THE BIG ARCHIVE THE BIG ARCHIVE art from bureaucracy sven spieker THE MIT PRESS CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS LONDON, ENGLAND © 2008 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. MIT Press books may be purchased at special quantity discounts for business or sales promotional use. For information, please email [email protected] or write to Special Sales Department, The MIT Press, 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, MA 02142. This book was set in Filosofi a and Helvetica Neue by Graphic Composition. Printed and bound in Spain. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Spieker, Sven. The big archive : art from bureaucracy / Sven Spieker. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978- 0- 262- 19570- 6 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Art, Modern—20th century. 2. Collective memory. 3. Art and history. I. Title. N6490.S646 2008 709.04—dc22 2007039872 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CONTENTS 1 Acknowledgments vii INTRODUCTION 1 2 SIXTEEN ROPES ix 1881 17 Ilya Kabakov MATTERS OF PROVENANCE (PICKING UP AFTER HEGEL) 3 FREUD’S FILES 35 Sigmund Freud 4 1913 51 “DU HASARD EN CONSERVE”: DUCHAMP’S ANEMIC ARCHIVES Marcel Duchamp 5 1924 85 THE BUREAUCRACY OF THE UNCONSCIOUS (EARLY SURREALISM) André Breton Max Ernst Le Corbusier 6 AROUND 1925 105 THE BODY IN THE MUSEUM El Lissitzky Sergei Eisenstein 7 1970–2000 131 ARCHIVE, DATABASE, PHOTOGRAPHY Hans- Peter Feldmann Susan Hiller Gerhard Richter Walid Raad Boris Mikhailov Epilogue 193 8 Thomas Demand THE ARCHIVE AT PLAY 173 Michael Fehr Notes 195 Andrea Fraser Susan Hiller Index 217 Sophie Calle Acknowledgments Over the years this project has been in the making, I have incurred debt of all sorts with many friends and colleagues. Finally, I want to thank at least some of them. Russell Coon, Martha Buskirk, Michael Fehr, Maria Gough, and Walid Raad kindly read portions of the book and shared their opinions. I thank Elisabeth Weber, Ann Adams, Bruce Robertson, Laurie Monahan, Hans-C hristian von Herrmann, Mai Wegener, Richard Polt, Bernhard Dotzler, Louis-P hilippe Martim, Wolf Kittler, Michael Molnar, Jackie SpaVord, Igor Smirnov, Wolfgang Ernst, Marco Codebò, and my colleagues on the ARTMargins editorial board who shared their knowledge and time. At the MIT Press, Roger Conover saw merit in this project at an early stage and accompanied its completion with warmth and critical curiosity. Also at the Press, Marc Lowenthal answered my e-m ails faster than I could even send them, and Paula Woolley and Matthew Abbate ed- ited the manuscript with great precision. I thank Margarita Encomienda for her masterful design of this book. Two anonymous reviewers helped me rethink parts of the book in unexpected ways. (I now know that they were Ulrich Baer and Rubén Gallo, and I thank them warmly.) My students in two graduate semi- nars on archives in twentieth- century art put my ideas to a rigorous test at an early stage, and an international conference on art and archives at the University of California, Santa Barbara (“Packrats and Bureaucrats: Study in the Archive”) brought together artists and scholars whose work was crucial to the project. Ilya and Emilia Kabakov, Boris and Vita Mikhailov, Andrea Fraser, Susan Hiller, Walid Raad, Michael Fehr, Markus Krajewski, James Putnam, Richard Polt, and Sally Smith kindly shared reproductions of their work or opened their collec- tions. For his dedication to securing images and the rights to their reproduction I thank Will Scilacci. My project benefi ted greatly from two fellowships, one at the Stanford Humanities Center and the other at Berlin’s Literaturzentrum. I am grateful to the staV of ucsb’s History of Art and Architecture department and the Comparative Literature Program / Department of Germanic, Slavic, and Semitic Studies for their help with many critical tasks. Without a grant from ucsb’s Academic Senate I would not have been able to recover the considerable cost of image reproduction. As always, thanks go to Russell E. Coon for his unwavering support and sustained aVection. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii SIXTEEN ROPES Ilya Kabakov IN ILYA KABAKOV’S INSTALLATION SIXTEEN ROPES (1984), NUMEROUS PIECES OF GARBAGE DANGLE AT REGULAR INTERVALS, ROUGHLY AT EYE LEVEL, FROM SIXTEEN PARALLEL ROPES THAT ARE SUSPENDED A METER AND A HALF FROM EACH OTHER AND THE SAME DISTANCE FROM THE FLOOR. Written labels attached to the objects by pieces of string contain text and fragments of phrases. (“Look what we took out of the library!” “We’ll read it this evening.”) Although it may not be immediately apparent, Sixteen Ropes represents an archive. In fact, such “stringing up” of objects was one of the most ancient forms of fi ling, and the English word “fi le,” which is derived from the French fi l (string), originally meant “to line something up on a piece of string.” The question posed by Sixteen Ropes, then, is whether its strings can deliver what archives promise us, a sense of (and in) time. Archives contain paperwork that no longer circulates in the bureaucracy, paperwork that has lapsed and become garbage. The crux of Sixteen Ropes is the way in which it provides garbage in a literal sense—from cigarette butts to wrappers, SIXTEEN ROPES ix scraps of paper, and railway tickets—with the archive’s formal trappings, such as strings, labels, ropes, knots, and written words, all functioning to tame the trash by turning it into documents of culture and history. The most important of the tools designed to bring about this conversion, the horizontal ropes and the ver- tical strings to which the labels are attached, form a three- dimensional grid on which the suspended garbage is caught. But can this formal grid suYciently re- duce the heterogeneity of the trash, its utter diVerence, so that a coherent story, and hence history, can emerge? 0.1 Ilya Kabakov, Sixteen Ropes (1984 installation). Watercolor and pen on paper (1993). Courtesy Ilya and Emilia Kabakov. © 2007 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. x THE BIG ARCHIVE
Description: