ebook img

The Contradictory Christ PDF

206 Pages·2021·1.203 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview The Contradictory Christ

OUPCORRECTEDPROOF – FINAL,2/12/2020,SPi OXFORD STUDIES IN ANALYTIC THEOLOGY SeriesEditors MichaelC.Rea OliverD.Crisp OUPCORRECTEDPROOF – FINAL,2/12/2020,SPi OXFORD STUDIES IN ANALYTIC THEOLOGY AnalyticTheologyutilizesthetoolsandmethodsofcontemporaryana- lytic philosophy for the purposes of constructive Christian theology, payingattentiontotheChristiantraditionanddevelopmentofdoctrine. This innovative series of studies showcases high-quality, cutting-edge researchinthisarea,inmonographsandsymposia. published titles include: MetaphysicsandtheTri-PersonalGod WilliamHasker TheTheologicalProjectofModernism FaithandtheConditionsofMineness KevinW.Hector TheEndoftheTimelessGod R.T.Mullins Atonement EleonoreStump Humility,Pride,andChristianVirtueTheory KentDunnington InDefenseofExtendedConciliarChristology APhilosophicalEssay TimothyPawl LoveDivine JordanWessling ASystematicAccountofGod’sLoveforHumanity VoicesfromtheEdge CentringMarginalizedPerspectivesinAnalyticTheology MichellePanchuk,MichaelRea ThePrinciplesofJudaism SamuelLebens OUPCORRECTEDPROOF – FINAL,2/12/2020,SPi The Contradictory Christ JC BEALL 1 OUPCORRECTEDPROOF – FINAL,2/12/2020,SPi 3 GreatClarendonStreet,Oxford,OX26DP, UnitedKingdom OxfordUniversityPressisadepartmentoftheUniversityofOxford. ItfurtherstheUniversity’sobjectiveofexcellenceinresearch,scholarship, andeducationbypublishingworldwide.Oxfordisaregisteredtrademarkof OxfordUniversityPressintheUKandincertainothercountries ©JcBeall2021 Themoralrightsoftheauthorhavebeenasserted FirstEditionpublishedin2021 Impression:1 Allrightsreserved.Nopartofthispublicationmaybereproduced,storedin aretrievalsystem,ortransmitted,inanyformorbyanymeans,withoutthe priorpermissioninwritingofOxfordUniversityPress,orasexpresslypermitted bylaw,bylicenceorundertermsagreedwiththeappropriatereprographics rightsorganization.Enquiriesconcerningreproductionoutsidethescopeofthe aboveshouldbesenttotheRightsDepartment,OxfordUniversityPress,atthe addressabove Youmustnotcirculatethisworkinanyotherform andyoumustimposethissameconditiononanyacquirer PublishedintheUnitedStatesofAmericabyOxfordUniversityPress 198MadisonAvenue,NewYork,NY10016,UnitedStatesofAmerica BritishLibraryCataloguinginPublicationData Dataavailable LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2020951048 ISBN 978–0–19–885236–0 DOI:10.1093/oso/9780198852360.001.0001 PrintedandboundinGreatBritainby ClaysLtd,ElcografS.p.A. LinkstothirdpartywebsitesareprovidedbyOxfordingoodfaithand forinformationonly.Oxforddisclaimsanyresponsibilityforthematerials containedinanythirdpartywebsitereferencedinthiswork. OUPCORRECTEDPROOF – FINAL,2/12/2020,SPi Forallwho’vesensedthecontradiction,andtoanywho’veyettodoso... OUPCORRECTEDPROOF – FINAL,2/12/2020,SPi OUPCORRECTEDPROOF – FINAL,2/12/2020,SPi Preface Aim Thisbookhasoneaim:toadvanceacontradictorychristology–andthereby a contradictory christian theology – as concisely as possible compatible withuser-friendliness,andwithanemphasisonthebigpictureratherthan intricatedetails.Assuch,thebookdoesnotansweralldetailsthatacademic theologiansorphilosophersorbiblicalscholarsmayraise;futurediscussion enjoysaninvitationfromthefuture.Thepointofthecurrentworkistoput theaccountinbroaderconversationsbeyondacademicjournals.(Thisisn’t tosaythatthebookisa‘tradebook’–itisn’t–orthatit’swrittenwithaneye specificallyonthemythical‘generalreader’,butthebookiswrittenwithout pausingateverypotentialacademicconcern.) Previouswork Substantial parts of this material were first published in The Journal of AnalyticTheology(JAT)asasymposiumonmyinitialdefinitionanddefense ofContradictoryChristology(Beall,2019a).Despitetheoverlap,thisbook presents significant new aspects of the account, including positive reasons foracceptingtheaccount,comparativecommentsonsalientalternatives,a handful of new objections and replies, and a brief glimpse towards future workonaunifiedapproachtowardsthetrinity. Futurework This book focuses on christology, and in particular the so-called funda- mentalproblemofchristology(muchmoreonwhichthroughoutthebook), namely,theapparentcontradictionofChrist’sbeingfullyhumanandfully divine.Thebookisintendedtobethefirstinatwo-bookseries(ofsorts), thesecondfocusingin depth onthetrinity. Thefinal chapterof thisbook OUPCORRECTEDPROOF – FINAL,2/12/2020,SPi viii preface (viz., §6) sketches a few – but only a very few – preliminary issues in the directionsofsubsequentwork. Hope Myhopeisthatreaderswhoareatleastnotdogmaticallycommittedtothe standardoff-the-shelfstoryoflogic(viz.,so-calledclassicallogic)findthis booktobenotonlyinterestingbutilluminating–perhapsevenliberating, loosening one not from the demands of a rational christian theology but from the demands of a logically consistent one, allowing one to shake off thescalesandaccepttheinconsistenttruthinitsscandalousbutawesome glory. I carry no illusion of final achievement in this work. Elements of the full truth, we know not exactly which ones, are vastly beyond us. But as responsible,systematicthinkersweareobligedtogivethetrueandcomplete- as-possible account, to the best of our abilities. This book is a step in that direction.Bymylights,thetruetheoryofChristisinconsistent:itcontains contradictions, claims that are false but, critically, also true. Conveying at leastthatmuchismyhope. Targetaudience The target audience is genuinely interdisciplinary (and ‘transdisciplinary’ and so on); it’s a very broad and varied audience. This book is written in awaythatisintendedtobeaccessibletoboththeologiansandphilosophers; however,thebookchieflyaimstomakeatheologicalcontribution,written and read by theologians who are not only interested in how best to make senseoftheapparentcontradictionofChrist,butarealsointerestedinthe pursuit of systematic theology as a systematic truth-seeking enterprise, an enterprisetherebysubjecttotheuniversalconstraintsoflogicandthespace oflogicalpossibility. Conventionsgoverningstyle Religiousnamesandadjectives:spelling.Whileitsrationaleremainsunclear tomeInonethelessfollowstandardEnglishconventioninusinguppercase OUPCORRECTEDPROOF – FINAL,2/12/2020,SPi preface ix ‘C’,‘J’,and‘M’whentalkingaboutChristians,Jews,andMuslims,understood asthosewho,respectively,accepttargetchristiandoctrine(formypurposes, doctrineandcreedsaffirmedatleastupthroughtheCouncilofChalcedon in 451), jewish doctrine, and islamic doctrine. In turn, and as reflected in the previous sentence, I use lowercase letters when the target terms are in adjectival position.One rationale forthisissimply aesthetic. Scattering a multitude of uppercase letters all over a Page makes for Aesthetically displeasing Pages. Another rationale is that my chosen convention is in keepingwithrelated conventions,includingthecommonobservationthat one can be a Platonist without spending one’s life dreaming of platonic essences or engaging in platonic relations or even endorsing all platonic doctrines. The same considerations apply to christological theories (any christology),whicharesystematicaccountsofChrist.Ifaspecificchristology isunderdiscussion,suchasConciliarChristology(perTimothyPawl’swork) or even Contradictory Christology as specifically developed in this book, uppercaselettersmaybeused–butevenhere,Iadmit,there’sverystrong pressureagainsttheuppercase. Quotation marks. I use single quotation marks in what, at least in phi- losophy,isoftencalledtheAnalysisconvention.Onthisconvention,single quotationmarksareusedinthreeverydifferentways,wherethegivenusage is always clear from context. First, I generally use single quotation marks tomentionwords,aswhenImentiontheword‘mention’.Ialsousesingle quotation marks for direct quotation, as when I directly quote Professor Dr. Oliver Crisp who, in conversation, once replied to something I said by saying nothing more nor less than ‘Very good.’ (The only exception to thedirect-quotationconventionisexceedinglyrare:viz.,adirectquotation withinadirectquotationwithinadirectquotation.Thisissorarethatfurther commentontheconventionisunnecessary.)Finally,Iusesinglequotation marksforscarequotesor(equivalently)shudderquotes,aswhenIsaythat enjoyable‘pains’mightnotbepainsatall.Asalways,communicationrests largelyoncontext,andwhenitcomestoquotationconventionscontextis the cure. And if one wants a rationale for adhering to the given Analysis convention,Iturntotworationales.First,onceagain,thereisanaesthetic one:singlequotationmarksdothejobwithoutclutteringpages.Secondis Ockham-ish:whyusemoremarkswhenfewerwilldo? Em dashes. Here again, I follow the given Analysis style by spelling an em dash as an en dash flanked by the single-space character – as I do in thissentence.(Theother,perhapsmorecommon,wayofspellingemdashes doessowithoutspaces—asdoneinthisparentheticalremark.)TheAnalysis

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.