SPRINGER BRIEFS IN EDUCATION Daniele Morselli The Change Laboratory for Teacher Training in Entrepreneurship Education A New Skills Agenda for Europe SpringerBriefs in Education We are delighted to announce SpringerBriefs in Education, an innovative product type that combines elements of both journals and books. Briefs present concise summaries of cutting-edge research and practical applications in education. Featuring compact volumes of 50 to 125 pages, the SpringerBriefs in Education allowauthorstopresenttheirideasandreaderstoabsorbthemwithaminimaltime investment. Briefs are published as part of Springer’s eBook Collection. In addition, Briefs are available for individual print and electronic purchase. SpringerBriefs in Education cover a broad range of educational fields such as: Science Education, Higher Education, Educational Psychology, Assessment & Evaluation, Language Education, Mathematics Education, Educational Technology, Medical Education and Educational Policy. SpringerBriefs typically offer an outlet for: (cid:129) An introduction to a (sub)field in education summarizing and giving an over- view of theories, issues, core concepts and/or key literature in a particular field (cid:129) A timely report of state-of-the art analytical techniques and instruments in the field of educational research (cid:129) A presentation of core educational concepts (cid:129) An overview of a testing and evaluation method (cid:129) A snapshot of a hot or emerging topic or policy change (cid:129) An in-depth case study (cid:129) A literature review (cid:129) A report/review study of a survey (cid:129) An elaborated thesis Both solicited and unsolicited manuscripts are considered for publication in the SpringerBriefsinEducationseries.Potentialauthorsarewarmlyinvitedtocomplete and submit the Briefs Author Proposal form. All projects will be submitted to editorial review by editorial advisors. SpringerBriefsarecharacterizedbyexpeditedproductionscheduleswiththeaim for publication 8 to 12 weeks after acceptance and fast, global electronic dissemination through our online platform SpringerLink. The standard concise author contracts guarantee that: (cid:129) an individual ISBN is assigned to each manuscript (cid:129) each manuscript is copyrighted in the name of the author (cid:129) theauthorretainstherighttopostthepre-publicationversiononhis/herwebsite or that of his/her institution More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/8914 Daniele Morselli The Change Laboratory for Teacher Training in Entrepreneurship Education A New Skills Agenda for Europe Daniele Morselli Faculty of Educational Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland ISSN 2211-1921 ISSN 2211-193X (electronic) SpringerBriefs inEducation ISBN978-3-030-02570-0 ISBN978-3-030-02571-7 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02571-7 LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2018958349 ©TheEditor(s)(ifapplicable)andTheAuthor(s)2019.Thisbookisanopenaccesspublication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adap- tation,distributionandreproductioninanymediumorformat,aslongasyougiveappropriatecreditto the originalauthor(s)and the source, providealink tothe CreativeCommonslicense andindicate if changesweremade. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons license,unlessindicatedotherwiseinacreditlinetothematerial.Ifmaterialisnotincludedinthebook’s CreativeCommonslicenseandyourintendeduseisnotpermittedbystatutoryregulationorexceedsthe permitteduse,youwillneedtoobtainpermissiondirectlyfromthecopyrightholder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publicationdoesnotimply,evenintheabsenceofaspecificstatement,thatsuchnamesareexemptfrom therelevantprotectivelawsandregulationsandthereforefreeforgeneraluse. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authorsortheeditorsgiveawarranty,expressorimplied,withrespecttothematerialcontainedhereinor for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictionalclaimsinpublishedmapsandinstitutionalaffiliations. ThisSpringerimprintispublishedbytheregisteredcompanySpringerNatureSwitzerlandAG Theregisteredcompanyaddressis:Gewerbestrasse11,6330Cham,Switzerland Foreword In the last three decades, entrepreneurship education has taken off as a subject of interestworldwide.Ithasdevelopedfrombeingaminorinterestinbusinessschools inuniversitiestobeinganimportantconsiderationforeducationalpolicymakersat nationalandsupra-nationallevel.Entrepreneurshipeducationhasspreadacrossthe universityandhasbecomeembeddedinothersubjects,suchasengineeringandthe finearts.Ithasgrownacrosstheeducationalsystemandtodayprogrammescanbe found in elementary and high schools in many countries. Entrepreneurship edu- cation has also spread, from being an almost uniquely North American phe- nomenon, to being of critical interest to European nations and has become important within the educational policy agenda of many. For example, it has been growingrapidlyasasubjectofconcernacrosstheChinesetertiarysector.Todayin theUnitedStatesuniversitiesareevenbuildingsignificantinfrastructuretosupport activity at a level noticeable to the New York Times which claimed that, “Where oncethecampusamenitiesarmsracewaswagedoverluxurydormsandrecreation facilities, now colleges and universities are building deluxe structures for the generation of wonderful ideas. They and their partners in industry are pouring millions into new buildings for business, engineering and applied learning that closely resemble the high-tech workplace, itself inspired by the minimally parti- tioned spaces of the garage and the factory” (NYT 08/07/2016). The skills agenda in entrepreneurship is a unique and significant phenomenon that has gained con- siderable momentum. The trend towards promoting entrepreneurial training and development within educational systems would appear to be driven by conse- quential changes to the nature of work and employment. Many countries now recognise the need to promote and support self-employment, small business man- agement and technology innovation and have developed policy to encourage education in these careers. Consequently, this book by Daniele Morselli is timely. The book begins by highlighting the development of the entrepreneurial skills agenda with a specific focus on the European context. In the first chapter, the author explains the skills agenda in Europe and highlights the European perspective on ‘enterprise skills’. Identified within these skills are the current competences recognised by the v vi Foreword European Union as contributing to the development of an ‘enterprising mindset’. Heexplainsthesecompetencesandthenprogressestodiscusshowthisperspective of entrepreneurship educationfitsin tothe prevailing research on entrepreneurship education. In the next chapter, he focuses more on how to assess enterprise and entrepreneurship competencies within educational contexts. He provides some examplesonassessinginitiative,particularlywithinthevocationaltrainingcontext, andconsiders theliterature on theassessment of entrepreneurship education.From this base, he introduces the Change Laboratory, which looks in depth at Cultural Historical Activity Theory and how this approach facilities expansive learning. He argues that that learning theory needs to drive our underlying frameworks for research in entrepreneurship education and presents in an effective way this theo- retical construct as a basis for a deeper understanding about learning through experience. He, in subsequent chapters, moves to introduce his research using the Change Laboratory as an approach to explore enterprise skills education in voca- tional traininginschoolswith aparticularfocusonsurveying.Remainingchapters inthebookpresenttheoutcomesofhisresearchexploringachangeprojectthrough the eyes of teachers, students and other participants and explaining the validation of the work and reflecting on the process as a researcher. The final chapter in the book provides a deep appreciation of how enterprise skills can be developed through the Change Laboratory method and explains the challenges and opportu- nities encountered when implementing the method, as well as, explaining the training outcomes for students. This book provides an excellent read for any educator in entrepreneurship educationanditshouldbeofparticularinteresttoeducatorsandresearchersstudying entrepreneurshipeducationinschools.TheconceptoftheChangeLaboratoryandthe methodofCulturalHistoricalActivityTheoryshouldbeofinteresttoresearchersin entrepreneurshipeducationmoregenerally,evenwherethefocusoftheirworkisthe tertiary sector. His work is insightful into many areas and provides a good basis to explore the European agenda in entrepreneurship education. It allows for a better understandingoftheskillsagendaandthecompetenciesthathavebeendevelopedby the European Union to guide educators in the development of programmes and associated funding requests. The particular research topic provides much depth focused on how to engage schools in real change projects while also allowing the researchertoconductresearch.Inmyview,therefore,thisbookhasmuchtoofferthe reader interested in the topic of entrepreneurship education. Athens (OH) Dr. Luke Pittaway Copeland Professor of Entrepreneurship, Ohio University USASBE Entrepreneurship Educator of 2018 Contents 1 The Research Hypothesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 A New Skills Agenda: A Policy View on Entrepreneurship . . . . . 2 1.2 The Debated Concept of Entrepreneurship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.3 Why the Theory of Expansive Learning for Entrepreneurial Education?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 1.4 The Research Hypothesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2 The Assessment of Entrepreneurial Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 2.1 The Assessment in Competence-Based Education. . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.2 The Assessment of Key Competences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.3 The Assessment of Entrepreneurial Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 2.4 Examples of Best Practices in Entrepreneurial Education . . . . . . . 27 2.4.1 Module on Grant Writing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 2.4.2 Introductory Course in Entrepreneurship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 2.4.3 Course in Social Entrepreneurship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 2.5 The Characteristics of Entrepreneurial Teachers, Assessing the Way They Educate for a Sense of Initiative and Entrepreneurship. The SIE Questionnaire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3 The Change Laboratory in Theory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.1 Expansive Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 3.2 Formative Interventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 3.3 Expansive Learning as Collective Transformative Agency. . . . . . . 46 3.4 Expansive Learning as Concept Formation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 3.5 Preparing a Change Laboratory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 3.6 Designing Tasks to Promote Expansive Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 vii viii Contents 4 The Change Laboratory in Practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 4.1 Historical Contextualisation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 4.1.1 The Field Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 4.2 The Change Laboratory Workshops. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 4.2.1 First Workshop, 23 February 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 4.2.2 Second Workshop, 2 March 2016. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 4.2.3 Third Workshop, 8 March 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 4.2.4 Fourth Workshop, 15 March 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 4.2.5 Fifth Workshop, 22 March 2016. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 4.2.6 Sixth Workshop, 5 April 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 4.2.7 Seven Workshop, 5 April 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 4.2.8 Department Council, 10 May 2016. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 4.3 The Follow-up Workshops . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 4.3.1 First Follow-up, 31 May 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 4.3.2 Department Council, 14 October 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.3.3 Second Follow-up, 22 March 2017. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 5 Participants’ View on the Interdisciplinary Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 5.1 The Methodology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 5.2 The Interdisciplinary Project in the Eyes of the Teachers . . . . . . . 85 5.2.1 What Are the Historical Antecedents?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 5.2.2 What Are the Features? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 5.2.3 What Are the Potentials? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 5.2.4 What Are the Challenges? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 5.3 The Interdisciplinary Project in the Eyes of the Workshop Assistants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 5.3.1 What Are the Features? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 5.3.2 What Are the Potentials? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 5.3.3 What Are the Challenges? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 5.4 The Interdisciplinary Project with the Class a Students’ Eyes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 5.5 The Interdisciplinary Project with the Class B Students’ Eyes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 5.5.1 What Are the Features? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 5.5.2 What Are the Potentials? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 5.5.3 What Are the Challenges? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 6 Reflecting on the Expansive Learning Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 6.1 The Interdisciplinary Project with the Member Checks . . . . . . . . . 112 6.1.1 The Features of the Interdisciplinary Project . . . . . . . . . . . 113 6.1.2 The Potentials of the Interdisciplinary Project . . . . . . . . . . 114 6.1.3 The Challenges of the Interdisciplinary Project . . . . . . . . . 115 Contents ix 6.2 Is the Interdisciplinary Project Implemented According to a Competence-Based Approach? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 6.3 A Comparison Between the Interdisciplinary Project in the Two Classes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 6.4 The Interdisciplinary Project Facing a Tertiary Contradiction . . . . 120 6.5 Old and New Curriculum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 6.5.1 The Old and New Coordination Among Teaching Staff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 6.5.2 Tensions Between the Old and the New Didactics. . . . . . . 123 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 7 Conclusions: Towards Entrepreneurial Education Through the Change Laboratory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 7.1 The Story so Far . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 7.2 Impact of the Change Laboratory Workshops. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 7.3 A Double View of Entrepreneurial Education in the Process and in the Outcome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 7.4 Concluding Remarks. Towards Teacher Training in Entrepreneurship with the Change Laboratory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 Appendix A: The Interdisciplinary Project... .... .... .... ..... .... 139 Appendix B: Results Validation.... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 143
Description: