The Business of Winemaking The Business of Winemaking Jeffrey L. Lamy The Business of Winemaking Text copyright © 2015 Jeffrey L. Lamy Wine Appreciation Guild an imprint of Board and Bench Publishing www.boardandbench.com No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Editor: Judith Chien Book design: TIPS Technical Publishing, Inc. Cover design: Tressa Pack Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lamy, Jeffrey L. The business of winemaking / Jeffrey L. Lamy. 1 online resource. Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed. ISBN 978-1-935879-64-0 (pdf)—ISBN 978-1-935879- 56-5 (epub)—ISBN 978-1-935879-65-7 (hardback) 1. Wine and wine making—Economic aspects. 2. Wineries— Management. 3. Viticulture. 4. Wine industry. I. Title. HD9370.5 338.4’76632—dc23 2015020827 Although all reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of this book, neither the author nor the publisher can accept liability for any consequences arising from the information contained herein or from use thereof. Printed and bound in the U.S.A. Contents List of Figures vii List of Tables xi 1. Are you ready for the challenge?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2. A supportive marketplace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3. Importance of the grape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4. The solar factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 5. Managing the vineyard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 6. Vineyard financial analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 7. Alternative fruits and products. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 8. Winemaking and pivotal role of the winemaker . . . . . . . . . . . . .121 9. Aptitudes for winemaking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .187 10. Does the wine sell itself? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .193 11. Recordkeeping and accounting in a regulated industry . . . . . . . 225 12. Winery equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 13. Winery building. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263 14. Winery revenues and expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283 15. Considerations relating to value in an acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . 303 16. Minimum economic size. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 309 17. Where do you get the money? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323 18. Management, and expertise of the owner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331 19. A case study: Grand Eagle Estate Winery management meeting. . 335 Appendixes A. Economic setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339 B. Wage rates and power costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343 C. Procedures for titration of total acidity using a pH meter . . . . . . 345 In Memoriam: Jeffery L. Lamy 1938–2014 349 Index 351 v List of Figures Figure 1 Wine Consumption in America, 2000–2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 Figure 2 explosive growth of Winery Licensees National Total, 1995–2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Figure 3 Number of Wineries 1975, 1995, 2005, 2010 and 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Figure 4 California Winegrape Crush 2000 –2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Figure 5 Wine Cost and Price Trends, Consumer Price and Producer indices . . . . . . . . . . .16 Figure 6 Alternative Ways To Analyze Solar radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Figure 7 Solar radiation Vectors on South-facing Slope at Noon, Available to Site and impacting Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Figure 8 Available Direct Solar radiation Vectors impacting Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Figure 9 Solar radiation Components Striking Bare ground, 16-hour day . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Figure 10 radiation Striking Bare ground . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Figure 11 effect Of Slope inclination, Sum of Direct Solar radiation Vectors . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Figure 12 Annual Degree-Days, Forest grove, Aurora, and Medford, Oregon . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Figure 13 Oregon’s New Vineyard Plantings in 2005–2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37 Figure 14 Washington’s New Vineyard Plantings in 2006–2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Figure 15 Vine Spacing and Headlands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44 Figure 16 Optimum Spray Track for 30-foot Headlands and 9-foot Aisles . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Figure 17 Sub-Block Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45 Figure 18 Marking Sub-Block Corners on a Constant elevation Plane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Figure 19 Planting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49 Figure 20 Planting by Shovel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49 Figure 21 Typical Disposition of Solar radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 Figure 22 Photosynthetically Active radiation (PAr) Compared with “Top of Atmosphere” Beam radiation and Beam radiation at ground Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 vii viii THe BuSi NeSS OF Wi NeMAki Ng Figure 23 Absorption of Solar radiation by Leaf Pigments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 Figure 24 Photosynthesis: A Simplified Schematic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 Figure 25 Vertical and east–West Vectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 Figure 26 east–West and North–South Vectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 Figure 27 Oregon upright Double guyot Training System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Figure 28 Burgundy Single guyot Training System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 Figure 29 Oregon radiation and Heat Vectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 Figure 30 Burgundy radiation and Heat Vectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .65 Figure 31 Oregon and Burgundy Compared, Capture per Lineal Meter of row . . . . . . . . . .66 Figure 32 Oregon and Burgundy Compared, Capture per Square Meter of Vineyard Land . . 67 Figure 33 Oregon and Burgundy Compared, Capture per Vine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 Figure 34 Oregon and Burgundy Compared, Capture per Pound of grapes Produced . . . . . 67 Figure 35 energy Capture per Pound of grapes, Burgundy Compared to Varying Yields for Dundee Hills AVA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 Figure 36 Alternative Trellis Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Figure 37 Vineyard Layout for Post Calculations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 Figure 38 example Purchase Order using Annual Purchase Contracting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Figure 39 Typical Vineyard Activity Schematic, Willamette Valley, Oregon . . . . . . . . . . . . .76 Figure 40 Vineyard Spray Targets, NW Oregon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 Figure 41 Vineyard Spray Targets, Ohio river Valley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .80 Figure 42 Timing of Fungicide Sprays, Ohio river Valley, near Cincinnati . . . . . . . . . . . . . .81 Figure 43 Yield Progression, Several Winegrape Varieties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 Figure 44 Yield Progression, Pinot Noir, VSP versus Burgundy Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 Figure 45 20 Selected Viticultural Areas in 18 States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Figure 46 grape Juice Constituents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 Figure 47 Changes during grape ripening, Sugar and Acids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 Figure 48 Cross-section of grape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 Figure 49 Density of Aqueous ethanol Solution, Oz/gal versus Percent ethanol by Weight . . 130 Figure 50 Stages in Yeast Fermentation of Sugar to Alcohol and Carbon Dioxide . . . . . . . 133 Figure 51 Sweet reserve Procedure, White riesling Wine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 Figure 52 Typical Barrel Aging Times for red Wines, Bordeaux and Burgundy Barrels . . . . 162 Figure 53 rough Filtration Aids, Comparison of effective Particle retention range . . . . . . 164 Figure 54 Free Sulfur Dioxide required To Provide 0 .8 ppm Molecular Sulfur Dioxide . . . . 167 Figure 55 Sulfur Dioxide Levels for Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 Figure 56 Finishing Filtration Aids, Comparison of effective Particle retention range . . . . 172 Figure 57 Traditional Bottle Shapes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 Figure 58 Some Popular Label Shapes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177 Figure 59 Anatomy of a Wine Label . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178 Figure 60 Bottling line with 9-spout Monobloc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 Figure 61 Final Filtration Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 Figure 62 Product Flow Through Channels of Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195 Figure 63 Changing Population Distribution By Age groups, 1970–2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . 209 Figure 64 enplaned Airline Passengers, All u .S . Airports, 1990–2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 Figure 65 estimated 2014 Table Wine Consumption, Top 25 Metro Areas, ranked by Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214 Figure 66 Oregon Winery Licensings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219 Figure 67 Winemaking records example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228 Figure 68 Amos Destemmer-Crusher kiessel Pomace Pump underneath . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 Figure 69 Types of Pomace Pumps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 Figure 70 DeJonge Shaker Table & Conveyor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 Figure 71 Press Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
Description: