P1: JzG 0521826179pre CB969/Vangelisti 0 521 82617 9 March 14, 2006 15 :18 The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relation- versity of Texas at Austin. Her work focuses ships serves as a benchmark of the current state of on the associations between communication and scholarship in this dynamic field, synthesizing the emotion in the context of close, personal rela- extant theoretical and empirical literature, trac- tionships. She has published numerous arti- ing its historical roots, and making recommenda- cles and chapters and has edited several books. tions for future directions. The volume addresses Vangelisti has served on the editorial boards a broad range of established and emerging topics, of over a dozen scholarly journals and has including theoretical and methodological issues received recognition for her research from the that influence the study of personal relationships; National Communication Association and the research and theory on relationship development; International Society for the Study of Personal the nature and functions of personal relation- Relationships. ships across the life span; individual differences and their influences on relationships; relationship Daniel Perlman is an academic psychologist processes such as cognition, emotion, and com- with broad, applied interests that cut across munication; relational qualities such as satisfac- social, developmental, and clinical psychology tion and commitment; environmental influences as focused on the study of close relationships. on personal relationships; and maintenance and He is a professor of Family Studies and also repair of relationships. The authors are experts teaches in the Department of Psychology at the from a variety of disciplines, including several University of British Columbia. He was presi- subfields of psychology, communication, family dent of the International Society for the Study studies, and sociology, who have made major con- of Personal Relationships and the Canadian Psy- tributions to the understanding of relationships. chological Association. He has authored more than 50 articles, edited or authored 15 books, Anita L. Vangelisti is a professor in the Depart- and been the editor or associate editor for four ment of Communication Studies at the Uni- journals. i P1: JzG 0521826179pre CB969/Vangelisti 0 521 82617 9 March 14, 2006 15 :18 ii P1: JzG 0521826179pre CB969/Vangelisti 0 521 82617 9 March 14, 2006 15 :18 The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships Edited by Anita L. Vangelisti and Daniel Perlman iii P1: JzG 0521826179pre CB969/Vangelisti 0 521 82617 9 March 14, 2006 15 :18 cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sa˜o Paulo Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, usa www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521826174 ⃝c Cambridge University Press 2006 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2006 Printed in the United States of America A catalog record for this publication is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships / edited by Anita L. Vangelisti, Daniel Perlman. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn-13 : 978-0-521-82617-4 (hardcover) isbn-10: 0-521-82617-9 (hardcover) isbn-13 : 978-0-521-53359-1 (pbk.) isbn-10: 0-521-53359-7 (pbk.) 1. Interpersonal relations – Handbooks, manuals, etc. 2 . Interpersonal communication – Handbooks, manuals, etc. 3 . Social psychology – Handbooks, manuals, etc. I. Vangelisti, Anita L. II. Perlman, Daniel. isbn-13 978-0-521-82617-4 hardback isbn-10 0-521-82617-9 hardback isbn-13 978-0-521-53359-1 paperback isbn-10 0-521-53359-7 paperback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of urls for external or third-party Internet Web sites referred to in this publication and does not guarantee that any content on such Web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. P1: JzG 0521826179pre CB969/Vangelisti 0 521 82617 9 March 14, 2006 15 :18 Contents Preface page ix 4. Research Methods for the Study Ellen Berscheid of Personal Relationships 51 Mahnaz Charania Contributors xvii William J. Ickes p a r t i 5. Advances in Data Analytic INTRODUCTION Approaches for Relationships Research: The Broad Utility 1. Personal Relationships: An of Hierarchical Linear Introduction 3 Modeling 73 Daniel Perlman Deborah A. Kashy Anita L. Vangelisti Lorne Campbell David W. Harris p a r t ii 6. Relationship Typologies 91 FOUNDATIONS FOR STUDYING C. Arthur VanLear RELATIONSHIPS Ascan Koerner 2 . The Seven Seas of the Study of Donna M. Allen Personal Relationships: From “The Thousand Islands” to p a r t iii Interconnected Waterways 11 DEVELOPMENT OF Daniel Perlman RELATIONSHIPS Steve Duck 7. From Courtship to Universal 3. Theoretical Perspectives in the Properties: Research on Dating Study of Close Relationships 35 and Mate Selection, 1950 to 2003 113 John H. Harvey Catherine A. Surra Amy Wenzel Christine R. Gray v P1: JzG 0521826179pre CB969/Vangelisti 0 521 82617 9 March 14, 2006 15 :18 vi contents Tyfany M. J. Boettcher 16. The Intimate Same-Sex Nathan R. Cottle Relationships of Sexual Adam R. West Minorities 293 8. The Affective Structure of Lisa M. Diamond Marriage 131 17. Family Relationships and John P. Caughlin Depression 313 Ted L. Huston Deborah J. Jones Steven R. H. Beach 9. Divorce and Postdivorce Frank D. Fincham Relationships 157 Marilyn Coleman Lawrence Ganong p a r t vi Kim Leon BASIC PROCESSES 18. Communication: Basic p a r t iv Properties and Their RELATIONSHIPS ACROSS THE Relevance to Relationship LIFE SPAN Research 331 Alan L. Sillars 10. Relationships in Early and Anita L. Vangelisti Middle Childhood 177 Willard W. Hartup 19. Social Cognition in Intimate Relationships 353 11. Personal Relationships in Garth J. O. Fletcher Adolescence and Early Nickola C. Overall Adulthood 191 Myron D. Friesen W. Andrew Collins Stephanie D. Madsen 2 0. Emotion in Theories of Close Relationships 369 12 . Close Relationships in Middle Sally Planalp and Late Adulthood 211 Julie Fitness Rosemary Blieszner Beverley Fehr 2 1. Physiology and Interpersonal p a r t v Relationships 385 INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Timothy J. Loving Kathi L. Heffner 13. Personality and Relationships: A Janice K. Kiecolt-Glaser Temperament Perspective 231 Jeffry A. Simpson p a r t vii Heike A. Winterheld Jennie Y. Chen INTERACTIVE PROCESSES 14. Attachment Theory, 2 2 . Self-Disclosure in Personal Individual Psychodynamics, Relationships 409 and Relationship Kathryn Greene Functioning 251 Valerian J. Derlega Phillip R. Shaver Alicia Mathews Mario Mikulincer 2 3. Close Relationships and Social 15. “His” and “Her” Relationships? A Support: Implications for Review of the Empirical the Measurement of Social Evidence 273 Support 429 Emily A. Impett Barbara R. Sarason Letitia Anne Peplau Irwin G. Sarason P1: JzG 0521826179pre CB969/Vangelisti 0 521 82617 9 March 14, 2006 15 :18 contents vii 2 4. Understanding Couple Conflict 445 34. Intimacy in Personal Relationships 637 Galena H. Kline Nicole D. Pleasant Jean-Philippe Laurenceau Sarah W. Whitton Brighid M. Kleinman Howard J. Markman p a r t x 2 5. Sexuality in Close Relationships 463 CONTEXT Susan Sprecher F. Scott Christopher 35. Social Networks and Personal Rodney Cate Communities 657 Graham Allan p a r t viii THREATS TO RELATIONSHIPS 36. Relationships in Home and Community Environments: A 26. Loneliness and Social Isolation 485 Transactional and Dialectic Jenny de Jong Gierveld Analysis 673 Theo van Tilburg Barbara B. Brown Pearl A. Dykstra Carol M. Werner 2 7. Stress in Couples: The Process of Irwin Altman Dyadic Coping 501 37. Relationships, Culture, and Carolyn E. Cutrona Social Change 695 Kelli A. Gardner Robin Goodwin 2 8. Lying and Deception in Close Urmila Pillay Relationships 517 38. Personal Relationships: On and Mark L. Knapp Off the Internet 709 2 9. Temptations and Threat: Jeffrey Boase Extradyadic Relations and Barry Wellman Jealousy 533 Abraham P. Buunk p a r t xi Pieternel Dijkstra MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF 30. Violence and Abuse in Personal RELATIONSHIPS Relationships: Conflict, Terror, 39. Maintaining Relationships 727 and Resistance in Intimate Daniel J. Canary Partnerships 557 Marianne Dainton Michael P. Johnson 40. The Treatment of Relationship p a r t ix Distress: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Findings 745 RELATIONAL QUALITIES Donald H. Baucom 31. Relationship Satisfaction 579 Norman B. Epstein Frank D. Fincham Susan Stanton Steven R. H. Beach p a r t xii 32 . Romantic Love 595 CONCLUSION Arthur Aron Helen E. Fisher 41. Bringing It All Together: A Greg Strong Theoretical Approach 769 33. Commitment 615 Patricia Noller Caryl E. Rusbult Michael K. Coolsen Author Index 791 Jeffrey L. Kirchner Jennifer A. Clarke Subject Index 828 P1: JzG 0521826179pre CB969/Vangelisti 0 521 82617 9 March 14, 2006 15 :18 viii P1: JzG 0521826179pre CB969/Vangelisti 0 521 82617 9 March 14, 2006 15 :18 Preface For volumes that review the present state tionships was in doubt. As a consequence, of knowledge in dynamic, rapidly evolv- and to be on the safe side, many of us ing fields, the label handbook seems only adopted the convention of referring to the marginally appropriate. When one thinks of relationship field as “emerging,” a practice a handbook, one visualizes a person hold- noted with exasperation in the late 1980s ing a plumbing manual in one hand and a by Steve Duck, the editor of the first rela- wrench in the other and, after the leaky pipe tionship handbook, the Handbook of Per- has been fixed, putting the manual away for sonal Relationships (1988). In his introduc- use another day, confident that the princi- tory remarks, Duck took a deep breath ples of plumbing will not change substan- and dared to declare that the field had tially from one year to the next or even emerged, putting its birth about 10 years very much from one decade to the next. earlier, in the late 1970s. A second edition Relationship science, in contrast, is a large of that first handbook appeared 10 years and still loosely organized field that con- later (Duck, 1997) and only 3 years after tinues to expand rapidly in all directions, that a relationship “sourcebook” edited by its momentum fueled partly by the internal Clyde and Susan Hendrick (2000) was pub- combustion provided by the theorists and lished. In between and since, several edited researchers who form the core of the field topical “mini-handbooks” have been pub- and partly by scholars in other fields who rec- lished, each devoted to a subject of special ognize the relevance of relationship theory interest to relationship researchers, as Dan and research to their own problems. Rela- Perlman and Duck note in their historical tionship science is, in short, a nova in the review chapter in this book. heavens of the social, behavioral, and bio- The continuing high volume of activity logical sciences. in the relationship field places a heavy bur- Not so long ago, the future of a field den on relationship scholars. There is too devoted to understanding interpersonal rela- much to learn, and far too little time in ix P1: JzG 0521826179pre CB969/Vangelisti 0 521 82617 9 March 14, 2006 15 :18 x preface which to learn it, for most of us to feel that be omitted from their report because they we have anything but a tenuous grasp of promise to be a waste of time or, of course, the breadth and depth of the field or more that some researchers invest their resources than a dim appreciation of its current trajec- more wisely than others. Histories of disci- tory. There are too many books, too many plines, in fact, are simply accounts of schol- journal articles, and too many conferences, ars’ bets that paid off. Lost wagers are rarely preconferences, and workshops for anyone mentioned. to take in. Hence the need for volumes It is to the prediction of profitable future that periodically, comprehensively, and con- activities that I address the remainder of cisely describe current activities in the field – these prefatory remarks because, like it or handbooks, in other words, or perhaps more not, all scholars must be gamblers. To decide accurately, status reports – to help us fend where to invest their time, energy, and other off the feelings of defeat that precede retreat resources, they must make predictions about into more settled areas of inquiry. the kinds of theoretical, research, and service activities that are the surest bets to advance the field. This kind of gambling is a high- stakes activity, both for the individual and A Book of Bets for the field, which perhaps is why so many scholarly conferences devote at least one ses- In addition to surveying present activities sion to “future directions” or some variant on in areas of interest to relationship schol- that theme and so many journals periodically ars, many handbook contributors briefly publish “forecast” articles and issues. describe the history of the area and some also attempt to predict its future. Histori- cal remarks are useful to newcomers to the field who, entering the relationship movie The Wild Cards midstream, often wonder how the relation- ship field got to where it is (and why it took Making accurate predictions about a field’s so long to get here). Forecasts of profitable future, especially predictions about the spe- future activities are especially useful to new cific research paths that will yield a sig- recruits, many of whom are in the process of nificant payoff, is extraordinarily difficult. deciding where they might most profitably It is hazardous, in fact. My thesis here is invest their scholarly efforts. A “bookmaker’s that the wild cards that so often trump the book of bets” is, in fact, a secondary defini- most carefully considered forecasts are dealt tion of the word handbook (Webster’s Col- by powerful, pervasive, and slow-moving legiate Dictionary, 10th ed., p. 526). Indeed, macroforces. Because these forces intensify and apart from the explicit predictions of so gradually (think of a hand in a bucket of future activity that some handbook con- water in which the temperature is slowly tributors make, their descriptions of cur- and imperceptibly increased to the boiling rent activities in a specific problem area can point), they are hard to identify even as they be viewed as surveys of the bets individual are exerting their massive and inexorable researchers are currently making – where, in influence on scholars’ activities. I illustrate other words, one’s colleagues are gambling the point by describing some of the macro- their professional and personal resources in forces that, I now see in retrospect, were the expectation that their investments will beginning to gather strength when I became pay off by advancing relationship knowl- involved in relationship research more than edge. It perhaps does not need saying that half a century ago. in performing the triage necessary for a con- The seeds of at least three macroforces cise report, some surveyors are better than that would influence all of the social and others in identifying which current activi- behavioral sciences were beginning to ger- ties are likely to be rewarding and which can minate when, as an undergraduate English