ebook img

The chalcidoid parasites (Hymenoptera, chalcidoidae) of economically important Liriomyza species (Diptera, agromyzidae) in North America PDF

21 Pages·1991·9.6 MB·
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview The chalcidoid parasites (Hymenoptera, chalcidoidae) of economically important Liriomyza species (Diptera, agromyzidae) in North America

PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 93(3), 1991, pp. 571-591 THE CHALCIDOID PARASITES (HYMENOPTERA, CHALCIDOIDAE) OF ECOMONICALLY IMPORTANT LIRIOMYZA SPECIES (DIPTERA, AGROMYZIDAE) IN NORTH AMERICA John LaSalle* and Michael P. Parrella (JL) Department ofEntomology, University ofCalifornia, Riverside, California 92521: (MP?) Department ofEntomology, University ofCalifornia, Davis, California 95616. v4/75/rac/.—Twenty-four species ofchalcidoid parasites ofthe five economically impor- tant species ofLihomyza in North America are reviewed, plus four species which may A proveto parasitizetheseLiriomyzaspecies. key ispresentedtodistinguishthese species, and each species is discussed, with host and distributional information given. Species names are corrected to reflect currently applied nomenclature, and a complete list ofall names that have been used for these parasites is given, indicating currently recognized names and all other names used for any ofthese species. Key Words: Agromyzidae, Chalcidoidea, Eulophidae, leafminer, Liriomyza, parasite, Pteromalidae Five speciesoiLiriomyza (brassicae, hui- key currently encompasses the entire chal- dobrensis, sativae, trifoliearum, trifolii) are cid fauna ofLiriomyza parasites. The pres- considered to be of economic importance entpapertreatsallspeciesofchalcidoidpar- in North America (Spencer 1973, Parrella asites recorded from of these leafminer 1982). Confusion concerningthe identity of species in North America. An additional these Liriomyza species has been rectified four species, Diglyphus isaea, D. earlylei, by several recent papers (Spencer 1981, Chrysocharis liriomyzae, C. ignota, are in- Spencer and Steyskal 1986, Parrella 1982). cluded in this paper because they are either The purpose ofthe present paper is to ex- very closely related to included species and amine the chalcidoid parasite complex of may be confused with them, or they are these leafminers, present a means for the suspectedtobeparasitesoftheseLiriomyza identification of the parasites, and to up- species or become so in the future. A key is grade the nomenclature ofthe parasites in presented to distinguish these 28 species, light ofseveral recent papers on the system- and each species is discussed in the text, atics ofthese groups. with diagnostic characters, and host and Alargeparasitecomplexisassociatedwith distributional information given. theseleafminers; 24 speciesofChalcidoidea Table 1 gives all names used for the leaf- are now known from North America. Al- miner parasites in the North American lit- though keys to identify many of the indi- eratureand indicates: currentlyvalid names; vidual genera and species are available, no the currently recognized names for species which are no longer consider valid; and all *Current mailing address: Dr. John LaSalle, CAB generic combinations (including the valid International,InstituteofEntomology,56Queen'sGate, one) used for any ofthe specific names. London, SW7 5JR, UNITED KINGDOM. This paper is not intended to be revi- 572 PROCEEDINGS OFTHE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Table 1. List ofall names used for Nearctic Lir- sionary in nature, but rather a means of iomyza parasites. Currently valid names in boldface. identifying known Liriomyza parasites. Genericnamesinparenthesesareothergenericnames Many ofthe genera treated here are badly underwhichaspecieshasbeentreatedintheliterature. in need of work, and there are problems which cannot be resolved without detailed acantha(Walker), Pediobius aenea (Walker), Halticoptera [misidentification ofH. revisionsary studies. It is out of the scope circulus(Walker)] ofthis paperto attempt to solve all ofthese agromyzae (Crawford), Chrysonotomyia (Derostenus) problems, howeverwetrytopointoutprob- = C. pimctivenths (Crawford) [although see discus- lem areas when we are aware ofthem. The sion in text under C. pimctivenths] key, discussions, and generic diagnoses are ainslieiCrawford, Chrysocharis basedon femalesonly, andarenot intended americanumGirault, Zagrammosoma arizonensis (Crawford), Chrysonotomyia (Derostenus) forgeneral use, only forspecies reared from = C. punctiventris(Crawford) Liriomyza. Complete revisions ofthe var- begin!(Ashmead), Diglyphus (Diaulinus, Solenotus) ious genera are referred to in the text and callichromaCrawford, Diaulinopsis thereadercanconsulttheseifthereisdoubt cinctipennis Ashmead, Closterocerus about species identifications. circulus(Walker), Halticoptera crassiscapus(Thomson), Chrysocharis Tables which summarize parasite/L/>/o- diastatae(Howard), Chrysonotmyia (Derostenus) myza interactions have previously been flavipes(Ashmead), Pnigalio presented (Minkenberg and van Lenteren ffloarvmoovisraidi(sWeCsrtawwofoodr)d,, CCihrrryosspoinloutsomyia (Achrysochar- 1986,Johnsonand Hara 1987), andwehave condensedand modifiedthesetablesto em- ella) fullawayi (Crawford), Chrysonotomyia (Derostenus, phasize the chalcidoid fauna associated with Achrysocharella) = C.formosa (Westwood) the five most important Liriomyza species giraultiYoshimoto, Chrysocharis in North America (Table 2). Records for ignota Hansson, Chrysocharis parasites not determined to species are intermedins(Girault), Diglyphus(Solenotus) omitted. Recent reviews o{Liriomyza con- isaea(Walker), Diglyphus lineaticeps (Girault), Zagrammosoma (Mirzagram- tainmorecompletelistsofreferencestopar- mosoma) asite biology, behavior, and effectiveness liriomyzaeDelucchi, Chrysocharis (Parrella and Robb 1985, Minkenberg and mallochi Gahan, Chrysocharis = C. crassiscapus van Lenteren 1986). (Thomson) mirum Girault, Zagrammosoma multilineatum (Ashmead), Zagrammosoma Parasites oscinidis Ashmead, Chrysocharis parksiCarwford,Chrysocharis=C.oscinidisAshmead The Chalcidoidea contains 24 species of patellana(Dalman),Halticoptera [misidentificationof known parasites ofthe 5 economically im- H. circuhis(Walker)] portant Liriomyza species in the Nearctic petiolata (Girault), Chrysocharis = C. girauhi Yoshi- region. Thesearepredominantlyinthefam- moto ily Eulophidae, with a single Pteromalidae, pictipes(Crawford), Chrysonotomyia(Derostenus) Halticoptera circulus(Walker). The euloph- pulchripes(Crawford), Diglyphus (Solenotus) punctiventris (Crawford), Chrysonotomyia (Derosten- id parasites o{Liriomyzaare in the subfam- us. Achrysocharella) ilies Entedoninae and Eulophinae (tribes rugosithorax Crawford, Pediobius (Pleurotropis) = P. Eulophini and Elachertini). Oatman and acantha(Walker) Kennedy (1976) list a Tetrastichus sp. (Tet- trifasciatus Westwood, Closterocerus rastichinae), however they do not supply a utahensisCrawford, Closterocerus variipes (Crawford), Chrysonotomyia (Derostenus. species name for this parasite. Achrysocharella) = C.formosa (Westwood) General host associations and distribu- viridis Provancher, Chrysocharis = C. oscinidis Ash- tion are given for all parasites. This infor- mead mation is taken from catalogues of North websteri(Crawford), Diglyphus (Solenotus) American Chalcidoidea (Peck 1963), North m VOLUME 93, NUMBER 3 573 Table 2. Host associations between Nearctic Liriomyza species and their parasites condensed from Min- kenberg& van Lentem (1986) and Johnson & Hara (1987). brassicae hiudobrcnsis tnfoliearuin Diglyphusbegini + + + Diglyphus intermedins + + Diglyphuspulchripes Diglyphus websteri Pnigalioflavipes Chrysocharisainsliei + + Chrysocharisgiraulti Chrysochariscrassiscapus + Chrysocharisoscinidis + + Chrysonotomyia diastatae Chrysonotomyiaformosa Chrysonotomyiapictipes ?* Chrysonotomyiapunctiventris + + + Closteroceruscinctipennis Closterocerustrifasciatus Closterocerus utahensis Pediobiusacantha Zagrammasoma americanu Zagrammasoma lineaticeps Zagrammasoma mirum Zagrammasoma multilineatum Cirrospilusflavoviridis Diaulinopsiscallichroma + Halticoptera circulus + + + "Oatman&Platner(1969)recordedthespeciesDerostenuspunctipesCrawford.Thereisnosuchspeciesname and it may have been that they meant to referto this species. American Hymenoptera (Burks 1979a, b) l'- Tarsi 4-segmented. Antennawith 2^ fumc- and.r.ev.isions ofthe various genera (which "i^"" segments. (Euiophidae) .... l arehsted undJereac,hgenus)X,andJ .t.huesework1s 2. Scutellumwith2setae(1 pair)(Figs.4-5,21- ,2). Submargmai vein with 2 dorsal setae shouldbechecked ifmorecompleterecords (pjg^ 6_8 \i_i2). (Entedoninae) 3 are desired. Complete synonymy lists are 2'. Scuteiiumwithatleast4setae(2pairs)(Figs. not given for the genera and species ofpar- 42^3). Submarginal vein with more than 2 asites, although all names used in the lit- do^-^^l ^^^^^ (^'g^- ^-^^^ 13-18). (Euioph- erature on LJi.n.omyza parasi-t^es are given in inae) 15 3 p^^p^^eumwithcompleteparallelplicae,and thetextandinTable 1. Completesynonymy ^^^mediancarinawhichdivergeposteriorly lists can be found in the above mentioned (Fig. i). (genus Pediobius) cataloguesandunderthevariousgenericre- Pediobiusacantha (Walker) 3'. Propodeumwithoutplicae;mediancarina(if Visions. present) not posteriorlybifurcate (Figs. 2-3, 25-28) 4 Key TO Species of 4. Forewingwith2or3distinct,althoughsome- Liriomyza Parasites ^'"^^^ *'^'"^' transverse bands (Fig^ 6). Scape Based on Females at least slightly flattened and produced ven- trally (Figs. 29, 30). Funicle usually slightly Tarsi 5-segmented.Antennawith 6 funicular to distinctly flattened (Fig. 30). (genus Clos- segments. (Pteromalidae). Notaulicomplete. terocerus) 5 Petioledistinct,althoughmaybesmall. Male 4'. Forewing without dark bands, at most with withmaxillarypalpienlarged, yellow, (genus a single slightly darkened area beneath stig- Halticoptera) ....Halticoptera circulus(Walker) mal vein. Scape and funicle not flattened . . 7 574 PROCEEDINGS OFTHE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OFWASHINGTON Scapewidestsubapically, narrowingtoapex; 26). Dorsellum (Fig. 26) slightly wider and funicle and pedicel not or only very slightly shorter than that seen in following species flattened (Fig. 29). Mesonotum green (Figs. 27-28) . . ChrysocharisgirauhiYoshimoto ClosteroceniscinctipennisAshmead 13'. Petiole 1.0-1.5 timeslongerthan wide(Figs. Scapewidestatapex;funicleandpediceldef- 27-28). Dorsellum somewhat narrower and initelyflattened(Fig. 30). Entirebodypurple longerthan in C. girauhi 14 to bluish 6 14. Eyes comparatively larger (Fig. 23). Petiole Propodeumdistinctlysculptured,withatleast 1.0-1.5X longer than wide (Fig. 27). Post- some raised, reticulate sculpture medial to marginal vein about 2x longerthan stigmal spiracle (Fig. 2) vein(Fig. 11). Hindfemoraalwayscomplete- ClosterocerustrifasciatusWestwood ly pale yellow . . ChrysocharisoscinidisAshmead Propodeum smooth over entire surface, or 14'. Eyescomparativelysmaller(Fig. 24). Petiole with only very faint sculpturing(Fig. 3) . . . aboutaslongaswide(Fig. 28). Postmarginal Closterocerus utahensisAshmead vein often less than 2x longer than stigmal Postmarginal vein shorter than the stigmal vein (Fig. 12). Hind femora usually dark, vein(Figs. 7, 8). Eyesnotemarginate. Meta- rarely completely pale yellow somawithoutdistinctpetiole(Figs.4, 5).(ge- ChrysocharisainslieiCrawford nus Chrysonotomyia) 8 15. Notauliincomplete,iftraceabletohindmar- Postmarginal vein definitely longer (at least gin ofmesoscutum then they are indistinct 1.5 times) than stigmal vein (Figs. 11, 12). and shallow posteriorly (Fig. 43). (Euloph- Eyes usually more or less emarginate (Figs. ini) 16 23,24).Petiolepresentanddistinct(Figs.25- 15'. Notaulicompleteanddistinct,clearlyreach- 28). (genus Chrysocharis) 10 ingeitherhindmarginofmesoscutumorax- Forewingsmoothlyroundedapically;slightly illae (Figs. 40-42). (Elachertini) 21 more than 2x longerthan wide (Fig. 7) . . , 16. Antennawith 2 funicularsegments(Fig. 31). Chrysonotomyiapictipes(Crawford) (genus Diglyphus) 17 Forewingsomewhattruncateapically;slight- 16'. Antennawith 4 funicularsegments(Fig. 32). ly less than 2x longerthan wide (Fig. 8). . . 9 (genus Pnigalio) . . .Pnigalioflavipes(Ashmead) Dorsum ofmesosoma with uniform, reticu- 17. Fore wingdensely setose, the basal cell uni- late, distinctly raised sculpture(Fig. 4). Scu- formly,denselysetose(Fig. 13). Stigmalvein tellum uniformly colored and postmarginal vein subequal in length. Chrysonotomyiaformosa(Westwood) Antennal scape alwaysdark 18 Dorsum ofthorax with at least parts ofthe 17'. Fore wing not so setose, the basal cell not scutellum smooth, or with engraved sculp- uniformlysetose, withat leastsomeareasof ture, orwith veryweak raised sculpture, but sparser setation (Figs. 14-16). Stigmal vein in some way differing from strong, uniform, usually shorter than postmarginal vein. An- raised reticulations (Fig. 5). Scutellum with tennalscapeeitherentirelydark,orwithbas- twodistinctcolors, purpletoblueanteriorly, al portion white 19 metallicgreen posteriorly 18. Basal 0.25-0.35 ofhind tibia with dark me- Chrysonotomyiadiastatae(Howard) talliccoloration, some dusky coloration dis- Chrysonotomyiapunctiventris(Crawford) tally (Fig. 33) Diglyphusintermedins(Girault) . . Occiputwithacompletesharp,raisedcarina, 18'. Atleast0.75 ofhindtibiawithdarkmetallic which extendsthe entire width ofthe vertex coloration;colorationnotfadingdistally(Fig. (Fig. 19) .... Chrysocharis liriomyzaeDt\ucc\\\ 34) Diglyphus isaea (Walker) 10' Occiput either without carina, or with a ca- 19. Basalportionofhindtibiawithdark,metallic rina which is only present medially (Fig. ring less than 0.25 the length oftibia (some 20) II dusky coloration may be present past this II. Longitudinal median groove present in pos- basalring)(Figs. 35-36).Antennalscapeuni- teriorpart ofmesoscutum and anterior part formly dark Diglyphus begini(Ashmead) ofscutellum (Fig. 21) Diglyphuscarlylei(Girault) Chrysochariscrassiscapus(Thomson) 19'. Basalportionofhindtibiawithdark,metallic II' Mesoscutum and scutellum without median ringatleast0.50the lengthoftibia(Fig. 37). longitudinal grooves (Fig. 22) 12 Antennal scape white basally 20 12. Petiole more than 2 times longer than wide 20. Postmarginal vein always distinctly longer (Fig. 25) Chrysocharis ignota Hansson than stigmal vein (Fig. 15) 12' Petiole less than 2 times longer than wide Diglyphus websteri(Crawford) (Figs. 26-28) 13 20'. Postmarginalveinatmostslightlylongerthan 13. Petiole 1.5-1.8 times longer than wide (Fig. stigmalvein,usuallyshorterthanstigmalvein; .. VOLUME 93, NUMBER 3 575 stigmal vein somewhat swollen (Fig. 16) . nusChrysocharisrevisedbyHansson(1987), Diglyphuspulchripes(Crawford) who provideda keyto species, and hostand 21. Notauli curving to meet axillae, well sepa- distribution information. A separate paper rated from posterior margin ofmesoscutum (Fig.40). Headvaultedabovecompoundeyes (Hansson 1985) treats Palaearctic members (Fig. 38). (genus Zagrammosoma) 22 of this genus. Species of Chrysocharis are, 21'. Notauli straight,extendingtoposteriormar- witha fewexceptions, primary, solitary, en- gin of mesoscutum (Fig. 41). Head not so doparasites oflarvae and pupae ofleafmin- vaulted, notextendingdistinctly higherthan ing insects. Most are polyphagous, with an compound eyes (Fig. 39) 25 22. Metasomaentirely black (Fig. 44) 23 extremely wide host range. For complete 22'. Metasomayellow,althoughwithblackmark- host and distribution lists, see Hansson ings (Figs. 45^6) 24 (1987), Burks (1979b), Peck (1963). 23. Mesosoma dorsally with wide, median yel- lowstripe(Fig. 44). Forewing(inaddition to other markings) without a dark stripe along Chrysocharis ainsliei Crawford apical margin (Fig. 10) (Figs. 12, 24, 28) Zagrammosoma mirum Girault 23'. Mesosomadorsally black(may have narrow This species and C. oscinidis (= parksi, yellow stripe laterally on pronotum). Fore- wing (in addition to other markings) with a viridis) are distinguished from the other dark stripe along apical margin in posterior Chrysocharis species because they lack the half(Fig. 9) distinct, completecarina on the vertex, lack Zagrammosoma lineaticeps(Girault) thelongitudinal, mediangroovesontheme- 24. Anterior margin of mesoscutum with dark soscutum and scutellum, have the petiole tfroarnmsivnegrsaespsottri(pseomtehtatimeissceonnlcaeragleeddlbaetneeraaltlhy 1.0-1.5 timeslongerthanwide,andthedor- posterior margin ofpronotum) (Fig. 45) sellum slightlylongerandnarrowerthanthat . . C .... Zagrammosoma multilineatum (Ashmead) seen in girauhi. This species is variable, 24'. Anterior margin of mesoscutum without anddifficulttodistinguishfrom C oscinidis. transverse stripe (Fig. 46) Chrysocharis oscinidis has completely pale Zagrammosoma americanumGirault 25. Postmarginal vein much longer (nearly 2x) hind femora, and ainsliei has previously than stigmal vein (Fig. 17). (genus Diauli- been separated from oscinidis as it has dark nopsis). Thorax entirely metallicgreen .... hind femora. However, Hansson (1987) has Diaulinopsis callichromaCrawford shown that this character is variable, and 25'. Postmarginalveinaboutaslongasorshorter specimens o{ainslieiwith pale hind femora than stigmal vein (Fig. 18). (genus Cirrospi- lus).Thoraxmetallicgreenwithyellowmark- are known. Apparently the only valid char- ings CirrospilusflavoviridisCrawford acters for separating these two species are thosegivenby Hansson(1987)andrepeated in the key in this paper: the eyes are some- Family Eulophidae what larger in oscinidis than in ainsliei; the Subfamily Entedoninae petiole in ainsliei is about as long as wide, Genus Chrysocharis Forster in oscinidis it ranges from 1.0-1.5 x as long (Figs. 11-12, 19-28) as wide; the postmarginal vein in ainsliei is often less than 2x longer than the stigmal Diagnosis.—Scutellum with 2 setae (1 vein, in oscinidis it is always about 2x lon- pair); submarginal vein with 2 dorsal setae; ger than the stigmal vein. propodeum without plicae; wings hyaline; Distribution.—Widely distributed and postmarginal vein distinctly longer than common throughout the Nearctic region. stigmal vein; petiole present and distinct, Alsoknown fromCuba, Guam, Hawaii,and usually at least as longas wide; eyes usually Europe. — slightly emarginate. Hosts. Larval-pupal parasite of leaf- Discussion.—Nearctic species of the ge- mining Agromyzidae. 576 PROCEEDINGS OFTHE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OFWASHINGTON - lU ^1^ VOLUME NUMBER 93, 3 577 Plate 2. (Figs. 6-10). Female forewings. 6. Closterocerus utahensis. 1. Chrysonotomyiapictipes. 8. Chryso- notomyiadiastatae. 9. Zagranimosoma lineaticeps. 10. Zagrammosoma mirum. Scale bars = 0.3 mm. pmv = postmarginal vein; smv = submarginal vein; sv = sligmal vein. 578 PROCEEDINGS OFTHE ENTOMOLOGICALSOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Plate 3. (Figs. 1 1-18). Female forewing ventation. 11. Chrysocharisoscinidis. 12. Chrysochahsainsliei. 13. Diglyphus intermedius. 14. Diglyphusbegini. 15. Diglyphus websteri. 16. Diglyphyspulchripes. 17. Diaulinopsis callichroma. 18. Cirrospilusflavoviridis. Scale bars = 0.3 mm. be = basal cell; mv = marginal vein; pmv = postmarginal vein; smv = submarginal vein; sv = stigmal vein. Chrysocharis giraulti Yoshimoto the other Chrysocharis species because it (Fig. 26) lacks the distinct, complete carina on the vertex,lackthelongitudinal,mediangrooves C This species has also been treated as on the mesoscutum and scutellum, the pet- petiolata Girault. It is distinguished from iole is 1.5-1.8 times longer than wide, and VOLUME 93, NUMBER 3 579 ^H S80 PROCEEDINGS OFTHE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON C Plate 5. (Figs. 25-28). Chrysocharis spp., 2, petioles. 25. C. ignota. 26. C. giraulti. 27. oscinidis. 28. C. ainsliei. Scale bars = 0.1 mm. ds = dorsellum; pr = propodeum; pt = petiole. distinct, completecarinaonthe vertex, lacks from the other Chrysocharis species by the thelongitudinal, mediangroovesontheme- strong, sharp, complete occipital carina soscutum and scutellum, and the petiole is which extends from the vertex all the way at least 2.0 times longer than wide. This onto the gena (Fig. 19). This species was species was recently described by Hansson introduced into North American as a par- (1987) who, recorded it from Liriomyza sp. asite o{Agromyzafrontella (Rondani), with mining herbs. It is included, even though subsequentestablishment (Hendrickson and the exact host species of Liriomyza is yet Barth 1979, as C. punctifacies). This is the unknown. only known Nearctic host, although it is Distribution.—USA, Canada. Also Cen- known to attack Liriomyza species includ- tral America and northern South America. ingL. trifolii) in Europe(BoucekandAskew Hosts.—From Liriomyza sp. on herbs. 1968), and it is likely that it will attack Lir- iomyza in North America. Chrysocharis liriomvzae Delucchi — Distribution. Palearctic; introduced into (Fig. 19) eastern United States, with subsequent re- This species has also been treated as C. covery (Hendrickson and Barth 1979, as C. punctifacies Delucchi. It is distinguished punctifacies).

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.