITION........... 62 The Emergence of Chivalry in Feudal Society................................. 62 The Ideals of Early Chivalry . . . . . . . 65 Contact Between Christian and Chivalric Ideals: The Christianiza- tion of the Feudal Knight............. 68 The Decline of Chivalric Idealism During the Crusades.................... 72 Evolutionary Contacts Between Chivalry and Fin1 amors: The Emergence of a "Courtly" Ideal of Chivalry................................. 79 R§sum§ of the Evolution: From Chivalry to Courtly Love and from Epic to Romance . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 V. THE COURTLY AND CHIVALRIC ELEMENTS OF AMADIS DE GAULA AND THEIR CHRISTIANIZATION . 89 Fin*amors in Amadis de Gaula........... . 89 The Religion of Love ........... 92 Humility in the Service of Love ... 95 The Rigors of Love.................... 100 Pleasure and Ennoblement in the Suffering of Love, and Its Final Reward .. . . . . 105 Courtly-Chivalric Elements in the Amadis ..........., ............... 113 The Christian Aspects of Courtly Chivalry in Amadis de Gaula . . . . . . 130 VI. CONCLUSION..................................... 148 REFERENCES.......................... 154 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT Drawing on the considerable amatory content of antique literature a mysterious group of poets known as the troubadours conceived in eleventh- and twelfth-century Languedoc an idealized vision of love which they called finTamors. ’ This new conception of love appeared in a society which conformed politically to feudalism in its most highly developed form, and socially to the ideal of chivalry. And while this society responded increasingly to the teachings of Christianity, rejection of its non- Christian origins surfaced in a general ambivalence in the treatment of sacred and profane material. The literary and social phenomenon which we study under the denomination of "courtly tradition" has resulted from the combination and development of elements from feudal chivalry, fin1amors and Christian doctrine: initially, troubadour poetry was inspired by chivalric models and, repeatedly thereafter by its reflection in chivalric literature. By the same token, chivalry was slowly stimulated and modified by its troubadouresque image. As fin'amors interacted with chivalry in social and moral forms which ranged from cortezia in the South to courtoisie in the North, the two ideals, under the constant influence of the Church, gradually merged into courtly vi Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. chivalry— the term we find most appropriate for expressing a Christianized vernacular literature based on Southern amatory ideals and set in a chivalric framework. Courtly chivalry first appears in the Northern roman courtois, especially as it is developed by Chr§tien de Troyes, who attempts to reconcile fin,amors with Christian matrimony. The spirit of the trouveres, especially the Christianizing tendencies of Chretien, is best represented by the late thirteenth-century Roman de la Rose wherein we find the clearly developed concept of courtship as a prelude to marriage, an idea which will be emphasized by the revisers of Amadis de Gaula. Due to its extended period of composition (up to two hundred years), the Amadis constitutes an excellent example of the development of courtly tradition, that is, the manner in which the ideals of chivalry and fin1amors were combined and Christianized in the formation of courtly chivalry. Analysis of Amadis de Gaula leads us to two main conclusions: (1) based on abundant examples of knightly and troubadour concepts the work must be considered to be, in many ways, an amalgamation of the ideologies of chivalry and fin'amors; and (2) the several revisions of primitive versions of the Amadis (which probably revealed an early Christian conscience), especially the one by Rodriguez de Montalvo, became increasingly moralistic and concerned with the aims of Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Description: