The Biology of Mental Disorders September 1992 OTA-BA-538 NTIS order #PB92-228477 GPO stock #052-003-01299-5 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, The Biology of Mental Disorders, OTA-BA-538 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1992). For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, MaiI Stop, SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-932X” ISBN 0-16 -038047-2 ii In Appreciation SILVIO O. CONTE The Office of Technology Assessment dedicates this report to the memory of the late Congressman Silvio O. Conte, in recognition of his enthusiastic support for research into the brain and mental disorders. Congressman Conte demonstrated that support in many ways, including his request for this study. His leadership in this area significantly contributed to the gains, already made and yet to come, in understanding and treating mental disorders. . . . Ill Foreword The 1990s bear witness to two opposing realities of mental illness. One is the pressing and even tragic nature of mental disorders: serious mental disorders, including schizophrenia and major mood and anxiety disorders, afflict millions of Americans, producing long-lasting and disabling symptoms. The other reality is improved technologies and advances in brain research that provide hope for alleviating the substantial burden of mental disorders—to individuals with these conditions, their families, and society at large-and the continuing research and development that promises future gains. Recognizing both the public health problem posed by mental disorders and the recent gains and future promise of brain research, several congressional committees requested or endorsed this report, which is the fourth in a series of OTA studies on ‘‘New Developments in Neuroscience. ’ The House Committees on Appropriations; Energy and Commerce; Science, Space, and Technology; Veteran Affairs; and the Senate Subcommittee on Science, Technology, and Space of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation requested this study. The study was endorsed by Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources. The Biology of Mental Disorders presents a summary of research into the biological factors associated with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, obsessive- compulsive disorder, and panic disorder. The report also discusses support for this research and the social context in which it moves forward. OTA concludes that, indeed, there have been important advances in understanding the biology of these disorders, and that rich opportunities for further research exist. While we know that these mental disorders cannot be understood in biological terms alone-psychological and social factors are important for a complete picture of mental disorders and their treatment-we conclude that further biological research will significantly improve our understanding and treatment of these conditions. Mindful of the advances and continued opportunities in research, the report provides policy options for action by the U.S. Congress in three areas: support for research, implications of research findings, and the dissemination of new information. OTA prepared this report with the assistance of a panel of advisers and reviewers selected for their expertise and diverse points of view. Additionally, dozens of individuals from academia, professional and advocacy groups, and Federal agencies cooperated with OTA staff through interviews or by providing written material. OTA gratefully acknowledges the contribution of each of these individuals. As with all OTA reports, however, the responsibility for the contents of this report is OTA’s alone. 8(? &# L’&A-- JOHN H. GIBBONS ~ Director 1 US. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Neurotoxicity: Identifying and Controlling Poisons of the Nervous System, OTA-BA-436 (Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing OffIce, April 1990); U.S. Congress, Office of ‘Ikchnology Assessment, Neural Grafling: Repairing the Brain and Spinal Cord, OTA-BA462 (Washingto~ DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1990); U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Biological Rhythms.’ Implications for the Worker, OTA-BA-463 (Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1991). New Developments in Neuroscience Advisory Panel Peter S. Spencer, Chair Center for Research on Occupational and Environmental Toxicology Oregon Health Sciences University Portland, OR Robert H. Blank Ronald Kartzinel Herbert Paroles University of Canterbury Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corp. College of Physicians and Christchurch, New Zealand Gainesville, GA Surgeons Columbia University James F. Childress Alan Kraut New York, NY Department of Religious Studies American Psychological Society University of Virginia Washington, DC Richard M. Restak Charlottesville, VA Neurological Associates Franklin E. Mirer Washington, DC Fred H. Gage Health and Safety Department Department of Neuroscience United Auto Workers University of California, San Diego Detroit, MI La Jolla, CA Albert S. Moraczewski Bernice Grafstein Pope John XXIII Medical, Moral Department of Physiology Research, and Education Center Cornell University, School of Houston, TX Medicine New York, NY The Biology of Mental Disorders Study Panel Michael S. Gazzaniga Ellen McGrath Alan A. Stone Dartmouth Medical School The Psychology Center Harvard Law School Hanover, NH Laguna Beach, CA Cambridge, MA James T. Havel Neil J. Risch David B. Wexler Mental Health Policy Resource Yale University University of Arizona Center, Inc. School of Medicine Tuscon, AZ Washington, DC New Haven, CT David Taiwai Wong David J. Kupfer Sara-Ann Steber Eli Lilly and Co. Western Psychiatric Institute University of Pennsylvania Indianapolis, IN and Clinic Philadelphia, PA Pittsburgh, PA NOTE: OTA appreciates and is grateful for the valuable assistance and thoughtful critiques provided by the advisory panel members. The panel does not, however, necessarily approve, disapprove, or endorse this report. OTA assumes fi.dl responsibility for the report and the accuracy of its contents. vi OTA Project Staff—The Biology of Mental Disorders Roger C. Herdman, Assistant Director, OTA Health and L&e Sciences Division Michael Gough, Biological Applications Program Manager David R. Liskowsky, Project Director, New Developments in Neuroscience Laura Lee Hall, Study Director Sema K. Aydede, Contractor Jacqueline T. Keller, Research Assistant Alan P. Lozier, Intern Michelle C. Munson, Intern Claire L. Pouncey, Research Analyst M. Catherine Sargent, Research Assistant Support Staff Cecile Parker, Office Administrator Linda Journette-Rayford, Administrative Secretary Jene Lewis, Secretary Contractors Blair Burns Potter (editor), Bethesda, MD John P. Ambrose and J. David Gallagher, National Mental Health Association, Alexandria, VA William T. Carpenter, Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Baltimore, MD Roland D, Ciaranello, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA John M. Kane, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Glen Oaks, NY Jaques M. Quen, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY Greg Scandlen, Health Benefits Letter, Alexandria, VA Contents Page Chapter 1. Summary, Policy Issues, and Options for Congressional Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Chapter 2. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Chapter 3. What Are Mental Disorders? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Chapter 4. Mental Disorders and the Brain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 Chapter 5. The Genetics of Mental Disorders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 Chapter 6. Research Effort and Issues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.23 Chapter 7. Public Attitudes and Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 Appendix A. Decade of the Brain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 Appendix B. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 Appendix C. List of Contractor Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174 Appendix D. Acronyms and Glossary of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .175 Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 Chapter 1 Summary, Policy Issues, and Options for Congressional Action CONTENTS Page DECADE OF THE BRAIN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 SCHIZOPHRENIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ......+ . . . . . 6 MOOD DISORDERS: MAJOR DEPRESSION AND BIPOLAR DISORDER . . . . . . . . . 8 ANXIETY DISORDERS: OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER AND PANIC DISORDER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 A SYNTHESIS: UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF BIOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 THE RESEARCH ENTERPRISE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 What Level of Public Concern Motivates Research Into Mental Disorders? . . . . . . . . . 14 What Is the Level of Research Support? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 What Factors Create Barriers to Research? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 IMPLICATIONS OF BIOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 POLICY ISSUES AND OPTIONS FOR CONGRESSIONAL ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 ISSUE 1: Federal Support for Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 ISSUE 2: Implications of Scientific Advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23 ISSUE 3: Dissemination of New Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Boxes Box Page l-A. The Cost of Mental Disorders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 l-B. The Final Symptom: Mental Disorder and Suicide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 l-C. Darkness Visible-A Personal Account of Depression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 l-D. Media Portrayals of Mental Disorders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 l-E. Eugenics and Mental Disorders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 l-F. Educating the Public About Depression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Figures Figure Page l-l. The Cost of Mental Disorders, 1985 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 l-2. Membership in the Society for Neuroscience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 l-3. Distribution of Federal Support of Neuroscience Research, Fiscal Year 1990 . . . . . . 5 l-4. PET Scan of an Individual With Schizophrenia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 l-5. Mood Disorders Among Twins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 l-6. PET Scan of an Individual With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 l-7. NIMH Budget, Fiscal Years 1980-92 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 l-8. Funding of the Division of Basic Brain and Behavioral Sciences, Fiscal Years 1988-92 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 17 l-9. Funding of the Division of Clinical Research, Fiscal Years 1980-92 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Tables Table Page l-1. Prevalence of Severe Mental Disorders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 l-2. Obsessions and Compulsions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 l-3. Comparison of Costs and Research Funding, Fiscal Year 1985 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 l-4. Drugs in Development for Mental Disorders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 l-5. DEPRESSION Awareness, Recognition, and Treatment Program, Fiscal Years 1986-91 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Chapter 1 Summary, Policy Issues, and Options for Congressional Action Mental disorders can strike with savage cruelty, age of hospital beds in Department of Veterans producing nightmarish hallucinations, crippling par- Affairs (VA) hospitals: Fully 40 percent of all VA anoia, unrelenting depression, a choking sense of inpatient care is for persons with mental disorders. panic, or inescapable obsessions. The sheer number Perhaps most tragically, approximately one-third of of Americans with mental disorders transforms this homeless single adults and 10 to 15 percent of personal tragedy into a widespread public health individuals who are incarcerated in jails and prisons problem. Nearly one in three American adults will have a severe mental disorder such as schizophrenia experience a mental disorder during his or her or bipolar disorder. lifetime, whether one of the disorders considered in this report [schizophrenia, bipolar disorder (com- One of the most powerful factors affecting people monly known as manic depression), major depres- with mental disorders and their families is the stigma sion, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and panic dis- often attached to these conditions. While the pub- order; table 1-1], or one of a variety of other lic’s attitudes and knowledge about mental disorders conditions, including cognitive impairment (as in have improved during the last 30 years, negative Alzheimer’s disease), substance abuse or depend- attitudes toward and ignorance of these disorders ence, phobias, and antisocial personality disorder. still abound. A sizable number of people continue to Moreover, approximately 1.7 to 2.4 million Ameri- be frightened by the notion of mental illness. The cans currently suffer from a persistent and severely public fears that people with mental disorders are disabling mental disorder, such as schizophrenia or violent and dangerous and perceives them to be dirty bipolar disorder. and unattractive, therefore often treating them with What are the costs of this public health problem? disrespect, if not rejecting them outright. Further- The most recent and comprehensive estimate of the more, despite gains in knowledge about specific total costs of mental disorders—for fiscal year Figure l-l—The Cost of Mental Disorders, 1985 1985—added up to $103.7 billion (figure l-l) (box (in billions of dollars) l-A). When adjusted for inflation, this figure reaches Other costs $136.1 billion in 1991. However, dollar figures $4.5 alone, no matter how large, do not convey the toll Mor mental disorders take. These disorders can be extremely disabling, significantly compromising productivity and the ability to work. It has been estimated that individuals with mental disorders fill 25 percent of all hospital beds and, further, that one-third of these persons suffer from schizophrenia. Mental disorders account for an even larger percent- Table l-l—Prevalence of Severe Mental Disorders Adults diagnosed with disorder during their Direct health-related costs lifetimes $42.5 Disorder (%) In 1985, mental disorders cost the United States more than$103 Schizophrenia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0 billion. Approximately 41 percent of that cost-$42.5 billion— Bipolar disorder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.8 stemmed from hospital care, medication costs, and other treat- ment costs. Nearly half of the costs of mental disorders-$47.4 Major depression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.9 billion-derives from lost productivity. Obsessive-compulsive disorder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.6 SOURCE: Rice, S. Miller, et al., The Economic Costs Alcohol and Drug Abuse and Mental Illness, report submitted to Panic disorder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.6 the Office of Financing and Coverage Policy, Alcohol, Drug SOURCE: Robins and D.A. Psychiatric Disorders America, Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, U.S. Department of The Epidemiologic Area Study (New York, NY: Free Health and Human Services (San Francisco, CA: Institute for Press, 1991). Health and Aging, University of California, 1990). –3–
Description: