THE COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY OF SPEECH- RELATED GESTURE Why do we gesture when we speak? The Cognitive Psychology of Speech- Related Gesture offers answers to this question while introducing readers to the huge interdisciplinary field of gesture. Drawing on ideas from cognitive psychology, this book highlights key debates in gesture research alongside advocating new approaches to conventional thinking. Beginning with the definition of the notion of communication, this book explores experimental approaches to gesture production and comprehension, the possible gestural origin of language and its implication for brain organization, and the development of gestural communication from infancy to childhood. Through these discussions the author presents the idea that speech- related gestures are not just peripheral phenomena, but rather a key function of the cognitive architecture, and should consequently be studied alongside traditional concepts in cognitive psychology. The Cognitive Psychology of Speech- Related Gesture offers a broad overview which will be essential reading for all students of gesture research and language, as well as speech therapists, teachers and communication practitioners. It will also be of interest to anybody who is curious about why we move our bodies when we talk. Pierre Feyereisen is Honorary Research Director of the Fund for Scientific Research – FNRS, Psychological Sciences Research Institute at the University of Louvain in Belgium. THE COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY OF SPEECH- RELATED GESTURE Pierre Feyereisen First published 2018 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2018 Pierre Feyereisen The right of Pierre Feyereisen to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book has been requested ISBN: 978- 1- 138- 70273- 8 (hbk) ISBN: 978- 1- 138- 70274- 5 (pbk) ISBN: 978- 1- 315- 20352- 2 (ebk) Typeset in Bembo by Out of House Publishing CONTENTS Preface vii Acknowledgements x 1 Introduction: matters of terminology and of philosophy 1 What is gestural communication about? 7 Why are cognitive psychologists interested in gestural communication? 16 Overview 22 Summary 23 Research questions 24 2 Speaking hands: inventory of forms and functions 32 Pioneers 34 Current perspectives 37 Final remarks 45 Summary 45 Research questions 46 3 Ghosts in the machine: models of gesture processing 51 Translucent architectures: gestures reveal thought 52 Information- processing models 55 Dynamical models 60 Pragmatic approaches 63 Conclusions 67 Summary 68 Research questions 68 vi Contents 4 Production mechanisms 75 Do speakers take the addressee’s perspective when they gesture? 76 Why do some spoken utterances involve gestures whereas others do not? 82 How do spoken and gestural production cooperate? 103 Conclusions: cooperative or competitive relationships? 107 Summary 108 Research questions 108 5 The impact of gestures on speech comprehension 118 Is message comprehension influenced by the gestures of the speaker? 120 How is visual and auditory information integrated in verbal comprehension using electrophysiological approaches? 133 Conclusions 140 Summary 140 Research questions 141 6 Evolution and neuropsychology of gestures 148 Does human speech stem from manual skills? 151 Do gestures and speech involve the same brain regions? 154 Conclusions 164 Summary 165 Research questions 166 7 The development of gestural communication 174 How do babies learn to read minds and to communicate their intentions? 179 What is the role of gestures in language acquisition? 188 Gesture use and atypical language development 202 General conclusions on gestural development 207 Summary 208 Research questions 208 8 Final remarks 219 Index 221 PREFACE Why do we gesture when we speak? By attempting to answer this question, the present book follows a previous work Gestures and speech: Psychological investigations written with Jacques- Dominique de Lannoy (Feyereisen & de Lannoy, 1991). The regretted sudden death of this colleague in 2001 is not the sole reason for refraining from adding the mention “second edition” to an updated publication of a simi- lar content. During the past 25 years, the field of gesture studies has profoundly changed and it is necessary to revise our way of thinking in the domain. The aim of this new book is to propose a state of the art of recent research on speech-a ccom- panying gestures (from 1990 to 2014). The time is ripe for stepping back from the wealth of publications available in order to identify more clearly gaps of knowledge and lines of divergence, which should fuel forthcoming investigations. I have been interested in gestures for many years, in fact since the beginning of my scientific career. At first, under the supervision of Jacques- Dominique de Lannoy, I observed self- touching gestures from a human ethological perspective. Classical ethology describes the occurrence of seemingly irrelevant activities in conflict situations, such as grooming behaviour in approach- avoidance conflicts (let us imagine a shy young girl meeting an adult stranger with some worry and curios- ity, and pulling her clothes or rubbing her nose). In an empirical study, I examined children and adolescents in the laboratory during a spatial problem solving task (de Lannoy, 1977; Feyereisen, 1977). In that context, self- grooming movements can be interpreted as signs of puzzlement or embarrassment at not finding a solution, a hypothesis already proposed by Darwin (1872). However, the frequency and dura- tion of these movements also depend on the time devoted to other activities such as object manipulation and speech-r elated gestures, which also involve hand use. Thus one cannot study grooming while ignoring competing movements. In ethology, the notion of “final common path” was proposed to refer to the central selection viii Preface mechanism preceding motor execution. There is a competition or a time sharing between activities using the same pool of resources. Post- doctoral research took another direction in the Neuropsychology Unit then founded at Brussels by Professors Michel Meulders and Christian Laterre, and directed by Xavier Seron. The population studied was that of brain- damaged patients suffering from language and communication disorders while the question posed was whether people with aphasia can compensate for their impairments through nonverbal means or, on the contrary, suffer from a general breakdown of communication. The theoretical framework was also quite different from ethol- ogy. It integrated the cognitive sciences which aim at understanding the human mind by means of various methods (Shallice & Cooper, 2011). The brain has often been compared to a computer, i.e. as a complex system made of parts that serve specific functions.1 Cognitive neuropsychologists are particularly concerned with dissociations caused by brain lesions and with associations showing the common cause underlying different symptoms. Thus they bring some elements that answer questions about the relations that may exist between language and action, semantics and pragmatics, cognition and emotion, among other subdivisions within the infor- mation processing system. The neuropsychological study of speech- related gestures sheds some light on the theoretical debates that divide the scientific community in that domain. Within the cognitive sciences, strong links connect different disciplines such as neuropsychology, linguistics, psychology, artificial intelligence, to cite only a few approaches to mental functions. Therefore, the organizational change in the University of Louvain was not a surprise when in 1989 the Neuropsychology Unit moved from the Faculty of Medicine to the Department of Experimental Psychology. This transfer favoured a reinforcement of pre- existing scientific col- laborations of neuropsychologists with the psycholinguists Jean Costermans and Michel Hupet and facilitated contacts between scientists and undergraduate students. In this new context, the study of gestures followed another orientation. To understand why people move their body when they speak, one has to consult sev- eral chapters of handbooks on cognitive psychology, covering topics such as atten- tion, memory, language processing, decision making, executive control and thus to build connections between separate issues. One of the motivations underlying the writing of Gestures and speech: Psychological investigations was to widen the research perspectives and to show that multiple approaches to gesture use are possible, not restricted to a single point of view. The same spirit inspires the present book aimed at a large audience, while trying to find a delicate but correct balance between interest in a narrowly defined issue and dispersal in the infinity of human knowl- edge. As it is impossible to read all that has been written, to follow papers published week after week and added to thousands already written, it is now time to conclude and be resigned to being incomplete. Preface ix Note 1 See for example Churchland and Sejnowski (1992). Several scholars disagree for various reasons and claim that the brain as a cognitive system does not work that way. References Churchland, P. S., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1992). The computational brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray. de Lannoy, J.- D. (1977). Rotations et translations. In Recherches sur l’abstraction réfléchis- sante, vol. 2: Abstraction de l’ordre et des relations spatiales (pp. 281–2 88). Ouvrage collectif sous la direction de J. Piaget. Études d’épistémologie génétique, vol. 35. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France [English translation in Piaget, J. Studies in Reflecting Abstraction (pp. 281-288). Hove, East Sussex: Routledge]. Feyereisen, P. (1977). Note sur la description des comportements d’auto-c ontact chez des sujets humains [Note concerning the description of autocontact behaviour in human subjects]. Psychologie Médicale, 9, 2147– 2161. Feyereisen, P., & de Lannoy, J.- D. (1991). Gestures and speech: Psychological investigations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Shallice, T., & Cooper, R. P. (2011). The organization of mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Description: